客车座椅动态试验仿真与改进

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.011

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 75-81.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.011

客车座椅动态试验仿真与改进

唐友名^1,2 教授, 谭卫锋¹, 张义^1,2 讲师, 王平^1,2 讲师

1 厦门理工学院机械与汽车工程学院,福建厦门 361024;
2 厦门理工学院福建省客车及特种车辆研发协同创新中心,福建厦门 361024

收稿日期:2020-08-01 修回日期:2020-10-18 出版日期:2020-11-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
作者简介:唐友名 (1981—),男,湖南祁东人,博士,教授,主要从事汽车集成安全、动力电池安全、深入事故调查与分析等方面的研究。E-mail:tangym1981@163.com。
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金资助(2020J01270);厦门市科技计划指导性项目(3502Z20179034);厦门市青年创新A类人才项目(厦委组[2018]10号);厦门理工学院科研攀登计划(XPDKT18012)。

Dynamic simulation of bus seats and model improvement

TANG Youming^1,2, TAN Weifeng¹, ZHANG Yi^1,2, WANG Ping^1,2

1 School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen Fujian 361024, China;
2 Fujian Collaborative Innovation Center for R & D of Coach and Special Vehicle, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen Fujian 361024, China

Received:2020-08-01 Revised:2020-10-18 Online:2020-11-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了使新生产的客车座椅满足动态试验国标GB13057—2014的强制要求,利用显式有限元软件LS-DYNA 3D建立某公司客车乘员座椅三维数模和有限元模型,耦合HybridIII 50%成年男性假人模型,得到客车座椅动态试验仿真模型;采用乘员损伤峰值、加权损伤指标(WIC)、乘员动态响应及位姿和客车座椅变形模式对标分析试验结果,验证模型可信度;通过改变座椅靠背海绵刚度和对座椅脚架开展基于成本考量的轻量化设计,改进仿真模型。结果表明:试验和仿真结果中乘员损伤指标和座椅变形吻合良好,WIC值误差不超过4.3%;轻量化设计效果明显,在成本增加2.8%的同时,座椅脚架减重31.8%,使WIC值降低11%;在综合考虑国标允许变形范围和座椅舒适性前提下,弱化座椅主要受力部件强度和降低前排靠背海绵刚度可有效降低后排座椅乘员综合损伤风险。

关键词: 客车座椅, 动态试验, 仿真模型, 加权损伤指标(WIC), 成本考量

Abstract: In order to have newly produced bus seats meet mandatory requirements of dynamic testing regulation GB13057-2014, a 3D mathematical model and finite element model of bus seats for a company was established by adopting explicit finite element software LS-DYNA 3D. And through coupling it with Hybrid III 50% male dummy model, a dynamic simulation model of seats was obtained. Then, test results were analyzed and simulation model was verified by using occupants' injury peak, WIC, dynamic responses and posture, and deformation mode of seats. Finally, the model was improved by changing sponge stiffness of seat back and light-weight seat foot design based on cost considerations. The results show that occupants' injury index and seat deformation are in good agreement in test and simulation, and error of WIC value is less than 4.3%. Moreover, light-weight design has obvious effects as seat foot weight reduces 31.8% and WIC value decreases 11% in case of an increase of 2.8% in cost. Weakening main components' strength and reducing sponge stiffness of seat back can effectively decrease occupants' injury level in rear seats on the basis of considering international acceptance standard of deformation range and seat comfort.

Key words: bus seat, dynamic test, simulation model, weighted injury criteria (WIC), cost consideration

中图分类号:

X913.4

唐友名, 谭卫锋, 张义, 王平. 客车座椅动态试验仿真与改进[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 75-81.

TANG Youming, TAN Weifeng, ZHANG Yi, WANG Ping. Dynamic simulation of bus seats and model improvement[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11): 75-81.

参考文献

[1] 金明新, 王军华. 客车座椅及其车辆固定件的被动安全性-联合国欧洲经济委员会ECE R80法规简析[J].交通标准化, 2001, 26(6): 12-15.
JIN Mingxin, WANG Junhua. Passive safety of bus-seat and fixed facilities of vehicles-briefly analyse on ECE R80 [J]. Communication Standardization, 2001, 26(6): 12-15.
[2] GB13057—2014, 客车座椅及其车辆固定件的强度[S].
GB13057-2014, Strength of the seats and their anchorages of passenger vehicles[S].
[3] KUPPA S, SAUNDERS J, FESSAHAIE O. Rear seat occupant protection in frontal crashes[C].The 19^th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, 2005, 212(1-8).
[4] MAYRHOFER E, GEIGL B C, STEFFAN H. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a bus and coach seat during rear end impact by means of sled tests[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2003, 8(3): 255-267.
[5] BAUMANN K H, SCHONEBURG R, JUSTEN R. A vision for an integrated safety concept[C]. The 17^th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, 2001, 493(1-9).
[6] 宋正超, 张金焕, 孔凡忠. 轻型客车乘员约束系统的模拟计算[J]. 清华大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 34(11): 1 536-1 539.
SONG Zhengchao, ZHANG Jinhuan, KONG Fanzhong. Simulation of minibus occupant restraint system[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University:Science and Technology, 2004, 34(11): 1 536-1 539.
[7] 葛如海, 许栋, 王桃英, 等. 客车座椅设计参数对乘员正面碰撞伤害影响的仿真研究[J]. 车辆与动力技术, 2010(2): 9-13.
GE Ruhai, XU Dong, WANG Taoying, et al. Influence of bus seat design parameters on occupant injury during front impact[J]. Vehicle & Power Technology, 2010(2): 9-13.
[8] TANG Youming, LYU Na, YI Liao, et al. Optimization design for seat restraint system of school bus in front impact[J].Journal of Applied Sciences, 2014, 14(20): 2 608-2 614.
[9] 周华,彭一峻,刘卓异,等. 约束系统对不同体型女性驾驶人的保护研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 76-82.
ZHOU Hua, PENG Yijun, LIU Zhuoyi, et al. A study on protection of restraint system on female drivers with different body types[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 76-82.
[10] 卢琳兆. 客车座椅-乘员耦合碰撞系统仿真分析与优化[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2015.
LU Linzhao. Simulation analysis and optimization of coach seat and passenger coupling impact system[D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2015.
[11] FMVSS 208, Federal motor vehicle safety standards: occupant crash protection[S].1997.
[12] ECE R94, Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision[S]. 2005.
[13] 马桃, 张维刚, 唐婷,等.基于全局灵敏度分析和Kriging代理模型的汽车乘员约束系统多参数优化研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2014, 25(13): 1 812-1 816.
MA Tao, ZHANG Weigang, TANG Ting, et al. Study on multi-parameter optimization of occupant restraint system based on global sensitivity analysis and kriging model[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 25(13): 1 812-1 816.

客车座椅动态试验仿真与改进

Dynamic simulation of bus seats and model improvement

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡甚平, 李圣媛, 赵睿, 李帅召, 王新雅. LNG动力船应急响应系统流程GSPN-MC仿真模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 174-181.
[2]	潘理虎, 芦飞平, 周耀辉, 秦世鹏. 煤矿安全逃生的多智能体仿真模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 35-41.
[3]	沈小燕, 张凡, 吕卉焘, 闫艳, 刘浩学. 追尾碰撞下液罐车罐体变形失效仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 37-42.
[4]	王瑛, 孙贇, 李超, 朱法顺, 王子君. 基于STAMP模型的军机飞行训练安全性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 68-73.
[5]	潘丹, 罗帆. 民航飞行员心理危机系统动力学仿真模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(7): 7-12.
[6]	杜红兵. 航空器内人员应急疏散仿真模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(7): 14-.
[7]	王海峰，上官志洪，赵锋，张启明，黄义超. 核电厂核事故应急疏散研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(7): 26-.
[8]	于英，于慧，田晋跃. 公路应急救援系统分析及模型仿真[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(7): 13-.