复杂社会技术系统下的塔吊安全思考

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.06.026

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 153-159.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.06.026

复杂社会技术系统下的塔吊安全思考

赵挺生教授, 周炜, 徐凯^**, 贺凌云

华中科技大学土木工程与力学学院,湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2018-03-07 修回日期:2018-05-13 出版日期:2018-06-28 发布日期:2020-11-25
通讯作者: **徐凯(1995—),男,江苏南京人,硕士研究生,研究方向为建筑施工安全管理。E-mail:xukr@hust.edu.cn。
作者简介:赵挺生(1963—),男,河南辉县人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事建筑可靠性鉴定与加固、建筑物业安全管理、建筑施工技术及质量管理、建筑施工安全技术、建筑设施安全管理等方面的研究。E-mail:tszhao@mail.hust.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0805500)。

Thinking about tower crane safety from an angle of complex sociotechnical system

ZHAO Tingsheng, ZHOU Wei, XU Kai, HE Lingyun

School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan Hubei 430074,China

Received:2018-03-07 Revised:2018-05-13 Online:2018-06-28 Published:2020-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为促进复杂社会技术系统背景下的塔吊安全管理,运用系统思想研究塔吊安全。首先,分析塔吊系统特征,明确塔吊安全系统构成要素;然后,基于RASMUSSEN风险管理理论建立塔吊安全系统层次体系,包含监管机构层、塔吊参与单位层、施工现场管理层、现场人员层、环境与设备层等5个层次;其次,通过文献调研、事故分析和专家访谈,系统地识别56项塔吊安全影响因素,并利用Accimap建模技术建立广义塔吊安全Accimap模型;最后,进一步分析塔吊安全的复杂社会技术系统机制。结果表明:塔吊安全是多层次多维度因素的耦合结果,受层间反馈、退化现象和动态环境影响。塔吊安全管理应遵循竖向整合思想,关注因素交互路径,采取系统性的干预和控制手段。

关键词: 塔吊安全, 复杂社会技术系统, 风险管理框架, 系统机制, Accimap模型

Abstract: For the sake of promoting the safety management of tower cranes in a complex sociotechnical system,the safety of the tower crane was studied by using the system thinking method.Firstly,characteristics of tower crane system were analyzed to understand the components of tower crane safety system.Second,based on RASMUSSEN risk management theory,a hierarchy system of tower crane safety system was established,which contains 5 levels,including regulatory bodies,tower crane stakeholders,construction site management,on-site staffs,environment and equipment.Then,systematic identification of 56 factors influencing tower crane safety was carried out through literature review,accident analysis and expert interviews.A generalized generic Accimap model of tower crane safety was built by using Accimap modeling technique.Finally,the system mechanism of tower crane safety is further analyzed in view of complex sociotechnical system.Results show that tower crane safety results from coupling of multi-level and multi-dimensional factors,and it is affected by feedback between layers,migration phenomena and dynamic environment,and that tower crane safety management should follow the vertical integration idea,pay attention to the factor interaction path,and take systemic interventions and control measures.

Key words: tower crane safety, complex sociotechnical system, risk management framework, system mechanism, Accimap model

中图分类号:

X948

赵挺生, 周炜, 徐凯, 贺凌云. 复杂社会技术系统下的塔吊安全思考[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 153-159.

ZHAO Tingsheng, ZHOU Wei, XU Kai, HE Lingyun. Thinking about tower crane safety from an angle of complex sociotechnical system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(6): 153-159.

参考文献

[1] 湖北省住房和城乡建设厅.关于武汉“8·21”塔吊安装事故情况的通报[EB/OL].[2017-09-28].http://www.hbzfhcxjst.gov.cn/Web/Article/2015/08/22/1737160247.aspx?ArticleID=22d6ad6f-a0d1-4c00-85b0-2a2e45f3704f.
[2] 广州市住房和城乡建设委员会.广州市住房和城乡建设委员会关于吸取海珠“7·22”事故教训立即开展全市建设施工安全生产专项检查的紧急通知[EB/OL].[2017-09-28].http://www.gzcc.gov.cn/gzcc/2.2/201707/e68ab47ab37f40888af562cdf22036bc.shtml.
[3] MCDONALD B,ROSS B,CAMAHAN R A.The Bellevue crane disaster[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2011,18(7):1621-1636.
[4] LI Heng,CHAN G,SKITMORE M.Multiuser virtual safety training system for tower crane dismantlement[J].Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,2012,26(5):638-647.
[5] LEE G,KIM H H,LEE C J,et al.A laser-technology-based lifting-path tracking system for a robotic tower crane[J].Automation in Construction,2009,18(7):865-874.
[6] SHAPIRA A,LYACHIN B.Identification and analysis of factors affecting safety on construction sites with tower cranes[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2009,135(1):24-33.
[7] SHIN I J.Factors that affect safety of tower crane installation/dismantling in construction industry[J].Safety Science,2015,72(1):379-390.
[8] WHITE D.Application of systems thinking to risk management:a review of the literature[J].Management Decision,1995,33(10):35-45.
[9] 甘旭升,崔浩林,刘卫东,等.STPA危险分析方法及其在ATSA-ITP设计中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2015,25(5):80-86.
GAN Xusheng,CUI Haolin,LIU Weidong,et al.STPA hazard analysis method and its application in ATSA-ITP design[J].China Safety Science Journal,2015,25(5):80-86.
[10] RASMUSSEN J.Risk management in a dynamic society:a modelling problem[J].Safety Science,1997,27(2/3):183-213.
[11] NEWNAM S,GOODE N.Do not blame the driver:a systems analysis of the causes of road freight crashes[J].Accident Analysis and Prevention,2015,76(1):141-151.
[12] STEVENS N J,SALMON P M.Sand,surf and sideways:a systems analysis of beaches as complex roadway environments[J].Safety Science,2016,85(1):152-162.
[13] SALMON P M,LENNE M G.Miles away or just around the corner? systems thinking in road safety research and practice[J].Accident Analysis and Prevention,2015,74(1):243-249.
[14] RASMUSSEN J,SVEDUNG I.Proactive risk management in a dynamic society[M].Karlstad:Swedish Rescue Services Agency,2000:10-98.
[15] SVEDUNG I,RASMUSSEN J.Graphic representation of accident scenarios:mapping system structure and the causation of accidents[J].Safety Science,2002,40(5):397-417.
[16] GOODE N,SALMON P M,TAYLOR N Z,et al.Developing a contributing factor classification scheme for Rasmussen's AcciMap:reliability and validity evaluation[J].Applied Ergonomics,2017,64(1):14-26.

复杂社会技术系统下的塔吊安全思考

Thinking about tower crane safety from an angle of complex sociotechnical system

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵挺生, 冯楚璇, 蒋灵, 张伟. 基于AcciMap模型的施工升降机安全风险研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 79-84.
[2]	于广涛，李永娟. 复杂社会技术系统安全控制人因研究的转变趋向[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(4): 32-.
[3]	许正权，朱方策. 复杂社会技术系统安全事故的成因结构敏感性及预防对策研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(3): 11-.
[4]	许正权. 复杂社会技术系统事故成因结构敏感性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(6): 56-.
[5]	张力，王以群，黄曙东. 人因事故纵深防御系统模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2002, 12(1): 34-.