基于云模型的客舱火灾应急处置协同能力测评方法

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.12.0313

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决虚拟应急演练测评主观性强、多人协同效果测评难等问题,针对客舱机组人员提出一种基于云模型的多人应急协同能力测评方法。首先,从团队协作和岗位胜任力角度出发,结合基于虚拟现实(VR)技术的演练平台,提出客舱火灾应急处置的虚拟演练流程,构建应急协同能力测评指标体系;然后,采集演练者在客舱火灾应急演练的实际过程数据,进行无量纲化处理,采用云模型测算演练成绩,并利用Matlab软件仿真测评结果;最后,设计比赛模式和培训模式2种演练类型,实现多人多组在不同模式下的应急协同能力测评。结果表明:该方法可以客观采集演练的过程数据,量化分析不同模式下的应急演练能力,直观排序各演练者及其演练组的演练成绩,符合客舱机组人员开展应急演练和能力提升的实际需求。

关键词: 云模型, 客舱火灾, 应急处置, 协同能力测评, 应急演练

Abstract:

In order to solve the problems of subjective evaluation of virtual emergency drill and difficult evaluation of multi-users collaborative effect, a method of evaluating emergency coordination capacity was proposed based on cloud model. Firstly, from the perspective of team cooperation and post competence, combined with the drill platform based on VR technology, the virtual drill process of emergency response in cabin fire was proposed, and the evaluation index system of emergency coordination capacity was constructed. Secondly, the actual process data of cabin crew in disposing of cabin fire emergency drill were collected and processed dimensionless. The drill results were calculated based on the cloud model and simulated by Matlab. Finally, competition mode and training mode were designed to realize the evaluation of emergency coordination capacity of multiple groups under different modes. The results show that this method could objectively collect the data of the drill process, quantitatively analyze the emergency capacity of cabin crew under different modes, and intuitively sort the results of each drill, which meets the actual requirements of cabin crew to improve their emergency drill capacity.

Key words: cloud model, cabin fire, emergency response, collaborative capacity evaluation, emergency drill

吴煜, 杨萌, 张青松. 基于云模型的客舱火灾应急处置协同能力测评方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(12): 206-213.

WU Yu, YANG Meng, ZHANG Qingsong. Evaluation method of collaborative capacity of cabin fire emergency response based on cloud model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(12): 206-213.

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

图3

表4

图4

参考文献 15

[1]	张蓝铮. 应急演练效能评估方法研究与系统实现[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2022.
	ZHANG Lanzheng. Research on efficiency evaluation method of emergency drill and system implementation[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2022.
[2]	郑登锋, 付明福, 龚晓凤. 基于情景构建的多地多场景应急演练[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6):171-176. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.028
	ZHENG Dengfeng, FU Mingfu, GONG Xiaofeng. Multi-place and multi-scenario emergency exercise based on scenario-building[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(6):171-176. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.028
[3]	FAN Yanmei, CHEN Yang, WANG Danting. Scene simulation of emergency drills for outpatient unexpected accidents and the effects on patients with HAMD, SAS scores[J]. Science Innovation, 2019, 7(6):171-174. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20190706.14
[4]	AHN S I, KURT R E, AKYUZ E. Application of a SPAR-H based framework to assess human reliability during emergency response drill for man overboard on ships[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022,251:DOI:10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.111089.
[5]	贾梦成. 基于Unity3D的液氧泄漏应急演练系统的设计与研究[D]. 马鞍山: 安徽工业大学, 2020.
	JIA Mengcheng. Design and research of liquid oxygen leakage emergency drill system based on Unity3D[D]. Ma'anshan: Anhui University of Technology, 2020.
[6]	喻钢, 史礼华. 基于MR与微服务的隧道应急模拟与推演系统[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1):162-167. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.01.025
	YU Gang, SHI Lihua. Tunnel emergency simulation and deduction system based on MR and microservice[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(1):162-167. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.01.025
[7]	KOUTITAS G, SMITH S, LAWRENCE G. Performance evaluation of AR/VR training technologies for EMS first responders[J]. Virtual Reality, 2020, 25(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00431-z
[8]	LEE D, LEE H, LEE B I. Development of virtual reality-based radiological emergency exercise system[J]. American Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 2020, 6(1):1-12.
[9]	朱新平, 徐海瑶, 万健. 基于虚拟现实的机场消防救援虚拟演练平台[J]. 计算机仿真, 2020, 37(2):102-105.
	ZHU Xinping, XU Haiyao, WAN Jian. Airport fire emergency rescue virtual drill platform based on virtual reality technique[J]. Computer Simulation, 2020, 37(2):102-105.
[10]	邓鹏, 袁狄平, 靳学胜. 石化基地灭火救援指挥VR训练系统设计与实现[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12):160-166. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.021
	DENG Peng, YUAN Diping, JIN Xuesheng. Design and implementation of VR training system for firefighting and rescue emergency command in petrochemical bases[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 160-166. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.021
[11]	曹中浩. 城市交通行业突发事件仿真与应急处置评估研究[D]. 北京: 北京建筑大学, 2022.
	CAO Zhonghao. Research on emergencies simulation and emergency response evaluation in urban transportation industry[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2022.
[12]	GAO Xiangsen, ZHANG Jianqin, ZOU Ruimeng. Multi-user collaborative virtual emergency drill system for urban road emergencies[J]. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2022, 10: 9-15.
[13]	武岩. 基于民航不安全事件分析的机组职业作风养成路径探索[J]. 民航管理, 2023 (4):49-52.
	WU Yan. Path exploration of air crew professionalism cultivation based on analysis of civil aviation incidents[J]. Civil Aviation Management, 2023(4): 49-52.
[14]	LI Deyi, CHEUNG D, SHI Xuemei, et al. Uncertainty reasoning based on cloud models in controllers[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 1998, 35(3): 99-123. doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(97)00282-4
[15]	熊钰, 孔德中, 杨胜利. 大倾角工作面煤壁稳定性的云模型综合辨识[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3):144-151. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.03.020
	XIONG Yu, KONG Dezhong, YANG Shengli. Cloud model identification of coal face stability in steeply inclined working faces[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(3): 144-151. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.03.020

目标层	一级指标		二级指标		三级指标		三级指标采集的演练过程数据
目标层	指标	权重	指标	权重	指标	权重	三级指标采集的演练过程数据
客舱机组人员应急协同能力 A	实训演练能力 A₁	0.62	设备及专业知识运用掌握能力A₁₁	0.11	应急设备使用正确率B₁/%	0.15	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
					专业基础知识掌握度B₂/%	0.30	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
					应急处置操作正确率B₃/%	0.27	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
					业务熟练度B₄/%	0.28	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
			现场反应能力A₁₂	0.33	信息获取能力B₅/个	0.25	[0,1)	[1,2)	[2,3)	[3,4)	[4,5]
					信息转换能力B₆/%	0.26	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
					反应时间B₇/s	0.23	[0,30]	(30,60]	(60,90]	(90,120]	(120,300]
					应变能力B₈/%	0.26	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
			多人协同能力A₁₃	0.56	团队沟通能力B₉/%	0.20	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
					团队配合能力B₁₀/s	0.21	[0,60]	(60,120]	(120,180]	(180,240]	(240,600]
					组织协同广度B₁₁/人	0.19	[0,1)	[1,2)	[2,3)	[3,4)	[4,5]
					组织协同深度B₁₂/个	0.18	[0,1)	[1,2)	[2,3)	[3,4)	[4,5]
					组织协同频率B₁₃/%	0.22	[0,20]	(20,40]	(40,60]	(60,80]	(80,100]
	岗位资格能力 A₂	0.38	个体基本素质A₂₁	1	身体状态B₁₄	0.27	不合格	合格	中等	良好	优秀
					心理状况B₁₅	0.25	不合格	合格	中等	良好	优秀
					工作资历B₁₆/a	0.24	[0,1)	[1,2)	[2,3)	[3,4)	[4,5]
					工作岗位B₁₇	0.24	实习学员	普通舱乘务员	2舱乘务员	乘务长	主任乘务长

测评指标	Ⅰ组					Ⅱ组				Ⅲ组
测评指标	Ⅰa/ Ⅰ1	Ⅰb/ Ⅰ2		Ⅰc/ Ⅰ3	Ⅰ4	Ⅱa/ Ⅱ1	Ⅱb/ Ⅱ2	Ⅱc/ Ⅱ3	Ⅱ4	Ⅲa/ Ⅲ1	Ⅲb/ Ⅲ2	Ⅲc/ Ⅲ3	Ⅲ4
B₁/%	78/85	85/87		61/88	91	95/88	89/93	92/94	96	58/89	56/92	53/90	93
B₂/%	83/89	90/93		58/89	91	93/95	90/91	93/87	90	56/90	61/93	58/97	94
B₃/%	82/89	87/90		65/92	90	92/93	88/86	90/92	95	68/93	62/89	50/96	94
B₄/%	79/89	92/92		70/93	86	89/95	91/93	88/89	87	64/96	70/92	55/89	89
B₅/个	2/3	2/4		1/4	3	2/3	2/4	2/4	4	1/4	1/4	1/4	4
B₆/%	92/90	90/95		80/94	93	96/90	90/95	85/95	96	53/94	60/96	51/93	94
B₇/s	40/31	35/29	62/24		33	28/25	35/26	43/24	23	90/20	105/21	130/20	22
B₈/%	86/90	89/95	60/94		90	93/92	89/93	85/94	89	70/88	68/93	61/95	89
B₉/%	90/93	91/94	72/92		96	94/89	92/90	90/94	93	80/95	75/89	73/88	96
B₁₀/s	120/58	120/60	120/49		57	90/50	90/45	90/53	62	300/63	300/45	300/62	49
B₁₁/人	1/3	2/3	1/3		3	2/3	2/3	2/3	3	1/3	1/3	0/3	3
B₁₂/个	4/3	4/3	4/3		3	4/3	4/3	4/3	3	2/3	2/3	0/3	3
B₁₃/%	75/92	100/95	50/100		97	100/95	100/89	100/97	94	50/94	50/93	0/90	95
B₁₄	良好/ 良好	优秀/ 优秀	合格/ 优秀		良好	良好/ 优秀	良好/ 良好	良好/ 优秀	优秀	中等/ 优秀	合格/ 优秀	合格/ 良好	优秀
B₁₅	良好/ 良好	良好/ 良好	合格/ 优秀		优秀	优秀/ 良好	优秀/ 良好	良好/ 良好	优秀	合格/ 良好	中等/ 良好	合格/ 优秀	良好
B₁₆/a	1/2	3/3	0.3/4		2	3/3	3/2	3/4	4	0.5/4	0.5/3	0.5/2	3
B₁₇	普通/ 2舱	乘务长/ 主任	实习/ 主任		乘务长	主任/ 主任	2舱/ 2舱	2舱/ 主任	主任	实习/ 主任	实习/ 主任	实习/ 2舱	乘务长
小组个人贡献值/%	37/12	48/30	15/37		21	36/23	33/19	31/29	29	51/26	47/27	1/21	26

小组排名	Ⅱ组			Ⅰ组			Ⅲ组
演练组成绩	(91.30,0.240 1,0.104 8)			(63.58,1.245 4,0.459 6)			(14.07,0.522 5,0.189 5)
演练者排名	Ⅱa	Ⅱb	Ⅱc	Ⅰb	Ⅰa	Ⅰc	Ⅲa	Ⅲb	Ⅲc
演练者个人成绩	80.24	79.64	76.24	60.46	58.26	53.86	21.46	20.66	11.46

小组排名	Ⅲ组				Ⅱ组				Ⅰ组
演练组成绩	(64.34,1.1418,0.3380)				(60.92,1.3058,0.4806)				(51.99,1.3122,0.2416)
演练者排名	Ⅲ2	Ⅲ1	Ⅲ4	Ⅲ3	Ⅱ3	Ⅱ4	Ⅱ1	Ⅱ2	Ⅰ3	Ⅰ2	Ⅰ4	Ⅰ1
演练者个人成绩	56.87	56.67	56.67	55.67	54.54	54.54	53.34	52.54	48.99	47.59	45.79	43.99