灾害环境中防护服性能测评研究进展

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.05.025

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 140-145.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.05.025

灾害环境中防护服性能测评研究进展

徐畅¹, 申世飞¹ 教授, 付明², 王道亮², 钱益武²

1 清华大学公共安全研究院,北京 100084;
2 清华大学合肥公共安全研究院,安徽合肥 320601

收稿日期:2017-02-13 修回日期:2017-03-31 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2020-10-30
作者简介:徐畅 (1994—),女,河南商丘人,硕士研究生,研究方向为灾害环境下个体防护装备防护性能测评。E-mail: xudongying1228@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0802807)。

Progress in research on test and evaluation of protective clothing performance in disaster environment

XU Chang¹, SHEN Shifei¹, FU Ming², WANG Daoliang², QIAN Yiwu²

1 Institute for Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084,China;
2 Heifei Institute for Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Heifei Anhui 320601, China

Received:2017-02-13 Revised:2017-03-31 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2020-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解灾害环境中防护服性能测评研究进展,选取火灾、爆炸、危险化学品泄漏作为典型灾害环境条件,系统调研防护服性能测评的相关文献,从单一和复合灾害环境2个层面,归纳分析防护服性能测评方法和研究现状,提出该领域的发展方向。研究表明:单一灾害环境中的防护服测评,面料性能测试方法应用广泛,整体防护性能测试研究不足;复合灾害环境下的防护服测评,是在多个单一灾害环境中分别检测各项性能,尚未开展多灾种耦合条件下的综合防护性能试验。当前研究趋势是建立并完善防护服的整体和综合防护性能测评方法,评估复合灾害环境条件中的防护服性能。

关键词: 防护服, 防护性能, 火爆毒灾害, 复合灾害环境, 测评

Abstract: To have a general overview of the progress in research on performance test and evaluation of protective clothing, fire, explosion,and leakage of dangerous chemicals were selected as typical disaster environmental conditions, a systematic and thorough literature investigation was carried out. From the two aspects of single and complex disaster environments, the status of research on protective clothing performance evaluation was analyzed, and the future trends were predicted. The research results show that for single disaster environments, the fabric performance test methods are currently widely used, while the research on clothing ensemble protective performance test is insufficient,that the protective clothing performance tests in complex disaster environment are carried out under multi independent disaster environmental conditions, while no method has been developed for testing the performance in multi-hazards coupling environments,and that the trends in the research are to optimize the ensemble and comprehensive protective performance test methods and evaluate the protective clothing's performance under complex disaster environment conditions.

Key words: protective clothing, protective performance, fire & explosive & toxic disaster, complex disaster environment, test and evaluation

中图分类号:

徐畅, 申世飞, 付明, 王道亮, 钱益武. 灾害环境中防护服性能测评研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(5): 140-145.

XU Chang, SHEN Shifei, FU Ming, WANG Daoliang, QIAN Yiwu. Progress in research on test and evaluation of protective clothing performance in disaster environment[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(5): 140-145.

参考文献

[1] 公安部消防局. 中国消防年鉴2014[M]. 昆明: 云南人民出版社, 2015: 367-371.
Fire Department of the Ministry of Public Security. China fire yearbook 2014[M]. Kunming:Yunnan People's Publishing House, 2015: 367-371.
[2] DUPANT. Tychem ® ThermoPro Technical Data Sheet[EB/OL]. [2017-03-26]. http://safespec.dupont.com/safespec/media/documents/TP_tech.pdf.
[3] 肖方,董大正. 探索新型消防服的秘密[J]. 中国消防, 2016(9):53.
XIAO Fang, DONG Dazheng. Explore the secrets of new fire suit[J] China Fire, 2016(9):53.
[4] CROWM E M, ACKERMAN M Y, DALE J D, et al. Design and evaluation of thermal protective flightsuits.part II: instrumented mannequin evaluation[J]. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 1998,16(2):79-87.
[5] ASTM F1930-2000, Standard test method for evaluation of flame resistant clothing for protection against flash fire simulations using an instrumented manikin[S].
[6] CAMENZIND M A, DALE D J, ROSSI R M. Manikin test for flame engulfment evaluation of protective clothing: historical review and development of a new ISO standard[J]. Fire and Materials, 2007,31(5):285-295.
[7] ROSSI R M, BRUGGMANN G, STÄMPFLI R. Comparison of flame spread of textiles and burn injury prediction with a manikin[J]. Fire and Materials, 2005, 29(6):395-406.
[8] SONG G. Modeling thermal protection outfits for fire exposures[D]. Raleigh:North Carolina State University, 2003.
[9] MAH T, SONG G. Investigation of the contribution of garment design to thermal protection.part 2: instrumented female mannequin flash-fire evaluation system[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2010, 80(14): 1 473-1 487.
[10] WOODWARD A B. Fire scenarios for an improved fabric flammability test[D]. Worcester: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2003.
[11] GAŠPERIN M, JURIČIČ D, MUSIZZA B, et al. A model-based approach to the evaluation of flame-protective garments[J]. ISATransactions, 2008, 47(2): 198-210.
[12] SIPE J E. Development of an instrumented dynamic mannequin test to rate the thermal protection provided by protective clothing[D]. Worcester: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2004.
[13] ROSSI R M, SCHMID M, CAMENZIND M A. Thermal energy transfer through heat protective clothing during a flame engulfment test[J]. Textile Research Journal, 2014, 84(13): 1 451-1 460.
[14] NIJ 0117.01, Public safety bomb suit NIJ standard[S]. 2016.
[15] CHICHESTER C, BASS C, BOGGESS B, et al. A test methodology for assessing demining personal protective equipment (PPE) [R]. Army Communications-Electronics Command Fort Belvoir Va, 2001.
[16] CEH M W J, FALL R W, BERGERON D M, et al. Protocols to test upper body PPE against AP blast mines[R]. Defence Research and Development Canada, 2005.
[17] CAMERON D B Davis M, RAFAES K, et al. A methodology for assessing blast protection in explosive ordnance disposal bomb suits [J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2005, 11(4): 347-361.
[18] 李剑, 王远途, 唐剑兰, 等. 基于人体模型的单体防护装备防护效能评价方法研究[J]. 警察技术, 2014(2):68-71.
LI Jian, WANG Yuantu, TANG Jianlan, et al. Research on evaluation method of protective effectiveness of monomer protective equipment based on dummy[J]. Police Technology, 2014(2):68-71.
[19] 李剑, 王远途, 房海珍. 警用防护装备效能评价技术[M]. 北京:中国人民公安大学出版社, 2015: 94-283.
LI Jian, WANG Yuantu, FANG Haizhen. Effectiveness evaluation technology of police protective equipment[M]. Beijing: Chinese People's Public Security University Press, 2015: 94-283.
[20] ASTM F2588-12, Standard test method for man-in-simulant test (MIST) for protective ensembles[S]. 2012.
[21] GAO P, KING W P, SHAFFER R. Review of chamber design requirements for testing of personal protective clothing ensembles[J]. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2007, 4(8): 562-571.
[22] National Research Council. Soldier protective clothing and equipment: feasibility of chemical testing using a fully articulated robotic mannequin[M]. Washington: National Academies Press, 2008:35-180.
[23] NELSON G, SAUNDERS A, NEVILLE N, et al. Petman: a humanoid robot for testing chemical protective clothing[J]. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 2012, 30(4):372-377.
[24] UK. Robot mannequin to test armed forces' protective suits[EB/OL]. (2014-04-05). http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-26892771.
[25] 王润泽. 高危生物污染环境下主动净化送风式正压生物防护服的使用安全性与热舒适性研究[D]. 北京: 中国人民解放军军事医学科学院, 2016.
WANG Runze. Study on safety and thermal comfort of positive purifying air supply pressure protective clothing in high risk biological polluted environment[D]. Beijing: Academy of Military Medical Sciences,2016.
[26] GA770—2008, 消防员化学防护服装[S].
GA770-2008, Chemical protective ensemble for firefighters[S].
[27] BARKER R, DEATON S, LISTON G, et al. A CB protective firefighter turnout suit[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2010, 16(2): 135-152.

灾害环境中防护服性能测评研究进展

Progress in research on test and evaluation of protective clothing performance in disaster environment

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	田水承, 周润康, 杨杰. 高温环境下降温服对消防员热反应的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 166-171.
[2]	杨越, 黄贻刚, 宋祥波, 王建忠. 基于运行数据的管制员工作效能测评方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 8-14.
[3]	朱雯, 苏云, 陈若颖, 李俊, 田苗. 相变微胶囊涂层织物在热防护服中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 180-185.
[4]	翟胜男, 陈太球, 蒋春燕, 傅佳佳, 王鸿博. 含水率对防护织物热防护性能的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 148-152.
[5]	杨文涛, 张悦, 徐帅, 高进东. 城市重特大事故风险管控体系运行测评研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 162-167.
[6]	范瑞娜，罗云，史凯，尹学军，张彦，王泉生，盛水平. 锅检机构绩效测评指标体系构建及优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 159-.
[7]	吴金辉，衣颖，杨荆泉，田涛，郝丽梅，王政. 全身正压生物防护服防护性能研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(9): 125-.
[8]	王志亮，杨仁树，张跃兵. 保护层开采效果测评指标及应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(10): 58-.
[9]	尤荻，戚安邦. 煤矿企业安全风险集成管理系统及其ANP测评模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(1): 60-.
[10]	赵显，傅贵. 企业安全氛围测评的实证研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(9): 145-.
[11]	陆柏，陈培，傅贵. 基于SEM的企业安全氛围诊断与测评研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(4): 22-.
[12]	朱志刚，刘衡秋，陈国华. 北京轨道交通工程地质灾害危险性预测评估——以昌平线(S2线)为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(9): 109-.
[13]	刘超，罗云，仝世渝，李佳蓉. 基于层次分析法的电力企业员工安全素质测评指标体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(9): 132-.
[14]	朱方龙，张渭源. 基于人体皮肤热模型的热防护服评价方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(11): 134-.
[15]	郝新敏，张建春，杨元. 医用多功能防护服研究与发展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(6): 80-.