中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 241-250.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.07.0446

• 职业健康 • 上一篇    下一篇

民航飞行签派员心理疲劳反应时增长预测模型

王岩韬1(), 胡雨寒2, 时统宇2,**()   

  1. 1 中国民航大学 科技创新研究院, 天津 300300
    2 中国民航大学 空中交通管理学院, 天津 300300
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-11 修回日期:2026-05-17 出版日期:2026-07-28
  • 通信作者:
    **时统宇(1988—),男,河北张家口人,博士,讲师,主要从事飞行运行安全与管理等方面的研究。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    王岩韬 (1982—),男,吉林磐石人,硕士,教授,主要从事飞行运行安全与管理等方面的研究。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFB4303900); 民航局安全能力项目(2024120)

A prediction model for reaction time growth due to psychological fatigue responses in civil aviation flight dispatchers

Wang Yantao1(), Hu Yuhan2, Shi Tongyu2,**()   

  1. 1 Institute of Science and Technology Innovation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
    2 College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • Received:2026-03-11 Revised:2026-05-17 Published:2026-07-28

摘要:

为准确测量与预测心理疲劳对民航飞行签派员反应时的影响,首先,选取97名航空公司飞行签派员作为被试,筛选出可有效反映心理疲劳情况的指标,设计并开发签派员心理疲劳反应时测试系统,按任务开展4批次测试;然后,结合飞行签派员警觉性三过程模型(TPMA),基于测试数据构建签派员心理疲劳反应时增长预测模型;最后,通过实测结果验证预测模型的有效性,并采用脑电(EEG)信号数据辅助验证。结果表明:反应时增长模型预测得到的持续注意力平均绝对占比误差为2%、细微注意力为3%、视觉疲劳为3%;嗜睡状态下的预测反应时与EEG信号数据平均相关系数为84%,当工作时间≥7 h时,平均反应时和错误个数分别增加14%和35%;航班量≥80架次时分别增加15%和30%;卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表评分≥7时分别增加12%和39%。

关键词: 飞行签派员, 心理疲劳, 反应时, 警觉性三过程模型(TPMA), 疲劳增长预测, 贝叶斯网络(BN)

Abstract:

To accurately measure and predict the effect of mental fatigue on reaction time in civil aviation flight dispatchers, 97 airline flight dispatchers were selected as subjects. Indicators capable of effectively reflecting mental fatigue were screened, a psychological-fatigue reaction time testing system was designed and developed, and four batches of task-based tests were conducted. Then, based on TPMA for flight dispatchers, a reaction time growth prediction model for dispatcher mental fatigue was established using the test data. Finally, the effectiveness of the model was validated with measured results and further supported by electroencephalography (EEG) signal data. The results show that the mean absolute percentage errors of the predicted reaction time growth are 2% for sustained attention, 3% for subtle attention, and 3% for visual fatigue. In the drowsy state, the average correlation coefficient between predicted reaction time and EEG signal data is 84%. When working time is ≥ 7 h, the average reaction time and number of errors increase by 14% and 35%, respectively; when flight volume is ≥ 80 flights, they increase by 15% and 30%, respectively; and when the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) score is ≥ 7, they increase by 12% and 39%, respectively.

Key words: flight dispatcher, mental fatigue, reaction time, three-process model of alertness(TPMA), fatigue growth prediction, Bayesian network(BN)

中图分类号: