基于熵权-TOPSIS法的煤矿安全投入决策分析*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.004

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 24-29.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.004

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

基于熵权-TOPSIS法的煤矿安全投入决策分析^*

姜福川副教授, 周师, 吴增彤, 钟基超, 张书豪, 张雪芳

辽宁工程技术大学安全科学与工程学院,辽宁葫芦岛 125105

收稿日期:2021-04-08 修回日期:2021-06-12 出版日期:2021-07-28 发布日期:2022-01-28
作者简介:姜福川 (1966—),男,黑龙江双鸭山人,博士,副教授,主要从事安全经济、安全管理等方面的研究。E-mail:1047074832@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51674127)。

Analysis of coal mine safety investment decision based on entropy weight-TOPSIS method

JIANG Fuchuan, ZHOU Shi, WU Zengtong, ZHONG Jichao, ZHANG Shuhao, ZHANG Xuefang

College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao Liaoning 125105, China

Received:2021-04-08 Revised:2021-06-12 Online:2021-07-28 Published:2022-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高煤矿安全投入决策水平,使安全投入更好地保障煤矿安全生产,建立基于熵权-逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)的安全投入方案评价模型。首先,针对安全投入的特点,从安全投入、产出2方面选取7个指标,构建安全投入评价指标体系;其次,基于熵权法确定各指标权重,并结合TOPSIS法计算得出各方案的相对贴近度,实现方案的优选并以最佳方案的投入比例为参考进行安全投入决策。结果表明:合理的安全投入结构是实现安全效益最大化的重要前提;该模型可以有效地选出以往安全投入方案中能以最少的投入实现最大产出的方案,有助于提高煤矿安全效益。

关键词: 煤矿, 安全投入, 熵权法, 逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS), 评价指标体系, 相对贴近度

Abstract: In order to improve decision-making level of coal mine safety investment and make safety input to better ensure safety of coal mine production, evaluation model of safety investment scheme based on entropy weight -TOPSIS was established. Firstly, according to characteristics of safety investment, seven indexes were selected from two aspects of safety investment and safety investment evaluation index system was constructed. Secondly, weight of each index was determined based on entropy weight method, and relative closeness degree of each scheme was calculated with TOPSIS method, so as to realize optimization of scheme and make safety investment decision with input proportion of best scheme as reference. The results show that reasonable safety investment structure is an important prerequisite to realize maximization of safety benefit. This model can effectively select previous safety input scheme which can achieve the maximum output with the least input, which is helpful to improve safety benefit of coal mine.

Key words: coal mine, safety investment, entropy weight method, technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution(TOPSIS), evaluation index system, relative closeness degree

中图分类号:

X915.4

姜福川, 周师, 吴增彤, 钟基超, 张书豪, 张雪芳. 基于熵权-TOPSIS法的煤矿安全投入决策分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 24-29.

JIANG Fuchuan, ZHOU Shi, WU Zengtong, ZHONG Jichao, ZHANG Shuhao, ZHANG Xuefang. Analysis of coal mine safety investment decision based on entropy weight-TOPSIS method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7): 24-29.

参考文献

[1] 蒋星星,李春香.2013—2017年全国煤矿事故统计分析及对策[J].煤炭工程,2019,51(1):101-105.
JIANG Xingxing, LI Chunxiang. Statistical analysis on coal mine accidents in China from 2013 to 2017 and discussion on the countermeasures [J] Coal Engineering, 2019, 51(1):101-105.
[2] 赵宝福,张超,贾宝山,等.煤企安全投入评价的G-INFNs-MCGDM方法及应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(2):139-144.
ZHAO Baofu, ZHANG Chao, JIA Baoshan, et al. G-INFNs-MCGDM method for evaluating safety input in coal enterprises and its application [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(2):139-144.
[3] 姜福川,张成良. 矿山安全投资与事故控制耦合理论研究[J].采矿技术,2008,8(6):90-92.
[4] 韩光胜,陈国华,万木生,等. 基于CES生产函数的企业安全投资决策方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(11):60-65.
HAN Guangsheng, CHEN Guohua, WAN Musheng, et al.Research on safety investment decision method based on CES function [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2007,17(11):60-65.
[5] 任海芝,陈玉琴,程恋军.煤炭企业安全投入规模与投入结构优化研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(8):3-8.
REN Haizhi, CHEN Yuqin, CHENG Lianjun. Study on optimizing both size and structure of safety investment in coal enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2014,24(8):3-8.
[6] 梅强, 张忆. 企业安全经济投入与安全效益产出的平衡研究[J]. 商业时代, 2010(30):84-85.
[7] 贺宏华, 闵永洁. 中国煤矿安全投入现状及其对策研究[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2009(31):174-175.
[8] 王书明. 基于层次分析法和熵权法的煤矿安全投入综合评价模型及其应用[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 2011, 27(4):8-16.
WANG Shuming. The establishment and application of the comprehensive evaluation model for safety input of coal mines based on AHP and entropy weight [J]. Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology, 2011, 27(4):8-16.
[9] 李树刚, 成连平, 景兴鹏, 等. 煤矿安全投入评价指标体系构建方法研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5(5):93-96.
LI Shugang, CHENG Lianping, JING Xingpeng, et al. Study on construction m ethod of evaluation index system for safety input of coal mine [J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(5):93-96.
[10] 尹岚岚. 煤矿安全投入评价及投入资金优化配置研究[D].葫芦岛:辽宁工程技术大学, 2011.
YIN Lanlan. Study on the evaluation of mine safety investment and optimal allocation of funds [D]. Huludao:Liaoning University of Engineering and Technology, 2011.
[11] JIANG Fuchan, LAI En, SHAN Yuxuan, et al. A set theory-based model for safety investment and accident control in coal mines [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 136:253-258.
[12] 陈全君. 企业安全投入及其指标体系的构建研究[J]. 中国煤炭, 2005, 31(9):77-79, 81.
[13] 张小兵, 朱建芳. 煤矿安全投入系统及其指标体系的构架[J]. 煤矿安全, 2009, 40(11):117-120.
ZHANG Xiaobing, ZHU Jianfang. Frame of coal mine safety input system and its index system [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2009, 40(11):117-120.
[14] 马齐飞扬,赵庶旭.改进TOPSIS在铁路应急救援决策中的应用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(1):155-161.
MA Qifeiyang, ZHAO Shuxu. Application of improved TOPSIS method in decision-making of railway emergency rescue [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26 (1): 155-161.
[15] 王晓翠,张礼敬,陶刚,等.基于TOPSIS法的桥梁火灾韧性评估模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(4):59-64.
WANG Xiaocui, ZHANG Lijing, TAO Gang, et al. Application of resilience theory to bridge fire risk assessment [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018,28 (4): 59-64.
[16] 陈刘瑜,李希建,毕娟,等.基于AHP-TOPSIS的冲击型煤与瓦斯突出倾向性预测[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(4):47-52.
CHEN Liuyu, LI Xijian, BI juan,et al. Prediction of coal-gas outburst induced by rock-burst tendency based on AHP-TOPSIS [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30 (4): 47-52.
[17] 程宏, 江志刚, 向鹏, 等. 基于熵权和TOPSIS法的再制造逆向物流模式决策研究[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2016(8):71-76.
CHENG Hong, JIANG Zhigang, XIANG Peng, et al. Decision-making model in remanufacturing reverse logistics based on entropy weight and TOPSIS method [J]. Manufacturing Technology & Machine Tool, 2016(8):71-76.
[18] 牛吉星, 马斌, 张进,等. 基于熵权-TOPSIS模型的既有建筑节能改造方案评估研究[J]. 嘉应学院学报, 2017, 35(5):33-37.
NIU Jixing, MA Bin, ZHANG Jin, et al. Study on evaluation of energy efficiency retrofit strategies for existing buildings based on entropy weight-TOPSIS model [J]. Journal of Jiaying University, 2017, 35(5):33-37.
[19] 高蕊.煤矿安全投入优化数学模型研究及应用[J].中国煤炭,2012,38(3):105-108.
GAO Rui. Research and application of mathematical model of optimum security investment to coal mine [J]. China Coal,2012,38(3):105-108.

基于熵权-TOPSIS法的煤矿安全投入决策分析^*

Analysis of coal mine safety investment decision based on entropy weight-TOPSIS method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨明, 贾改妮, 刘毛毛, 全星苑. 我国煤矿噪声研究进展科学知识图谱分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 177-184.
[2]	唐飞, 王云刚, 杜炳成, 孔祥岩. 基于优化马尔可夫模型的煤矿事故死亡人数预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 122-128.
[3]	邝雨婕, 赵佳虹. 连续时变风险下危险品储运选址-选线问题[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 185-191.
[4]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[5]	王兴隆, 陈仔燕, 刘岩. 基于组合赋权法的空管监视信息质量评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 41-50.
[6]	阎红巧, 陈怡玥, 田琨, 胡瑾秋, 冒亚明, 周靖桐. 企业安全生产关键指标体系与风险评价模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 21-28.
[7]	贺琦, 张金锁, 王萍. 煤矿高层管理者工作压力与安全绩效关系研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 29-35.
[8]	白春, 王来贵, 刘书贤, 路沙沙, 聂伟. 煤矿采动对RC框架结构抗震性能影响试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 174-183.
[9]	杨三军, 荆亚茹, 姜润发. 矿山救援队应急救援能力评价指标体系构建^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 180-188.
[10]	成连华, 周瑞雪, 严瑾, 郭慧敏. 煤矿应急救援能力成熟度评价模型构建及应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 180-186.
[11]	王刚, 商荦真, 刘学麟, 唐礼, 程前. 采用AHP-熵权法的巷道启封中毒窒息致因研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 187-192.
[12]	宿国瑞, 贾宝山, 王鹏, 申琢. 基于多源异构数据的煤矿安全管理效果评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 64-69.
[13]	栗婧, 王真, 秦亚茹, 汪振, 罗江昊. 不同噪声强度对煤矿工人作业失误率的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 179-184.
[14]	吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, 刘增凯. 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.
[15]	郭楠, 王茜, 石坤杰, 栗继祖. 煤矿安全管理人员工作压力相关研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 1-6.