角色压力对员工安全行为影响的元分析:主管支持的调节作用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.05.0079

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明晰角色压力对员工安全行为的影响机制,运用元分析方法,统计分析现有35篇实证文献中的37个独立样本,剖析角色压力(角色冲突、角色模糊和角色超载)、主管支持与员工安全行为(安全任务行为和安全情境行为)之间的作用关系,并探讨经济发展水平和行业类型在角色压力与安全行为之间的调节作用。结果表明:角色冲突、角色模糊和角色超载负向影响员工安全行为,其中角色模糊对员工安全行为影响最大,并且对安全情境行为的影响大于安全任务行为;主管支持正向影响员工安全行为,并分别在角色冲突、角色模糊、角色超载和安全任务行为之间以及角色模糊和安全情境行为之间起到调节作用;在发展中经济和高危行业条件下,员工的安全行为比成熟经济和一般行业更容易受到角色压力的影响。

关键词: 角色压力, 员工安全行为, 元分析, 主管支持, 角色冲突, 角色模糊, 角色超载

Abstract:

In order to clarify impact mechanism of role stress on employees' safety behavior, meta-analysis was used to analyze relationship between role stress (role conflict, role ambiguity and role overload), supervisor support and employees' safety behavior (safety task behavior and safety contextual behavior) by statistically integrating 37 independent samples from 35 empirical studies. Then, moderating effects of economic development levels and industry types were investigated. The results show that role conflict, role ambiguity and role overload negatively affect employees' safety behavior, among which role ambiguity has the greatest impact on it, and also a greater impact on safety contextual behavior than on safety task behavior. However, supervisor support positively affects such behavior, and plays a moderating role between role conflict, role ambiguity, role overload and safety task behavior, as well as between role ambiguity and safety contextual behavior respectively. Moreover, employees' safety behavior is more vulnerable to role stress in developing economies and high-risk industries than in mature economies and general industries.

Key words: role stress, employees' safety behavior, meta-analysis, supervisor support, role conflict, role ambiguity, role overload

陈巧, 刘素霞, 梅强, 张菁菁. 角色压力对员工安全行为影响的元分析:主管支持的调节作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 21-27.

CHEN Qiao, LIU Suxia, MEI Qiang, ZHANG Jingjing. Meta-analysis on impacts of role stress on employees' safety behavior:moderating effect of supervisor support[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 21-27.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 30

[1]	FANG Dongping, WU Chunlin, WU Haojie. Impact of the supervisor on worker safety behavior in construction projects[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2015, 31(6): DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000355. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000355
[2]	SAMPSON J M, DEARMOND S, CHEN P Y. Role of safety stressors and social support on safety performance[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 64(3):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.025
[3]	ZHU Yongyue, QUANSAH P E, OBENG A F, et al. Investigating the effects of role demands, psychosocial stress symptoms and safety leadership on mineworkers' safety performance[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2020, 13:419-436. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S245142 pmid: 32494209
[4]	SARGENT L D, TERRY D J. The moderating role of social support in Karasek's job strain model[J]. Work Stress, 2000, 14:245-261. doi: 10.1080/02678370010025568
[5]	PUAH L N, ONG L D, CHONG W Y. The effects of perceived organizational support, perceived supervisor support and perceived co-worker support on safety and health compliance[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2016, 22(3):333-339. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1159390
[6]	DELLA R H, LIRN T C, SHANG K C. The study of safety behavior in ferry transport[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 131(5):1-12.
[7]	GRIFFIN M A, NEAL A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2000, 5(3):347-358. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
[8]	LIU Suxia, YANG Xu, MEI Qiang. The effect of perceived organizational support for safety and organizational commitment on employee safety behavior: a meta-analysis[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2019: DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2019.1694778. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2019.1694778
[9]	陈华仲, 刘素霞, 梅强. 安全领导力对员工安全行为影响的元分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5):7-13. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.002
	CHEN Huazhong, LIU Suxia, MEI Qiang. Meta-analysis on impact of safety leadership on employees' safety behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(5):7-13. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.002
[10]	CURCURUTO M, GRIFIN M A. Prosocial and proactive "safety citizenship behaviour"(SCB): the mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 104:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.010
[11]	刘晴, 王文顺, 王建平. 基于扎根理论的安全公民行为影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(2):26-31.
	LIU Qing, WANG Wenshun, WANG Jianping. Research on factors affecting construction workers' SCB based on grounded theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(2):26-31.
[12]	ROY D F, KAHN R L, WOLFE D M, et al. Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity[J]. American Sociological Review, 1965, 10(1):DOI: 10.2307/2091375. doi: 10.2307/2091375
[13]	崔楠, 胡洋红, 徐岚. 组织中的角色压力研究:整合研究框架及未来研究方向[J]. 软科学, 2014, 28(9):82-86.
	CUI Nan, HU Yanghong, XU Lan. Role stressors in the organizations:an integrated research framework and future directions[J]. Soft Science, 2014, 28(9):82-86.
[14]	佟瑞鹏, 王露露, 杨校毅, 等. 社会心理风险因素对工人行为安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8):18-24. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.003
	TONG Ruipeng, WANG Lulu, YANG Xiaoyi, et al. Research on influence mechanism of PR on behavior based safety of Workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(8):18-24. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.003
[15]	YUAN Zhenyu, LI Yongjuan, LIN Jingyu. Linking challenge and hindrance stress to safety performance: the moderating effect of core self-evaluation[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, 68:154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.025
[16]	LEUNG M Y, CHAN Y S, YUEN K Y. Impacts of stressors and stress on the injury incidents of construction workers in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(10):1093-1103. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000216
[17]	GRACIA F J, MARIO M C. Understanding risky behaviours in nuclear facilities: the impact of role stressors[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 104:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.006
[18]	EATOUGH E M, CHANG C H, MILOSLAVIC S A, et al. Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(3):619-632. doi: 10.1037/a0021887
[19]	ZHOU Qin, MARTINEZ L F, FERREIRA A I, et al. Supervisor support, role ambiguity and productivity associated with presenteeism: a longitudinal study[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(9):3380-3387. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.006
[20]	WALLACE J C, EDWARDS B D, ARNOLD T, et al. Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(1):254-262. doi: 10.1037/a0013090
[21]	GILBOA S, SHIROM A, FRIED Y, et al. A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2008, 61(2):227-271. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x
[22]	LEPINE J A, PODSAKOFF N P, LEPINE M A. A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: an explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(5):764-775. doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
[23]	TUCKER M K, JIMMIESON N L, BORDIA P. Supervisor support as a double-edged sword: supervisor emotion management accounts for the buffering and reverse-buffering effects of supervisor support[J]. International Journal of Stress Management, 2018, 25(1):14-34. doi: 10.1037/str0000046
[24]	GUO Ming, LIU Shuzhen, CHU Fulei, et al. Supervisory and coworker support for safety: buffers between job insecurity and safety performance of high-speed railway drivers in China[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 117:290-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.017
[25]	HU Xiaowen, GRIFFIN M A, BERTULEIT M. Modelling antecedents of safety compliance: incorporating theory from the technological acceptance model[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 87:292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.018
[26]	AVANZI L, SAVSDORI L, FRACCAROLI F. Unraveling the organizational mechanism at the root of safety compliance in an Italian manufacturing firm[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2016, 24(1):52-61. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1232917
[27]	WANG Dan, WANG Xueqing, GRIFFIN M A, et al. Safety stressors, safety-specific trust, and safety citizenship behavior: a contingency perspective[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2020, 142:1-10.
[28]	MAYO M, SANCHEZ J I, PASTOR J C, et al. Supervisor and coworker support: a source congruence approach to buffering role conflict and physical stressors[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012, 23(18):3872-3889. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2012.676930
[29]	LEUNG M Y, LIANG Qi, OLOMOLAIYE P. Impact of job stressors and stress on the safety behavior and accidents of construction workers[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2016, 32(1): DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000373. doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000373
[30]	姜兰, 刘雅琴, 孙佳. 机场安检员工作压力与不安全行为关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4):13-18. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.04.003
	JIANG Lan, LIU Yaqin, SUN Jia. Research on relationship between work stress and unsafe behaviors of airport security staff[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4):13-18. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.04.003

模型	文献数 k	效应值β	置信区间95%CI		标准化正态值 Z值双侧	异质性检验
模型	文献数 k	效应值β	下限	上限	标准化正态值 Z值双侧	自由度df	观察变异I²	加权方差Q值	P
固定	37	-0.221	-0.234	-0.209	-33.619	36	98.365	2 202.503	0.000
随机	37	-0.116	-0.225	-0.004	-2.021	36	98.365	2 202.503	0.000

变量		k	样本量n	β	标准误差	95%CI		I²
自变量	因变量	k	样本量n	β	标准误差	下限	上限	I²
角色冲突	安全任务行为	8	3 038	-0.220	0.032	-0.364	-0.065	94.447
角色冲突	安全情境行为	8	2 885	-0.317	0.042	-0.473	-0.142	95.824
角色模糊	安全任务行为	5	2 330	-0.260	0.053	-0.455	-0.042	96.285
角色模糊	安全情境行为	5	1 993	-0.433	0.164	-0.699	-0.062	98.668
角色超载	安全任务行为	5	1 631	-0.146	0.009	-0.241	-0.049	71.159
角色超载	安全情境行为	3	627	-0.037	0.014	-0.167	0.095	62.582
主管支持	安全任务行为	9	4 031	0.363	0.021	0.245	0.470	138.966
主管支持	安全情境行为	5	1 877	0.358	0.047	0.153	0.533	90.052

潜变量	类别	k	n	β	95%CI		双尾检验		异质性检验
潜变量	类别	k	n	β	下限	上限	Z值	p值	Q值	I²	p值
经济发展水平	发展中经济	7	3 293	-0.268	-0.299	-0.235	-15.683	0.000	115.741	94.816	0.000
经济发展水平	成熟经济	6	1 058	-0.145	-0.204	-0.085	-4.703	0.000	14.862	66.357	0.011
行业类型	一般行业	6	1 432	-0.163	-0.213	-0.112	-6.176	0.000	14.186	64.755	0.014
行业类型	高危行业	7	2 919	-0.275	-0.308	-0.241	-15.168	0.000	116.288	94.840	0.000