Effects of emotion on safety behavior decision-making of low sensation seekers: evidence from ERPs

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.08.1213

Abstract

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of different incidental emotions on low sensation seekers' unsafe behavior decision-making process from a neural level, ERPs technique was used. The Chinese version of the Sensation Seeking Questionnaire for College Students was used to select low and medium sensation seekers (control group). Then, video clips were used as emotional stimulus materials to induce positive and negative emotions before the experiment, and a risk scenario task was set to perform risk decision-making experiments. The results indicated that when the emotional stimulus variable was not considered, there was no significant difference in safe behavior decision-making between the low sensation-seeking and the control groups. Under positive emotion, low sensation seekers maintained risk aversion. However, low sensation seekers were more likely to make unsafe behavior decisions regarding behavioral performance under negative emotion. Under negative emotion, the latency of LPP induced by low sensation seekers was delayed, indicating that the interference of negative emotion made it more difficult for individuals to classify and evaluate risks. Therefore, the intrinsic reasons for their external behavioral performance can be explained from a neural level. Therefore, emotions play a moderating role in the process of sensation seeking affecting safe behavior decision-making.

Key words: emotion, low sensation seeking, safe behavior decision-making, event-related potentials (ERPs), late positive potential (LPP)

CLC Number:

X910安全人体学

ZHANG Shu, YANG Qiyu, YU Xinrou, WANG Shuang, SHI Xiuzhi. Effects of emotion on safety behavior decision-making of low sensation seekers: evidence from ERPs[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(8): 43-52.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.5

References 33

[1]	HOLLNAGEL E. Human reliability analysis: context and control[M]. London: Academic Press, 1993:135-159.
[2]	孟加拉国客机在尼泊尔首都附近坠毁[EB/OL].(2018-03-12). https://www.chinanews.com.cn/tp/hd2011/2018/03-12/805705.shtml.
[3]	阳剑兰, 武影慧. 基于“安全阀理论”的城市公交司乘冲突应急管理研究:以重庆“10·28”公交坠江事件为例[J]. 交通企业管理, 2019, 34(5):86-89.
	YANG Jianlan, WU Yinghui. Research on emergency management of urban bus ride conflict based on safety valve theory: take the "10·28" bus crash in chongqing as an example[J]. Transportation Enterprise Management, 2019, 34(5):86-89.
[4]	SIMON H A. Reason in human affairs[M]. San Francisco: Stanford University, 1983: 29.
[5]	ZHAO Ding, GU Ruolei, TANG Ping, et al. Incidental emotions influence risk preference and outcome evaluation[J]. Psychophysiology, 2016, 52(10): 1 542-1 551.
[6]	JOHNSON E J, TVERSKY A. Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45: 20-31.
[7]	SAADAOUI H, EL H S, IBANEZ L. Do people trust more when they are happy or when they are sad? evidence from an experiment[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2019, 40(4): 374-383.
[8]	KUGLER T, CONNOLLY T, OEDONEEZ L D. Emotion, decision, and risk: berring on gambles versus betting on people[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2012, 25(2): 123-134.
[9]	张冰, 王垒, 朱婷, 等. 虚拟现实诱发恐惧情绪对风险决策的影响[J]. 职业与健康, 2019, 35(9):1 201-1 203,1 207.
	ZHANG Bing, WANG Lei, ZHU Ting, et al. Influence of fear induced by virtual reality on risk decision making[J]. Occupation and Health, 2019, 35(9):1 201-1 203,1 207.
[10]	魏卿. 情绪、特质情绪智力对风险决策影响的实验研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2011.
[11]	ZUCKERMAN M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994:2-3.
[12]	张敏. 高、低感觉寻求青少年对戒烟广告的认知反应及对心理健康教育的启示[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2012.
[13]	MOON J L, MIJA S. Fear versus humor: the impact of sensation seeking on physiological, cognitive, and emotional responses to antialcohol abuse messages[J]. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 2011, 145(2): 73-92.
[14]	刘耀中, 杨长华. 风险决策偏好的ERPs研究[J]. 西北师大学报:社会科学版, 2012, 49(2):128-132.
	LIU Yaozhong, YANG Changhua. The preference of risk decision-making: an ERPs study[J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University:Social Science, 2012, 49(2): 128-132.
[15]	ZHENG Yan, XU Jing, JIA Hongning, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of emotional processing in sensation seeking[J]. Biological Psychology, 2011, 88(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.06.006 pmid: 21726599
[16]	LEITE J, CARVALHO S, GALDO-ALVAREZ S, et al. Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2012, 83(3):375-381. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.005 pmid: 22226675
[17]	于凯, 邢强. 感觉寻求对风险决策影响的认知神经机制[J]. 广州大学学报:社会科学版, 2015, 14(4):22-28.
	YU Kai, XING Qiang. The effect of sensation seeking on the performance of risky decision-making: a study based on ERPs[J]. Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition, 2015, 14(4): 22-28.
[18]	ZHENG Ya, TAN Fei, XU Jing, et al. Diminished P300 to physical risk in sensation seeking[J]. Biological Psychology, 2015, 107: 44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.03.003 pmid: 25766263
[19]	DENG Xinmei, ZHANG Lin. Neural underpinnings of the relationships between sensation seeking and emotion regulation in adolescents[J]. International Journal of Psychology, 2022, 55(5):851-860.
[20]	赵闪. 大学生感觉寻求及其与心理健康关系的研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2004.
[21]	张舒, 王双, 史秀志. 不安全行为决策中情绪作用机理的脑电研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1):32-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.2435
	ZHANG Shu, WANG Shuang, SHI Xiuzhi. An EEG study on the mechanism of emotion in unsafe behavior decision-making[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1):32-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.2435
[22]	BRADLEY M M, LANG P J. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential[J]. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1994, 25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 pmid: 7962581
[23]	林玉莲. 环境心理学[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2000:64.
[24]	JOHNSON K J, WAUGH C E, FREDRICKSON B L. Smile to see the forest: facially expressed positive emotions broaden cognition[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 2010, 24(2):299-321.
[25]	刘兴宇, 杨伊生, 姜淞秀. 正性情绪影响注意广度的ERP研究[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报:自然科学汉文版, 2018, 47(6):538-543.
	LIU Xingyu, YANG Yisheng, JIANG Songxiu. A ERP research on the effect of positive affect on attentional scope[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Natural Science Edition, 2018, 47(6): 538-543.
[26]	ISEN A M, PATRIK R. The effects of positive feelings on risk taking: when the chips are down[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1983, 31:194-202.
[27]	DREISBACH G, GOSCHKE T. How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 2004, 30(2):343-353.
[28]	BALADA F, LUCAS I, BLANCH Á, et al. Neuroticism is associated with reduced oxygenation levels in the lateral prefrontal cortex following exposure to unpleasant images[J]. Physiology & Behavior, 2019, 199: 66-72.
[29]	JOSEPH J E, LIU Xun, JIANG Yang, et al. Neural correlates of emotional reactivity in sensation seeking[J]. Psychological Science, 2009, 20(2):215-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02283.x pmid: 19222814
[30]	SCHUPP H T, JUNGHOFER M, WEIKE A I, et al. The selective processing of brirfly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis[J]. Psychophysiology, 2004, 41(3):441-449.
[31]	BARTHOLOW B D, AMODIO D M. Using event-related brain potentials in social psychological research: a brief review and tutorial[M]. NewYork: Methods in Social Neuroscience, 2009:198-232.
[32]	KOK A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity[J]. Psychophysiology, 2001, 38(3):557-577. doi: 10.1017/s0048577201990559 pmid: 11352145
[33]	HAJCAK G, MACNAMARA A, OLVET D M. Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: an integrative review[J]. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2010, 35(2):129-155. doi: 10.1080/87565640903526504 pmid: 20390599

变异来源		平方和	自由度	均方	F	p值
组内	情绪类型	0.03	1	0.03	5.026^*	0.039
	情绪类型×感觉寻求类型	0.033	1	0.033	5.570^*	0.031
	误差(情绪类型)	0.096	16	0.006	—	—
组间	感觉寻求类型	0.379	1	0.379	4.033	0.062
组间	误差	1.503	16	0.094	—	—

变异来源		平方和	自由度	均方	F	p
组内	情绪类型	243 157.472	1	243 157.472	57.092^***	0
	情绪类型×感觉寻求类型	13 793.72	1	13 793.72	3.239	0.091
	误差(情绪类型)	68 144.622	16	4 259.039	—	—
组间	感觉寻求类型	1 786.753	1	1 786.753	0.051	0.824
组间	误差	560 726.347	16	35 045.397	—	—

变异来源		平方和	自由度	均方	F	p
组内	情绪类型	10.270	1	10.270	3.035	0.101
	情绪类型×感觉寻求类型	15.933	1	15.933	4.709^*	0.045
	误差(情绪类型)	54.140	16	3.384	—	—
	电极点	138.213	2	69.107	11.485^***	0.000
	电极点×感觉寻求类型	8.141	2	4.070	0.676	0.516
	误差(电极点)	192.556	32	6.017	—	—
	情绪类型×电极点	1.767	2	0.884	7.820^**	0.002
	情绪类型×电极点×感觉寻求	0.119	2	0.060	0.528	0.595
	误差(情绪类型×电极点)	3.616	32	0.113	—	—
组间	感觉寻求类型	0.709	1	0.709	0.012	0.913
组间	误差	918.643	16	57.415	—	—

变异来源		平方和	自由度	均方	F	p
组内	情绪类型	10 005.356	1	10 005.356	1.687	0.212
	情绪类型×感觉寻求类型	38 661.356	1	38 661.356	6.518^*	0.021
	误差(情绪类型)	94 910.489	16	5 931.906	—	—
	电极点	179 169.333	4	4 4792.333	9.776^***	0.000
	电极点×感觉寻求类型	7 752.889	4	1 938.222	0.423	0.791
	误差(电极点)	29 3247.378	64	4 581.990	—	—
	情绪类型×电极点	6 110.756	4	1 527.689	0.813	0.522
	情绪类型×电极点×感觉寻求	17 218.756	4	4 304.689	2.290	0.069
	误差(情绪类型×电极点)	120 331.289	64	1 880.176	—	—
组间	感觉寻求类型	3 125.000	1	3 125.000	0.114	0.740
组间	误差	439 822.844	16	27 488.928	—	—