中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 24-29.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.005

• 安全系统学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于PSO-ELM-Boosting模型的底板破坏深度预测

邵良杉 教授, 周玉   

  1. 辽宁工程技术大学 系统工程研究所,辽宁 葫芦岛 125100
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-15 修回日期:2018-03-20 出版日期:2018-04-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
  • 作者简介:邵良杉(1961—),男,辽宁凌源人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿业系统工程、数据挖掘等方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail:lntushao@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(71371091, 7177111);辽宁省社会规划基金资助(L14BTJ004)。

Prediction of destroyed floor depth based on SO-ELM-Boosting model

SHAO Liangshan, ZHOU Yu   

  1. System Engineering Institute,Liaoning Technical University,Huludao Liaoning 125100,China
  • Received:2018-01-15 Revised:2018-03-20 Online:2018-04-28 Published:2020-09-28

摘要: 为准确预测煤层底板采动破坏深度,在分析底板破坏深度主要影响因素的基础上确定评判指标;以经粒子群优化算法(PSO)优化输入权值和隐层阈值的极限学习机(ELM)为基预测器,以Boosting算法为集成学习框架,构建基于PSO-ELM-Boosting的底板破坏深度强预测模型;比较不同ELM隐层节点与基预测器个数组合对模型预测精度的影响,2次筛选确定二者的最优组合,并控制样本权值避免发生“权值扩充”现象;选取64组底板破坏深度实测数据为试验样本,对比分析PSO-ELM-Boosting模型与其他集成学习模型的预测准确率。结果表明:PSO-ELM-Boosting模型具有更好的平均绝对误差百分比(4.54%)、均方误差(0.4292m2)和拟合优度(0.9565),验证了PSO-ELM-Boosting模型的有效性。

关键词: 底板破坏深度, Boosting算法, 集成学习, 极限学习机(ELM), 粒子群优化算法(PSO)

Abstract: In order to predict seam destroyed floor depth accurately, firstly, main factors affecting destroyed floor depth were identified to futher determine the evaluation indicators on the basis of a comprehensive analysis. ELM optimizing the input weights and hidden layer bias by PSO was chosen as a base predictor, Boosting as a ensemble learning framework, and a strong predictor model was built for destroyed floor depth based on PSO-ELM-Boosting theory. Then, effect of combination of ELM hidden layer nodes and base predictor number on the prediction result was studied, and the most superior combination of both was obtained. Besides, the "weight expansion" issues were avoided by controlling the weight of sample. Finally, according to the 64 available data from destroyed floor depth measurement, a series of experiments were carried out to compare and analyze the prediction results obtained by using the PSO-ELM-Boosting model and others. The experimental results show that the PSO-ELM-Boosting model has lower mean absolute percentage error(4.54%), mean squared error(0.429 2 m2) and higher R2 (0.956 5),which illustrates the effectiveness of the PSO-ELM-Boosting model.

Key words: destroyed floor depth, Boosting algorithm, ensemble learning, extreme learning machine (ELM), particle swarm optimization(PSO)

中图分类号: