Configuration path analysis of fire safety supervision capability based on TOE framework

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.03.0684

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to improve the efficacy of fire safety supervision, an analysis framework named TOE of fire safety supervision was constructed according to the TOE framework. The fsQCA method was used to study the causal mechanism between different factors and supervision performance. Five configuration paths were developed to achieve good supervision performance: technical support-dynamic governance, technical support-normal supervision, both normal and dynamic supervision-technical promotion, environmental shaping-dynamic governance, and environmental shaping-normal supervision. The results show that with the help of financial advantages, economically leading regions can adopt two paths of technical support-dynamic governance and technical support-normal supervision to improve the performance of fire safety supervision. Economically backward regions tend to focus on three other paths of both normal and dynamic supervision-technical promotion, environmental shaping-dynamic governance, and environmental shaping-normal supervision. By combining different governance methods such as normal supervision and dynamic governance and shaping the fire safety environment, it has a positive effect on improving the performance of fire safety supervision.

Key words: technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework, fire safety supervision, fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), configuration analysis, fire supervision performance

DONG Changqi, LIU Jida, ZHAO Zebin. Configuration path analysis of fire safety supervision capability based on TOE framework[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(3): 153-160.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

References 16

[1]	司戈. 2007—2017年较大以上直接财产损失火灾统计分析[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2020, 39(8):1171-1174.
	SI Ge. Study of the direct fire loss of more than 10 million yuan fire statistics from 2007 to 2017[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(8):1171-1174.
[2]	罗福周, 袁慧卿, 张扬. 旧工业建筑再生项目消防安全韧性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3):167-173. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.03.023
	LUO Fuzhou, YUAN Huiqing, ZHANG Yang. Assessment on fire safety resilience of old industrial building regeneration projects[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(3):167-173. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.03.023
[3]	HAEJUN P, BRIAN J M, NICHOLAS A D, et al. Integration of fire safety and building design[J]. Building Research & Information, 2014, 42(6): 696-709.
[4]	刘纪达, 安实, 麦强. 消防救援机构与社会单位在消防监管中的演化博弈分析[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(5):128-133,146.
	LlU Jida, AN Shi, MAl Qiang. Evolutionary game analysis of fire rescue agencies and social institutions in fire supervision and management[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 27(5):128-133,146.
[5]	HASSANAIN M A, Al-HAROGI M, IBRAHIM A M. Fire safety risk assessment of workplace facilities: a case study[J]. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2022, 23:DOI:10.3389/fbuil.2022.861662. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.861662
[6]	MALUK C, WOODROW M, TORERO J L. The potential of integrating fire safety in modern building design[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2017, 88: 104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.12.006
[7]	TOMATZKY L G, KLEIN K J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: a meta analysis of findings[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1982, 29(11):28-45.
[8]	IBRAHIM I, JAAFAR H S. Determinant factor of environment management practices: a theoretical framework[J]. International Review of Management and Business Research (IRMBR), 2015, 4(2): 1180-1192.
[9]	汤志伟, 王研. TOE框架下政府数据开放平台利用水平的组态分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(6):187-195.
	TANG Zhiwei, WANG Yan. Configuration analysis of utilization level of government data open platform under the framework of TOE[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2020, 39(6):187-195.
[10]	胡税根, 结宇龙, 陈伊伦. 行政审批制度改革的路径选择:基于30个省会及以上城市的定性比较分析[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2022(2):112-122.
	HU Shuigen, JIE Yulong, CHEN Yilun. The path selection of the reform of the administrative approval system: qualitative comparative analysis based on 30 provincial capital cities and above[J]. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 2022(2):112-122.
[11]	陈世香, 王芮. 中国省级政府移动政务服务水平的影响因素与提升路径[J]. 理论与改革, 2022(2):85-98.
	CHEN Shixiang, WANG Rui. A study on the influencing factors and realization paths of mobile government service levels of provincial governments in China[J]. Theory and Reform, 2022(2):85-98.
[12]	刘纪达, 宋雨薇, 王健. 新时代消防安全监管体系的基本框架、演进逻辑与实践进路[J]. 中国应急管理科学, 2021(10):17-27.
	LIU Jida, SONG Yuwei, WANG Jian. The basic framework, evolution logic and practical approach of the fire safety supervision system in the new era[J]. Journal of China Emergency Management Science, 2021(10):17-27.
[13]	RAGIN C C, STRAND S I. Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal order comment on Caren and Panofsky[J]. Sociological Methods & Research, 2008, 36(4):431-441.
[14]	张玉磊, 张光宇, 马文聪, 等. 什么样的新型研发机构更具有高创新绩效?基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(4):758-768.
	ZHANG Yulei, ZHANG Guangyu, MA Wencong, et al. What kind of new R&D institutions have higher innovation performance? configuration analysis based on TOE framework[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2022, 40(4):758-768.
[15]	刘纪达, 康宁, 安实, 等. 双随机、一公开消防监管模式的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12):133-140. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.019
	LIU Jida, KANG Ning, AN Shi, et al. Evolutionary game analysis on fire supervision model of two random selections and one information publicity[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(12):133-140. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.019
[16]	FURNARI S, CRILLY D, MISANGYI V F, et al. Capturing causal complexity: heuristics for configurational theorizing[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2020, 46(4):778-799. doi: 10.5465/amr.2019.0298

变量类型	变量名称		模糊集分数处理
条件变量	技术层面T	T₁:消防安全监管基础设施建设	0.00、0.33、 0.67、1.00
	技术层面T	T₂:消防监督管理信息系统建设	0.00、0.33、 0.67、1.00
	组织层面O	O₁:消防安全专项行动组织情况	0.00、0.33、 0.67、1.00
	组织层面O	O₂:日常消防监督检查实施情况	0.00、0.33、 0.67、1.00
	环境层面E	E₁:消防安全科普宣传	0.00、0.33、 0.67、1.00
	环境层面E	E₂:地区经济发展水平	0.00、0.33、 0.67、1.00
结果变量	F:消防安全监管绩效		0.00、0.33、 0.67、1.00

条件变量	结果变量
	F		~F
	一致性	覆盖度	一致性	覆盖度
T₁	0.68	0.62	0.65	0.62
~T₁	0.58	0.61	0.60	0.67
T₂	0.73	0.70	0.50	0.50
~T₂	0.47	0.47	0.70	0.74
O₁	0.73	0.63	0.60	0.55
~O₁	0.47	0.53	0.60	0.70
O₂	0.69	0.59	0.60	0.54
~O₂	0.47	0.53	0.55	0.65
E₁	0.58	0.61	0.55	0.61
~E₁	0.63	0.57	0.65	0.62
E₂	0.52	0.55	0.60	0.67
~E₂	0.68	0.62	0.60	0.57

条件	解
	经济领先地区		经济欠佳地区
	组态1	组态2	组态3	组态4	组态5
T₁	●	●	●	$\otimes$	$\otimes$
T₂	●	●	$\otimes$	●	$\otimes$
O₁	●	$\otimes$	●	●	$\otimes$
O₂	*	●	●	$\otimes$	●
E₁	●	$\otimes$	$\otimes$	●	●
E₂	●	●	$\otimes$	$\otimes$	$\otimes$
一致性	0.70	0.75	1.00	0.85	0.75
原始覆盖度	0.37	0.16	0.16	0.31	0.16
净覆盖度	0.11	0.11	0.11	0.05	0.11
解的覆盖度	0.79
解的一致性	0.71

地区	组态路径	组态视图
经济领先地区	技术支撑-治理动态化型
经济领先地区	技术支撑-监管常态化型
经济欠佳地区	专常并重-技术促进型
	环境塑造-动态治理型
	环境塑造-监管并重型