广义安全结构理论研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.05.008

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 41-46.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.05.008

广义安全结构理论研究

金智新¹ 教授级高工, 王延生^2,3, 邓存宝³ 教授, 郭嗣琮⁴ 教授, 张勋²

1 山西焦煤集团有限责任公司,山西太原 030024;
2 辽宁工程技术大学矿业学院,辽宁阜新 123000;
3 辽宁工程技术大学安全工程技术研究院,辽宁阜新 123000;
4 辽宁工程技术大学理学院,辽宁阜新 123000

收稿日期:2017-01-11 修回日期:2017-03-10 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2020-10-30
作者简介:金智新 (1959—),男,辽宁锦州人,教授级高工,中国工程院院士,主要从事安全科学基础理论及工程管理等方面的研究。王延生 (1991—),男,山东枣庄人,博士研究生,研究方向为安全科学基础理论及应用技术。E-mail:wangys91@163.com。

Research on generalized safety structure theory

JIN Zhixin¹, WANG Yansheng^2,3, DENG Cunbao³, GUO Sicong⁴, ZHANG Xun²

1 Shanxi Coking Coal Refco Group Ltd, Taiyuan Shanxi 030024,China;
2 College of Mining Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin Liaoning 123000, China;
3 Institute of Safety Engineering and Technology, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin Liaoning 123000, China;
4 College of Science, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin Liaoning 123000, China

Received:2017-01-11 Revised:2017-03-10 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2020-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为加强对安全科学及安全工程的理论研究,基于生物信息学和因素空间理论,提出广义安全结构理论。阐明安全问题的本质规律,建立安全结构的组成要素及其数学逻辑分析框架,并研究主动安全管控系统的组成及其构建过程。结果表明:安全是人或物质活动与活动环境相互作用形成的结构形态,结构形态的变化规律是安全问题孕育、发生和演化的本质规律;安全结构由安全事件结构、环境结构、活动结构及活动与环境的相互作用组成;主动安全管控系统范式体系由环境因素属性空间、活动因素空间、信息空间、系统外部扰动、安全调控及各部分之间的关联(映射)构成。

关键词: 安全事件, 因素空间理论, 活动环境, 安全结构, 主动安全管控系统

Abstract: In order to strengthen the study of safety science and safety engineering theory, based on the bioinformatics and the factor space theory, a generalized safety structure theory was worked out, and essential laws of safety issues were clarified, components of the safety structure and mathematical logic analysis frameworks of the components were studied, in addition, the composition and construction process of the active safety control system were given. The results show that the safety is the structural form formed by the interaction between human or material activities and activity environment,that the changing law of structural form is the essence law of the beginning, occurrence and evolution of safety issues,that the safety structure is composed of four elements: safety events structure, environment structure, activity structure, interaction mechanism between activity and environment,and that the paradigm of active safety control system is composed of five parts: environment factors attribute space, activity factors space, information space, system external factors, safety control and the association (mapping) between the parts.

Key words: safety events, factor spaces theory, activity environment, safety structure, active safety system management

中图分类号:

金智新, 王延生, 邓存宝, 郭嗣琮, 张勋. 广义安全结构理论研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(5): 41-46.

JIN Zhixin, WANG Yansheng, DENG Cunbao, GUO Sicong, ZHANG Xun. Research on generalized safety structure theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(5): 41-46.

参考文献

[1] HEINRICH H W,STONE R W . Industrial accident prevention[J]. Social Service Review,1931,5(2):323-324.
[2] REASON J. Human error[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 12-39.
[3] 李艳. 基于轨迹交叉论的电力生产事故预防研究[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2006.
LI Yan. Research on electric production accident prevention based on trajectory crossing theory[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2006.
[4] 田宏, 陈宝智, 吴穹,等. 广义多态事件树模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2000, 10(6):35-39.
TIAN Hong, CHEN Baozhi, WU Qiong, et al. Generalized multi-state event tree analysis model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2000, 10(6):35-39.
[5] FERDOUS R, KHAN F, SADIQ R, et al. Fault and event tree analyses for process systems risk analysis: uncertainty handling formulations[J]. Risk Analysis, 2011, 31(1):86-107.
[6] 崔铁军, 汪培庄, 马云东. 01型空间故障树的结构化表示方法[J]. 大连交通大学学报, 2016, 37(1):82-87.
CUI Tiejun,WANG Peizhuang, MA Yundong. Structured representation methods for 01 space fault tree[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2016, 37(1):82-87.
[7] RATHNAYAKA S, KHAN F, AMYOTTE P. SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach.part I: methodology and model description[J]. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 2011, 89(3):151-164.
[8] LEVESON N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2002, 42(4):237-270.
[9] LEVESON N, DULAC N, MARAIS K, et al. Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: a systems approach to safety in complex systems[J]. Organization Studies, 2009, 30(2/3):227-249.
[10] 于海湧,谢骏,金智新. 事故发生的三种模式探讨[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(1):70-73.
YU Haiyong, XIE Jun, JIN Zhixin. Three basic accident modes[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2005,15(1):70-73.
[11] 陈宝智. 系统安全评价与预测[M].北京:冶金工业出版社, 2011:16-39.
CHEN Baozhi. System safety evaluation and prediction[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2011:16-39.
[12] 张跃兵,王凯,王志亮. 危险源理论研究及在事故预防中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(6):10-16.
ZHANG Yuebing, WANG Kai, WANG Zhiliang. Theoretical research on hazards and its application in accident prevention[J].China Safety Science Journal,2011,21(6):10-16.
[13] 金智新. 安全结构理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:1-51.
JIN Zhixin. Safety structure theory [M].Beijing: Science Press, 2012:1-51.
[14] 李越中, 闫章才, 高培基. 基因组研究与生物信息学[M].济南:山东大学出版社, 2001:37-65.
LI Yuezhong, YAN Zhangcai, GAO Peiji. Genome research and bioinformatics[M]. Ji′nan: Shandong University Press, 2001:37-65.
[15] 汪培庄, 李洪兴. 知识表述的数学理论[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1994:3-94.
WANG Peizhuang, LI Hongxing. Mathematical theory of knowledge representation[M].Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Press,1994:3-94.

广义安全结构理论研究

Research on generalized safety structure theory

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	金智新, 刘倩, 邓存宝, 王延生. 生产安全事件随机-模糊耦合的危险性度量[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 1-7.
[2]	贾博, 孙延进, 张贵明. 基于DBN的飞机着陆弹跳预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 84-91.
[3]	陈勇刚, 熊升华, 贺强, 詹婷雯. 民航机务维修不安全事件N-K风险耦合分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 104-109.
[4]	张宇栋, 吕树进, 吕淑然, 王春雪, 刘芳茗. 系统安全结构理论及特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 25-30.
[5]	金智新, 王延生, 邓存宝. 基于安全结构理论的安全事件内涵数学表达^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 38-43.
[6]	王永刚，王灿敏，郑红运，陈芳. 基于系统动力学的航空公司不安全事件致因复杂性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 71-.
[7]	颜烨. 安全社会学的内涵及其体系深化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(4): 3-.
[8]	葛春景，王霞，关贤军. 应对城市重大安全事件的应急资源联动研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(3): 166-.
[9]	李春香. 飞行数据可视化技术研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(1): 166-.
[10]	颜峻，袁宏永，疏学明. 社会安全事件空间分布研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(7): 39-.
[11]	曾亮. 多层次模糊评估法在民航不安全事件风险评估中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(1): 131-.