核电厂操纵员人因失误影响因素分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.07.008

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 42-47.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.07.008

核电厂操纵员人因失误影响因素分析

李鹏程¹ 副教授, 陈国华² 教授, 张力^1,3, 戴立操¹, 蒋建军¹

1 南华大学人因研究所,湖南衡阳 421001;
2 华南理工大学安全工程研究所,广东广州 510641;
3 湖南工学院人因与安全管理研究所,湖南衡阳 421002

收稿日期:2017-04-13 修回日期:2017-06-08 发布日期:2020-11-26
作者简介:李鹏程 (1978—),男,湖南邵阳人,博士,副教授,主要从事人因工程、系统安全评价和核电厂HRA研究。E-mail:lipengcheng0615@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71371070, 71301069, 51674145);湖南省自然科学基金资助 (2017JJ2222);湖南省社会科学基金资助(16YBA314);教育部人文社会科学基金资助(11YJC630207)。

Analysis of influencing factors triggering operator's error in nuclear power plants

LI Pengcheng¹, CHEN Guohua², ZHANG Li^1,2, DAI Licao¹, JIANG Jianjun¹

1 Institute of Human Factor, University of South China, Hengyang Hunan 421001,China;
2 Institute of Safety Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong 510641,China;
3 Institute of Human Factor and Safety Management, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang Hunan 421002,China

Received:2017-04-13 Revised:2017-06-08 Published:2020-11-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究核电厂操纵员的行为影响因素 (PIFs)以及它们间的关联关系,通过文献分析,从组织视角建立比较全面具体的PIFs分类体系。统计分析核电厂大量人因事件,识别影响操纵员人因失误的重要因素。基于人因事件样本数据,对PIFs进行相关性分析,研究PIFs之间的相互影响关系。研究表明:影响核电厂操纵员的主要因素为个体因素中的心理状态、素质和能力,情境环境因素中的规程、培训和组织管理等因素;个体因素受各种情境环境因素的影响,但不同的个体因素与各种情境环境因素的影响关系不同,如心理状态主要受人的素质和能力、技术系统等影响,而人的生理状态主要受工作环境、班组因素和组织结构等影响。

关键词: 行为影响因素(PIFs), 人因失误, 组织因素, 相关性分析, 核电厂

Abstract: The paper was aimed at identifying PIFs of operators in nuclear power plants and studying interrelationships between them. A relatively comprehensive and specific classification system of PIFs was built from the perspective of organization after literature survey. Important factors impacting operator's error were identified by analysis of human factor events in nuclear power plants. Correlation analyses between PIFs were carried out based on the sample data on human factor events, relationships between PIFs were studied. The results show that the main factors influencing operators are psychological state, quality and capacity of operators belonging to individual factors, and procedures, training and organizational management belonging to contextual factors etc, and that individual factors are influenced by various contextual factors, but the influencing relationships are diffierent between the contextual factor and various individual factors, for example, human psychological state is mainly influenced by person's quality and ability, technical system and so on, and human physiological state is mainly influenced by work environment, team factors and organizational structure and so on.

Key words: performance influencing factors (PIFs), human error, organizational factors, correlation analysis, nuclear power plants

中图分类号:

X913

李鹏程, 陈国华, 张力, 戴立操, 蒋建军. 核电厂操纵员人因失误影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(7): 42-47.

LI Pengcheng, CHEN Guohua, ZHANG Li, DAI Licao, JIANG Jianjun. Analysis of influencing factors triggering operator's error in nuclear power plants[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(7): 42-47.

参考文献

[1] DOUGHERTY E. Context and human reliability analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993, 41:25-47.
[2] SWAIN A D,GUTTMANN H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications[R]. NUREG/CR-1278, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1983.
[3] HOLLNAGEL E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method[M]. Oxford, UK:Elsevier Science Ltd.,1998:178-196.
[4] CHANG Y H J,MOSLEH A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. part 2:IDAC performance influencing factors model[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007,92(8):1 014-1 040.
[5] 武淑平.电力企业生产中人因失误影响因素及管理对策研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2009.
WU Shuping. Study on the influencing factors triggering human error and management countermeasures in electric power enterprises[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2009.
[6] 蒋英杰,孙志强, 宫二玲, 等. 一种系统化的行为形成因子分类方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(10):20-25.
JIANG Yingjie, SUN Zhiqiang, GONG Erling, et al. A systematic classification method of performance shaping factors[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2010,20(10):20-25.
[7] CHANG Y H J,MOSLEH A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(8):1 061-1 075.
[8] 席永涛, 陈伟炯, 张晓东,等.基于DEMATEL方法的海运行为形成因子影响关系分析[J].中国安全科学学报, 2012,22(4):14-19.
XI Yongtao, CHEN Weijiong,ZHANG Xiaodong, et al. Dependency analysis of marine performance shaping factor based on DEMATEL method[J].China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(4):14-19.
[9] 李龙,蒋英杰,孙志强,等.行为形成因子与人为差错模式的定性关联分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(1):3-10.
LI Long, JIANG Yingjie, SUN Zhiqiang, et al.Qualitative correlation analysis between performance shaping factors and human error mode[J].China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(1):3-10.
[10] EMBREY D E. SLIM-MAUD: a computer-based technique for human reliability assessment[J].International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,1986, 3(1):5-12.
[11] WILLIAMSJ C. A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors in Nuclear Power Plants,1988:436-450.
[12] USNRC. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA) [R]. NUREG/CR-1624, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,2000.
[13] STRÄTER O. Evaluation of human reliability on the basis of operational experience[D]. Munich:Society for Plant and Reactor Safety (GRS), 2000.
[14] DANG V N. Modeling operator cognition for accident sequence analysis: development of an operator-plant simulation[D]. Cambridge Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996.
[15] GERTMAN D,BLACKMAN H,MARBLE J,et al. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method[R]. NUREG/CR-6883, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005.
[16] KOLACAKOWSKI A,FORESTER J,LOIS E,et al. Good practices for implementing human reliability analysis(HRA)[R]. NUREG-1792, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005.
[17] O'HARE J M,BROWN W S,LEWIS P M,et al. Human-system interface design review guidelines[R].NUREG-0700, Nuclear Regulatory Commission,2002.
[18] 李鹏程, 肖东生, 陈国华, 等. 高风险系统组织因素分类与绩效评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(2): 140-147.
LI Pengcheng, XIAO Dongsheng,CHEN Guohua, et al. The classification of organizational factors and performance assessment for high risk systems[J].China Safety Science Journal,2009, 19(2): 140-147.
[19] 李鹏程. 核电厂数字化控制系统中人因失误与可靠性研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2011.
LI Pengcheng.Study on human error and reliability in digital control systems of nuclear power plalnts[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology,2011.
[20] 张力, 邹衍华, 黄卫刚. 核电站运行事件人误因素交互作用分析[J]. 核动力工程, 2010, 31(6): 41-46.
ZHANG Li,ZOU Yanhua,HUANG Weigang.Interactive analysis of human error factors in NPP operation events[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2010, 31(6): 41-46.

核电厂操纵员人因失误影响因素分析

Analysis of influencing factors triggering operator's error in nuclear power plants

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于士康, 吴晓莉, 冯慧慧. 核电厂监控显示界面中警示线路信息突显研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 106-112.
[2]	秦帅. 高校社会实践安全风险影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 18-23.
[3]	王志如, 高林源, 王敏. 无序多分类Logistic回归的地铁扶梯事故特征分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 114-120.
[4]	牛莉霞, 刘洁, 李乃文. 人因失误驱动力SBM跨层次模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 43-51.
[5]	张亚, 张明广, 钱城江, 赵瑶. 基于SD的HEP仿真建模分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(3): 89-94.
[6]	成连华, 郑庆, 郭慧敏, 严瑾, 周瑞雪. 基于累积效应的事故进程研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 35-39.
[7]	张欣欣, 胡甚平, 陈渊, 王明世. 船舶港口引航风险致因人-组织因素影响分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 78-84.
[8]	张力, 夏娅雯, 李鹏程, 李秋香, 刘建桥. 核电厂建造施工班组安全氛围影响机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 138-143.
[9]	夏娅雯, 张力, 李鹏程, 李秋香, 刘建桥. 核电厂建造施工班组安全氛围测量量表研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 159-164.
[10]	高畅, 苑景凯, 张坤, 王永, 邹金强. 系列间切换中多因素对核电厂RRI系统压力的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 138-143.
[11]	菅美英, 石京. 老年驾驶员跟驰行为及影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(6): 25-30.
[12]	陈雪锋, 陈文涛. 建筑工人安全态度及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 31-36.
[13]	张津嘉, 许开立, 王延瞳, 王犇, 李力, 李春辉. 特别重大瓦斯爆炸事故致因机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 48-52.
[14]	李鹏程，陈国华，张力，戴立操，陈青青. 基于ANFIS的人因失误风险严重度识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(1): 72-.
[15]	林文闻，黄淑萍. 基于贝叶斯网络的组织因素对船员疲劳的影响分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(6): 26-.