Studies on research objects of safety science

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.01.0124

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the appropriate research object of safety science from a perspective of practice, based on the methods of logical analysis and deductive reasoning, six criteria were constructed to evaluate the research object of the discipline. And on the basis of analysing the presuppositions, advantages and disadvantages of 11 main views, it was argued that accident is the appropriate research object of safety science from the perspective of practice. The results show that the research object in practice should have the characteristics of uniqueness, clarity, generalization, comprehensiveness, maturity and deducibility. The main views can not meet these characteristics of the research object that should be met in practice. The proposal of a clear definition of accident solves the demand for the concept of general safety. The essential problem of safety science is accident prevention.

Key words: safety science, research object, accident, research presupposition, practical perspective

CLC Number:

X91安全科学基础理论

LI Xiao, FU Gui. Studies on research objects of safety science[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 35-42.

Figures/Tables 3

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

References 36

[1]	张景林, 王晶禹, 黄浩. 安全科学的研究对象与知识体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(2): 16-21.
	ZHANG Jinglin, WANG Jingyu, HUANG Hao. The object of study of safety science and its knowledge system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17 (2): 16-21.
[2]	傅贵. 安全科学学及其应用探讨[J]. 安全, 2019, 40(2): 1-10.
	FU Gui. The science of safety science and its practical implications[J]. Safety & Security, 2019, 40 (2): 1-10.
[3]	库尔曼·A德. 安全科学导论[M]. 赵云胜, 魏伴云, 罗云,等, 译. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1991:1-3.
	KUHLMANN A. Introduction to safety science[M]. ZHAO Yunsheng, WEI Banyun, LUO Yun, et al, Translated. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 1991: 1-3.
[4]	傅贵, 张江石, 许素睿. 论安全科学技术学科体系的结构和内涵[J]. 中国工程科学, 2004, 6(8):12-16.
	FU Gui, ZHANG Jiangshi, XU Surui. Critical examination of safety science[J]. Engineering Science, 2004, 6(8):12-16. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20210601.12
[5]	HOLLNAGEL E. Is safety a subject for science?[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025
[6]	LEVESON N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237-270. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
[7]	HALE A. Foundations of safety science: a postscript[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.001
[8]	刘潜. 安全科学[J]. 劳动安全与健康, 1994(5): 14-17.
[9]	LEVESON N. Safety-III: a systems approach to safety and resilience[EB/OL]. [2020-01-07]. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/safety-3.pdf.
[10]	AVEN T. What is safety science?[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.026
[11]	吕保和. 安全科学若干基础问题研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2006, 8(11): 57-61.
	LYU Baohe. Study on some basic problems of safety science[J]. Engineering Science, 2006, 8 (11): 57-61.
[12]	吴超, 杨冕. 安全科学原理及其结构体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(11): 3-10.
	WU Chao, YANG Mian. Study of safety science principles and their constructions[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(11): 3-10.
[13]	MISUMI Y, SATO Y. Estimation of average hazardous-event-frequency for allocation of safety-integrity levels[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1999, 66(2): 135-144. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00030-7
[14]	刘雪涛. 安全系统工程概况[J]. 核动力工程, 1985, 6(6): 87-90.
[15]	许铭, 吴宗之, 罗云, 等. 论安全科学的研究对象[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(12): 3-8.
	XU Ming, WU Zongzhi, LUO Yun, et al. Discussion on research objects of safety science[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25 (12): 3-8.
[16]	GE Ji, XU Kaili, WU Chunying, et al. What is the object of safety science?[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 118: 907-914. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.029
[17]	梁振东. 人-机-环-管系统管理视角下的矿业员工不安全行为干预对策研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2014, 23(4): 20-24.
	LIANG Zhendong. Intervention of the miners unsafe behaviors from the perspective ofman machine-environment management system[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2014, 23 (4): 20-24.
[18]	傅贵, 章仕杰. 事故的直接原因及危险源与隐患关系解析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 1-5. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.05.001
	FU Gui, ZHANG Shijie. Analysis of direct cause of accident and relationship between hazard and hidden danger[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28 (5): 1-5. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.05.001
[19]	ISO GUIDE 73-2009, Risk management-vocabulary[S].
[20]	徐德蜀, 金磊, 罗云. 关于安全科学技术学科建设的研究[J]. 劳动安全与健康, 1999(1):23-26.
[21]	HOPKINS A. Issues in safety science[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.007
[22]	林坚, 刘文. 土地科学研究对象和学科属性的思考[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(4): 4-10.
	LIN Jian, LIU Wen. Research object and discipline attribute of land science[J]. China Land Science, 2015, 29 (4): 4-10.
[23]	傅贵, 杨晓雨, 刘卓栩, 等. 安全科学的学科基本问题研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 18-24. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.003
	FU Gui, YANG Xiaoyu, LIU Zhuoxu, et al. Studies on fundamentals of safety science[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31 (5): 18-24. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.003
[24]	王南湜. 社会哲学:现代实践哲学视野中的社会生活[M]. 昆明: 云南人民出版社, 2001:11-14.
[25]	赵宏展, 徐向东. 危险源的概念辨析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(1): 65-70.
	ZHAO Hongzhan, XU Xiangdong. Discrimination of the concept of hazard[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2006, 16 (1): 65-70.
[26]	REASON J. Human error[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 214-215.
[27]	GIBSON J. The contribution of experimental psychology to the formulation of the problem of safety:a brief for basic research[M]. Behavioral approaches to accident research. New York: Association for the Aid of Crippled Children, 1961: 77-89.
[28]	陈信, 龙升照. 人-机-环境系统工程学概论[J]. 自然杂志, 1985, 8 (1):36-38,80.
[29]	GUILLAUME E G. Identifying and responding to weak signals to improve learning from experiences in high-risk industry[D]. Delft: Technische Universiteit Delft, 2011.
[30]	傅贵, 袁晨辉, 时照, 等. 安全科学名词含义的研究方法及“安全”的含义解析[J]. 安全, 2021, 42(7): 1-5.
	FU Gui, YUAN Chenhui, SHI Zhao, et al. Research methods of safety science terms and analysis of the meaning of "safety"[J]. Safety & Security, 2021, 42 (7): 1-5.
[31]	钟期进. 中美安全科学发展“黄金十年”比较研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2010.
	ZHONG Qijin. Comparative study on the "golden ten-year" development of safety science between China and USA[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2010.
[32]	GREENWOOD M, WOODS H M. The incidence of industrial accidents upon individuals with special reference to multiple accidents[M]. London:Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Medical Research Committee, 1919:2-28.
[33]	HEINRICH H W. Industrial accident prevention:a scientific approach[M]. New York; London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Incorporated, 1931:1-10.
[34]	傅贵. 傅贵教授解析“安全基本术语”[J]. 安全, 2018, 39(6): 1-4.
[35]	傅贵, 陆柏, 陈秀珍. 基于行为科学的组织安全管理方案模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(9): 21-27.
	FU Gui, LU Bai, CHEN Xiuzhen. Behavior based model for organizational safety management[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15 (9): 21-27.
[36]	黄浪, 吴超. 事故致因模型体系及建模一般方法与发展趋势[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(2): 10-16.
	HUANG Lang, WU Chao. Study on system of accident-causing model and its general modeling methods and development trend[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13 (2): 10-16.

类型	研究对象
逆向(负面事件、非安全状态)	事故、灾事、安全问题、风险、危险源、危险源+隐患+事故
正向(本原安全)	安全、安全-I、安全-II、安全-III、安全现象
中性(系统)	人-机-环系统、危险源-目标系统

安全科学的研究对象	提出者	研究预设
人-机-环系统	库尔曼^[3]	事前控制、系统综合防治、安全技术
风险、危险源	MISUMI等^[13];刘雪涛^[14]	危险源辨识、风险控制、定性定量
灾事	吕保和^[11]	大安全观、共性问题、避免人受危害
安全问题	张景林等^[1]	大安全观、共性问题、避免人受危害
安全现象	吴超等^[12]	本原安全、安全科学学、安全系统思想
安全	刘潜^[8]	本原安全、积极动态研究、安全系统思想
安全-I	AVEN^[10]	本原安全、风险视角、不确定性
安全-II	HOLLNAGEL^[5]	本原安全、积极动态研究
安全-III	LEVESON^[9]	本原安全、系统安全方法、危险源控制
危险源+隐患+事故	许铭等^[15]	隐患排查治理、全过程管理
危险源-目标系统	GE Ji等^[16]	系统思维、MADS模型、H-B-T模型

主要观点	独特性	清晰性	概括性	全面性	成熟性	演绎性
人-机-环系统	×	√	√	√	√	×
风险、危险源	√	×	√	√	√	√
灾事	√	×	√	√	×	√
安全问题	√	×	√	×	×	×
安全现象	√	×	√	√	√	√
安全	√	×	√	√	√	√
安全-I	√	×	√	√	√	√
安全-II	√	×	√	×	×	√
安全-III	√	×	√	√	√	√
危险源+隐患+事故	√	×	√	×	√	×
危险源-目标系统	√	×	√	√	√	√