Studies on fundamentals of safety science

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.003

Abstract

Abstract: In order to provide a theoretical basis for discipline construction and safety management practice, fundamentals of previous safety science were analyzed by using literature research and comprehensive analysis, expressions of fundamentals were obtained. The results show that safety science has three perspectives: accident prevention, risk management and comprehensive generalization. There are different expressions for basic subject issues, namely, basic term, research object, research purpose, research content, research method, subject attribute, research scope, basic axiom, subject definition and content boundary from each perspective. At present, in terms of inclusion ability of research content, overall logic, difficulty or practicability of understanding and completeness of basic theory, expression of fundamentals of discipline from perspective of accident prevention is the best. In the course of discipline construction and safety practice, it is necessary to choose discipline perspective, way of thinking and expression of discipline fundamentals according to actual needs.

Key words: safety science, fundamentals, research object, accident prevention, risk management

CLC Number:

FU Gui, YANG Xiaoyu, LIU Zhuoxu, TONG Ruipeng, KONG Qingduan, GUO Lijuan. Studies on fundamentals of safety science[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(5): 18-24.

References

[1] 傅贵, 屈德君, 付亮, 等. 论“安全学科”设立为一级学科的理由[J]. 河南理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 24(2):85-92.
FU Gui, QU Dejun, FU Liang, et. al. The reasons for the listing safety discipline in class I of the discipline classification system[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Natural Science, 2006, 24(2):85-92.
[2] COZE Le J C, PETTERSEN K, REIMAN T. The foundations of safety science[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67:1-5.
[3] 佟瑞鹏, 张艳伟, 杨云云, 等. 新工科背景下安全工程学科建设发展研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7):150-155.
TONG Ruipeng, ZHANG Yanwei, YANG Yunyun, et. al. Research on development of safety engineering major under background of emerging engineering education[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(7):150-155.
[4] 温德涌. “泰坦尼克号”海难事故引发的思考[J]. 武汉船舶职业技术学院学报, 2006(2):20-22.
WEN Deyong. Reflect on accident of TITANIC at sea[J]. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Shipbuilding Technology, 2006(2):20-22.
[5] 王林. 对恐怖主义概念和类型的重新界定:从德国之翼航班空难说开来[J]. 武汉公安干部学院学报, 2015, 29(2): 55-57.
WANG Lin. Redefinition of the concept and types of terrorism:talking from German wing flight crash[J]. Journal of Wuhan Public Security Cadre's College, 2015, 29(2):55-57.
[6] 傅贵, 索晓. 自然灾害引发的事故原因分析与预防[C]. 多学科灾害研究-昆明论坛, 2016:171-177.
[7] FU Gui, WANG Jianhao, YAN Mingwei. Anatomy of Tianjin Port fire and explosion: process and causes[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2016, 35(3):216-220.
[8] 曾辉, 孙峰, 李铁, 等. 澳大利亚“9·28”大停电事故分析及对中国启示[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(13):1-6.
ZENG Hui, SUN Feng, LI Tie, et. al. Analysis of “9·28” blackout in south Australia and its enlightenment to China[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(13):1-6.
[9] 傅贵, 陈大伟, 杨甲文. 论安全学科的内涵与本科教育课程体系建设[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(1):63-66.
FU Gui, CHEN Dawei, YANG Jiawen. Discussions on the connotation of the safety science discipline and curriculum construction for undergraduates[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15(1):63-66.
[10] 傅贵, 张江石, 许素睿. 论安全科学技术学科体系的结构和内涵[J]. 中国工程科学, 2004,6(8):12-16.
FU Gui, ZHANG Jiangshi, XU Surui. Critical examination of safety science[J]. Engineering Science, 2004,6(8):12-16.
[11] 傅贵. 安全学科的结构研究[M]. 墨尔本: 安全科学出版社, 2015:15-16.
[12] 傅贵. 安全科学学及其应用探讨[J]. 安全, 2019, 40(2):1-10.
FU Gui. The science of safety science and its practical implications[J]. Safety & Security, 2019, 40(2):1-10.
[13] 傅贵. 安全科学基本概念的简明解释(第一版)[EB/OL]. (2020-10-12). https://www.toutiao.com/i6882680955924906500/.
[14] ISO. Online browsing platform [Z/OL]. [2021-02-24]. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui.
[15] 傅贵, 吴亚丽, 章仕杰, 等. 危险源的实质内容分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11):1-5.
FU Gui, WU Yali, ZHANG Shijie, et. al. Analysis on essential content of hazard[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11):1-5.
[16] FRENCH A P, BERGMANN P G. Special relativity: the MIT introductory physics series[J]. Physics Today, 1969, 22(5):DOI: 10.1063/1.3035599.
[17] SARTORI L. Understanding relativity: a simplified approach to Einstein's theories[M].Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997:9.
[18] FOCK V. The theory of space, time and gravitation[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1964:33.
[19] 付汇琪, 陈萍, 傅贵. 对安全学科中“事故”定义的探讨[J]. 科技导报, 2017, 35(7):11.
FU Huiqi, CHEN Ping, FU Gui. Discussions on the concept of an accident[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2017, 35(7):11.
[20] 傅贵. 事故的定义及其重要性[J]. 现代职业安全, 2019(7):67-68.
[21] MIL-STD-882E, Department of defense standard practice system safety[S]. 2012.
[22] 吴超. 安全研究的预设和途径及新观点[J]. 安全, 2019, 40(8):32-37,42.
WU Chao. Presupposition, paths and new thought of safety research[J]. Safety & Security, 2019, 40(8):32-37,42.
[23] 张景林, 王晶禹, 黄浩. 安全科学的研究对象与知识体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(2): 16-21.
ZHANG Jinglin, WANG Jingyu, HUANG Hao. The object of study of safety science and its knowledge system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17(2): 16-21.
[24] 林坚, 刘文. 土地科学研究对象和学科属性的思考[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(4):4-10.
LIN Jian, LIU Wen. Research object and discipline attribute of land science[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(4):4-10.
[25] HOLLNAGEL E. Is safety a subject for science?[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67:21-24.
[26] ASSE. Career guide to the safety profession (3^th Ed) [M]. New York: The American Society of Safety Engineers Foundation and the Board of Certified Safety Professionals,2007:3.
[27] PRYOR P. Hazard as a concept: core body of knowledge for generalist OHS professionals (2^nd Ed) [M]. Tullamarine: Australian Institute of Health and Safety, 2019:5-9.
[28] 刘雪涛. 安全系统工程概况[J]. 核动力工程, 1985,6(6):87-90.