考虑列车折返的城市轨道交通网络脆弱性评估

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.08.0819

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 84-92.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.08.0819

考虑列车折返的城市轨道交通网络脆弱性评估

何明卫¹(), 钱佳¹, 刘杰¹^,^**(), 殷勇², 占曙光³

¹ 昆明理工大学交通工程学院,云南昆明 650500
² 西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院, 四川成都 611756
³ 合肥工业大学汽车与交通工程学院,安徽合肥 230000

收稿日期:2023-03-19 修回日期:2023-06-15 出版日期:2023-10-08
通讯作者:
**刘杰(1993—),男,四川凉山人,博士,讲师,主要从事交通网络系统分析、交通管理优化方面的研究。E-mail:Liu_jie521188@163.com。
作者简介:
何明卫 (1981—),男,四川南江人,博士,副教授,主要从事城市交通规划、出行行为决策、交通地理等方面的研究。E-mail: hmwei01@163.com。
刘杰讲师
殷勇副教授
占曙光教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71861017); 昆明理工大学学科交叉研究专项项目(KUST-xk2022002); 云南省基础研究计划项目(202301AU070052)

Vulnerability assessment of an urban rail transit network considering turn-back operation of trains

HE Mingwei¹(), QIAN Jia¹, LIU Jie¹^,^**(), YIN Yong², ZHAN Shuguang³

¹ Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming Yunnan 650500, China
² School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 611756, China
³ School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei Anhui 230000, China

Received:2023-03-19 Revised:2023-06-15 Published:2023-10-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为有效缓解城市轨道交通网络(URTN,简称城轨网络)运营中断问题,考虑列车折返评估城轨网络的脆弱性。首先,识别相邻两折返站间的折返区间集合,并明确集合中的任意区间中断均会导致集合中的其他区间不可用;其次,构建4个指标以评估网络的结构脆弱性和服务脆弱性;然后,运用基于组合权重的改进理想点法(TOPSIS),识别影响脆弱性的关键折返区间集合;最后,以武汉地铁网络为例进行实证分析。结果表明:折返区间集合中断对网络结构性能的影响大于对网络服务性能的影响;关键折返区间集合在网络连通性中发挥重要作用,应避免其中断导致网络性能恶化;考虑列车折返以反映中断下的网络运营特征,能更合理准确地评估城轨网络的脆弱性。

关键词: 列车折返, 城市轨道交通网络(URTN), 脆弱性评估, 逼近理想解法(TOPSIS), 折返区间集合

Abstract:

In order to effectively alleviate the operation interruption of URTN, the vulnerability of a URTN was evaluated by considering trains' turn-back operation. Firstly, the sets of turn-back intervals between any two adjacent turn-back stations in a URTN were identified, and it was specified that any interval interruption in a set makes other intervals in the set to be unusable. Secondly, four vulnerability metrics were constructed to evaluate the structural vulnerability and service vulnerability of a URTN. Then, the improved TOPSIS based on combined weights was used to identify the critical turn-back interval sets that affect the network vulnerability. Finally, taking Wuhan subway network as an example for empirical analysis. The results show that the interruption of a turn-back interval set has a higher negative impact on the URTN's structure performance than service performance. The critical turn-back interval sets play an important role in network connectivity, and their interruption should be avoided to deteriorate the network performance. Considering trains' turn-back operation to reflect the network operation characteristics under interruption, the vulnerability of URTN can be evaluated more reasonably and accurately.

Key words: trains' turn-back, urban rail transit network(URTN), vulnerability assessment, technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution(TOPSIS), turn-back interval set

何明卫, 钱佳, 刘杰, 殷勇, 占曙光. 考虑列车折返的城市轨道交通网络脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 84-92.

HE Mingwei, QIAN Jia, LIU Jie, YIN Yong, ZHAN Shuguang. Vulnerability assessment of an urban rail transit network considering turn-back operation of trains[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 84-92.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

表2

折返区间集合重要度表征指标权重

表征指标	$C X i$	$E X i$	$V X i$	$T X i$
$μ j$	0.239 1	0.229 7	0.299 4	0.231 8
$φ j$	0.218 8	0.384 2	0.196 2	0.200 8
$ω j$	0.223 2	0.350 1	0.219 0	0.207 7

表2

图7

表3

参考文献 18

[1]	LIU Jie, SCHONFELD P M, PENG Qiyuan, et al. Measures of travel reliability on an urban rail transit network[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2020, 146(6): 1-14.
[2]	BERDICA K. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done[J]. Transport Policy, 2002, 9(2): 117-127. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
[3]	叶青. 基于复杂网络理论的轨道交通网络脆弱性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(2): 122-126.
	YE Qing. Vulnerability analysis of rail transit based on complex network theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(2): 122-126.
[4]	李涛, 荣莉莉. 时空视角下中国高铁网络脆弱性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(7): 1801-1809.
	LI Tao, RONG Lili. Vulnerability analysis of high-speed rail network in China from spatial-temporal perspective[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(7): 1801-1809.
[5]	李成兵, 魏磊, 李奉孝, 等. 基于攻击策略的城市群复合交通网络脆弱性研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2017, 34(3): 101-109.
	LI Chengbing, WEI Lei, LI Fengxiao, et al. Study on vulnerability of city agglomeration compound traffic network based on attack strategy[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 34(3): 101-109.
[6]	万丹, 郭倩, 邓良凯, 等. 城市轨道交通网络脆弱性对比研究[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2021, 24(1): 60-64.
	WAN Dan, GUO Qian, DENG Liangkai, et al. Comparative study on vulnerability of urban rail transit network[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2021, 24(1): 60-64.
[7]	马超群, 张爽, 陈权, 等. 客流特征视角下的轨道交通网络特征及其脆弱性[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(5): 208-216.
	MA Chaoqun, ZHANG Shuang, CHEN Quan, et al. Characteristics and vulnerability of rail transit network based on perspective of passenger flow characteristics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 208-216.
[8]	MATTSSON L G, JENELIUS E. Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems: a discussion of recent research[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 81: 16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
[9]	刘杰, 陈锦渠, 彭其渊, 等. 城市轨道交通网络可靠性和运输服务质量评估[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(2): 395-402.
	LIU Jie, CHEN Jinqu, PENG Qiyuan, et al. Reliability and service quality evaluation for urban rail transit network[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(2): 395-402.
[10]	LU Qingchang, LIN Shan. Vulnerability analysis of urban rail transit network within multi-modal public transport networks[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(7): DOI: 10.3390/su11072109.
[11]	YIN Haodong, WU Jianjun, SUN Huijun, et al. Optimal bus-bridging service under a metro station disruption[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 2018: 1-16.
[12]	路庆昌, 崔欣, 徐标, 等. 公交接驳场景下轨道交通网络脆弱性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 141-146. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.020
	LU Qingchang, CUI Xin, XU Biao, et al. Vulnerability research of transit network under bus connection scenarios[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 141-146. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.020
[13]	LIU Jie, SCHONFELD P M, ZHAN Shuguang, et al. Reducing an urban rail transit network's passenger-oriented vulnerability by adding turn-back tracks[J]. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2022, 10(1): 667-692. doi: 10.1080/21680566.2022.2025953
[14]	HIROKI N, MASAAKI F. Rethinking critical node problem for railway networks from the perspective of turn-back operation[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 558(1): DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020. 124950.
[15]	胡华, 高云峰, 刘志钢, 等. 地铁运营中断下公交桥接疏运车辆应急调度模型及算法[J]. 铁道学报, 2018, 40(5): 31-37.
	HU Hua, GAO Yunfeng, LIU Zhigang, et al. Model and algorithm for bridging bus emergency dispatching problem during metro operational disruptions[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2018, 40(5): 31-37.
[16]	闫旭, 彭其渊, 殷勇, 等. 区域铁路运输安全态势表征与评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 33-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.006
	YAN Xu, PENG Qiyuan, YIN Yong, et al. Characterization and assessment of safety situation for regional railway transportation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 33-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.006
[17]	DIXIT M, BRANDS T, OORT V N, et al. Passenger travel time reliability for multimodal public transport journeys[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019, 2673(2): 149-160.
[18]	熊婕妤. 城市轨道交通运营中断下桥接公交组织方法[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2021.
	XIONG Jieyu. Method of the bridging bus organization under disruption of urban rail transit[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2021.

编号	相邻两折返站间的折返区间集合	所在线路
1	泾河—三店	线路1
2	三店—东吴大道	线路1
3	东吴大道—竹叶海	线路1
︙	︙	︙
122	未来一路—未来三路	线路11
123	未来三路—左岭	线路11
124	左岭—葛店南站	线路11

排序	折返区间集合	所在线路	区间数量	中断是否导致线路与网络断开连接
1	小龟山—广埠屯	2	5	是
2	虎泉—光谷广场	2	2	是
3	广埠屯—虎泉	2	1	是
4	光谷广场—光谷大道	2	3	是
5	新河街—瑞安街	7	4	否
6	古田三路—汉西一路	1	2	是
7	汉阳客运站—武汉商务区	3	7	否
8	汉西一路—宗关	1	1	是
9	光谷大道—武汉东站	2	2	是
10	岳家嘴—园林路	4	3	是
11	黄浦路—二七路	1	2	否

考虑列车折返的城市轨道交通网络脆弱性评估

Vulnerability assessment of an urban rail transit network considering turn-back operation of trains

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 18

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨景峰, 朱大鹏, 赵瑞琳. 城轨网络站点重要度评估与级联失效抗毁性分析*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 161-167.
[2]	罗福周, 袁慧卿, 张扬. 旧工业建筑再生项目消防安全韧性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 167-173.
[3]	李文龙, 李慧民, 裴兴旺, 刘怡君. 基于多因素耦合的山区道路系统脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 165-170.
[4]	王晓翠, 张礼敬, 陶刚, 王祥. 基于TOPSIS法的桥梁火灾韧性评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 59-64.
[5]	卢颖, 王洁鑫, 姜学鹏, 赵云胜. 基于PTVA模型的房屋多灾种耦合物理脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(8): 1-6.
[6]	陈庚，李丽芬，刘茂，张宇. 从"对立面"来考虑安全脆弱性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(11): 23-.