考虑各向异性影响的煤层吸附及渗透机制研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.007

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 41-46.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.007

考虑各向异性影响的煤层吸附及渗透机制研究

李波波^1,2,3 副教授, 李建华¹, 杨康¹, 任崇鸿¹, 王斌¹

1.贵州大学矿业学院,贵州贵阳 550025;
2.贵州大学喀斯特山区优势矿产资源高效利用国家地方联合工程实验室,贵州贵阳 550025;
3.山东科技大学矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,山东青岛 266590

收稿日期:2019-11-19 修回日期:2020-01-15 出版日期:2020-02-28 发布日期:2021-01-25
作者简介:李波波(1985—),男,贵州修文人,博士,副教授,主要从事煤层气渗流、矿井灾害防治等方面的工作。E-mail:bbli@gzu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51804085,51911530203);贵州省科技计划资助项目(黔科合平台人才[2018]5781号)。

Research on adsorption and permeability mechanism of coal seams considering influence of anisotropy

LI Bobo^1,2,3, LI Jianhua¹, YANG Kang ¹, REN Chonghong¹, WANG Bin¹

1. College of Mining,Guizhou University,Guiyang Guizhou 550025,China;
2. National Joint Engineering Laboratory for the Utilization of Dominant Mineral Resources in Karst Mountain Area,Guizhou University,Guiyang Guizhou 550025,China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao Shandong 266590,China

Received:2019-11-19 Revised:2020-01-15 Online:2020-02-28 Published:2021-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究煤层各向异性渗流机制,分析其吸附特性,建立吸附模型并计算吸附变形量,进而量化吸附作用对渗透率的贡献情况。在此基础上分析煤层各向异性渗流特性,进一步构建应力和滑脱效应耦合作用的各向异性渗透率模型,并通过试验数据验证其适用性。结果表明:煤层瓦斯吸附过程受吸附变形和外应力的影响,且不同方向的瓦斯吸附量存在差异;在孔隙压力增大过程中,各方向瓦斯吸附量曲线先增大后趋于平缓;在有效应力、孔隙压力和滑脱效应的综合作用下,煤层各方向的渗透率均先减小后趋于平缓。考虑应力和滑脱效应耦合作用下煤层各向异性渗透率模型计算曲线与试验值吻合度较高,验证了模型的适用性。

关键词: 各向异性, 孔隙压力, 吸附模型, 煤层, 渗透率

Abstract: In order to explore the anisotropic seepage mechanism of coal seams, an adsorption model was established by analyzing its adsorption characteristics and the amount of adsorption deformation was calculated. Furthermore, the contribution of adsorption to permeability was quantified. On this basis, the anisotropic seepage characteristics of coal seams were analyzed. An anisotropic permeability model with coupling effect of stress and slippage effect was further constructed, and its applicability was verified by experimental data. The results show that the coal seam gas adsorption process is affected by sorption-induced deformation and external stress and there are differences in gas absorption amount in different directions, that during the increase of pore pressure, the gas adsorption curve in each direction shows a trend of increasing first and then flattening out, that under the combined effect of effective stress, pore pressure and slippage effect, the permeability of coal seams in all directions shows a decreasing trend and then a gentle change, and that considering the coupling effect of stress and slippage, the calculated curve of the anisotropic permeability model of the coal seam is in good agreement with the experimental value, which verifies the applicability of the model.

Key words: anisotropic, pore pressure, adsorption model, coal seam, permeability

中图分类号:

X936

李波波, 李建华, 杨康, 任崇鸿, 王斌. 考虑各向异性影响的煤层吸附及渗透机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 41-46.

LI Bobo, LI Jianhua, YANG Kang , REN Chonghong, WANG Bin. Research on adsorption and permeability mechanism of coal seams considering influence of anisotropy[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2): 41-46.

参考文献 23

[1]	张浩浩, 李胜, 范超军, 等. 煤岩渗透率各向异性模型及瓦斯抽采模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12):109-115.ZHANG Haohao, LI Sheng, FAN Chaojun, et al. Study on model for coal rock permeability anisotropy and simulation of gas extraction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(12):109-115.
[2]	尹光志, 李文璞, 李铭辉, 等. 加卸载条件下原煤渗透率与有效应力的规律[J].煤炭学报, 2014, 39(8):1 497-1 503.YIN Guangzhi, LI Wenpu, LI Minghui, et al. Permeability properties and effective stress of raw coal under loading-unloading conditions[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(8):1 497-1 503.
[3]	周军平, 鲜学福, 李晓红, 等. 吸附不同气体对煤岩渗透特性的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(11):2 256-2 262.ZHOU Junping, XIAN Xuefu, LI Xiaohong, et al. Effective of different adsorptional gases on permeability of coal[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(11):2 256-2 262.
[4]	MAZUMDER S, WOLF K H. Differential swelling and permeability change of coal in response to CO2 injection for ECBM[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, 74:123-138.
[5]	唐巨鹏,潘一山,李成全,等. 有效应力对煤层气解吸渗流影响试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006, 25(8):1 563-1 568.TANG Jupeng, PAN Yishan, LI Chengquan, et al. Experimental study on effect of effective stress on desorption and seepage of coalbed methane[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(8): 1 563-1 568.
[6]	ZOU Junpeng, CHEN Weizhong, YANG Diansen, et al. The impact of effective stress and gas slippage on coal permeability under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 31:236-248.
[7]	臧杰, 王凯, 刘昂, 等. 煤层正交各向异性渗透率演化模型[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(1):36-45.ZANG Jie, WANG Kai, LIU Ang, et al. An orthotropic coal per meability model[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(1):36-45.
[8]	王登科, 吕瑞环, 彭明, 等. 含瓦斯煤渗透率各向异性研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(4):1 008-1 015.WANG Dengke, LYU Ruihuan, PENG Ming, et al. Experimental study on anisotropic permeability rulr of coal bearing methane[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(4):1 008-1 015.
[9]	YANG Diansen, QI Xianyin, CHEN Weizhong, et al. Numerical investigation on the coupled gas-solid behavior of coal using an improved anisotropic permeability model[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 34:226-235.
[10]	TAN Yuling, PAN Zhejun, LIU Jishan, et al. Experimental study of impact of anisotropy and heterogeneity on gas flow in coal. Part I: diffusion and adsorption[J]. Fuel, 2018, 232:444-453.
[11]	TAN Yuling, PAN Zhejun, LIU Jishan, et al. Experimental study of impact of anisotropy and heterogeneity on gas flow in coal. Part II: permeability[J]. Fuel, 2018, 230:397-409.
[12]	杨康, 李波波, 任崇鸿, 等. 温度作用下考虑过剩吸附的煤岩吸附模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10):137-142.YANG Kang, LI Bobo, REN Chonghong, et al. Research on a modified model for adsorption of methane on coal under temperature effect considering excess adsorption[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(10):137-142.
[13]	YE Zhihui, CHEN Dong, PAN Zhejun, et al. An improved Langmuir model for evaluating methane adsorption capacity in shale under various pressures and temperatures[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 31:658-680.
[14]	COCHRAN T W, KABEL R L, DANNER R P. Vacancy solution theory of adsorption using Flory-Huggins activity coefficient equations[J]. Aiche Journal, 1985, 31(2): 268-277.
[15]	TANG Xu, RIPEPI N, STADIE N P, et al. A dual-site Langmuir equation for accurate estimation of high pressure deep shale gas resources[J]. Fuel, 2016, 185:10-17.
[16]	LIU Shimin, HARALANI S. A new theoretical approach to model sorption-induced coal shrinkage or swelling[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(7):1 033-1 049.
[17]	ZHOU Yinbo, LI Zenghua, YANG Yongliang, et al. Evolution of coal permeability with cleat deformation and variable Klinkenberg effect[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2016, 115(1):153-167.
[18]	WANG Jianguo, HU Bowen, LIU Hua, et al. Effects of 'soft-hard' compaction and multiscale flow on the shale gas production from a multistage hydraulic fractured horizontal well[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 70:873-887.
[19]	CHEN Zhongwei, LIU Jishan, PAN Zhejun, et al. Influence of the effective stress coefficient and sorption-induced strain on the evolution of coal permeability: model development and analysis[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 8:101-110.
[20]	SUTCU M. Orthotropic and transversely isotropic stress-strain relations with built-in coordinate transformations[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1992, 29(4):503-518.
[21]	ZANG Jie, WANG Kai. A numerical model for simulating single-phase gas flow in anisotropic coal[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 28:153-172.
[22]	袁梅, 许江, 李波波, 等. 气体压力加卸载过程中无烟煤变形及渗透特性的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(10):2 138-2 146.YUAN Mei, XU Jiang, LI Bobo, et al. Experimental study of permeability and deformation of anthracite during process of gaseous loading-unloading[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(10): 2 138-2 146.
[23]	LAUBACH S E, MARRETT R A, OLSON J E, et al. Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: a review[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1998, 35(1/2/3/4):175-207.

考虑各向异性影响的煤层吸附及渗透机制研究

Research on adsorption and permeability mechanism of coal seams considering influence of anisotropy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩雷 , 沈春明, 王维华. 水力切槽钻孔瓦斯涌出特征及渗透率反演分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 105-112.
[2]	欧阳振华, 周鑫鑫, 孙秉成, 易海洋, 刘旭东, 周然然. 近直立煤层冲击地压自保护卸压机制与防控^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 64-71.
[3]	王俏, 王兆丰, 马树俊, 张康佳. 冷冻取芯过程煤样温度变化特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 76-81.
[4]	季鹏飞, 林海飞, 孔祥国, 龙航, 李博涛. 注氮促排煤体瓦斯数值模拟研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 127-134.
[5]	成巧耘, 李波波, 李建华, 高政, 王斌. 支撑剂嵌入作用下煤岩裂隙压缩性及渗流特性^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 105-111.
[6]	张玉鹏, 张玉军, 刘毅涛, 宋业杰, 赵秋阳. 蒙西深部厚煤层大采高综采面覆岩破坏高度研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 37-43.
[7]	张耀辉, 李西凡, 熊祖强, 王成. 厚煤层综采工作面空巷综合治理技术[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 71-77.
[8]	郭敬中, 金龙哲, 杨朝霞, 赵启峰, 蒋大峰. 应用渗透棒提高煤层注水效果分析及试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 54-59.
[9]	杨正凯, 程志恒, 刘彦青, 王宏冰, 杨鹏, 孙福龙. 突出煤层群多次采动对底板穿层钻孔瓦斯抽采的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 66-73.
[10]	贾进章, 葛佳琪, 甄纹浩, 赵丹. 水力压裂增透技术及应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 63-68.
[11]	贾男. 煤层脉动式酸化压裂增透技术及其应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 75-81.
[12]	翁安琦, 袁树杰, 王晓楠, 马瑞峰. 煤层注水降尘中表面活性剂复配应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 90-95.
[13]	钟涛平, 李振雷, 刘旭东, 宋大钊, 冯攀飞, 李东辉. 近直立特厚煤层分段综放开采巷道布置研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 96-104.
[14]	李宏, 马金魁, 邓其根. 顶板灰岩瓦斯涌出异常分析及治理技术[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 81-86.
[15]	谢雄刚, 赵先伟, 邓爱萍, 王潞欧, 李维翔. 静态膨胀剂开裂煤与瓦斯突出煤层的试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 99-104.