考虑网络韧性的城市轨道交通故障恢复研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1770

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 179-186.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1770

考虑网络韧性的城市轨道交通故障恢复研究

张雯婕(), 胡军红^**(), 闻成维, 汤瑞

南京工业大学交通运输工程学院,江苏南京 210009

收稿日期:2022-11-11 修回日期:2023-02-12 出版日期:2023-04-28
通讯作者:
^** 胡军红(1974—),女,河南新郑人,博士,副教授,主要从事交通运输规划与管理等方面的研究。E-mail:happyjunhong@163.com。
作者简介:
张雯婕 (1998—),女,贵州贵阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为轨道交通网络建模与分析、城市轨道交通应急管理。E-mail:wenjiez98@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51878349); 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(SJCX22_0479)

Research on urban rail failure recovery considering network resilience

ZHANG Wenjie(), HU Junhong^**(), WEN Chengwei, TANG Rui

School of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210009, China

Received:2022-11-11 Revised:2023-02-12 Published:2023-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提升城市轨道交通的可靠性,提出一种基于区间修复的城市轨道交通故障恢复策略;以网络平均效率度量网络韧性性能函数,按不同折返区段分段处理失效线路,构建以网络韧性损失和恢复总时长最小为目标的城市轨道交通故障恢复模型,设计NSGA-Ⅱ算法求解模型;并以成都地铁网络为例,探讨环线失效和放射线失效2种场景下列车运行交路调整对网络恢复决策及网络恢复性能的影响。结果表明:提出的故障恢复方法能有效避免站点修复完成后仍需长时间等待其他站点修复完成才能接入线网运营的情况,考虑列车运行交路调整恢复方案的韧性损失比不考虑运行交路调整时减少28.3%;是否考虑列车运行交路调整对网络环线线路的故障恢复决策影响较大,对外围放射区域线路的故障恢复决策影响较小。

关键词: 网络韧性, 城市轨道交通网络, 故障恢复, 列车运行交路, 网络平均效率

Abstract:

In order to improve the reliability of urban rail transit, a fault recovery strategy for urban rail transit was proposed. It was carried out based on interval restoration. The paper measured the network resilience performance function in terms of the global efficiency of the network. And the failed lines were segmented by different turnback intervals. Subsequently, an urban rail transit fault recovery model was constructed to minimize network toughness loss and total recovery time. An algorithm was designed to solve the failure recovery model, which was based on the global efficiency of the network. Finally, the fault recovery model was applied to the Chengdu metro network. Then the impact of train operation intersection adjustment on network recovery decision and network recovery performance under loop or radial line failure was discussed. The results show that the fault recovery method is effective. It can avoid the situation that the station is repaired but still needs to wait for other stations to be repaired for normal operation. The resilience loss of the recovery scheme considering train operation crossing adjustment is 28.3% less than that without considering operation crossing adjustment. Whether or not to consider train operation crossing adjustment has an important impact on the fault recovery decision for network loop lines, but has a small impact on the fault recovery decision for lines in the outer radial area.

Key words: network resilience, urban rail network, failure recovery, train routing, network global efficiency

张雯婕, 胡军红, 闻成维, 汤瑞. 考虑网络韧性的城市轨道交通故障恢复研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 179-186.

ZHANG Wenjie, HU Junhong, WEN Chengwei, TANG Rui. Research on urban rail failure recovery considering network resilience[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 179-186.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 15

[1]	鞠艳妮, 李宗平, 陈宇帆, 等. 区域轨道交通系统节点重要度及故障恢复研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 112-119. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.02.016
	JU Yanni, LI Zongping, CHEN Yufan, et al. Study on node importance and failure recovery of regional rail transit system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(2): 112-119. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.02.016
[2]	ZHANG Dongming, DU Fei, HANG Hongwei, et al. Resiliency assessment of urban rail transit networks: Shanghai metro as an example[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 106: 230-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.023
[3]	殷勇, 陈锦渠, 朱蔓, 等. 城市轨道交通站点失效修复策略[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(4): 865-872.
	YIN Yong, CHEN Jinqu, ZHU Man. Repair strategies for failure of urban rail transit stations[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 865-872.
[4]	陈锦渠, 殷勇, 朱蔓. 城市轨道交通区间失效修复策略仿真研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2021, 38(8): 139-143.
	CHEN Jinqu, YIN Yong, ZHU Man. Simulation of repairs strategy of urban rail transit link's failure[J]. Computer Simulation, 2021, 38(8): 139-143.
[5]	黄莺, 刘梦茹, 魏晋果, 等. 基于韧性曲线的城市地铁网络恢复策略研究[J]. 灾害学, 2021, 36(1): 32-36.
	HUANG Ying, LIU Mengru, WEI Jinguo, et al. Research on urban metro network recovery strategy based on resilience curve[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2021, 36(1): 32-36.
[6]	张洁斐, 任刚, 马景峰, 等. 基于韧性评估的地铁网络修复时序决策方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4):14-20.
	ZHANG Jiefei, REN Gang, MA Jingfeng, et al. Resilience evaluation and failure recovery strategy of metro network considering bus connection scenario[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(4): 14-20.
[7]	吕彪, 管心怡, 高自强. 地铁网络服务韧性评估与最优恢复策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 198-205.
	LYU Biao, GUAN Xinyi, GAO Ziqiang. Evaluation and optimal recovery strategy of metro network service resilience[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 198-205.
[8]	SAADA Y, AYYUB B M, ZHANG Yanjie, et al. Resilience-Based strategies for topology enhancement and recovery of metrorail transit networks[J]. Asce-Asme Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part a: Civil Engineering, 2020, 6(2):DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001057. doi: 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001057
[9]	ZHANG Jiefei, REN Gang, SONG Jianhua. Resilience-based restoration sequence optimization for metro networks: a case study in China[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 2022: 1-22.
[10]	陈锦渠, 左彤, 朱蔓, 等. 城市轨道交通网络失效修复策略[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2022, 22(1): 316-323.
	CHEN Jinqu, ZUO Tong, ZHU Man, et al. Repair strategies for a damaged urban rail transit network[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2022, 22(1): 316-323.
[11]	HIROKI N, MASAAKI F. Rethinking critical node problem for railway networks from the perspective of turn-back operation[J]. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 558(1):DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124950. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124950
[12]	LIU Jie, SCHONFELD P M, ZHAN Shuguang, et al. Reducing an urban rail transit network passenger-oriented vulnerability by adding turn-back tracks[J]. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2022, 10(1): 667-692. doi: 10.1080/21680566.2022.2025953
[13]	杨景峰, 朱大鹏, 赵瑞琳. 城轨网络站点重要度评估与级联失效抗毁性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 161-167. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.1148
	YANG Jingfeng, ZHU Dapeng, ZHAO Ruilin. Evaluation of station importance and cascading failure resistance analysis of urban rail transit network[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 161-167. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.1148
[14]	毕玮, 汤育春, 冒婷婷, 等. 城市基础设施系统韧性管理综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6):14-28. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.003
	BI Wei, TANG Yuchun, MAO Tingting, et al. Review on resilience management of urban infrastructure system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(6):14-28. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.003
[15]	BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497

考虑网络韧性的城市轨道交通故障恢复研究

Research on urban rail failure recovery considering network resilience

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 15

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨景峰, 朱大鹏, 赵瑞琳. 城轨网络站点重要度评估与级联失效抗毁性分析*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 161-167.
[2]	马敏, 胡大伟, 刘杰, 马壮林. 基于客流加权的城市轨道交通网络抗毁性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(12): 141-149.
[3]	陈露，马驷. 城市轨道交通网络运营安全问题的复杂多属性决策方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(4): 146-.