高海拔铁路工程施工人员不安全行为评估

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.08.1447

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高高海拔铁路工程施工人员不安全行为评估的稳定性和精确性,从安全生理、安全心理、安全管理、安全环境、安全能力5个方面,编制高海拔铁路施工人员不安全行为心理测量量表,并针对西成铁路甘青隧道项目施工人员进行实测;利用粗糙集理论对量表测量结果进行属性约简、数据挖掘和重要度计算;构建施工人员不安全行为水平评估体系,利用软件Matlab正向云发生器绘制不安全行为水平综合评价云图,直观表达评估结果。结果表明:利用该评估体系获得的不安全行为评估结果与现场实际一致,该评估体系能够实时监控高海拔地区施工人员的不安全行为,有利于提高施工人员的安全行为水平。

关键词: 高海拔铁路工程, 施工人员, 不安全行为, 粗糙集理论, 云模型, 熵权法(EWM)

Abstract:

In order to improve the stability and accuracy of the assessment of unsafe behavior of high-altitude railway construction personnel, a psychological measurement scale of unsafe behavior of high-altitude railway construction personnel was compiled from five aspects: safety physiology, safety psychology, safety management, safety environment and safety ability. It was measured for the construction personnel of the Ganqing Tunnel Project of Xicheng Railway. The rough set theory was used to reduce attributes, data mining and calculate the importance of the results. The evaluation system of unsafe behavior level of construction personnel was constructed, and the software Matlab forward cloud generator was used to draw a comprehensive evaluation cloud map of unsafe behavior level to visually express the evaluation results. The results show that the unsafe behavior assessment results obtained by the evaluation system are consistent with the actual situation on site, and the evaluation system can monitor the unsafe behavior of construction personnel at high-altitude areas in real time, which is beneficial to improving the safety behavior level of construction personnel.

Key words: high-altitude railway project, construction personnel, unsafe behavior, rough set theory, cloud model, entropy weight method(EWM)

莫俊文, 王锐锐, 滕仓国. 高海拔铁路工程施工人员不安全行为评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 30-38.

MO Junwen, WANG Ruirui, TENG Cangguo. Assessment of unsafe behavior of construction personnel in high-altitude railway projects[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 30-38.

图/表 7

表1

表2

图1

表3

图2

表4

图3

参考文献 14

[1]	罗勋, 谢文强, 曾发镔. 基于云模型的复杂艰险山区深埋隧道施工通风系统综合评估[J]. 铁道学报, 2022, 44(3):123-131.
	LUO Xun, XIE Wenqiang, ZENG Fabin. Comprehensive evaluation of construction ventilation system of deep-buried tunnel at high altitude based on cloud model[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 44(3):123-131.
[2]	张琦, 王月峰, 李建春, 等. 深基坑紧邻地铁隧道安全评价方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4):95-104. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.04.013
	ZHANG Qi, WANG Yuefeng, LI Jianchun, et al. Evaluation method for safety of subway tunnels adjacent to deep foundation pits[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(4):95-104. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.04.013
[3]	ASADI Y, NEYSANI S N, KIAVARZ M M, et al. Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings using the rough set theory and weighted linear combination[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2022, 19(3): 11-13.
[4]	HAN Feng, LIU Zhibo, LI Liangying, et al. Study on ecological risk evaluation and optimum selection of desert expressway schemes based on the two-dimensional cloud model[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 2022:DOI:10.1155/2022/1361861.
[5]	周雪, 左忠义, 程伟. 基于组合赋权云模型的铁路旅客运输安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(增1):158-164.
	ZHOU Xue, ZUO Zhongyi, CHENG Wei. Safety evaluation of railway passenger transportation based on combined weighting cloud model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1):158-164. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.S1.028
[6]	虞未江, 贾超, 狄胜同, 等. 基于综合权重和改进物元可拓评价模型的地下水水质评价[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2019, 49(2):539-547.
	YU Weijiang, JIA Chao, DI Shengtong, et al. Ground water quality assessment based on comprehensive weight and improved matter-element extension evaluation model[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2019, 49(2):539-547.
[7]	程卫民, 周刚, 王刚, 等. 基于灰色-模糊-改进动量BP算法的矿工不安全行为评价方法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(1): 101-105.
	CHENG Weimin, ZHOU Gang, WANG Gang, et al. Evaluation method of miners' safety behavior based on gray-fuzzy-improving momentum BP algorithm[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(1): 101-105.
[8]	陈辰, 程嘉, 窦志平. 在用自动扶梯和自动人行道安全评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2):103-109. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.02.1298
	CHEN Chen, CHENG Jia, DOU Zhiping. Safety assessment of existing escalators and moving walks[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2):103-109. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.02.1298
[9]	卢彦君. 粗糙模糊聚类算法及其应用[D]. 银川: 北方民族大学, 2021.
	LU Yanjun. Rough-fuzzy clustering algorithm and its application[D]. Yinchuan: North Minzu University, 2021.
[10]	刘伦. 基于粗糙集的航空灾害预警决策支持系统研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2013.
	LIU Lun. Study on the aviation disaster warning decision support system based on the rough set-theoretical[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2013.
[11]	印勇. 粗糙集理论及其在数据挖掘中的应用[J]. 重庆大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 27(2):44-46,50.
	YIN Yong. Rough sets theory and its application to data mining[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2004, 27(2): 44-46,50.
[12]	莫俊文, 滕仓国, 李甲, 等. 基于熵权-二维云模型的高铁建设工程系统韧性评价[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(1):26-33.
	MO Junwen, TENG Cangguo, LI Jia, et al. Resilience evaluation of high-speed railway construction engineering system based on entropy weight-two dimensional cloud model[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19 (1):26-33.
[13]	鞠恒荣. 面向态势认知的粗糙集决策方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2019.
	JU Hengrong. Research on rough sets based decision making method for situation awareness[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2019.
[14]	陈旭婷. 基于SD模型的地铁施工人员安全能力仿真研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2020.
	CHEN Xuting. Simulation research on safety capability of subway construction workers based on SD model[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2020.

被试	条件属性									决策属性
被试	C₁	C₂	C₃	C₄	…	C₆₃	C₆₄	C₆₅	C₆₆	d
1	1	3	3	3	…	1	3	3	3	1
2	2	3	3	2	…	2	2	2	1	2
3	1	2	4	4	…	1	3	2	3	2
4	1	3	2	3	…	2	3	2	3	2
5	2	4	2	3	…	2	3	3	2	1
6	1	3	3	3	…	3	3	3	3	1
7	1	3	3	1	…	2	3	3	1	2
︙	︙	︙	︙	︙		︙	︙	︙	︙	︙
66	2	2	3	2	…	2	2	2	2	2
67	1	4	4	2	…	3	3	3	2	2
68	1	2	4	2	…	3	3	3	1	1
69	1	3	4	4	…	1	4	3	1	2
70	1	3	2	4	…	4	3	1	2	1
71	1	2	3	2	…	3	2	3	2	2
72	1	3	3	3	…	1	3	2	2	2

属性元素	重要度值	属性元素	重要度值	属性元素	重要度值	属性元素	重要度值
C₁	0.194 4	C₁₈	0.277 8	C₃₅	0	C₅₂	0.055 6
C₂	0	C₁₉	0.250 0	C₃₆	0.056	C₅₃	0
C₃	0.194 4	C₂₀	0.350 2	C₃₇	0	C₅₄	0.166 7
C₄	0.258 0	C₂₁	0.194 4	C₃₈	0.097 2	C₅₅	0.069 4
C₅	0.222 2	C₂₂	0.374 9	C₃₉	0.013 9	C₅₆	0.083 3
C₆	0.250 0	C₂₃	0.083 3	C₄₀	0.125 0	C₅₇	0
C₇	0.138 9	C₂₄	0.118 5	C₄₁	0.152 8	C₅₈	0.138 9
C₈	0.133 9	C₂₅	0.055 2	C₄₂	0.111 1	C₅₉	0.110 2
C₉	0.152 8	C₂₆	0.303 8	C₄₃	0.055 6	C₆₀	0
C₁₀	0.140 5	C₂₇	0.234 7	C₄₄	0.027 8	C₆₁	0
C₁₁	0.222 2	C₂₈	0.269 9	C₄₅	0.097 2	C₆₂	0.208 3
C₁₂	0.105 8	C₂₉	0.111 1	C₄₆	0.110 2	C₆₃	0.236 1
C₁₃	0.078 9	C₃₀	0.303 8	C₄₇	0.111 1	C₆₄	0.138 9
C₁₄	0.263 9	C₃₁	0.269 9	C₄₈	0.055 6	C₆₅	0
C₁₅	0.138 9	C₃₂	0	C₄₉	0.069 4	C₆₆	0.166 7
C₁₆	0	C₃₃	0.180 6	C₅₀	0	—	—
C₁₇	0.250 0	C₃₄	0.097 2	C₅₁	0.055 6	—	—

综合评价云		一级评价云			二级评价云
目标	数字特征	指标	权重	数字特征	指标	权重	数字特征
B	(1.431,0.819,0.369)	B₁	0.102 5	(1.447,0.637,0.217)	B₁₁	0.166 0	(0.680,0.207,0.124)
					B₁₂	0.357 2	(0.916,0.541,0.204)
					B₁₃	0	(0,0,0)
					B₁₄	0.476 2	(2.113,0.859,0.258)
		B₂	0.156 8	(0.622,0.376,0.174)	B₂₁	0.352 2	(0.720,0.460,0.259)
					B₂₂	0.203 9	(0.674,0.419,0.158)
					B₂₃	0.177 6	(0.406,0.255,0.124)
					B₂₄	0.266 6	(0.932,0.490,0.170)
		B₃	0.291 2	(1.178,0.699,0.307)	B₃₁	0.175 3	(0.585,0.350,0.127)
					B₃₂	0.480 5	(1.672,0.950,0.413)
					B₃₃	0.052 0	(0.124,0.078,0.387)
					B₃₄	0.291 9	(0.918,0.609,0.287)
		B₄	0.162 1	(2.251,1.051,0.496)	B₄₁	0.670 0	(3.203,1.467,0.679)
					B₄₂	0.155 3	(0.306,0.195,0.117)
					B₄₃	0.174 8	(0.330,0.216,0.129)
		B₅	0.287 4	(1.66,1.117,0.522)	B₅₁	0.104 4	(0.403,0.269,0.124)
					B₅₂	0.701 6	(2.220,1.499,0.699)
					B₅₃	0	(0,0,0)
					B₅₄	0.104 4	(0.435,0.265,0.121)
					B₅₅	0.089 5	(0.184,0.112,0.067)

目标	指标	影响系数		初始值	指标	影响系数		初始值
B	B₁	W₁	0.103	0.60	B₁₁	W₁₁	0.139	0.50
					B₁₂	W₁₂	0.298	0.60
					B₁₃	W₁₃	0	0.50
					B₁₄	W₁₄	0.397	0.40
	B₂	W₂	0.157	0.60	B₂₁	W₂₁	0.271	0.60
					B₂₂	W₂₂	0.157	0.70
					B₂₃	W₂₃	0.136	0.45
					B₂₄	W₂₄	0.205	0.56
	B₃	W₃	0.291	0.60	B₃₁	W₃₁	0.159	0.85
					B₃₂	W₃₂	0.437	0.65
					B₃₃	W₃₃	0.047	0.55
					B₃₄	W₃₄	0.266	0.45
	B₄	W₄	0.162	0.60	B₄₁	W₄₁	0.609	0.20
					B₄₂	W₄₂	0.141	0.23
					B₄₃	W₄₃	0.159	0.50
	B₅	W₅	0.287	0.60	B₅₁	W₅₁	0.087	0.44
					B₅₂	W₅₂	0.585	0.52
					B₅₃	W₅₃	0	0.45
					B₅₄	W₅₄	0.087	0.24
					B₅₅	W₅₅	0.075	0.55

[1]	李长明, 赵开功, 张晓蕾, 王睿迪, 李严肃. 煤矿智能化项目风险评价云模型及其应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 168-174.
[2]	王丹, 高雯雯. 基于组合赋权-偏序集的应急供应链可靠性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 231-237.
[3]	吴建军, 陈炎, 朱清华, 胡甚平. 紧迫危险威胁下交叉相遇局面应急操船方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 238-246.
[4]	王东营, 陈小平, 刘权, 赵天浩, 闫序. 基于改进的云模型-FMEA的油气管道风险排序[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 61-68.
[5]	陈娜, 胡毅彤, 袁英峰, 秦向南, 刘军. 基于博弈论组合赋权-云模型的消防员训练损伤风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 232-238.
[6]	赵树磊, 孙兵, 陈稳干, 徐寅峰, 王俊峰, 郭春. 超高海拔隧道施工人员生理指标变化及劳动强度研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 239-246.
[7]	王军武, 何娟娟, 宋盈辉, 刘一鹏, 陈兆, 郭婧怡. 基于RF-SFLA-SVM的装配式建筑高空作业工人不安全行为预警[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(3): 1-8.
[8]	黄国平, 雷皓翔. 基于云-TOPSIS法的应急物流供应商综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 217-224.
[9]	江新, 张腾飞, 陈婧, 赵力, 邱国坤, 王辉. 复杂系统视角下洞室施工人员安全认知仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 22-30.
[10]	倪国栋, 杨栎, 安瑶瑶, 郑雨茁. 不安全行为信息在建筑工人群体中的传染机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 43-52.
[11]	周海怡, 鲍全贵, 叶茂, 朱圣文, 林颖典. 基于组合赋权法的城市桥梁可靠性模糊综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 156-161.
[12]	王振宇, 向泽锐, 邹瑞, 丁铁成, 支锦亦. 融合点阵拓扑优化法和熵权法的铲运机外观设计[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 215-221.
[13]	李凤, 张来斌, 董绍华, 陈林, 张行. 基于EWM-AHP-云模型的站场法兰系统密封失效风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 150-156.
[14]	古莹奎, 汪源金, 石昌武. 基于EWM和SVR的滚动轴承剩余使用寿命预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 49-55.
[15]	魏琳, 李丽华, 秦立强, 肖延辉, 唐玉光. 城市地铁恐怖袭击事件应急能力综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 213-221.