气粉两相体系爆炸下限变化特征及量化模型研究进展

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.07.0948

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 1-11.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.07.0948

• 安全科学理论与方法 • 下一篇

气粉两相体系爆炸下限变化特征及量化模型研究进展

纪文涛¹^,²^,³(), 王雅歌¹^,²^,³, 肖海利¹^,²^,³, 孟令宣¹^,²^,³, 王燕¹^,²^,³^,^**()

¹ 河南理工大学安全科学与工程学院, 河南焦作 454003
² 河南省燃爆动力灾害预警与应急工程技术研究中心, 河南焦作 454003
³ 煤炭安全生产与清洁利用省部共建协同创新中心, 河南焦作 454003

收稿日期:2026-02-11 修回日期:2026-04-13 出版日期:2026-08-10
通信作者:
^**王燕(1982—),女,河南周口人,博士,教授,主要从事气体与粉尘爆炸灾害防治、危化品安全、新能源安全等方面的研究。E-mail:yanwang@hpu.edu.cn。
作者简介:
纪文涛 (1989—),男,河南周口人,博士,教授,主要从事气体与粉尘爆炸灾害防治方面的研究。E-mail:jiwentao@hpu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(52374197); 国家自然科学基金资助(52474217); 河南省自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金资助(252300421106); 河南省科技研发计划联合基金青年科学家项目(235200810079); 河南省高校科技创新团队项目(25IRTSTHN005)

Research progress on change characteristic and quantitative model of lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures

Ji Wentao¹^,²^,³(), Wang Yage¹^,²^,³, Xiao Haili¹^,²^,³, Meng Lingxuan¹^,²^,³, Wang Yan¹^,²^,³^,^**()

¹ College of Safety Science and Engineering, Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China
² Explosion Dynamic Disaster Early Warning and Emergency Engineering Technology Research Center of Henan Province, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China
³ Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Work Safety and Clean High Efficiency Utilization, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China

Received:2026-02-11 Revised:2026-04-13 Published:2026-08-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

可燃气体和粉尘共存形成的可爆两相体系在工业生产中广泛存在,由其引发的爆炸事故已成为爆炸灾害的主要形式之一。为防治气粉两相体系爆炸灾害,聚焦爆炸下限(LEL)这一关键特征参数,从可燃气体体积分数和粉尘质量浓度、可燃气体化学反应活性、粉尘粒径、粉尘热解特征、粉尘组分等角度,分类阐述LEL变化特征的研究现状并总结现有研究的局限;同时,针对LEL的量化需求,从经验/半经验模型和理论模型2个方面分析现有量化模型,梳理其类型、特点及局限,并提出LEL变化特征及量化模型研究展望。结果表明:可燃气体体积分数和粉尘质量浓度直接调控LEL,可燃气体化学反应活性、粉尘粒径、组分和热解特征也是关键影响因素;经验/半经验模型形式简洁、计算便捷,但高度依赖特定试验数据和条件;理论模型虽具有更坚实的科学基础,但往往基于理想化假设建立。

关键词: 气粉两相体系, 爆炸下限(LEL), 变化特征, 量化模型, 经验模型, 理论模型

Abstract:

The explosive hybrid mixtures formed by the coexistence of flammable gas and dust are widely present in industrial production, and the explosion accidents caused by them have become one of the main forms of explosion accidents. In order to prevent and control the explosion disasters of hybrid mixtures, focusing on LEL of hybrid mixtures as the key characteristic parameter, the research status on the change characteristic of LEL of hybrid mixtures was classified and expounded from the perspective of influencing factors such as flammable gas and dust concentration, chemical reactivity of flammable gas, dust particle size, dust pyrolysis characteristics and dust composition, and the limitations of existing research were summarized. At the same time, in response to the quantitative requirements for LEL of hybrid mixtures, the research status of the quantitative model of LEL of hybrid mixtures was summarized and analyzed from two aspects of experience/semi-empirical model and theoretical model, and the types, characteristics and limitations of existing models were sorted out. Based on these, the research prospects for the change characteristic and the quantitative model of the LEL of hybrid mixtures were proposed. The results indicate that the flammable gas and dust concentration have a direct regulatory effect on LEL. The chemical reactivity of flammable gas, dust particle size, composition, and pyrolysis characteristics are also key influencing factors. Although empirical/semi-empirical models are simple in form and convenient for calculations, they are highly dependent on specific experimental data and conditions, while theoretical models have a more solid scientific foundation, they are often based on idealized assumptions.

Key words: hybrid mixtures, lower explosion limit(LEL), change characteristic, quantitative model, empirical/semi-empirical model, theoretical model

中图分类号:

X932爆炸安全与防火、防爆

纪文涛, 王雅歌, 肖海利, 孟令宣, 王燕. 气粉两相体系爆炸下限变化特征及量化模型研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2026, 36(7): 1-11.

Ji Wentao, Wang Yage, Xiao Haili, Meng Lingxuan, Wang Yan. Research progress on change characteristic and quantitative model of lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(7): 1-11.

图/表 7

表1

气粉浓度对两相体系LEL变化特征的影响

气体和粉尘种类	气体和粉尘名称	试验装置	点火能量及方式	LEL变化特征
可燃气体/ 天然有机粉尘	甲烷、丙烷、氢气、乙醇蒸气、甲苯蒸气、异丙醇蒸气玉米淀粉、石松子粉、木粉	改进型戈德伯特-格林沃尔德(Godbert-Greenwald,GG)炉	—	低于LEL的可燃气体可显著降低粉尘的最小爆炸浓度Minimum Explosion Concentration, MEC)^[14]
	甲烷、石松子	20 L球形爆炸装置	0.5 kJ 化学点火	石松子粉尘MEC随甲烷浓度的增加而逐渐降低^[9]
	甲烷、软木屑	22.7 L近球形爆炸装置	2.5 kJ 化学点火	软木屑粉尘MEC随甲烷体积分数的增加而逐渐降低^[15]。
可燃气体/ 合成有机粉尘	乙烯、聚乙烯	20 L球形爆炸装置	0.5 kJ 化学点火	聚乙烯粉尘MEC随乙烯体积分数的增加而逐渐降低^[8]
	甲烷、乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯树脂粉尘	20 L球形爆炸装置	10 kJ 化学点火	乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯树脂粉尘MEC随甲烷体积分数的增加而降低^[16]
	丙烷、聚酰胺树脂粉尘	20 L球形爆炸装置	10 kJ 化学点火	聚酰胺树脂粉尘MEC随丙烷体积分数的增加而降低^[17]
	甲烷、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯粉尘、热塑性聚氨酯粉尘	20 L球形爆炸装置	14 J 电火花	2种粉尘MEC浓度均随甲烷体积分数的增加而逐渐降低^[18]
	甲烷、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(Polymethyl Methacrylate,PMMA)粉尘	半封闭试验装置	—	PMMA粉尘MEC随甲烷体积分数的增加而降低^[19]
	甲烷、丙烷、聚氯乙烯(Polyvinyl Chloride,PVC)粉尘	1 m³爆炸装置	10 kJ 化学点火	PVC粉尘的MEC随甲烷、丙烷体积分数的增加均逐渐降低^[20]
	环戊烷、聚氨酯粉尘	哈特曼管	—	聚氨酯粉尘MEC随环戊烷气体体积分数的增加而降低^[21]
可燃气体/ 金属粉尘	环氧丙烷蒸气、铝粉	5L圆柱形爆炸装置	22.68 J 电火花	环氧丙烷蒸气的添加显著降低了铝粉的MEC^[22]
可燃气体/ 金属粉尘	氢气、铝粉	20 L球形爆炸装置	10 kJ 化学点火	氢气的添加显著降低了铝粉的MEC^[23]

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

表2

表3

参考文献 50

[1]	陈刚, 张晓蕾, 徐帅, 等. 我国2005—2020年粉尘爆炸事故统计分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8):76-83. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.0812
	Chen Gang, Zhang Xiaolei, Xu Shuai, et al. Statistical analysis on dust explosion accidents in China from 2005 to 2020[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8):76-83. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.0812
[2]	吴俊禄, 季云彬. 聚丙烯产品料仓闪爆原因分析及对策措施[J]. 石油化工安全技术, 2003, 19(6):37-40.
	Wu Junlu, Ji Yunbin. Reason of deflagration of polypropylene product storehouse and its countermeasures[J]. Petrochemical Safety Technology, 2003, 19(6):37-40.
[3]	王梦蓉. Al solutions公司金属粉尘爆炸事故[J]. 现代职业安全, 2014(9):90-95.
[4]	“2·23”辽阳石化分公司聚乙烯装置爆炸事故[EB/OL]. [2002-02-23]. https://www.safehoo.com/Case/Case/Blow/201108/196385.shtml.
[5]	“12·26”北京交通大学实验室爆炸事故[EB/OL]. [2018-12-26]. https://news.bjtu.edu.cn/info/1044/29087.htm.
[6]	景国勋, 张胜旗, 段新伟, 等. 竖直管道内煤尘浓度对瓦斯爆炸特性影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3):15-20. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.003
	Jing Guoxun, Zhang Shengqi, Duan Xinwei, et al. Impact of coal dust concentration on gas explosion in vertical pipelines[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(3):15-20. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.003
[7]	蔡周全, 罗振敏, 程方明. 瓦斯煤尘爆炸传播特性的实验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2009, 34(7):938-941.
	Cai Zhouquan, Luo Zhenmin, Cheng Fangming. Experimental study on propagation characteristics of gas/coal dust explosion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(7):938-941.
[8]	喻建良, 纪文涛, 孙会利, 等. 乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12):4841-4847.
	Yu Jianliang, Ji Wentao, Sun Huili, et al. Explosibility of hybrid mixtures of ethylene and polyethylene dust[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12):4841-4847.
[9]	喻健良, 纪文涛, 孙会利, 等. 甲烷/石松子粉尘混合体系爆炸下限的变化规律[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(6):924-930.
	Yu Jianliang, Ji Wentao, Sun Huili, et al. Experimental investigation of the lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures of methane and lycopodium dust[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6):924-930.
[10]	Engler C. Beitrage zur kenntniss der staubexplosionen[J]. Chemische Industrie, 1885, 6:171-173.
[11]	Garcia-AgredaA, Di Benedetto A, Russo P, et al. Dust/gas mixtures explosion regimes[J]. Powder Technology, 2011, 205(1/2/3): 81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.08.069
[12]	王磊, 李润之. 瓦斯、煤尘共存条件下爆炸极限变化规律试验研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2016, 25(4):87-90.
	Wang Lei, Li Runzhi. Experimental study on the explosion limits change laws under gas and coal dust coexisting conditions[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2016, 25(4):87-90.
[13]	姜海鹏, 司荣军, 李润之. 高挥发分煤尘对瓦斯爆炸极限的影响[J]. 煤矿安全, 2015, 46(8):174-177.
	Jiang Haipeng, Si Rongjun, Li Runzhi. Influence of high volatile coal dust on gas explosion limits[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(8):174-177.
[14]	Addai E K, Gabel D, Krause U. Experimental investigation on the minimum ignition temperature of hybrid mixtures of dusts and gases or solvents[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 301:314-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.006 pmid: 26378364
[15]	Pilão R, Ramalho E, Pinho C. Overall characterization of cork dust explosion[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 133:183-195. pmid: 16297545
[16]	杨博, 苏登, 吕岳, 等. EVA树脂粉尘/甲烷/空气杂混物爆炸特性[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2016, 42(5): 60-62, 66.
	Yang Bo, Su Deng, Lyu Yue, et al. Explosion properties for hybrid of EVA dust/methane/air mixtures[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 42(5):60-62, 66.
[17]	苏登, 杨博, 吕岳, 等. 聚酰胺树脂粉尘/丙烷/空气杂混物爆炸特性[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2016, 35(5): 603-606.
	Su Deng, Yang Bo, Lyu Yue, et al. Explosion characteristics for hybrid of PA dust/propane/air mixtures[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2016, 35(5):603-606.
[18]	高林杰. 甲烷/塑料粉尘/空气杂混物爆炸火焰传播进程及特征参数研究[D]. 杭州: 中国计量大学, 2019.
	Gao Linjie. The study on flame propagation process and characteristic parameters of methane/plastic dust/air mixture explosion[D]. Hangzhou: China Jiliang University, 2019.
[19]	甘波, 高伟, 张新燕, 等. 甲烷浓度对PMMA/甲烷混合爆炸下限及预热区厚度的影响[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(2):188-195.
	Gan Bo, Gao Wei, Zhang Xinyan, et al. Influence of methane concentration on the lower explosive limit and the thickness of the preheating zone of PMMA/methane hybrid mixtures[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2):188-195.
[20]	罗宏昌. 粉尘爆炸及“杂混合物”对其特性的影响[J]. 交通部上海船舶运输科学研究所学报, 2000, 23(1): 21-26.
	Luo Hongchang. Explosion of powder dust and effect of scramble compound on its characteristics[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute, 2000, 23(1):21-26.
[21]	Nifuku M, Tsujita H, Fujino K, et al. Ignitability assessment of shredder dusts of refrigerator and the prevention of the dust explosion[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(2): 181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.04.007
[22]	谭汝媚, 张奇. 环氧丙烷蒸气-铝粉-空气杂混合物的爆炸特性研究[J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(1): 48-54.
	Tan Rumei, Zhang Qi. Research on the explosibility of gaseous epoxypropane aluminum dust-air hybrid mixtures[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(1): 48-54.
[23]	曹卫国, 赵懿明, 吴星亮, 等. 悬浮态AlH₃粉尘爆炸泄放过程能量输出规律[J]. 含能材料, 2021, 29(10):985-992.
	Cao Weiguo, Zhao Yiming, Wu Xingliang, et al. Energy output behaviors of suspended AlH₃dust in explosive venting[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2021, 29(10):985-992.
[24]	纪文涛. 气粉两相混合体系爆炸及泄放特性研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018.
	Ji Wentao. Study on the explosion and relief characteristics of the gas-powder two-phase mixed system[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2018.
[25]	孙会利. 可燃气体/粉尘两相爆炸特性实验研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2017.
	Sun Huili. Experimental study on the explosion characteristics of combustible gas/dust two-phase systems[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2017.
[26]	Ji Wentao, Wang Yang, Yang Jingjing, et al. Methods to predict variations of lower explosion limit associated with hybrid mixtures of flammable gas and dust[J]. Fuel, 2022, 310: DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122138.
[27]	祁畅. 甲烷、丙烷对PMMA、ABS粉尘爆炸特性的影响研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2020.
	Qi Chang. Study on the influence of methane and propane on the explosion characteristics of PMMA and ABS dusts[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2020.
[28]	冯永安. 基于20 L球形爆炸装置的甲烷对煤尘爆炸影响实验研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2013.
	Feng Yongan. Experimental study on the influence of methane on coal dust explosion based on a 20 L spherical explosion device[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2013.
[29]	甘向阳. 多因素影响下瓦斯/煤尘复合爆炸特征参数变化规律及量化模型研究[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2022.
	Gan Xiangyang. Study on the variation laws and quantitative models of characteristic parameters of gas/coal dust composite explosion under the influence of multiple factors[D]. Jiaozuo: Henan Polytechnic University, 2022.
[30]	王可. 受限空间内煤尘爆炸及抑爆特性研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2016.
	Wang Ke. Study on the explosion and explosion suppression characteristics of coal dust in a confined space[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2016.
[31]	王燕, 齐英全, 温小萍, 等. 煤尘组分对瓦斯/煤尘复合爆炸下限的影响研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(2): 125-130.
	Wang Yan, Qi Yingquan, Wen Xiaoping, et al. Influence study of coal dust composition on the lower explosion limit of hybrid mixture of gas and coal dust[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2020, 48(2):125-130.
[32]	于立富. 油页岩粉气杂混物爆炸特性理论与实验研究[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2018.
	Yu Lifu. Theoretical and experimental study on the explosion characteristics of the mixture of oil shale powder and gas[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2018.
[33]	何朝远. 瓦斯煤尘共存条件下爆炸危险性的研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 1996, 27(12):5-6,22.
[34]	王者鹏. 低浓度瓦斯对煤尘爆炸下限的影响研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2017, 48(2):26-27, 32.
	Wang Zhepeng. Study on influence of low concentration gas on lower explosive limit of coal dust[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(2):26-27, 32.
[35]	张振华. 丙烯/聚丙烯两相混合体系爆炸特性研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2024.
	Zhang Zhenhua. Investigation on explosion characteristics of propylene/polypropylene dust hybrid mixtures[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2024.
[36]	a Fleur A. Ternary and quaternary explosion regions and Le Chatelier's formula[J]. Recueil Des Travaux Chimiques Des Pays Bas, 1937, 56(5):442-437. doi: 10.1002/recl.v56:5
[37]	Cashdollar K L, Sapko M J, Weiss E S. Laboratory and mine dust explosion research at the Bureau of mines[J]. ASTM Special Technical Publication (STP), 1987, 958:107-123.
[38]	Cashdollar K L. Coal dust explosibility[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1996, 9(6):65-76. doi: 10.1016/0950-4230(95)00050-X
[39]	Garcia Agreda A. Study of hybrid mixture explosions[D]. Napoli: Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 2010.
[40]	Hertzberg M, Cashdollar K L. Introduction to dust explosions[J]. ASTM Special Technical Publications, 1987, 6:5-32.
[41]	Bartknecht W. Explosions:course, prevention, protection[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981: 49-55.
[42]	Khalili I, Dufaud O, Poupeau M, et al. Ignition sensitivity of gas-vapor/dust hybrid mixtures[J]. Powder Technology, 2012, 217:199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.027
[43]	Addai E K, Gabel D, Krause U. Lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures of burnable gas and dust[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 36: DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.02.014.
[44]	Sanchirico R, Russo P, Di Sarli V, et al. On the explosion and flammability behavior of mixtures of combustible dusts[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, 94:410-419. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2014.09.007
[45]	Jiang Jiaojun, Liu Yi, Mannan M S. A correlation of the lower flammability limit for hybrid mixtures[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 32:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.07.014
[46]	齐英全. 煤尘/瓦斯复合爆炸特性参数变化规律及预测模型[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2021.
	Qi Yingquan. Variation laws of characteristic parameters and prediction models of coal dust/gas composite explosion[D]. Jiaozuo: Henan Polytechnic University, 2021.
[47]	Abbas Z, Zinke R, Gabel D, et al. Theoretical evaluation of lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2019, 60:296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.05.014
[48]	Yu Xiaozhe, Zhang Zhenhua, Yan Xingqing, et al. Effect of multi-component gaseous fuel on the explosion behaviors and mechanism of aluminum dust[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2022, 80: DOI:10.1016/J.JLP.2022.104918.
[49]	Zhang Zhenhua, Yu Xiaozhe, Chen Xi, et al. Analysis and prediction model of the minimum explosion concentration of plastic dust in gaseous fuel environments[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2024, 259: DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.113134.
[50]	Essenhigh R H, Misra M K, Shaw D W. Ignition of coal particles: a review[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1989, 77(1):3-30. doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(89)90101-6

名称	量化模型	模型特点	局限性
Le Chatelier^[36]模型	式(3)	揭示了可燃气体LEL与粉尘云MEC 之间的线性关系	适用于燃烧火焰温度相等或相似可燃气体和粉尘
Bartknecht^[41]模型	式(4)	揭示了可燃气体LEL与粉尘云LEL 之间的非线性关系	精度较低,缺乏针对性
Jiang等^[45]模型	式(5)	考虑了初始湍流,关联可燃气体和粉尘的爆炸指数	受试验条件的影响较大
Ji等^[26]模型	式(6) 式(7)	关联了由可燃气体和粉尘最大爆炸压力和爆炸指数构造的极限因子	受试验条件的影响较大
Qi等^[96]模型	式(8) 式(9)	极限因子中引入粉尘粒径	普适性有待验证
Gan等^[29]模型	式(10)	关联了粉尘粒径及挥发分	普适性有待验证

名称	量化模型	模型特点	局限性
Abbas等^[47] 模型	式(12)	以热力学为理论核心	未考虑粉尘分散后有效粉尘质量浓度的变化以及混合燃料在LEL附近对整个系统的有效加热
Yu等^[48] 模型	式(13)	以热力学为理论核心,引入粉尘燃烧的有效系数k_d,eff和整个供热系统的有效系数k_f,eff	忽略了气体燃料对粉尘反应机制的影响,公式中燃料组分之间的质量浓度关系仍假设为线性
Zhang等^[49] 模型	式(16)	以动力学为理论核心,假设粉尘热解在爆炸过程中起主导作用	对于热解速率较快或不易热解的粉尘,预测值与实测值可能会产生较大的误差

气粉两相体系爆炸下限变化特征及量化模型研究进展

Research progress on change characteristic and quantitative model of lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 50

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程关兵, 叶豪辉. 基于FDS的风扇舱双油池火温度变化特征[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 133-139.
[2]	黄敏华, 王海桥, 郝小礼, 刘东, 赵彧, 陈世强. 单液滴介观润湿行为理论模型与动态特征[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(3): 11-18.
[3]	王露露, 尘兴邦, 袁嘉淙, 吴松, 佟瑞鹏. 职业心理学视域下矿工不安全行为研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 48-55.
[4]	杨雪松, 王乾, 王宇昊, 赵旭, 佟瑞鹏. 矿山职业性尘肺病四级预防框架[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(12): 181-187.
[5]	周成, 居里锴. 面向机械安全风险预警的评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 86-92.
[6]	欧阳秋梅, 吴超. 复杂安全系统数据场及其降维理论模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(8): 32-37.
[7]	王玉娇, 赵江平. 谷物粉尘爆炸特性试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 77-81.
[8]	李国梁，蒋军成，潘勇. 基于绝热火焰温度混合气体爆炸下限的预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(7): 57-.
[9]	张??李永娟，蒋丽. 驾驶行为理论模型研究概述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(2): 23-.
[10]	陈网桦，何中其，饶国宁，胡毅亭，彭金华. 五氯硫酚锌盐粉尘爆炸下限浓度的实验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(8): 104-.
[11]	王彦富，蒋军成，龚延风，钟星灿，茅靳丰. 全尺寸隧道火灾实验研究与烟气逆流距离的理论预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(8): 37-.
[12]	任国友，孟燕华. 中国职业安全卫生一体化发展模式探索[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(5): 69-.