复杂安全系统数据场及其降维理论模型

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.08.006

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 32-37.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.08.006

复杂安全系统数据场及其降维理论模型

欧阳秋梅, 吴超教授

中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南长沙 410083

收稿日期:2017-04-20 修回日期:2017-06-14 出版日期:2017-08-20 发布日期:2020-10-13
作者简介:欧阳秋梅,(1992—),女,江西宜春人,硕士研究生,研究方向为安全科学基础理论、安全统计学与大数据。E-mail:ouyangqiumei0893@csu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(51534008);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2017zzts628)。

Research on model for dimension reduction of complex safety system based on data field

OUYANG Qiumei, WU Chao

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China

Received:2017-04-20 Revised:2017-06-14 Online:2017-08-20 Published:2020-10-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索复杂安全系统降维方法和模式,基于安全系统数据场视角,对复杂安全系统降维理论模型开展研究。首先,将数据场概念引入复杂安全系统,并从宏观和微观2个层面阐述安全系统数据场的内涵及其4个基本要素;其次,分析数据场在安全系统中产生的3种效应模式及其导致事故发生的内在机制;最后,以复杂安全系统降维过程中的降维、降变和降容为主线,构建复杂安全系统降维理论模型。结果表明,数据场理论及其效应模式适用于描述和阐释复杂安全系统的降维过程与规律,自聚类、维内降容、维间降维、维内(间)降变是复杂安全系统降维的4个关键过程。

关键词: 复杂安全系统, 数据场, 效应, 降维, 理论模型

Abstract: To explore dimension reduction methods and patterns of complex safety systems, based on safety system data field, a research on dimension reduction model of complex safety system was carried out. Firstly from the perspective of data representing safety characteristics and states, a concept of data field was introduced, and connotations of data field in safety space were described from both macro and micro levels. Meanwhile, four basic elements were summarized. Then based on all above, the effects that data field brought in safety space were analyzed from three levels to explain how accidents occurred from small incidents. Finally, a dimension reduction model of complex safety system based on data field was built by taking the dimension reduction, capacity reduction and change reduction process as main line. The results show that data field can describe and explain the dimension reduction process and rules of complex safety system effectively, and self-organizing clustering, capacity reduction in the dimension, dimension reduction between dimensions, and that change reduction in or between dimensions are four key processes of safety system dimension reduction.

Key words: complex safety system, data field, effect, dimension reduction, theoretical model

中图分类号:

X913

欧阳秋梅, 吴超. 复杂安全系统数据场及其降维理论模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(8): 32-37.

OUYANG Qiumei, WU Chao. Research on model for dimension reduction of complex safety system based on data field[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(8): 32-37.

参考文献

[1] ZHOU Meili. Some concepts and mathematical considerations of similarity system theory[J]. Journal of Systems Science & Systems Engineering, 1992, 1(1): 84-92.
[2] 吴超,贾楠. 相似安全系统学的创建研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(5): 1 354-1 360.
WU Chao, JIA Nan. Establishment of similarity safety systematics[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016,36(5): 1 354-1 360.
[3] 贾楠,吴超,黄浪,等. 相似安全系统学研究的方法论[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(6): 30-35.
JIA Nan, WU Chao,HUANG Lang, et al. Methodology of similarity safety systematics research[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(6): 30-35.
[4] 吴超,王婷. 安全统计学的创建及其研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(7): 3-11.
WU Chao, WANG Ting. Foundation of safety statistics and its investigation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(7): 3-11.
[5] 欧阳秋梅,吴超. 从大数据和小数据中挖掘安全规律的方法借鉴[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(7): 1-6.
OUYANG Qiumei, WU Chao. Comparison between methods for extracting safety rules from big data and small data[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(7): 1-6.
[6] HOSSE René S,BECKER U,MANZ H. Grey systems theory time series prediction applied to road traffic safety in Germany[J].IFAC-Papers On Line, 2016, 49(3): 231-236.
[7] 兰建义,乔美英,周英. 基于灰色系统理论的煤矿人因事故关键因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(2):178-185.
LAN Jianyi, QIAO Meiying, ZHOU Ying. Analysis of critical factors in human error accidents in coal mine based on gray system theory[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(2): 178-185.
[8] ZHANG S, SULANKIVI K, KIVINIEMI M, et al. BIM-based fall hazard identification and prevention in construction safety planning[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 72(8): 31-45.
[9] BANSAL V K. Application of geographic information systems in construction safety planning[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(1): 66-77.
[10] 黄合来, 许鹏鹏, 马明, 等. 道路交通安全规划理论研究前沿[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27(9): 90-98.
HUANG Helai, XU Pengpeng, MA Ming, et al. Recent theoretical researches on transportation safety planning [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(9): 90-98.
[11] MALCOLM Frank, PAUL Roehrig, BENJAMIN Pring. Code halos: how the digital lives of people, things, and organizations are changing the rules of business[M]. Indianapolis: John Wiley & Sons, 2014: 2-8.
[12] ZHAO Jing, LIU Yue. Safety evaluation of intersections with dynamic use of exit-lanes for left-turn using field data[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017,102(3): 31-40.
[13] 孟永东,蔡征龙,徐卫亚,等. 边坡工程中监测数据场三维云图实时动态可视化方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012,31(增2): 3 482-3 490.
MENG Yongdong,CAI Zhenglong,XU Weiya, et al. A method for three-dimensional nephogram real-time dynamic visualization of safety monitoring data field in slope engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2012,31(S2): 3 482-3 490.
[14] 石美红, 赵辉, 贾郑磊,等. 基于数据场的无线传感网数据双重聚类算法[J]. 微电子学与计算机, 2016,33(2): 49-53.
SHI Meihong, ZHAO Hui, JIA Zhenglei, el at. An dual clustering algorithm for data in wireless sensor networks based on data-field model[J].Microelectronics & Computer, 2016,33(2):49-53.
[15] 黄浪, 吴超, 贾楠. 安全理论模型构建的方法论研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(12): 1-6.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao, JIA Nan. Study on methodology of safety theoretical model construction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(12): 1-6.
[16] CLARK Billy. Relevance theory and language change[J]. Lingua, 2016, S175/S176: 139-153.
[17] 徐盛桓. 关联原则与优化思维—关联理论的阐释与献疑[J]. 外国语, 2002,25(3): 2-10.
XU Shenghuan. Principle of relevance and optimal thinking: explorations into and questions about relevance theory[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2002,25(3): 2-10.
[18] 谢优贤,吴超. 安全容量原理的内涵及其核心原理研究[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2016(4): 739-743.
XIE Youxian, WU Chao. Researches on connotation and core principles of safety capacity[J]. World Sci-tech R&D, 2016(4): 739-743.

复杂安全系统数据场及其降维理论模型

Research on model for dimension reduction of complex safety system based on data field

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李帅, 练章华, 丁亮亮, 廖涛. 多因素耦合作用下的气井持续环空压力预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 166-172.
[2]	靳慧斌, 朱孟昌, 马明霞. 基于ACE-BN的通勤飞行事故/事件诱因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 96-102.
[3]	王露露, 尘兴邦, 袁嘉淙, 吴松, 佟瑞鹏. 职业心理学视域下矿工不安全行为研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 48-55.
[4]	史恭龙, 张尧轶, 李红霞, 田水承, 王倩. 安全投入、技术创新对采掘业经济效益的影响:门槛效应模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 9-15.
[5]	吴建军, 薛孝行, 席永涛, 金永兴. 考虑货物动态失稳因素的船舶稳性修正方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 77-84.
[6]	杨雪松, 王乾, 王宇昊, 赵旭, 佟瑞鹏. 矿山职业性尘肺病四级预防框架[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(12): 181-187.
[7]	苏荣华, 李超, 马志远. 考虑初始损伤效应的砂岩蠕变扰动特性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 36-43.
[8]	张钧祥, 刘彦伟, 任培良, 韩红凯, 左伟芹. 基于蠕变效应的穿层钻孔封孔参数优化与试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 97-104.
[9]	彭姓, 唐晓雨, 常若松, 蒋浩, 石荣. 附加听觉信号对行人觉察交通信号的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 144-152.
[10]	赵国辉, 潘佑东. 高矮塔斜拉桥横向减震体系关键参数联合优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 72-80.
[11]	臧泽升, 李忠辉, 钮月, 刘帅杰, 宋晶晶, 张全聪. 不同瓦斯压力下煤体力学特性试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 90-95.
[12]	廖秀萍, 吴超, 王秉. 安全系统涌现性模型构建及核心问题研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 1-8.
[13]	宋英华, 白明轩, 马亚萍, 霍非舟. 考虑多主体心理效应的应急资源调度超网络模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 158-166.
[14]	冯亚娟, 邢仲超. 辱虐管理对安全绩效的曲线效应:领导信任的调节作用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 1-8.
[15]	季鹏飞, 林海飞, 孔祥国, 龙航, 李博涛. 注氮促排煤体瓦斯数值模拟研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 127-134.