成品油管道周边区域社会风险分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.11.028

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 177-182.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.11.028

成品油管道周边区域社会风险分析

齐先志¹ 工程师, 王晓霖¹ 教授级高工, 许学瑞²

1 中国石化大连石油化工研究院,辽宁大连 116045;
2 中国安全生产科学研究院, 北京 100012

收稿日期:2019-07-19 修回日期:2019-09-13 发布日期:2020-10-30
作者简介:齐先志 (1986—),男,河北玉田人,硕士,工程师,主要从事管道完整性管理与风险评价等方面的研究。E-mail:qixianzhi1986@126.com。

Societal risk analysis for vicinity of product oil pipelines

QI Xianzhi¹, WANG Xiaolin¹, XU Xuerui²

1 Dalian Research Institute of Petroleum and Petrochemicals, Sinopec, Dalian Liaoning 116045, China;
2 China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2019-07-19 Revised:2019-09-13 Published:2020-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为合理规划管道周边区域,将人员伤害风险控制在可接受范围内,首先建立成品油管道社会风险计算模型,该模型给出潜在生命损失(PLL)和F-N曲线的计算步骤;其次采用修正基准失效频率的方法计算管道失效频率;然后利用基于区块的人口统计方法,在管道失效频率、危害后果计算分析和人口数量统计的基础上,计算各类事故的发生概率和可能造成的死亡人数;最后构建F-N曲线并计算PLL。结果表明:管道中孔和破裂失效由于泄漏流量大,引燃概率高成为人员伤害风险来源。该模型可应用于成品油管道社会风险计算和管道周边区域人口分布规划。

关键词: 成品油管道, 失效频率, 社会风险, F-N曲线, 潜在生命损失(PLL)

Abstract: For the sake of reasonable planning and control of casualties risk within acceptable limit in vicinity of pipelines, a societal risk calculation model was established in which procedures to calculate potential loss of life and construct F-N curve were illustrated. Secondly, pipeline failure frequency was calculated by using modification of basic frequency. Then occurrence frequency of different types of accidents caused were calculated on the basis of pipeline failure frequency, hazardous consequence calculation and analysis and population statistics through a block -based demographic method. In the end, F-N curve was constructed and potential loss of life was calculated. The results show that risk of personal injuries was caused by medium and rupture leaks due to large release flow and high ignition probability. This model can be applied in societal risk calculation of product oil pipelines and population distribution planning for the vicinity of pipelines.

Key words: petroleum product pipeline, failure frequency, societal risk, F-N curve, potential loss of life(PLL)

中图分类号:

X937

齐先志, 王晓霖, 许学瑞. 成品油管道周边区域社会风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 177-182.

QI Xianzhi, WANG Xiaolin, XU Xuerui. Societal risk analysis for vicinity of product oil pipelines[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(11): 177-182.

参考文献

[1] PD 8010-3-2009. Steel pipelines on land-a guide to the application of pipeline risk assessment to proposed developments in the vicinity of major accident hazard pipelines containing flammables[S].
[2] 张华兵,冯庆善,郑洪龙,等.油气长输管道定量风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2008,18(3): 161-165.
ZHANG Huabing, FENG Qingshan, ZHENG Honglong, et al. Quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas long-distance pipeline[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2008,18(3): 161-165.
[3] JO Y D, CROWL D A. Individual risk analysis of high-pressure natural gas pipelines[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2008, 21(6): 589-595.
[4] 周亚薇, 张振永, 田珊珊, 等.地区等级升级后的天然气管道定量风险评价技术[J].天然气工业, 2018, 38(2): 112-118.
ZHOU Yawei, ZHANG Zhenyong, TIAN Shanshan, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of the natural gas pipelines in upgraded areas[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(2): 112-118.
[5] 姚安林, 周立国, 汪龙, 等. 天然气长输管道地区等级升级管理与风险评价[J].天然气工业, 2017, 37(1): 124-130.
YAO Anlin, ZHOU Liguo, WANG Long, et al. Management of and risk evaluation on long-distance gas pipelines related to regional level upgrading [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(1): 124-130.
[6] 单克, 帅健, 张思弘. 基于修正因子的油气管道失效概率评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(1): 87-93.
SHAN Ke, SHUAI Jian, ZHANG Sihong.Adjustment factos based assessment of oil and gas pipelines failure probability [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(1): 87-93.
[7] 吴宗之, 张圣柱, 于立见. 基于潜在生命损失的长输油气管道选线方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(2): 71-76.
WU Zongzhi, ZHANG Shengzhu, YU Lijian.A method for long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline route selection based on potential loss of life [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(2): 71-76.
[8] 张华兵, 王新.基于风险评价的管道安全距离确定方法[J].油气储运, 2018, 37(1): 20-23.
ZHANG Huabing, WANG Xin. Pipeline safety distance determination method based on risk assessment[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(1): 20-23.
[9] GOODFELLOW G, HASWELL J. A comparison of inherent risk levels in ASME B31.8 and UK gas pipeline design codes[C]. 2006 International Pipeline Conference, 2006: 1-12.
[10] DAVIS P M. Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines. Statistical summary of reported spillages in 2014 and since 1971[R]. CONCAWE, 2016.
[11] 狄彦, 帅健, 王晓霖, 等.油气管道事故原因分析及分类方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2013,23(7): 109-115.
DI Yan, SHUAI Jian, WANG Xiaolin, et al. Study on methods for classifying oil ＆ gas pipeline incidents[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(7): 109-115.
[12] AQ/T 3046—2013, 化工企业定量风险评价导则[S].
AQ/T 3046-2013, Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment of chemical enterprises [S].
[13] Arthur D Little Limited. Risks from gasoline pipelines in the United Kingdom [R]. Health and Safety Executive,1999.
[14] SY/T 6859―2012, 油气输送管道风险评价导则[S].
SY/T 6859-2012, Guidelines for risk assessment of oil and gas pipelines [S].

成品油管道周边区域社会风险分析

Societal risk analysis for vicinity of product oil pipelines

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	江新, 李雪莲, 吴静涵, 李炜, 罗东立, 费凡. 敏感性水利工程社会稳定风险演化SD模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 18-26.
[2]	刘莉君. 中国企业参与“一带一路”建设的境外安全风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 143-150.
[3]	常志朋, 张增国, 张涛, 徐浩越. 基于耗散结构的重大决策社会风险态势判别模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 157-162.
[4]	潘科，刘媛，许开立. 基于probit模型的超压引发多米诺效应定量风险评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(9): 51-.
[5]	贾伟，朱建新，高增梁，包其富. 区域定量风险评价方法及其在化工园区中的运用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(5): 140-.
[6]	徐亚博，钱新明，刘振翼. 天然气输送管道泄漏事故危害定量分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(1): 146-.