大客车正面碰撞乘客约束系统仿真分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.019

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 135-141.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.019

大客车正面碰撞乘客约束系统仿真分析

司俊德¹ 高级工程师, 李建平², 张博强¹ 高级工程师, 孙明英² 高级工程师

1 河南工业大学机电工程学院,河南郑州450001;
2 郑州宇通股份有限公司,河南郑州450001

收稿日期:2020-12-06 修回日期:2021-02-07 出版日期:2021-03-28 发布日期:2021-12-20
作者简介:司俊德 (1982—),男,河南荥阳人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事汽车碰撞安全技术方面的工作。E-mail: sijunde@haut.edu.cn。
基金资助:
郑州市重点攻关项目(141PZDGG115);河南工业大学高层次人才基金资助(2019BS062)。

Simulation analysis of passenger restraint system in coach frontal collision

SI Junde¹, LI Jianping², ZHANG Boqiang¹, SUN Mingying²

1 School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou Henan 450001, China;
2 Zhengzhou Yutong Bus Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou Henan 450001, China

Received:2020-12-06 Revised:2021-02-07 Online:2021-03-28 Published:2021-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究约束系统在全承载客车正面碰撞事故中对乘客损伤的影响,利用有限元分析软件LS_DYNA建立某大客车正面碰撞仿真模型,并开展整车50 km/h 正面100%重叠碰撞固定刚性壁障试验;从车身变形、加速度曲线和乘员损伤等3方面验证仿真模型;基于已验证的仿真模型,开展不同座椅间距、车厢位置及安全带类型的乘员运动响应和损伤等综合分析与评价。研究结果表明:不同位置车身加速度波形整体趋势相似,但具体峰值和出现时刻存在差异;增大座椅间距和主动预紧安全带能够有效降低降低头部损伤值,而颈部损伤则随之增大;乘客胸部损伤值和大腿力受主动预紧安全带、座椅间距和车厢位置影响不大。

关键词: 大客车, 正面碰撞, 约束系统, 乘员损伤, 仿真分析

Abstract: In order to study impacts of restraint system on occupant injury in a frontal collision of a coach, a simulation model of frontal crash was built by using LS_DYAN, and a crash experiment was performed at 50 km/h with 100% of coach front striking a rigid barrier. Then, the simulation model was validated against crash-test in terms of vehicle deformation, acceleration, and occupant injury. Finally, based on verified model, comprehensive analysis and evaluation were carried out on occupant motion response and injury for conditions, including different seat pitch, carriage position, and seat belt type. The results show that overall trend of acceleration time-history at different positions is similar, but specific peak and its timing are different. Increasing seat pitch and active pretension seatbelt can effectively reduce value of head injury while raise that of neck injury. Chest injury value and femur force of passengers are not greatly affected by active pretension seatbelt, seat pitch, and carriage position.

Key words: coach, frontal crash, restraint system, occupant injury, simulation analysis

中图分类号:

X924.4

司俊德, 李建平, 张博强, 孙明英. 大客车正面碰撞乘客约束系统仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 135-141.

SI Junde, LI Jianping, ZHANG Boqiang, SUN Mingying. Simulation analysis of passenger restraint system in coach frontal collision[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(3): 135-141.

参考文献

[1] 吴长风. 承载式公路客车车身正面碰撞安全性设计方法研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2019.
WU Changfeng. Research on safety design method for front collision of monocoque bus body[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2019.
[2] 陆欢,戢晓峰,杨文臣,等. 高原山区公路环境下交通事故形态致因分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(5): 44-49.
LU Huan, JI Xiaofeng, YANG Wenchen, et al. Cause analysis of different patterns of traffic accidents on plateau mountain roads[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(5): 44-49.
[3] 周登科.客车前撞吸能特性与乘员损伤机理的研究[D]. 长沙:湖南大学,2016.
ZHOU Dengke. The study on coach energy-absorbing characteristics and injury mechanism of occupant under frontal crash[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2016.
[4] 国务院陕西安康京昆高速“8·10”特别重大道路交通事故调查组. 陕西安康京昆高速“8·10”特别重大道路交通事故调查报告[R],2018.
[5] 国务院长深高速江苏无锡“9·28”特别重大道路交通事故调查组. 长深高速江苏无锡“9·28”特别重大道路交通事故调查报告[R],2020.
[6] 余泽.大客车正面碰撞乘员运动响应及损伤特征研究[D].西安:长安大学,2019.
YU Ze. A study on the occupant dynamic response and injury characters in frontal impact of coach[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University,2019.
[7] NHTSA's motorcoach safety research crash, sled, and static tests[EB/OL]. (2010-05-20). https://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NVS/Vehicle%20Research%20&%20Test%20Center%20(VRTC)/cw/811335.pdf.
[8] KUZNETCOV A. Effect of acceleration time history in motorcoach frontal collision on passenger safety under uncertainty of seating posture [D]. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, 2017.
[9] 曹立波,欧阳志高,郜亢,等. 主动预紧式安全带控制系统的实现[J]. 汽车工程,2016,38(11):1 300-1 304,1 299.
CAO Libo, OUYANG Zhigao, GAO Kang, et al. The implementation of control system for active pre-tensioning safety belt[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2016, 38(11): 1 300-1 304,1 299.
[10] JT/T 1094—2016,营运客车安全技术条件[S].
JT/T 1094-2016,Safety specifications for commercial bus[S].
[11] 颜长征,王若璜,张科峰. 基于GB13057的客车座椅结构对乘员伤害的分析[J].机械研究与应用,2020,33(2): 160-163.
YAN Changzheng, WANG Ruohuang, ZHANG Kefeng. Analysis on occupant injury caused by structure of coach seat based on GB 13057[J]. Mechanical Research & Application, 2020,33(2): 160-163.
[12] 应龙,葛如海,张学荣. 小学校车正面碰撞下乘员约束系统安全性仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(6): 40-45.
YING Long,GE Ruhai,ZHANG Xuerong. Research on occupant restraint system safety in school bus front crash[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(6): 40-45.
[13] European Commission. ECBOS-enhanced coach and bus occupant safety final report[R],2006.
[14] 司俊德,崔崇桢,李建平,等. 正面碰撞事故中大客车乘员损伤影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(6): 183-188.
SI Junde, CUI Chongzhen, LI Jianping, et al. Analysis on influencing factors of coach occupants injury in frontal crash accident[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020,16(6): 183-188.
[15] KUZNETCOV A, TELICHEV I. Influence of comfortable seating posture on safety of motorcoach passengers in frontal collisions: a numerical study[J]. Safety Science, 2019,113: 1-8.
[16] JT/T 325—2018,营运客车类型划分及等级评定[S].
JT/T 325-2018,Type dividing and class rating for commercial motor-vehicles of passenger transport[S].

大客车正面碰撞乘客约束系统仿真分析

Simulation analysis of passenger restraint system in coach frontal collision

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王秋红, 王力文, 蒋军成, 张明广, 李鑫. 城镇地埋天然气管道泄漏诱发气云爆炸仿真^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 75-82.
[2]	周华, 彭一峻, 刘卓异, 张道文, 尹均. 约束系统对不同体型女性驾驶人的保护研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 76-82.
[3]	彭聪, 张道文, 杨苓, 刘卓异. 偏置碰撞中轿车左后排乘员损伤的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(3): 21-26.
[4]	张鹏, 张道文, 肖凌云, 彭一峻, 杨苓. 男性行人与SUV正碰后的运动形态及损伤研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 25-30.
[5]	王树凤, 张大伟, 刘宗锋. 极限工况下汽车正面碰撞事故损伤度预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 37-42.
[6]	张光辉, 张道文, 肖凌云, 冉启林, 张鹏. 轿车斜角碰撞后排左侧乘员损伤仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 38-43.
[7]	赵俊茹, 白伟, 陈靖, 戴光. 油气罐区安全水平影响因子SD仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(6): 43-48.
[8]	唐灿, 李平飞, 黄海波, 刘娜, 周明. 汽车正面碰撞中驾驶人坐姿对其损伤影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 54-58.
[9]	张鹏, 张道文, 尹均, 王鑫. 电动自行车与汽车侧面碰撞对骑车人的损伤研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 13-18.
[10]	洪亮,, 傅靖江, 周海超. 正面40%偏置碰撞中约束系统对女性驾驶员的保护研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 36-41.
[11]	李浩然，吴超仲，褚端峰，谢飞，乐中耀，黄珍. 基于K均值聚类的高速公路汽车碰撞事故分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(11): 91-.
[12]	王洪德，莫朝霞. 基于高斯模型的液氨储罐泄漏扩散仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(9): 31-.
[13]	徐滢，叶永峰，蒋燕锋，胡群芳. 地铁车站人员安全疏散仿真理论分析与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(3): 39-.
[14]	何刚，张国枢，陈清华，乔国通. 煤矿安全生产中人的行为影响因子系统动力学(SD)仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(9): 43-.
[15]	周孔亢，张文娜，揭琳峰，刘韶庆，杨启耀. 汽车儿童约束系统的误用讨论[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(2): 30-.