China Safety Science Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 23-30.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.12.1873
• Safety social science and safety management • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Jingyang1(), PAN Xuan1, FU Xiaorong2, GAO Jianwei1, PAN Weijun1
Received:
2023-06-19
Revised:
2023-09-19
Online:
2023-12-28
Published:
2024-06-28
HUANG Jingyang, PAN Xuan, FU Xiaorong, GAO Jianwei, PAN Weijun. Safety risk assessment for low and medium altitude general aviation flight plans[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(12): 23-30.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.12.1873
Tab.1
Safety risk assessment indicators for the low and medium-altitude general aviation flight plans
一级指标 | 二级指标 | 定义 |
---|---|---|
复杂度风险R1 | 飞行计划复杂度风险C1 | 该飞行计划的航段数量、高度变化次数、飞行规则转换次数等转化的风险值 |
通信、导航、监视 资源风险R2 | 通信资源完善度风险C2 | 通信设施完善程度转化的风险值 |
导航资源覆盖度风险C3 | 导航设施对空域的覆盖程度转化的风险值 | |
监视资源覆盖度风险C4 | 监视设备对空域的覆盖程度转化的风险值 | |
障碍物风险R3 | 绕飞障碍物风险C5 | 绕飞障碍物,如绕飞尖塔等高耸障碍物对该飞行活动的威胁程度 |
飞越障碍物风险C6 | 飞越线状障碍物或中低障碍物对该飞行活动的威胁程度 | |
行人风险C7 | 该飞行活动对行人的威胁程度 | |
飞行冲突风险R4 | 飞行活动冲突风险C8 | 所使用空域内该飞行活动与其他飞行活动的冲突概率 |
人员环境风险R5 | 放行评估风险C9 | 综合考量执飞人员(飞行员或无人机操作员)资质,及天气条件等情况 |
[1] |
王增强, 丁静, 白松浩, 等. 面向低空空域协同管理的应急决策方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7):177-182.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.07.028 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.07.028 |
|
[2] |
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.06.019 |
[3] |
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.03.003 |
[4] |
王红勇, 温瑞英. 基于复杂网络的空中交通态势风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5):172-178.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.05.029 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.05.029 |
|
[5] |
张启钱, 牟思妍, 张洪海, 等. 非结构化空域下无人机冲突风险评估指标研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(1):17-25.
|
|
|
[6] |
韩鹏, 王梦琦, 赵嶷飞. 基于贝叶斯网络的物流无人机失效风险评估[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(11):178-183.
|
|
|
[7] |
胡莘婷, 戴福青. 基于城区行人安全的无人机运行风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8):137-142.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.020 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.020 |
|
[8] |
张宏宏, 甘旭升, 李双峰, 等. 复杂低空环境下考虑区域风险评估的无人机航路规划[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2021, 42(1): 257-266.
|
|
|
[9] |
韩鹏, 王军, 王启, 等. 基于飞行剖面的航空器试飞活动空管风险研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1):149-156.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.020 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.020 |
|
[10] |
高锋阳, 王文祥, 张浩然, 等. 基于状态和风险评估的无接触网城轨车辆电气系统运维策略[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2022, 43(4):148-156.
|
|
|
[11] |
AP-115-TM—2016-01, 民用航空通信导航监视运行保障与维护维修规程[S].
|
[12] |
贺洪波, 徐晨晨, 叶虎平. 无人机低空飞行障碍物环境风险评估方法研究:以京津新城为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(9):1503-1515.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.09.006 |
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.09.006 |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
张洪海, 张连东, 刘皞, 等. 城市低空物流无人机航迹规划模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(1):256-264.
|
|
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
陈锦涌, 周锐, 张宇航, 等. 一种考虑飞行轨迹不确定性的碰撞风险评估方法[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2021, 51(4):469-479.
|
doi: 10.1360/SST-2020-0209 |
|
[17] |
曲玉玲, 霍志勤, 李翀, 等. 空域规划中碰撞风险模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(11):67-72.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.11.012 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.11.012 |
|
[18] |
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009 |
[1] | QI Qingjie, LIU Yingjie, SUN Zuo, TONG Ruipeng. Types and evaluation methods of secondary disasters in coal mines induced by earthquake [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 167-174. |
[2] | CHEN Na, HU Yitong, YUAN Yingfeng, QIN Xiangnan, LIU Jun. Risk assessment of firefighter training injury based on game theory combinatorial weighting and cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 232-238. |
[3] | ZHANG Shulin, WANG Lanning, LU Yi. Risk assessment of hydrogen peroxide production technology by using anthraquinone process based on dynamic Bayesian network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 110-116. |
[4] | TONG Ruipeng, HU Xiangyang, WANG Leyao, HAN Jixiang. Risk zoo (Ⅳ): risk metaphor event identification and evaluation based on complex system thinking [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 53-59. |
[5] | LI Pengcheng, XU Qian, WANG Ye. Study on evaluation index system of safety culture in operation phase of nuclear power plant [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 60-66. |
[6] | ZHANG Qi, JIRGEL. Detection algorithm of slime water overflow based on convolutional neural network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S1): 192-195. |
[7] | LI Feng, ZHANG Laibin, DONG Shaohua, CHEN Lin, ZHANG Hang. Research on sealing failure risk assessment of station flange system based on EWM-AHP-cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 150-156. |
[8] | LI Xinhong, FU Yaqian, LIU Yazhou, HAN Ziyue, ZHANG Renren. Copula-BN based risk assessment methodology of marine ship collisions [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 204-213. |
[9] | WANG Ying, WANG Pu, WANG Zixuan, WANG Fengqing, WANG Liangchao, ZHANG Jin. Water quality safety risk assessment method for water supply network in mountainous cities [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 205-211. |
[10] | LI Sicong, XU Tao. A review of research on occupational hygiene risk assessment and management of pharmaceutical dusts [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 219-230. |
[11] | CHEN Fang, CUI Qingmin, XIANG Qianqiu. Safety risk assessment of civil aviation air parking events based on DBN [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 16-23. |
[12] | LI Xiaoran, CHEN Xin, XIE Zhongpeng. Fire risk assessment of air film stadium based on WSR-game weighting-regret theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(6): 174-180. |
[13] | LUO Zhenhua, GUO Juntao, HAN Jianqiang. Construction safety risk assessment of prefabricated subway station based on cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(6): 88-95. |
[14] | YANG Xiaoyi, YANG Chunxue, ZHU Yuchen, YANG Xuesong. Comparison of laws and regulations related to management of occupational psychology aiming at promoting OSH [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(5): 81-87. |
[15] | NAN Yanzhou, KE Hui, ZHU Caihua, YAO Zhenxing, LI Yan. A driving risk assessment method at intersection using driver's ECG data [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2): 185-193. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||