Analysis of gas-liquid two-phase coordinated explosion and flame retardant effect based on fundamental reaction

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.03.1169

Abstract

Abstract:

To improve the synergistic explosion suppression and flame retardant efficiency of inert gas-water mist, based on spectral experiments, theoretical analysis and numerical simulation methods such as Fluent and CHEMKIN-PRO were used to study the changes in elementary reactions and typical free radical (H· and ·OH) molar fractions during the explosion suppression and flame retardant process of N₂ water mist at different injection positions and pressures. The results showed that staggered injection of N₂ and fine water mist had better synergistic explosion suppression and flame retardant effect than convection and parallel injections. For case of simulated pipeline, good explosion suppression and flame retardant effect were found only when the spray pressure of N₂ and water mist was 4.5 and 2 MPa, respectively. Furthermore, the maximum value of mole fraction for H· and ·OH was 0.006 4 and 0.006 9, respectively. The spray pressure can be applied to the actual methane explosion fire area based on scale effect. Moreover, the H· and ·OH mole fractions can be used as monitoring parameters during the operation of the current automatic fire extinguishing system in the fire protection area, and their changes can be used as a reference for fire extinguishing process.

Key words: elementary reaction, gas-liquid two phase, synergistic explosion suppression, fire retardant effectty, Fluent

CLC Number:

X932爆炸安全与防火、防爆

ZHANG Licong, LI Siman. Analysis of gas-liquid two-phase coordinated explosion and flame retardant effect based on fundamental reaction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 101-108.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Tab.2

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

References 15

[1]	张博, 李蕙竹, 仲冰, 等. 中国甲烷控排面临的形势、问题与对策[J]. 中国矿业, 2022, 31(2):1-10.
	ZHANG Bo, LI Huizhu, ZHONG Bing, et al. The situation, problems and countermeasures for the controls of China's methane emissions[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2022, 31(2):1-10.
[2]	叶兰. 我国瓦斯事故规律及预防措施研究[J]. 中国煤层气, 2020, 17(4): 44-47.
	YE Lan. Research on rules and prevention measures of gas accidents in China[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 2020, 17(4): 44-47.
[3]	罗振敏, 王欣, 王涛, 等. 细水雾-惰性气体协同灭火性能试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10):63-68. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.2237
	LUO Zhenmin, WANG Xin, WANG Tao, et al. Experimental study on synergetic fire extinguishing performance of water mist and inert gas[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(10):63-68. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.2237
[4]	段玉龙, 卜云兵, 龙凤英, 等. 氮气-细水雾-滑移装置对甲烷爆炸特性的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10):83-89. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.1861
	DUAN Yulong, BU Yunbing, LONG Fengying, et al. Effect of N₂-water slip device on methane explosion characteristics[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(10):83-89. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.1861
[5]	LAUNDER B, SPALDING D. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence[M]. London: Academic Press, 1972:28-29.
[6]	于勇, 张俊明, 姜连田. Fluent入门与进阶教程[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2008:52-53.
[7]	王磊. 大型巷道与小型管道瓦斯爆燃传播规律实验和数值模拟研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2021.
	WANG Lei. Experimental and numerical simulation research on gas deflagration propagation laws in large roadways and small pipelines[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2021.
[8]	常新明, 张红军, 魏垂胜, 等. 细水雾粒径对管内瓦斯爆炸特性的影响机理研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报:自然科学, 2021, 40(5):8-15.
	CHANG Xinming, ZHANG Hongjun, WEI Chuisheng, et al. Study on the influence mechanism of fine water mist particle size on gas explosion characteristics in pipe[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Natural Science, 2021, 40(5):8-15.
[9]	张延松, 孟祥豹, 覃欣欣, 等. ABC干粉和细水雾抑制甲烷爆炸研究[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2018:11-12.
[10]	秦汉圣. 密闭空间可燃气体爆燃传播特性和阻燃技术的实验研究[D]. 廊坊: 华北科技学院, 2021.
	QIN Hansheng. Experimental study on deflagration propagation characteristics and flame retardant technology of combustible gas in a confined space[D]. Langfang: North China Institute of Science and Technology, 2021.
[11]	胡洋, 杨雨欣, 石云东, 等. 惰性气体参数对瓦斯爆燃火焰传播抑制效果的研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(12):1-10.
	HU Yang, YANG Yuxin, SHI Yundong, et al. Experimental study on the inhibition effect of inert gas parameters on gas deflagration flame propagation[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(12):1-10.
[12]	李卓然, 夏远辰, 张彬, 等. 细水雾对置障管内预混气体抑爆机理研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2021, 40(6):884-887.
	LI Zhuoran, XIA Yuanchen, ZHANG Bin, et al. Study on the suppression mechanism of water mist on the deflagration of premixed methane gas in a barrier tube[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(6):884-887.
[13]	LIU Rongzheng, JIA Baoshan, WANG Wei. Numerical simulation of gas explosion suppression by ultrasonic water mist based on the cloud, fog, and edge computing[J]. Environmental Thchnology & Innovation, 2021, 21(2):185-191.
[14]	曹甄俊, 朱彤. 稀释气体对甲烷层流预混火焰燃烧速度的影响[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 39(10):1557-1562.
	CAO Zhenjun, ZHU Tong. Effect of diluents addition on laminar burning velocity of premixed methane flames[J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science, 2011, 39(10):1557-1562.
[15]	GB35181—2017,重大火灾隐患判定方法[S].
	GB35181-2017,Method for determining major fire hazards[S].

序号	监测点编号	距离点火区域端距离/mm
1	f₁	2 030
2	f₂	4 530
3	f₃	7 030
4	f₄	8 530
5	f₅	9 030
6	f₆	10 530
7	f₇	13 030
8	f₈	15 530

方案序号	N₂喷射压力/MPa	细水雾喷射压力/MPa
1	3.5	1
2	3.5	1.5
3	3.5	2
4	4	1
5	4	1.5
6	4	2
7	4.5	1
8	4.5	1.5
9	4.5	2