Safety risk mechanism of GT-SEM based amphibious seaplane during take-off and landing

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.04.025

Abstract

Abstract: This research is conducted for the purposing of exploring the take-off and landing safety risk mechanism of amphibious seaplanes and effectively preventing such risks. Firstly, the risk factors of take-off and landing of amphibious seaplanes were identified by encoding 28 accident statistical reports and interview records of 29 interviewees on the basis of GT, and then a conceptual model of risk factors was constructed. Secondly, data was collected through questionnaires, factor analysis was used to screen risk factors, and the interrelation between risk factors were explored. Finally, SEM was applied to reveal the function route of risk factors to take-off and landing safety. The results show that the conceptual model of risk factors includes 33 specific factors under 4 categories: personnel, equipment and facilities, environment and management. The 4 categories are obviously interrelated with each other and they have significant influence on the function route coefficients of take-off and landing safety risks.

Key words: grounded theory (GT), amphibious seaplane, take-off and landing safety, risk identification, structural equation model (SEM)

CLC Number:

X949

XIAO Qin, LUO Fan. Safety risk mechanism of GT-SEM based amphibious seaplane during take-off and landing[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 158-163.

References

[1] LLIOPOULOU C, KEPAPTSOGLOU K, KARLAFTIS M G. Route planning for a seaplane service: the case of the Greek Islands[J]. Computers & Operation Research, 2015, 59: 66-77.
[2] XIAO Qin, LUO Fan. Discussion on the construction problem of civil seadrome[J]. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 2017, 28(3): 3 596-3 599.
[3] 翁建军, 秦雪儿, 李亚攀. 水上飞机起降移动安全区定量计算分析[J]. 中国航海, 2016, 39(3): 87-92.
WENG Jianjun, QIN Xueer, LI Yapan. Quantitative method for establishing moving safety zone around seaplane during taking-off and landing[J]. Navigation of China, 2016, 39(3): 87-92.
[4] 翁建军, 周阳. 水上飞机与船舶碰撞风险因素建模[J]. 中国航海, 2013, 36(3): 70-75.
WENG Jianjun, ZHOU Yang. Analysis of risk factors of seaplane-vessel collision based on the integration of DEMATEL and ISM[J]. Navigation of China, 2013, 36(3): 70-75.
[5] GUO Guoping,XU Yuanchun,WU Bing. Overview of current progress and development of seaplane safety management[C]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering, 2016: 58-63.
[6] 张攀科, 罗帆. 水上机场航道冲突风险机制的FTA-BN建模[J].中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 177-182.
ZHANG Panke, LUO Fan. FTA-BN modeling of runway conflict risk mechanism at water aerodrome[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(9): 177-182.
[7] 李琰, 于瑾慧. 矿工不安全行为成本和收益因素识别与分析:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 152-157.
LI Yan, YU Jinhui. Miners' unsafe behavior cost and benefit factors recognition and analysis: based on grounded theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(9): 152-157.
[8] PANDIT N R. The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method[J]. The Qualitative Report, 1996, 2(4): 4-7.
[9] 杜晓君, 刘赫. 基于扎根理论的中国企业海外并购关键风险的识别研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012, 24(4): 18-27.
DU Xiaojun, LIU He. A grounded-theory-based study on the key risk identification of Chinese enterprises' cross-border M&As[J]. Management Review, 2012, 24(4): 18-27.
[10] 陈劲, 景劲松, 沈祖志. 复杂产品系统创新项目风险作用机理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, 13(S1): 157-164.
CHEN Jin, JING Jinsong, SHEN Zuzhi. A study on mechanism of risk in innovation project of cops[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005, 13(S1): 157-164.
[11] DOLL W J, XIA Weidong, TORKZADEH G. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computer satisfaction index[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1994,18(4): 453-461.
[12] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS 的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009: 263-305.

[1]	CHEN Yanlin, HUANG Wenwei, LI Hongyang. Relationship between error management climate and workers' safety performance in construction enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 28-34.
[2]	JI Xiaofeng, GENG Zhaoshi, PU Yongming, LU Mengyuan, QIN Wenwen. Influence of access roads on accident risks of mountainous two-lane highway passing through villages and towns segments [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 155-162.
[3]	FANG Xue, XIE Chaowu, HUANG Rui. Formation mechanism of safety accidents in domestic drifting tourism based on GT [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(4): 23-29.
[4]	YI Tao, LI Jizu. Influence of job insecurity on miners' safety performance: based on perspective of intergenerational difference [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(4): 49-56.
[5]	ZHANG Lei, PENG Jinshuan, CHEN Xiaoli. Design of driving distraction behavior scale and analysis of influencing factors [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(11): 39-46.
[6]	LIU Shaojun, SHANG Yuan, CHEN Dong. CRRC safety management system based on grade evaluation and hidden danger management [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 6-10.
[7]	WANG Meng, LIU Jiaxing, HOU Xueqing, HUO Menghua, DENG Xiuquan. Formation mechanism of emergencies along high-speed rail [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 179-187.
[8]	YE Gui, LI Xuezheng, XIANG Qingting, YUE Hongzhe. Research on formation mechanism of construction workers' DVB motivation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(8): 12-17.
[9]	WANG Dan, QIN Yunyun. Influence of paternalistic leadership on safety behaviors of employees: mediating effect of psychological capital and moderating effect of cynicism [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(8): 25-30.
[10]	ZHANG Jianshe, ZHANG Wenyu, CHENG Ruiya, LUO Chunyang, WANG Tianxing. Structural equation model between safety accidents and network capability of construction enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 57-63.
[11]	AN Yu, LI Jianfei, LI Hongwei, QI Minghui, XU Surui, TONG Ruipeng. Relationship between work stress and behaviors of safety supervisors in mines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(1): 7-13.
[12]	XIE Anna, YIN Panpan, WANG Zhiyuan. Influence factor analysis of railway passenger transportation safety based on SEM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(S2): 30-34.
[13]	ZHANG Jianshe, LUO Chunyang, CHENG Mengyuan, ZHAO Yifan. Structural equation model between safety accidents and organizational culture of construction enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(7): 129-136.
[14]	YUAN Xuan, CHEN Yao, YUAN Guochang. Study on psychological distance model of risk perception of cavern construction workers [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(5): 31-36.
[15]	JIANG Lan, LIU Yaqin, SUN Jia. Research on relationship between work stress and unsafe behaviors of airport security staff [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 13-18.