Research on fundamental theory of macrosecurisafetyology

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.08.1814

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to construct the fundamental theory of macrosecurisafetyology (which combines the meanings of security & safety science for the large-scale issues), combined methods of literature review, data statistics, logical deduction and model analysis, etc. were used in this investigation. First, the research process and characteristics on the relevant theory of macrosecurisafety (which means the integrated security & safety for the large-scale issues) in the past decade were reviewed. Then, definitions, connotation, and characteristics of macrosecurisafety were given from multi perspectives, and a group of the basic concepts and their systems of macrosecurisafetyology were put forward. The disciplinary group that constitutes macrosecurisafetyology was built, and a research paradigm and principles of macrosecurisafetyology were summarized. Two macrosecurisafety models and their related definitions were built according to two scenarios. The research results clarify the scope and identification criteria of macrosecurisafety, extract 10 sets of core concept groups supporting 10 macrosecurisafetyology subjects, including macrosecurisafety state studies, macrosecurisafety meta principle studies, macrosecurisafety internal cause studies, macrosecurisafety system studies, macrosecurisafety natural disaster studies, macrosecurisafety man-made disaster studies, macrosecurisafety external cause studies, macrosecurisafety prevention and control studies, macrosecurisafety comprehensive studies, and macrosecurisafety marginal studies, providing their definitions and scopes for these macrosecurisafetyology subjects, form a research paradigm and classification for macrosecurisafetyology principles, and obtain a modeling method and two typical models for macrosecurisafetyology. The above results play an important role in consolidating the foundation of macrosecurisafetyology.

Key words: macrosecurisafety, macrosecurisafetyology, concept group, macrosecurisafety principles, macrosecurisafety models

CLC Number:

WU Chao. Research on fundamental theory of macrosecurisafetyology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(8): 1-13.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Definitions of macrosecurisafety from different perspectives and views

视角或视域	大安全的定义	主要特点及说明
英文safety和security一体化,即2大类安全一体化	囊括人类无意(意外)和故意(恶意)造成事故灾难的综合安全	一类安全主要涉及非故意引发的事故灾难问题,另一类安全主要涉及有意引发的事故灾难问题。该定义具体表征了由这2大类典型人因导致的综合安全问题。但2类事故灾难可大可小,将很小的事故归入大安全不太恰当
中文“大+安全”	比小安全大的综合安全问题,通常指规模较大的综合安全	由于大与小是相对而言的,该定义没有确定性,缺乏实际意义;此外,其对肇事性质(故意与非故意)的界定不明确
多灾种的数量	涉及2种及以上灾难叠加形成的综合安全	例如:地震与台风灾害同时发生在同一地区、饥荒与战争同时发生在同一地区、火灾与爆炸和环境污染同时发生在同一地区等。该定义对肇事性质(故意与非故意)的界定不明确
灾难结果的规模	涉及灾难损失或伤亡超过某一标准的综合安全	例如:以《安全生产法》规定的重大事故及以上等级作为大安全的界定标准。该定义下的大安全在常态下无法界定
灾难的尺度	涉及发生灾难的强度超过某一尺度值的综合安全	例如:以火灾面积、地震烈度、受灾居民数量等指标作为界定是否属于大安全问题的依据。该定义下的大安全在常态下无法界定
多部门合作情况	需要2个及以上组织机构协同处理的综合安全	例如:需公安部门、国家安全部门、应急管理部门、卫生部门、环境部门等多机构联合应对的安全问题
跨地区情况	需要多地区协同合作的综合安全	涉及2个及以上省、市、县等协同合作的大安全问题,通常具有复杂综合性
系统学的系统概念	复杂系统或巨系统的综合安全	例如:大城市系统、国家系统、全球互联网系统等层面的安全问题
涉及主体的数量	涉及人数众多且具有多样性的综合安全	涉及人员数量庞大、构成性质复杂、类型多元等特征的安全问题
复合视角和视域	囊括上面多种情况的综合安全	例如:同时混合无意致因、故意致因、多灾种叠加、跨地区影响、跨部门协作、庞大复杂系统、后果严重等多重属性的综合安全问题

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Lists of specific concepts from first to third levels of macrosecurisafetyology

层次	概念群	主要概念
第1层	大安全状态学概念群(13个)	安全、安全感、可靠性、安全韧性、安全功能、事故、危险、风险、威胁、损失、损害、伤害、伤亡(部分概念的主观和客观的分析见第4部分)
	大安全元理学概念群(17个)	属性、安全属性、安全自然属性、安全社会属性、安全综合属性、安全现象、安全规律、安全本体论、安全认识论^[32]、本质安全、事件、安全事件、正安全事件、负安全事件、元事物、正元事物、负元事物^[33](部分概念的主观和客观的分析见第4部分)
	大安全内因学概念群(15个)	生命、安全观、安全人性、安全意识、安全愿景、安全伦理、安全道德、安全认知、安全知识、安全习惯、安全行为、安全心理、安全生理、安全技能、安全素养
	大安全系统学概念群(26个)	安全科学学、安全学科、安全哲学、安全理论、安全原理、安全方法、安全模型、组织、安全组织、系统、巨系统、负系统、安全系统、体系、安全体系、安全复杂性、安全运筹、安全关联、安全比较、安全统计、安全分析、安全结构、安全秩序、安全涌现、负系统学^[34]、安全系统学
第2层	大安全天灾学概念群(20个)	灾害、地震、洪涝、台风、干旱、虫灾、泥石流、极端天气、全球变暖、火灾、爆炸、雷电、坠落、坍塌、污染、中毒、传染病、噪声、沙尘、辐射
	大安全人祸学概念群(26个)	武装、武器、保密、隐藏、泄密、病毒、毒品、核威胁、对抗、斗争、博弈、稳定、危机、破坏、抢劫、恐袭、舆情、案件、侵犯、犯法、犯罪、战略、战术、警情、侵略、颠覆^[35]
	大安全外因学概念群(13个)	危险源、隐患、能量、机器、物质、信息、安全信息、情报、安全情报、环境、安全环境、资源、安全资源
	大安全防治学概念群(42个)	信仰、平安、公安、保安、治安、预案、应急、警务、侦查、认证、救援、防灾、减灾、危险辨识、事故预防、安全预测、安全决策、安全评价、安全模拟、安全设计、安全规划、安全投入、安全效益、安全措施、安全控制、安全管理、安全治理、安全法规、安全文化、安全教育、安全人才、安全职业、安全系统工程、技术、工程、保障、可持续、保险、卫生、绿色、环保、保健
第3层	大安全综合学概念群(19个)	大安全、世界和平、全球安全、人类安全、国家安全、公共安全、网络安全、交通安全、城市安全、生产安全、生活安全、安全文明、未来安全、自然空间安全、人造空间安全、社会空间安全、生物空间安全、信息空间安全、宇宙空间安全^[36]
第3层	大安全边际学概念群(20个)	对象、范畴、预设、时间、空间、主体、客体、动态、静态、微观、中观、宏观、短期、中期、长期、交叉、模糊、混沌、社会、网络

Table 2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 38

[1]	EAMES D P, MOFFETT J. The integration of safety and security requirements[C]. Computer Safety, Reliability and Security:18^th International Conference, SAFECOMP'99 Toulouse, 1999: 468-480.
[2]	CHAPMAN R, HILTON A. Enforcing security and safety models with an information flow analysis tool[C]. Proceedings of the 2004 Annual ACM SIGAda International Conference on Ada: The Engineering of Correct and Reliable Software for Real-time & Distributed Systems Using Ada and Related Technologies, 2004: 39-46.
[3]	AVEN T. A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(6): 745-754.
[4]	AVEN T. Identification of safety and security critical systems and activities[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(2): 404-411.
[5]	PIÈTRE-CAMBACÉDÈS L, BOUISSOU M. Modeling safety and security interdependencies with BDMP (boolean logic driven Markov processes)[C]. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2010: 2852-2861.
[6]	RENIERS G L L, CREMER K, BUYTAERT J. Continuously and simultaneously optimizing an organization's safety and security culture and climate: the improvement diamond for excellence achievement and leadership in safety & security (IDEAL S&S) model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, 19(11): 1239-1249.
[7]	PIÈTRE-CAMBACÉDÈS L, BOUISSOU M. Cross-fertilization between safety and security engineering[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2013, 110: 110-126.
[8]	RASPOTNIG C, OPDAHL A. Comparing risk identification techniques for safety and security requirements[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2013, 86(4): 1124-1151.
[9]	YOUNG W, LEVESON N. Systems thinking for safety and security[C]. Proceedings of the 29^th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 2013: 1-8.
[10]	KRIAA S, BOUISSOU M, COLIN F, et al. Safety and security interactions modeling using the BDMP formalism: case study of a pipeline[C]. Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security:33^rd International Conference, 2014: 326-341.
[11]	KRIAA S, PIETRE-CAMBACEDES L, BOUISSOU M, et al. A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems[J]. Reliability Engineering &System Safety, 2015, 139: 156-178.
[12]	BRUNNER M, HUBER M, SAUERWEIN C, et al. Towards an integrated model for safety and security requirements of cyber-physical systems[C]. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), 2017: 334-340.
[13]	KRIAA S, BOUISSOU M, LAAROUCHI Y. A new safety and security risk analysis framework for industrial control systems[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2019, 233(2): 151-174.
[14]	Editorial. Safety science new scope[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 121: 651.
[15]	RENIERS G, LANDUCCI G, KHAKZAD N. What safety models and principles can be adapted and used in security science?[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 64: DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104068.
[16]	BOUSTRAS G, WARING A. Towards a reconceptualization of safety and security, their interactions, and policy requirements in a 21^st century context[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 132: DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104942.
[17]	HOSSEINI A M, SAUTER T, KASTNER W. Towards adding safety and security properties to the industry 4.0 asset administration shell[C]. 2021 17^th IEEE International Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), 2021: 41-44.
[18]	GEORGE P G, RENJITH V R. Evolution of safety and security risk assessment methodologies towards the use of Bayesian networks in process industries[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 149: 758-775.
[19]	HALE A, MEARNS K, WYBO J L, et al. The future of safety science[J]. Safety Science, 2022, 150: DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105705.
[20]	颜烨. 我国安全理论研究现状分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2005(7): 184-186.
	YAN Ye. Analysis on the current situations of safety security theory developed in China[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2005(7): 184-186.
[21]	张景林, 王晶禹, 黄浩. 安全科学的研究对象与知识体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(2): 16-21.
	ZHANG Jinglin, WANG Jingyu, HUANG Hao. The object of study of safety science and its knowledge system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17(2):16-21.
[22]	范维澄. 公共安全科技问题与思考[C]. 新观点新学说学术沙龙文集15:发展中的公共安全科技:问题与思考, 2007: 6-11.
[23]	吴超. 安全科学学的初步研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(11): 5-15.
	WU Chao. Initial study of the science of safety science[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17(11):5-15.
[24]	GB/T13745—2009,学科分类与代码[S].
	GB/T13745-2009, Classification and code of disciplines[S].
[25]	吴超. 安全学科体系构建综述研究[J]. 安全, 2019, 40 (1): 7-13.
	WU Chao. Review study on safety discipline system construction[J]. Safety & Security, 2019, 40 (1): 7-13.
[26]	吴超. 安全科学方法学[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社, 2010: 113-144.
	WU Chao. Methodology of Safety Science[M]. Beijng: China Labor and Social Security Publishing House, 2011:113-144.
[27]	吴超, 杨冕. 安全科学原理及其结构体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(11):3-10.
	WU Chao, YANG Mian. Study of safety science principles and their constructions[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(11):3-10.
[28]	颜烨. 安全学:基于总体安全观的学科门类战略探索[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(7): 161-171.
	YAN Ye. Anquanology: strategic exploration of one disciplinary categories based on the overall anquan concept[J]. China Soft Science, 2019(7): 161-171.
[29]	吴超. 新时期安全科技的学科结构及专业设置研究[J]. 安全, 2021, 42 (8): 30-36.
	WU Chao. Research on discipline structure of safety & security science and technology and its specialty setting in new era[J]. Safety & Security, 2021, 42(8):30-36.
[30]	王秉. 普通安全学:面向大安全寻找普适性安全规律[J]. 广州大学学报:社会科学版, 2023, 22 (4): 131-138.
	WANG Bing. General safety & security science: looking for general safety & security laws towards big safety & security[J]. Journal of Guangzhou University: Social Science Edition, 2023, 22 (4): 131-138.
[31]	WU Chao, HUANG Xi, WANG Bing. Glimpse of safety science development in China: a review of safety fundamental research and construction of six new postgraduate courses for safety majors by safety & security theory innovation and promotion Center of Central South University[J]. Safety Science, 2024, 169: DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106323.
[32]	吴超. 安全属性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33 (5): 1-8. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.0926
	WU Chao. Investigation of safety & security attributes[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(5):1-8. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.0926
[33]	吴超. 一组表达安全创新的新概念及其关联问题[J]. 安全, 2020, 41 (2): 65-72.
	WU Chao. A group of new concepts for showing safety innovation and their relevant problems[J]. Safety & Security, 2020, 41(2): 65-72.
[34]	吴超. 负系统学的创建研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33 (3): 1-10. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.03.0738
	WU Chao. Negative sytematology construction research[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(3):1-10. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.03.0738
[35]	程林. 公安学通论[M]. 北京: 中国人民公共大学出版社,2014: 3-40.
[36]	WU Chao. Redefining concepts of nation and national security and establishing their models for the new era[J]. Journal of Safety and Sustainability, 2025, 2(1): 45-58.
[37]	吴超, 王秉, 黄浪. 安全科学原理:第2版[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2023: 1-40.
	WU Chao, WANG Bing, HUANG Lang. Principles of safety & security science: 2^nd ed[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2023: 1-40.
[38]	WU Chao. Investigation of foundation theory of safety & security complexity[J]. Journal of Safety and Sustainability, 2024, 1(1): 14-25.