既有大跨度钢网架结构体育场馆安全性评定

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.04.1204

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提升既有大跨度钢网架结构体育场馆安全性,从地基基础、上部结构、围护结构等3个角度出发,构建24个因素影响层指标,并采用博弈论综合主客观赋权法对安全性评定指标体系进行赋权;通过荷载传力路径划分构件重要性等级,并严格界定不同指标安全性等级临界值,确立物元可拓评价模型。基于物元可拓模型,对5个既有大跨度钢网架结构体育场馆进行数据采集与模型应用,并以甲体育馆为例进行实证分析。结果表明:甲体育馆在常规荷载(工况1、工况2)下安全性等级为Ⅱ级,但在极限荷载(工况3)下安全性等级为Ⅲ级,需重点监测构件锈蚀与变形问题;5个既有大跨度钢网架结构体育场馆模型评定结果与专家现场勘验结果吻合度达91.35%。研究证实,该模型能有效量化复杂工况下的既有大跨度钢网架结构体育场馆结构安全性。

关键词: 即有大跨度, 钢网架结构, 体育场馆, 安全性评定, 物元可拓

Abstract:

In order to improve the safety of existing large-span steel grid structure stadiums and gymnasiums, from the three perspectives of foundation, superstructure and enclosure structure, 24 factors influencing layer indexes were constructed, and the safety evaluation index system was weighted by game theory comprehensive subjective and objective weighting method. The importance grade of components was divided by load transfer path analysis, and the critical value of safety grade of different indexes was strictly defined, and the matter-element extension evaluation model was established. Based on the matter-element extension model, the data collection and model application of five existing large-span steel grid structure stadiums were carried out, and the stadium was taken as an example for empirical analysis. The results show that the safety grade of the stadium is grade II under the normal load (working conditions 1, 2), but the safety grade is grade III under the extreme load (working condition 3), and the corrosion and deformation of the components need to be monitored. The agreement rate between the evaluation results of the five existing large-span steel grid structure stadiums model and the on-site inspection results by experts is 91.35%. The research confirms that the model can effectively quantify the structural safety of existing large-span steel grid structure stadiums under complex working conditions.

Key words: existing large span, steel grid structure, stadiums, safety assessment, matter-element extension

中图分类号:

X924.2安全监测技术与设备

贾丽欣, 吕文浩, 裴兴旺, 孙成, 李文龙. 既有大跨度钢网架结构体育场馆安全性评定[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(4): 173-180.

JIA Lixin, LYU Wenhao, PEI Xingwang, SUN Cheng, LI Wenlong. Safety assessment of existing stadiums with large-span steel grid structures[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 173-180.

图/表 8

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

表3

表4

表5

参考文献 26

[1]	TAN Yao, SHI Junfeng, LIU Peng, et al. Research on the mechanical performance of a mountainous long-span steel truss arch bridge with high and low arch seats[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(12): DOI:10.3390/buildings13123037.
[2]	NIE Jiangguo, WANG Jiaji, GOU Shuangke, et al. Technological development and engineering applications of novel steel-concrete composite structures[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11709-019-0514-x
[3]	SZEWCZAK I, ROZYLO P. The influence of using steel tapes and composite materials on reinforcing hot-rolled steel profiles[J]. Materials, 2024, 17(13): DOI:10.3390/ma17133086.
[4]	YANG Yang, DU Hongbo, YAO Gang, et al. Time-varying mechanical analysis of long-span spatial steel structures integral lifting in construction basing building information model[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(14): DOI:10.3390/su151411256.
[5]	董兆海, 侯双军, 周宇庆, 等. 丽水南城运动综合体体育馆结构设计[J]. 建筑结构, 2023, 53(增2): 445-449.
	DONG Zhaohai, HOU Shuangjun, ZHOU Yuqing, et al. Structural design of the gymnasium of Lishui southern sports complex[J]. Building Structure, 2023, 53(S2): 445-449.
[6]	梁凯, 安杰, 吕杨, 等. 大跨度斜交单层曲面圆形钢结构穹顶关键施工技术[J]. 建筑结构, 2023, 53(增2): 1817-1824.
	LIANG Kai, AN Jie, LYU Yang, et al. Research on key technologies for construction of large span steel structure day lighting roof[J]. Building Structure, 2023, 53(S2): 1817-1824.
[7]	张端, 杨松森, 刘客, 等. 基于时间反演的螺栓球节点连接状态监测研究[J]. 空间结构, 2022, 28(1): 79-85.
	ZHANG Duan, YANG Songsen, LIU Ke, et al. Connection status monitoring of bolted spherical joint based on time reversal method[J]. Spatial Structures, 2022, 28(1): 79-85.
[8]	杜咏, 李国强. 大跨度建筑钢结构抗火性能研究进展与趋势[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2022, 24(1): 53-66.
	DU Yong, LI Guoqiang. Development and tendency of the fire resistance of large-span steel buildings[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2022, 24(1): 53-66.
[9]	赵欢欢, 苏乃特, 卫文彬. 中小学地下体育场馆火灾风险及对策[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(3): 375-378.
	ZHAO Huanhuan, SU Naite, WEI Wenbin. Fire risk and countermeasures of underground sports venues in primary and middle schools[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38(3): 375-378.
[10]	武金料. 基于层次分析法的大跨度钢结构监测综合评估方法研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2023, 53(6): 218-223,24.
	WU Jinliao. Research on comprehensive evaluation method for long-span steel structure monitoring based on AHP[J]. Industrial Construction, 2023, 53(6): 218-223,24.
[11]	林金地, 韦永斌, 林冰, 等. 杭州国际博览中心大跨度钢结构施工应力监测技术[J]. 施工技术, 2016, 45(2): 18-20,104.
	LIN Jindi, WEI Yongbin, LIN Bing, et al. Stress monitoring technology of large-span steel structure construction in Hangzhou international expo center[J]. Construction Technology, 2016, 45(2): 18-20,104.
[12]	JIA Lixin, SUN Cheng, LYU Wenhao, et al. Research on safety evaluation of stadium reconstruction construction based on combination weighting extension model[J]. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2024, 14(20): DOI:org/10.3390/app14209575.
[13]	XIONG Zhongming, FENG Chengshuai. Application study on the method for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of large-span steel structure safety[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(4): 128-133.
[14]	张无敌, 陈一洲, 李琪, 等. 城市大型公共建筑火灾风险因素影响程度及可能性分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(4):1434-1439.
	ZHANG Wudi, CHEN Yizhou, LI Qi, et al. Analysis of degree of influence and risk possibility of fire risk factors in large-scale public buildings in cities[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(4): 1434-1439.
[15]	GB 50292—2015,民用建筑可靠性鉴定标准[S].
	GB 50292-2015,Reliability appraisal standard of civil building[S].
[16]	李慧民, 贾丽欣. 在役大跨度钢结构安全性检测与评定[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2019:193-195.
[17]	辛酉阳, 杨德磊, 方前程. 改进GRA-TOPSIS模型在装配式建筑施工风险评估中的应用[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(7):2212-2222.
	XIN Youyang, YANG Delei, FANG Qiancheng. Application of improved GRA-TOPSIS model in risk assessment of prefabricated building construction[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 23(7): 2212-2222.
[18]	李慧民. 土木工程安全检测与鉴定[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2014:87-92.
[19]	裴兴旺, 李慧民, 李文龙, 等. 基于熵权物元可拓的桥梁检测作业危险性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8):42-48. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.08.007
	PEI Xingwang, LI Huimin, LI Wenlong, et al. Risk assessment of bridge detection operation based on entropy weight and matter element extension theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(8): 42-48. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.08.007
[20]	阿布都热合曼·阿布都艾尼. 基于博弈论组合赋权模型的跨境电商物流业务评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(19):184-188.
[21]	陈娜, 胡毅彤, 袁英峰, 等. 基于博弈论组合赋权-云模型的消防员训练损伤风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4):232-238. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.04.1247
	CHEN Na, HU Yitong, YUAN Yingfeng, et al. Risk assessment of firefighter training injury based on game theory combinatorial weighting and cloud model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 232-238. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.04.1247
[22]	裴兴旺. 既有建筑结构安全性综合评定方法研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2015.
	PEI Xingwang. Research on comprehensive evaluation method of existing building structure safety[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2015.
[23]	郑学召, 董贝贝, 童鑫, 等. 应急救援装备保障能力评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(1):194-201. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.01.0742
	ZHENG Xuezhao, DONG Beibei, TONG Xin, et al. Emergency rescue equipment support capability assessment model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(1): 194-201. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.01.0742
[24]	张向阳, 孔冉, 李修冠, 等. 基于博弈组合赋权-云模型的坚硬顶板采场来压强度等级评估研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2024, 51(2):98-105,110.
	ZHANG Xiangyang, KONG Ran, LI Xiuguan, et al. Research on weighting grade evaluation of hard roof stope based on game combination weighting-cloud model[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2024, 51(2): 98-105,110.
[25]	李文龙, 李慧民, 王孙梦, 等. 再生利用项目建筑结构安全性评定研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(7):85-92. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.07.013
	LI Wenlong, LI Huimin, WANG Sunmeng, et al. Research on safety assessment of building structure for regeneration project[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(7): 85-92. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.07.013
[26]	王永刚, 王海玥, 方琛亮. 航空公司安全韧性评价模型[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(1):63-71.
	WANG Yonggang, WANG Haiyue, FANG Chenliang. Evaluation model of airline safety resilience[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2024, 24(1): 63-71.

一级指标	一级指标权重	二级指标权重	三级指标权重
地基基础	0.32	地基0.55	0.13、0.61、0.26
地基基础	0.32	基础0.45	0.10、0.64、0.26
上部结构	0.63	核心传力构件0.37	0.39、0.25、0.16、0.09、0.11
		重要传力构件0.18	0.39、0.25、0.16、0.09、0.11
		一般传力构件0.08	0.39、0.25、0.16、0.09、0.11
		支撑结构0.21	0.33、0.15、0.22、0.20、0.10
		结构稳定性0.16	0.15、0.54、0.31
围护结构	0.05	屋面板1.00	0.39、0.22、0.17、0.15、0.07

序号	工况名称	场馆工况描述
1	小型荷载作用(荷载工况1)	每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为1.5 t; 每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为2.3 t; 每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为3.0 t
2	中型荷载作用(荷载工况2)	施加荷载总重为64.4 t。每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为1.8 t; 每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为1.0 t; 每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为0.8 t; 点荷载(含吊挂设备)为1.5 t; 每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为1.0 t
3	大型荷载作用(荷载工况3)	施加荷载总重为80 t,每点荷载(含吊挂设备)为4.7 t

一级指标	一级指标等级	二级指标	二级指标等级
地基基础	Ⅰ级	地基	Ⅰ级
地基基础	Ⅰ级	基础	Ⅰ级
上部结构	Ⅱ级	核心传力构件	Ⅰ级
		重要传力构件	Ⅱ级
		一般传力构件	Ⅱ级
		支撑结构	Ⅱ级
		结构稳定性	Ⅲ级
围护结构	Ⅱ级	屋面板	Ⅱ级

序号	工况名称	评定结果	结构安全性描述
1	小型荷载作用 (荷载工况1)	Ⅱ级	结构基本安全
2	中型荷载作用 (荷载工况2)	Ⅱ级	结构基本安全
3	大型荷载作用( 荷载工况3)	Ⅲ级	结构不安全