中国安全科学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 161-167.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.S2.0008

• 安全工程技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑坡体沉降变形推移式滑坡稳定性评价方法

张安琦1(), 谢谟文1, 蒋宇静2, 张学朋2, 刘敬楠1, 杜岩1,**()   

  1. 1 北京科技大学 未来城市学院, 北京 100083
    2 山东科技大学 露天煤矿灾害防治与生态保护全国重点实验室, 山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-10 出版日期:2026-02-04
  • 通信作者:
    **杜 岩 (1985—),男, 河南新乡人,博士,副教授,主要从事土木工程防灾减灾方面的研究。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    张安琦 (2001—),女, 湖北宜昌人,本科,助理工程师,主要从事土木工程防灾减灾方面的工作。E-mail:

    谢谟文 教授

    蒋宇静 教授

    张学朋 研究员

    杜岩 副教授

  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3081400); 国家自然科学基金资助(42477167); 露天煤矿灾害防治与生态保护全国重点实验室开放基金资助(DPEPM202502)

A stability evaluation method for thrust-type landslides considering slope settlement and deformation

ZHANG Anqi1(), XIE Mowen1, JIANG Yujing2, ZHANG Xuepeng2, LIU Jingnan1, DU Yan1,**()   

  1. 1 School of Future Cities, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    2 State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Ecology Protection in Open-Pit Coal Mines, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao Shandong 266590, China
  • Received:2025-06-10 Published:2026-02-04

摘要:

为解决推移式滑坡在坡体沉降、地震、暴雨等因素作用下易引发大规模滑动破坏并造成严重灾害的问题,开展适用于推移式滑坡的稳定性评价与预警预防研究。综合分析坡体沉降信息,建立推移式滑坡力学分析模型,提出考虑坡体沉降变形推移式滑坡稳定性评价方法,并在云南纳楼寨滑坡进行工程应用。结果表明:传统稳定性系数评价结果误差最高为8.81%,坡体剩余推力误差最大为24.87%。改进的稳定性评价方法有效降低传统计算方法未考虑坡体沉降带来的误差,较好反映滑坡的实际情况。

关键词: 坡体, 沉降变形, 推移式滑坡, 稳定性分析, 传递系数

Abstract:

To address the significant risk that thrust-type landslides are prone to triggering large-scale failures and severe disasters under factors such as slope settlement, earthquakes, and heavy rainfall, it is of great importance to conduct research on stability evaluation and early warning and prevention methods applicable to thrust-type landslides. The slope settlement information was comprehensively analyzed, and a mechanical analysis model for thrust-type landslides was established. A stability evaluation method for thrust-type landslides considering slope settlement and deformation was proposed, and an engineering application at the Nalouzhai Landslide in Yunnan Province was conducted. The results show that the maximum error of the traditional factor of safety evaluation results is 8.81%, and the maximum error of the slope's remaining thrust is 24.87%. The improved stability evaluation method effectively reduces the errors introduced by traditional calculation methods that do not consider slope settlement and better reflects the actual conditions of the landslide.

Key words: slope body, settlement deformation, thrust-type landslide, stability analysis, transfer coefficient

中图分类号: