Evaluation of safety resilience in tunnel construction based onideal fuzzy matter element

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.009

Abstract

Abstract: In order to ensure safety of tunnel construction, a concept of safety resilience in tunnel construction was put forward based on characteristic of resilience theory. First, considering characteristics of tunnel engineering, engineering geology, emergency management and other factors, evaluation index system of tunnel construction safety and toughness including 9 indexes was determined from resilience attributes of resistance, adaptability and recovery capability. Then, based on ideal fuzzy matter-element, evaluation model of safety resilience in tunnel construction was established. Finally, with reference to Dagala tunnel, resilience rating was class Ⅱ, which was low. The results show that Dagala tunnel system is less able to resist external intrusion and prevent disasters, low level of toughness. Evaluation results of safety resilience in tunnel construction based on ideal fuzzy matter-element are consistent with actual conditions of project.

Key words: tunnel construction, safety resilience evaluation, ideal fuzzy matter element, evaluation model, resilience level

CLC Number:

X913.4

WEI Qiang, LIU Jiaqi, WANG Jingchun, WANG Peng. Evaluation of safety resilience in tunnel construction based onideal fuzzy matter element[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 62-68.

References

[1] 郑宗溪, 孙其清. 川藏铁路隧道工程 [J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(8): 1 049-1 054.
ZHENG Zongxi, SUN Qiqing. Sichuan-Tibet railway tunnel project [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(8): 1 049-1 054.
[2] 王景春, 林佳秀, 靳俊中. 基于云模型的隧道突水突泥风险评估 [J]. 铁道标准设计, 2019, 63(3): 100-104, 142.
WANG Jingchun, LIN Jiaxiu, JIN Junzhong. Risk assessment of water gushing and mud bursting in tunnels based on cloud model [J]. Railway Standard Design, 2019,63(3): 100-104,142.
[3] ANITA C, DANIJEL M, KRESO I. A risk-assessment methodology in tunneling [J]. Technical Gazette, 2011, 18(4): 529-536.
[4] 吕擎峰, 霍振升, 赵彦旭, 等. 基于TSP的隧道施工风险评估 [J]. 铁道标准设计, 2018, 62(8): 117-123.
LYU Qingfeng, HUO Zhensheng, ZHAO Yanxu, et al. Risk assessment of tunnel construction based on tunnel seismic prediction [J]. Railway Standard Design, 2018, 62(8): 117-123.
[5] 刘杰, 宋亮, 毛爱民, 等. 基于FAHP-ISPA-PCN耦合的隧道施工动态评价模型 [J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(2): 559-566.
LIU Jie, SONG Liang, MAO Aimin, et al. Tunnel construction risk dynamic evaluation model based on the coupling of FAHP-ISPA-PCN[J] . Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(2): 559-566.
[6] 王頠, 黄斌, 周强, 等. 隧道总体风险评价的改进模糊评判方法 [J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(2): 531-538.
WANG Wei, HUANG Bin, ZHOU Qiang, et al. Improved fuzzy assessment method of total risk for tunnel engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(2): 531-538.
[7] 王洪德, 朱贵东. 隧道施工过程的三角模糊数与神经网络安全评估[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 35(6): 613-617.
WANG Hongde, ZHU Guidong. Safety assessment for subway construction process with triangular fuzzy number and neural network [J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University:Natural Science, 2016, 35(6): 613-617.
[8] CRAIG R A, DAVID G A. Quantifying spatial resilience[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 53(3): 617-624.
[9] 黄浪, 吴超, 杨冕, 等. 韧性理论在安全科学领域中的应用 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 1-6.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao, YANG Mian, et al. Application of resilience theory in the field of safety science [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(3): 1-6.
[10] 王景春, 赵福全, 王炳华, 等. 多因素影响下的地铁车站深基坑韧性评估 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 154-159.
WANG Jingchun, ZHAO Fuquan, WANG Binghua, et al. Resilience evaluation for deep foundation pit of metro station under influence of multiple factors [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(10): 154-159.
[11] 汪洋, 黄金辉, 付姗姗, 等. 系统安全的思维转型:风险与韧性的比较研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 62-68.
WANG Yang, HUANG Jinhui, FU Shanshan, et al. Thinking transformation of system safety: a comparative study of risk and resilience [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(1): 62-68.
[12] CHINWE I S, WIESMANN U, STEPHAN R. An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social-ecological dynamics [J]. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 2014, 28: 109-119.
[13] MACASKILL K, GUTHRIE P. Multiple interpretations of resilience in disaster risk management [J]. Procedia Economics & Finance, 2014, 18: 667-674.
[14] 黄浪, 吴超, 王秉. 系统安全韧性的塑造与评估建模 [J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(12): 15-21.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao, WANG Bing. Modeling on shaping and assessment of system safety resilience [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(12): 15-21.
[15] ROYCE F, BEHAILU B. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014, 121(1): 90-103.
[16] Q/CR 9006—2014, 铁路建设工程风险管理技术规范[S].
Q/CR 9006-2014, Technical code for risk management of railway construction engineering [S].