交通标志语义认知与情绪加工的脑电研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.026

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 184-190.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.026

交通标志语义认知与情绪加工的脑电研究

卢国英副教授, 张婷^** 副教授

上海电机学院设计与艺术学院,上海 200240

收稿日期:2020-12-10 修回日期:2021-02-07 出版日期:2021-03-28 发布日期:2021-12-20
通讯作者: **张婷(1981—),女,上海人,博士,副教授,主要从事数字媒体艺术、包容性设计等方面的研究。E-mail:zhangting@sdju.edu.cn。
作者简介:卢国英 (1978—),女,浙江东阳人,博士,副教授,主要从事交通标志设计、人因工效学、工程心理学等方面的研究。E-mail:normee@126.com。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助(18YJCZH114);上海电机学院人文社科研究专项计划(A1-0288-19-031-07);上海电机学院学科建设项目(A1-0288-19-002-26)。

An EEG study on semantic cognition and emotional evaluation for traffic signs

LU Guoying, ZHANG Ting

School of Design &Art, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2020-12-10 Revised:2021-02-07 Online:2021-03-28 Published:2021-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了让驾驶员更正确快速地理解交通标志,避免不当驾驶行为,探究驾驶员对交通标志的语义认知和情绪加工过程。采用刺激1-刺激2(S1-S2)试验范式,基于事件相关电位(ERPs)技术和脑电信号(EEG)时频(TF)分析方法,研究交通标志语义一致性和情绪唤醒的客观评价指标。结果显示,交通标志和文字语义不一致条件下,同一时间窗表现出更大的N400和θ波活动,证实了交通标志和文字之间存在较大的语义距离;交通标志和文字语义一致条件下,诱发更大的晚期正成分(LPP);N400、θ波和LPP可以用于判断交通标志的语义距离和情绪唤醒。 ERPs结合EEG的TF分析结果能从神经科学的视角解释行为数据,可用于测量交通标志理解度。

关键词: 交通标志, 语义认知, 情绪加工, 脑电信号(EEG), 事件相关电位(ERPs)

Abstract: In order to make drivers understand traffic signs more correctly and quickly, avoiding improper driving behavior, and improving driving safety, semantic cognition and emotional evaluation for traffic signs was investigated. Objective evaluation indicators of semantic congruence and emotional arousal of traffic signs using ERPs measurement combined with EEG time-frequency(TF)analysis was explored and a S1-S2 paradigm was adopted. The result shows that a larger N400 and θ activity in the same time window were elicited by semantically incongruent traffic sign and word pairs, which indicated semantic distance between traffic signs and words. A larger late positive potential (LPP) was induced by semantically congruent traffic sign-word pairs. It implied emotional arousal of participants. N400, θ wave and LPP can be used to determine semantic distance and emotional arousal in traffic signs. The results of ERPs combined with EEG TF analysis can provide a neuroscientific interpretation of behavioral data and it can be employed to measure traffic sign comprehension.

Key words: traffic signs, semantic cognition, emotional evaluation, electroencephalogram (EEG), event related potentials(ERPs)

中图分类号:

X910

卢国英, 张婷. 交通标志语义认知与情绪加工的脑电研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 184-190.

LU Guoying, ZHANG Ting. An EEG study on semantic cognition and emotional evaluation for traffic signs[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(3): 184-190.

参考文献

[1] LIANG Yulan, LEE J D, YEKHSHATYAN L. How dangerous is looking away from the road algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving [J]. Human Factors, 2012,54: 1 104-1 116.
[2] NG Annie W Y, CHAN Alan H S. The effects of driver factors and sign design features on the comprehensibility of traffic signs [J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2008, 39(3): 321-328.
[3] NG Annie W Y, CHAN Alan H S. Effects of user factors and sign referent characteristics in participatory construction safety sign redesign [J]. Safety Science, 2015, 74: 44-54.
[4] STASI L L D, MEGIAS A, CANDIDO A, et al. Congruent visual information improves traffic signage [J]. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 2012, 15(4): 438-444.
[5] BENBASSAT T, SHINAR D. Ergonomic guidelines for traffic sign design increase sign comprehension [J]. Human Factors, 2006, 48(1): 182-195.
[6] SHINAR D, VOGELZANG M. Comprehension of traffic signs with symbolic versus text displays [J]. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 2013, 18(4): 72-82.
[7] OUYANG Kun, LIU Yungching. Effects of design feature and training on traffic sign comprehension between different user groups[C]. Proceeding in the 17^th World Congress on Ergonomics, 2009: 1-5.
[8] 陈默, 王海燕, 薛澄岐,等. 基于事件相关电位的产品意象-语义匹配评估[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 44(1): 58-62.
CHEN Mo, WANG Haiyan, XUE Chengqi,et al. Match judgments of semantic word-product image based on event-related potential [J]. Journal of Southeast University:Natural Science Edition, 2014, 44(1): 58-62.
[9] KUTAS M, FEDERMEIER K D. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2011, 62(1): 621-647.
[10] CUTHBERT B N, SCHUPP H T, BRADLEY M M, et al. Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report [J]. Biological Psychology, 2000, 52(2): 95-111.
[11] PASTOR M C, BRADLEY M M, LOW A, et al. Affective picture perception: emotion, context, and the late positive potential [J]. Brain Research, 2008, 1189(1): 145-151.
[12] CODISPOTI M, FERRARI V, BRADLEY M M. Repetition and event-related potentials: distinguishing early and late processes in affective picture perception [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2007, 19(4): 577-586.
[13] 裴玉龙, 金英群, 陈贺飞. 基于脑电信号分析的不同年龄驾驶人疲劳特性[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(4):59-65, 77.
PEI Yulong, JIN Yingqun, CHEN Hefei. Fatigue characteristics in drivers of different ages based on analysis of EEG[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(4):59-65,77.
[14] DAVIDSON D J, INDEFREY P. An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing [J]. Brain Research, 2007, 1158(1): 81-92.
[15] SAUSENG P, GRIESMAYR B, FREUNBERGER R, et al. Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations [J]. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2010, 34(7): 1 015-1 022.
[16] BASTIAANSEN M C, BERKUM V J J, HAGOORT P. Event-related theta power increases in the human EEG during online sentence processing [J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2002, 323(1): 13-16.
[17] HAMM J P, JOHNSON B W, KIRK I J. Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2002, 113(8): 1 339-1 350.
[18] BARRETT S E, RUGG M D. Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures [J]. Brain & Cognition, 1990, 14(2): 201-212.
[19] POLICH J. N400s from sentences, semantic categories, number and letter strings? [J]. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1985, 23(4): 361-364.
[20] MCPHERSON W B, HOLCOMB P J. An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects [J]. Psychophysiology, 2010, 36(1): 53-65.
[21] DYCK M, BRODEUR M B. ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2015, 72(4): 43-51.
[22] GUO Fu, WANG Xueshuang, LIU Weilin, et al. Affective preference measurement of product appearance based on event-related potentials[J]. Cognition Technology & Work, 2018, 20(2): 299-308.
[23] 郭伏, 刘玮琳, 王雪霜,等. 网页界面满意度评估的事件相关电位研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(3): 126-131.
GUO Fu, LIU Weilin, WANG Xueshuang, et al. Event-related potentials study on webpages satisfaction evaluation[J].International Engineering and Management, 2016, 21(3): 126-131.
[24] SCHUPP H T, CUTHBERT B N, BRADLEY M M, et al. Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance [J]. Psychophysiology, 2010, 37(2): 257-261.
[25] HAGOORT P, HALD L, BASTIAANSEN M, et al. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension [J]. Science, 2004, 304(5669): 438-441.
[26] MAGUIRE M J, BRIER M R, FERREE T C. EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships [J]. Brain & Language, 2010, 114(1): 16-25.
[27] HALD L, BASTIAANSEN M, HAGOORT P. EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing [J]. Brain & Language, 2006, 96(1): 90-105.
[28] LIN Chinteng, LIN Hongzhang, CHIU Tzaiwen, et al. Distraction-related EEG dynamics in virtual reality driving simulation[C]. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits & Systems, 2008: 1 088 - 1 091.
[29] LIN Chinteng, CHEN Shian, KO Liwei, et al. EEG-based brain dynamics of driving distraction[C]. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2011: 1 497-1 500.

交通标志语义认知与情绪加工的脑电研究

An EEG study on semantic cognition and emotional evaluation for traffic signs

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈龙, 王崴, 瞿珏, 胡波, 蔡睿, 赵敏睿. EEG功率信息显示特征对认知负荷的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 183-189.
[2]	黄小芳, 贾志绚, 卓亚娟. LED交通标志的视认性试验研究与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 37-42.
[3]	杨艳群，郑新夷，陈少惠. 城市道路养护作业对驾驶员安全驾驶的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(2): 16-.
[4]	左淑霞，席建锋，肖殿良，田建，李飞燕. 特色交通标志设计及其信息量度量方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(11): 139-.
[5]	隽志才，曹鹏，吴文静. 基于认知心理学的驾驶员交通标志视认性理论分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(8): 8-.