China Safety Science Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 63-70.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.07.2086
• Safety engineering technology • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Wenbin1(
), ZHANG Jiyang1, WANG Xiao1, YANG Hui1, FAN Jiancong2, ABDUMALIK Olimov3
Received:2024-01-12
Revised:2024-04-15
Online:2024-07-28
Published:2025-01-28
CLC Number:
SUN Wenbin, ZHANG Jiyang, WANG Xiao, YANG Hui, FAN Jiancong, ABDUMALIK Olimov. Staged sensing method of fault sudden water based on gray correlation analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(7): 63-70.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.07.2086
Table 2
Formation properties and simulated material ratios
| 位置 | 岩性 | 实际厚 度/m | 模型厚 度/cm | 抗压强度/MPa | 模拟材料配比 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 实际强度 | 模拟强度 | ||||||
| 顶板 | 砂质泥岩 | 6.4 | 4 | 32.6 | 0.15 | 8∶8∶2 | 石英砂∶碳酸钙∶ 石膏 |
| 细砂岩 | 20.8 | 14 | 42.0 | 0.19 | 6∶5∶5 | ||
| 砾岩 | 12.6 | 8 | 80.6 | 0.36 | 8∶6∶4 | ||
| 砂质泥岩 | 15.3 | 10 | 32.7 | 0.15 | 8∶8∶2 | ||
| 粉砂岩 | 11.8 | 8 | 20.9 | 0.10 | 7∶5∶5 | ||
| 煤层 | 煤层 | 6 | 4 | 15.3 | 0.07 | 30∶1∶0.8∶1∶1 | 石英砂∶ 石蜡∶液压油∶ 碳酸钙∶凡士林 |
| 底板 | 泥岩 | 14.6 | 10 | 93.8 | 0.42 | 12∶1.8∶0.7∶1.2∶0.6 | |
| 砂质泥岩 | 10.7 | 7 | 75.1 | 0.33 | 14∶1.6∶0.7∶1.2∶0.7 | ||
| 中砂岩 | 13.2 | 8 | 39.7 | 0.18 | 18∶0.8∶0.6∶1.2∶0.8 | ||
| 粉砂岩 | 11.1 | 7 | 28.6 | 0.13 | 18∶1∶0.7∶1.2∶0.9 | ||
| 断层 | 充填物 | 5.6 | 4 | — | 1∶1.2∶0.3 | 碎石∶河沙∶黏土 | |
| [1] |
王国法, 刘峰, 庞义辉, 等. 煤矿智能化:煤炭工业高质量发展的核心技术支撑[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(2):349-357.
|
|
|
|
| [2] |
雷毅. 我国井工煤矿智能化开发技术现状及发展[J]. 煤矿开采, 2017, 22(2):1-4.
|
|
|
|
| [3] |
李利平, 李术才, 石少帅, 等. 基于应力-渗流-损伤耦合效应的断层活化突水机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增1):3295-3304.
|
|
|
|
| [4] |
翟成. 近距离煤层群采动裂隙场与瓦斯流动场耦合规律及防治技术研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2008.
|
|
|
|
| [5] |
张士川. 采动底板构造活化灾变前兆信息辨识及突水机理试验研究[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2018.
|
|
|
|
| [6] |
宋文成, 梁正召, 刘伟韬, 等. 采场底板破坏特征及稳定性理论分析与试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(11):2208-2218.
|
|
|
|
| [7] |
施龙青. 底板突水机理研究综述[J]. 山东科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 28(3):17-23.
|
|
|
|
| [8] |
卜万奎. 采场底板断层活化及突水力学机理研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2009.
|
|
|
|
| [9] |
王进尚, 姚多喜, 黄浩. 煤矿隐伏断层递进导升突水的临界判据及物理模拟研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(7):2014-2020.
|
|
|
|
| [10] |
孙文斌, 杨辉, 赵金海, 等. 断层突水灾变演化过程划分基础试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(7): 118-128.
|
|
|
|
| [11] |
陈兰兰, 肖海平, 刘鑫钰, 等. 灰色关联度支持下的露天矿边坡稳定性影响因素敏感性分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2024(1):145-149.
doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2024.0125 |
|
doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2024.0125 |
|
| [12] |
马清水, 赵相铮, 宋振骐, 等. 回采巷道稳定性风险评判模型设计与系统应用[J]. 煤矿安全, 2024, 55(10):1-11.
|
|
|
|
| [13] |
鲁锦涛, 贾小榕, 郭昕曜. 基于改进灰色预测的瓦斯突出敏感指标分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(11):74-81.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.0326 |
|
|
|
| [14] |
徐爽, 徐聪聪. 利用灰色关联度进行煤层底板突水危险性综合评价的研究与应用[J]. 山东国土资源, 2017, 33(2):51-55.
|
|
|
|
| [15] |
曾一凡, 武强, 赵苏启, 等. 我国煤矿水害事故特征、致因与防治对策[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(7):1-14.
|
|
|
|
| [16] |
国家煤炭工业局. 建筑物、水体、铁路及主要井巷煤柱留设与压煤开采规程[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 2000:53-57.
|
| [1] | He Wen, He Gengfeng. Influence of pipelines wear by mine backfill slurry based on CFD-DEM method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 113-121. |
| [2] | Rong Hai, Xi Zhouyong, Li Jincheng, Pan Xiangyin, Zhang Weida, Han Mingyu. YOLOv8n-based personnel detection model for underground mines optimized with SPDs-Conv and WIoU [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 139-149. |
| [3] | Zhang Jianguo, Wang Wenchang, Ren Lianwei, Zou Youfeng, Dun Zhilin. Parameter solution of probability integral method under condition of thick loose layer based on SAA-GRNN optimization model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 18-26. |
| [4] | Qin Kai, Deng Zhigang, Shu Longyong, Wei Shuaihao. Data reliability evaluation for coal mine disaster monitoring system [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 190-198. |
| [5] | Zhang Yibo, Zhao Pengxiang, Li Shugang, Lin Haifei, Sun Hongxing, Liu Yuanjia. Intelligent design and application of high-level boreholes for pressure-relief gas drainage in coal seam mining [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 215-223. |
| [6] | Jing Deji, Dong Zhibin, Wang Deji, Li Zhen, Liu Hongwei, Bao Chunhua. Experimental and simulation study on influence of pick cone angle on coal-rock fragmentation and dust-generation characteristics [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 64-72. |
| [7] | Sheng Wu, Chu Xiaoyu, Wu Minwei. Fault diagnosis model for mine main hoists based on BO-XGBoost-SHAP architecture [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 89-97. |
| [8] | Lyu Pengfei, Wang Yongliang, Liang Ye, Qi Yun, Geng Yijian, Sun Yuting. Study on rock burst danger and double entry inward layout optimization for rock burst prevention under condition of inclined thick coal seam [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(4): 132-141. |
| [9] | Teng Yifei, He Ziqi, Fu Yu, Quan Mingxu, Liu Chang, Cui Zheng. Performance mechanism of supported cobalt-copper catalyst for CO elimination [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(4): 152-159. |
| [10] | Liang Bing, Zhang Shiyao, Sun Weiji, Zhang Xiaoyang, Nie Tao. Analysis of CO2 displacement CH4 and storage effect in different stratified coals [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(4): 65-74. |
| [11] | Wang Lichuan, Xiao Hongwu, An Fenghua, Liu Yanlong, Wang Zhaofeng, Zhou Zongqing. Prevention and control technologies for abnormal gas emission in tunnel construction through unstable coal-bearing strata [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(4): 85-93. |
| [12] | ZHANG Jie, YANG Ke, FAN Chaochen. Prediction method of support load in coal mining face based on MTAM-LSTM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 144-152. |
| [13] | ZHANG Xiaoying, LIN Haifei, YAN Min, WANG Ruizhe, QIU Yue, ZHOU Xing. Experimental study on influence of ultrasonic stimulation on kinetic characteristics of gas diffusion in coal [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 153-161. |
| [14] | XIE Zunxian, MA Haohao, JIANG Song, WU Xiaoyun. Prediction of slope instability in open-pit mine waste dumps based on GA-BP neural network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 81-88. |
| [15] | ZHAO Bo. Risk assessment model for embankment slope failure in mining goafs [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 121-126. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||