不同温度下超高层建筑窗口火蔓延模拟分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.017

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 121-127.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.017

不同温度下超高层建筑窗口火蔓延模拟分析

王宇副教授, 邢佳, 周盈彤

沈阳建筑大学土木工程学院,辽宁沈阳 110168

收稿日期:2020-12-13 修回日期:2021-02-19 出版日期:2021-03-28
作者简介:王宇 (1977—),男,河北抚宁人,硕士,副教授,主要从事高层建筑抗火、结构抗震等研究。E-mail: wyasyn@163.com。
基金资助:
辽宁省自然科学基金资助(2019-ZD-0299);国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC1504303)。

Simulation analysis of window fire spread in super high-rise building at different temperatures

WANG Yu, XING Jia, ZHOU Yingtong

School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University,Shenyang Liaoning 110168,China

Received:2020-12-13 Revised:2021-02-19 Published:2021-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示不同温度条件对凹型超高层建筑窗口羽流火焰融合高度的影响,采用火灾动态仿真模拟软件PyroSim,构建不同温度条件下凹型超高层建筑的火灾模型;分析该模型下竖向连续多窗口温度分布等温线及温度曲线。结果表明:在不同室外温度条件下,纵向连续3窗口比2窗口在达到危险温度540 ℃时,火焰融合高度上升4.5～5.9 m;在达到危险温度350 ℃时,火焰高度上升11.0～13.3 m。纵向连续4窗口比3窗口在达到危险温度540 ℃时,火焰融合高度上升3.0～3.4 m;在达到危险温度350 ℃时,火焰高度上升7.8～9.5 m;对于凹型超高层建筑,室内外温差越大,火焰融合高度越高;从纵向连续3窗口开始,火焰融合高度增长趋势下降。

关键词: 超高层建筑, 窗口, 火焰融合, 室内外温差, 危险温度

Abstract: In order to study influence of different temperature conditions on flame fusion height of window plume of concave super high-rise building, fire model of concave super high-rise building under different temperature conditions were numerically simulated by PyroSim software, and temperature distribution isotherm and temperature curve of longitudinal continuous multiple windows were analyzed. The results show that flame height increases by 4.5-5.9 m when dangerous temperature reaches 540 ℃ at 3 windows compared with 2 windows in longitudinal continuous window.When dangerous temperature reached 350 ℃, flame height increased by 11.0-13.3 m. Flame height increases by 3.0-3.4 m when longitudinal continuous 4 window compared with 3 window combustion at dangerous temperature of 540 ℃. When dangerous temperature is 350 ℃, flame height rises by 7.8-9.5 m. For concave super high-rise building, the greater the temperature difference between indoor and outdoor, the higher the flame fusion height. Begin from longitudinal continuous 3 windows, growth trend of flame fusion height decreases.

Key words: super tall buildings, window, flame fusion, indoor and outdoor temperature difference, dangerous temperature

中图分类号:

X932

王宇, 邢佳, 周盈彤. 不同温度下超高层建筑窗口火蔓延模拟分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 121-127.

WANG Yu, XING Jia, ZHOU Yingtong. Simulation analysis of window fire spread in super high-rise building at different temperatures[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(3): 121-127.

参考文献

[1] GB 50016—2014, 建筑设计防火规范(2018年版)[S].
GB 50016-2014, Code for fire protection design of buildings (2018) [S].
[2] 张明空, 胡小兵, 王静爱. 考虑火灾动态扩散过程的高层疏散路径研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2019, 29(3): 32-38.
ZHANG Mingkong, HU Xiaobing, WANG Jing'ai. Study on high-rise evacuation path considering dynamic fire diffusion process [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(3): 32-38.
[3] 张立宁, 安晶, 张丽华. 高层建筑火灾精确报警的无线复合信号系统[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2017,27(11): 14-17.
ZHANG Lining, AN Jing, ZHANG Lihua. Research on evacuation route from high rise building under real effect of fire spread [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017,27(11): 14-17.
[4] 周扬, 夏登友, 高平. 城市商业综合体建筑火灾事故演变路径分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2018,28(2): 170-174.
ZHOU Yang, XIA Dengyou, GAO Ping. Analysis of evolution path of urban commercial complex fire accident[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2018,28(2): 170-174.
[5] 潘晓菲, 吕品. 凹型建筑外立面火灾烟气蔓延特性研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(2): 45-51.
PAN Xiaofei, LYU Pin. Study on fire smoke spread characteristics of facade in concave building[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018,14(2): 45-51.
[6] 英明鉴, 李易, 陆新征. 极端火灾作用下典型超高层混凝土框架-核心筒结构的连续倒塌分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2016,49(4): 48-56.
YING Mingjian, LI YI, LU Xinzheng. Progressive collapse analysis of a typical super high rise concrete frame core tube structure exposed to extreme fire[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016,49(4): 48-56.
[7] USMANI A S, CHUNG Y C, TORERO J L. How did the WTC towers collapse: a new theory[J]. Fire Safety Journal,2003, 38(6): 501-533.
[8] FlRTCHER I. Tall concrete buildings subjected to vertically moving fires: a case study approach[D]. Edinburgh: the University of Edinburgh School of Engineering,2009.
[9] 王晓华. 超高层建筑防火疏散设计的探讨[D].长沙:湖南大学,2007.
WANG Xiaohua. The research on the super high-rise buildings fire fighting and fire escape design[D]. Changsha: Hunan University,2007.
[10] 朱杰. 超高层建筑竖井结构内烟气运动规律及控制研究[D].合肥:中国科技大学,2008.
ZHU Jie. Studies on the characteristic of smoke movement and smoke control in shaft of uitra-high-rise buildings[D].Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China,2008.
[11] 张璐. 超高层住它楼内天井自然排烟特性的数值模拟研究[D].合肥:中国科技大学,2018.
ZHANG Lu. Numerical simulation of natural smoke exhaust characteristics in the patio of super high-rise residential building[D].Heifei: University of Science and Technology of China,2018.
[12] 安伟光. PS建筑外墙保温材料燃烧及火蔓延行为研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2015.
AN Weiguang. Investigation of combustion and flame spread behaviors of PS insulation materials applying to building exterior wall [D]. Hefei: University in Science and Technology of China, 2015.
[13] SEIGEL L G. The projection of flames from burning buildings[J]. Fire Technology, 1969, 5(1): 43-51.
[14] THOMAS P H, LAW M. The projection of flames from buildings on fire[J]. Fire Prevention Science and Technology, 1972, 10(1): 19-26.
[15] GB 51251—2017,建筑防烟排烟系统技术标准[S].
GB 51251-2017,Technical standard for smoke management systems in buildings [S].

不同温度下超高层建筑窗口火蔓延模拟分析

Simulation analysis of window fire spread in super high-rise building at different temperatures

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邓立军, 尚文天, 刘剑, 周煜凯, 宋莹. 基于DWT与SVM的风门开闭阶段识别方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 95-104.
[2]	沈阳, 徐磊, 王少纯. 基于风险管理的整体钢平台变形预警指标研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 56-63.
[3]	邢朝亮, 黄咸家, 何乐, 祝赫, 郑泽铭. 火焰撞击障碍物形成的溢流火焰融合行为研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 171-176.
[4]	左自波, 潘曦, 黄玉林, 汪小林, 张龙龙. 超高层ICCP安全监测与控制的预警指标研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 53-60.
[5]	郑霞忠, 仝立杨, 陈国梁. 建筑业安全生产水平时空演变及影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 27-34.
[6]	夏泊洢. 岩石各向异性对井周应力分布及破裂压力影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 129-134.
[7]	房志明, 许清风, 宋伟宁, 陈玲珠, 冷予冰. 超高层建筑人员步行疏散试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 185-190.