基于FAHP法的连续多跨渡槽拆除爆破安全评价

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.010

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 67-74.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.010

基于FAHP法的连续多跨渡槽拆除爆破安全评价

张志雄^1,2 高级工程师, 叶雪云^**3 高级工程师, 殷志强⁴ 副教授, 刘洋⁵, 蓝声宁^1,2

1 北部湾大学建筑工程学院,广西钦州 535011;
2 钦州市结构健康检测工程技术研究中心,广西钦州 535011;
3 北部湾大学电子与信息工程学院,广西钦州 535011;
4 安徽理工大学能源与安全学院,安徽淮南 232001;
5 安徽建筑大学土木工程学院, 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2020-08-16 修回日期:2020-10-13 出版日期:2020-11-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: **叶雪云(1980—),女,广东湛江人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事数值模拟及计算机应用技术方面的研究。E-mail:892780089@qq.com。
作者简介:张志雄 (1980—),男,湖南衡阳人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事爆破施工技术与理论方面的研究。E-mail:120775051@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51874006,51604006);广西自然科学基金项目(2019JJA160090);广西中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2020KY10027)。

Safety evaluation of continuous multi-span aqueduct's demolition blasting based on FAHP method

ZHANG Zhixiong^1,2, YE Xueyun³, YIN Zhiqiang⁴, LIU Yang⁵, LAN Shengning^1,2

1 College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beibu Gulf University,Qinzhou Guangxi 535011, China;
2 Qinzhou Structural Health Inspection Engineering Technology Research Center, Qinzhou Guangxi 535011, China;
3 College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou Guangxi 535011, China;
4 School of Mining and Safety, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China;
5 School of Civil Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei Anhui 230601, China

Received:2020-08-16 Revised:2020-10-13 Online:2020-11-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为有效控制爆破危害因素,以连续多跨渡槽复杂结构拆除爆破为研究对象,利用模糊层次分析法(FAHP),构建渡槽拆除爆破安全评价模型;建立三角模糊函数以定量刻画比较强度,通过定义相应矩阵运算获得不同层级影响因素的权重及隶属度,分析获得安全评价对象的评价等级。研究表明:FAHP定量评估拆除爆破的安全风险,并获得影响因素的权重及其重要度排序;迎春渡槽安全评价综合得分为75.18分,评定为“较安全”等级;从而完成爆破设计参数优化,提高钻孔、断点位置、预处理等环节施工质量。

关键词: 模糊层次分析法(FAHP), 连续多跨, 渡槽, 拆除爆破, 安全评价

Abstract: In order to effectively control blasting hazard factors, with demolition blasting of continuous multi-span aqueduct's complex structure as research object, a safety evaluation model of its demolition blasting was established by using FAHP method. Then, a triangular fuzzy function was developed to quantitatively describe comparative strength. Finally, weight and membership degree of influencing factors at different levels were obtained by defining corresponding matrix operation, and safety evaluation grade of the object was analyzed. The results show that FAHP quantitatively evaluates safety risk of demolition blasting, and obtains weight and importance ranking of influencing factors. And comprehensive assessment score of the object is 75.18, rated as "relatively safe". Blasting design parameters are optimized, and construction quality of drilling, breakpoint location and pretreatment is improved.

Key words: fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP), continuous multi-span, aqueduct, demolition blasting, safety evaluation

中图分类号:

X932

张志雄, 叶雪云, 殷志强, 刘洋, 蓝声宁. 基于FAHP法的连续多跨渡槽拆除爆破安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 67-74.

ZHANG Zhixiong, YE Xueyun, YIN Zhiqiang, LIU Yang, LAN Shengning. Safety evaluation of continuous multi-span aqueduct's demolition blasting based on FAHP method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11): 67-74.

参考文献

[1] 吴波, 兰扬斌, 杨建新, 等. 新建隧道爆破对临近隧道振动特性的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 89-95.
WU Bo, LAN Yangbin, YANG Jianxin, et al. Influence of new tunnel blasting on vibration characteristics of adjacent existing tunnel[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(11): 89-95.
[2] 蒋开春. 明月峡长江大桥水下中深孔爆破安全技术研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2019, 36(7):44-47,91.
JIANG Kaichun. Research on the underwater medium-deep hole blasting safety technology for Mingyuexia Yantze River Bridge[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2019, 36(7):44-47,91.
[3] 张志雄, 郭银领, 李林峰.切缝药包爆破裂纹扩展机理研究[J]. 工程爆破, 2007, 13(2): 11-14.
ZHANG Zhixiong, GUO Yinling, LI Linfeng. Study on mechanism of crack growth of cutting seam cartridge blasting[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2007, 13(2): 11-14.
[4] 骆浩浩, 李祥龙, 王建国, 等. 井下大爆破直通巷道冲击波超压的预测研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(3): 57-62.
LUO Haohao, LI Xianglong, WANG Jianguo, et al. Study on peak overpressure prediction of underground blasting shock waves on straight-through roadways[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(3): 57-62.
[5] 于文贵. 我国安全评价现状分析及对策的思考[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2010,20(1):56-60.
YU Wengui. Current situation of safety assessment work in China and its countermeasures[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010,20(1):56-60.
[6] 王丹丹, 章光, 高光明, 等. 基于模糊层次分析法的高楼拆除爆破安全评价[J]. 工程爆破, 2017, 23(4): 48-53.
WANG Dandan, ZHANG Guang, GAO Guangming,et al. Safety evaluation of the high rise building demolition blasting based on fuzzy-AHP[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2017, 23(4): 48-53.
[7] 张黎明, 池恩安, 赵明生, 等. 模糊综合评价法在岩土爆破安全评价中的应用[J]. 工程爆破, 2015,21(2): 13-17.
ZHANG Liming, CHI En'an, ZHAO Mingsheng, et al. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evalution in rock-soil blasting safety assessment[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2015,21(2): 13-17.
[8] 赵珂劼, 张义平,池恩安,等.改进AHP-模糊综合评价在工程爆破安全评价中的应用[J].中国矿业,2019,28(8): 160-164.
ZHAO Kejie, ZHANG Yiping, CHI En'an, et al. Application of improved AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in safety evaluation of engineering blasting[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2019,28(8): 160-164.
[9] 韩利, 梅强, 陆玉梅,等. AHP-模糊综合评价方法的分析与研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(7):89-92.
HAN Li, MEI Qiang, LU Yumei, et al. Analysis and study on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2004, 14(7):89-92.
[10] 李建强. 132 m渡槽爆破拆除[J]. 爆破,2010,27(2): 71-73,102.
LI Jianqiang. Explosive demolition of 132m aqueduct[J]. Blasting, 2010, 27(2):71-73,102.
[11] 张志雄,叶雪云,李庆,等.跨公路线双肋拱U型渡槽拆除爆破[J].工程爆破, 2020,26(4): 53-58.
ZHANG Zhixiong, YE Xueyun, LI Qing, et al. Demolition blasting of double rib arch U-shaped aqueduct across highway[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2020, 26(4): 53-58.
[12] CHANG Dayong. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 95(3): 649-655.
[13] BUCKLEY J J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 17(3): 233-247.
[14] ALI E, WILLIAM H O. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York, CRC Press, 2018: 45-72.
[15] VEERABTHIRAN R, SRINATH K A. Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP[J]. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology,2012,7,4(7): 3 472-3 480.
[16] SHIKHA V, SHARAD C. Integration of fuzzy reasoning approach (FRA) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for risk assessment in mining industry[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 2014,7(5): 1 347-1 367.
[17] GB 6722—2014, 爆破安全规程[S].
GB 6722-2014, Safety regulations for blasting [S].
[18] AQ 8001—2007, 安全评价通则[S].
AQ 8001-2007, General principle of safety assessment [S].

基于FAHP法的连续多跨渡槽拆除爆破安全评价

Safety evaluation of continuous multi-span aqueduct's demolition blasting based on FAHP method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张琦, 王月峰, 李建春, 张斌, 徐江讲师. 深基坑紧邻地铁隧道安全评价方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 95-104.
[2]	刘啸奔, 王宝栋, 张东, 张宏. 地表载荷作用下含缺陷燃气管道安全评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 127-135.
[3]	周雪, 左忠义, 程伟. 基于组合赋权云模型的铁路旅客运输安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 158-164.
[4]	江欣国, 任瀚堃, 范英飞, 李想, 付川云. 信号协调控制干线交通安全仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 143-149.
[5]	贺莹鸽, 连民杰, 江松, 苏梦哲. 矿工习惯性违章行为风险态势评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 62-69.
[6]	贡力, 康春涛, 王鸿, 杨轶群, 王忠慧. 盐冻耦合侵蚀作用下寒旱地区渡槽劣化机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 43-52.
[7]	宋雨欣. GUI下的高速铁路客运站安全评价系统^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 134-137.
[8]	李程睿, 赵明, 尹盼盼, 刘美池, 马乐陶. 高速铁路客运站安全评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 149-153.
[9]	邬春兰, 宋雨欣, 李晨. 高铁列车客运安全评价及风险管控^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 150-157.
[10]	伍毅敏, 蔡直言, 傅鹤林, 徐文浩, 戴路生, 马哲. 基于精细化模型的初期支护安全性评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 168-172.
[11]	王康, 董四辉. 轨道交通车辆系统安全评价云模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 51-56.
[12]	冯亚娟, 都思竹, 张竞一. 基于EW-SPA的装配式建筑施工安全评价及预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 85-90.
[13]	宋博. DEA-BP神经网络下地铁车站深基坑施工安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 91-96.
[14]	刘美池, 尹盼盼, 荣文竽. 基于模糊模式识别的高铁快运安全综合评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 149-154.
[15]	李忠源, 荣文竽, 陈滋顶. 基于可变模糊集理论的铁路行包运输安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S1): 186-190.