中国安全科学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 40-48.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.02.1081

• 安全工程技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

充填工作面异常气体对传感器交叉干扰的影响研究

陆伟1,2(), 罗瑞1, 张青松1,2, 卓辉1,2,**(), 李金亮1,2, 朱思超3   

  1. 1 安徽理工大学 安全科学与工程学院,安徽 淮南 232001
    2 安徽理工大学 矿山安全高效开采安徽省高校工程技术研究中心,安徽 淮南 232001
    3 枣庄矿业(集团) 岱庄煤业有限公司,山东 枣庄 277000
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-11 修回日期:2024-11-20 出版日期:2025-02-28
  • 通信作者:
    **卓辉(1992—),男,安徽萧县人,博士,讲师,主要从事热动力灾害防治、采空区监测预警等方向研究。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    陆伟 (1977—),男,四川广安人,博士,教授,主要从事矿井热动力灾害防治、防灭火材料研发等方面研究。E-mail:

    张青松 教授

    李金亮 副教授

  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2023YFC3009102); 国家自然科学基金资助(52204192); 安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(2022m07020006); 安徽理工大学高层次引进人才科研启动基金资助(2021yjrc42)

Study on the impact of abnormal gases in filling work faces on sensor cross-interference

LU Wei1,2(), LUO Rui1, ZHANG Qingsong1,2, ZHUO Hui1,2,**(), LI Jinliang1,2, ZHU Sichao3   

  1. 1 School of Safety and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
    2 Anhui Province University Engineering Technology Research Center for Safe and Efficient Mining,Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
    3 Daizhuang Coal Mining Company, Zaozhuang Mining (Group) Co., Ltd., Zaozhuang Shandong 277000, China
  • Received:2024-09-11 Revised:2024-11-20 Published:2025-02-28

摘要:

为明确充填工作面回风隅角CH4、CO传感器异常报警的具体原因,开展传感器异常报警诱因的系统性分析。首先,通过充填材料程序升温-气相色谱(GC)试验,并结合现场GC分析结果,判断CH4、CO传感器报警是否由CH4、CO气体体积分数超限所致;然后,利用便携式气体检测仪监测各类充填原材料,确定导致传感器报警的主要充填原材料;最后,进行GC-质谱(MS)试验,分析胶黏剂挥发性成分及其对CH4、CO传感器的干扰效应。结果表明:CH4、CO传感器报警由胶黏剂挥发气体引起,并非CH4、CO气体体积分数超限;胶黏剂挥发气体的主要成分为烷烃类,次要成分为醇酯类等其他气体;对CH4传感器的主要干扰气体为C5H12、C6H12、C6H14等烷烃类气体,次要干扰气体为CH4O、C2H4O2、C3H8O2等,试验所测10种可燃气体均对CH4传感器产生交叉干扰;对CO传感器的干扰气体为CH4O、C2H4O2、C3H8O2,传感器在短期内处于异常气体气氛下,具备一定抗干扰能力,但长期暴露下其稳定性和抗干扰能力下降。

关键词: 充填工作面, 异常气体, 传感器, 交叉干扰, 回风隅角, 异常报警, 胶黏剂

Abstract:

In order to elucidate the specific causes of abnormal alarms from CH4 and CO sensors in the return corner of the backfill working face, a systematic investigation was conducted. Initially, a programmed heating-gas chromatography (GC) experiment was carried out on filling materials, complemented by on-site GC measurements, to evaluate whether the alarms were attributable to CH4 and CO concentrations exceeding threshold limits. Subsequently, a portable gas detector was employed to monitor various filling materials, identifying the primary materials responsible for triggering the sensor alarms. Finally, GC-mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was performed to characterize the volatile components of adhesives and their interference effects on CH4 and CO sensors. The results indicate that the alarms triggered by CH4 and CO sensors were caused by the volatile gases from adhesives, rather than by an excessive concentration of CH4 or CO. The primary constituents of the adhesive VOCs were alkanes, while secondary components included alcohols and esters. Key interfering substances for CH4 sensor were alkanes such as C5H12, C6H12, and C6H14, with minor contributions from alcohols and esters such as CH4O, C2H4O2, and C3H8O2. All ten tested combustible gases exhibited cross-interference effects on CH4 sensor. Interfering substances for CO sensor included CH4O, C2H4O2, and C3H8O2. While the sensors demonstrated short-term resilience to interference under abnormal gas atmospheres, their stability and anti-interference performance significantly deteriorated with prolonged exposure.

Key words: backfill working face, abnormal gases, sensors, cross-interference, return corner, abnormal alarms, adhesives

中图分类号: