Chain intermediary mechanism of perceived organizational support on miners' unsafe behavior

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.07.1766

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to clarify the mechanism of perceived organizational support on miners' unsafe behaviors, a chain mediation model was constructed by introducing regulatory emotional self-efficacy and job burnout as mediating variables. A structured questionnaire was developed utilizing the Perceived Organizational Support Scale, the Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale, the Job Burnout Scale, and the Unsafe Behaviors Scale, and a quantitative empirical study was conducted based on the sample data of 245 front-line miners. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to deepen understanding of miners' perspectives on these relationships. The results indicated that perceived organizational support significantly and negatively influenced miners' unsafe behaviors; regulatory emotional self-efficacy and job burnout exerted partial mediating effects between perceived organizational support and miners' unsafe behaviors, and regulatory emotional self-efficacy significantly and negatively impacted job burnout, with both variables exhibited chain mediation effects between perceived organizational support and miners' unsafe behaviors.

Key words: perceived organizational support, unsafe behaviors, chain mediation, regulatory emotional self-efficacy, job burnout

CLC Number:

X936

LIU Yi, ZHANG Jinsuo, HE Qi, CAI Linmei. Chain intermediary mechanism of perceived organizational support on miners' unsafe behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(7): 22-30.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.2

Table 5

References 26

[1]	国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2023年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2024-02-28). https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202402/t20240228_1947915.html.
[2]	李琰, 赵梓焱, 田水承, 等. 矿工不安全行为研究综述[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(8): 47-54.
	LI Yan, ZHAO Ziyan, TIAN Shuicheng, et al. Review of research on unsafe behavior of miners[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(8): 47-54.
[3]	王露露, 尘兴邦, 袁嘉淙, 等. 职业心理学视域下矿工不安全行为研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 48-55. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0782
	WANG Lulu, CHEN Xingbang, YUAN Jiacong, et al. Review of research on miners' unsafe behaviors in perspective of occupational psychology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 48-55. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0782
[4]	李乃文, 刘孟潇, 牛莉霞. 辱虐管理对安全绩效的影响:心理痛苦和心智游移的链式中介作用[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(9): 60-63.
	LI Naiwen, LIU Mengxiao, NIU Lixia. Effects of abusive supervision on safety performance:the chained mediation of psychological distress and mind wandering[J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(9): 60-63.
[5]	张叶馨, 栗继祖, 冯国瑞, 等. 基于SEM矿工组织支持感与不安全行为关系研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2017, 48(8): 238-241.
	ZHANG Yexin, LI Jizu, FENG Guorui, et al. Research on relationship between niners' perceived organizational support and unsafe behavior based on SEM[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(8): 238-241.
[6]	吕威建, 吕永卫. 工作负荷与矿工不安全行为的关系研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2020, 39(12): 181-184.
	LYU Weijian, LYU Yongwei. Research on relationship between workload and miners' unsafe behavior[J]. Coal Technology, 2020, 39(12): 181-184.
[7]	郭彦豫, 栗继祖. 基于SEM的矿工情绪智力对其不安全行为的影响研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2021, 52(9): 250-255.
	GUO Yanyu, LI Jizu. Research on influence of emotional intelligence on unsafe behaviors of miners based on SEM[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(9): 250-255.
[8]	禹敏, 栗继祖, 秦文静. 心理社会安全氛围对矿工不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 34-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.1357
	YU Min, LI Jizu, QIN Wenjing. Influence of PSC on miners' unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 34-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.1357
[9]	HOBFOLL S E. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress[J]. American Psychologist, 1989, 44(3): DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.
[10]	汤冬玲, 董妍, 俞国良, 等. 情绪调节自我效能感:一个新的研究主题[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(4): 598-604.
	TANG Dongling, DONG Yan, YU Guoliang. The regulatory emotional self-efficacy: a new research topic[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2010, 18(4): 598-604.
[11]	EISENBERGER R, HUNTINGTON R, HUTCHISON S, et al. Perceived organizational support[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71: DOI: 10.1037/12318-002.
[12]	黄丽, 丁世青, 谢立新, 等. 组织支持对职业使命感影响的实证研究[J]. 管理科学, 2019, 32(5): 48-59.
	HUANG Li, DING Shiqing, XIE Lixin, et al. An empirical study on the effect of organizational support on calling and vocation[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2019, 32(5): 48-59.
[13]	史玉芳, 董芮. 组织支持感对建筑业农民工不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(10): 158-164.
	SHI Yufang, DONG Rui. Impact of perceived organizational support on unsafe behavior of migrant workers in construction industry[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(10): 158-164.
[14]	BENFER N, BARDEEN J R, CLAUSS K. Experimental manipulation of emotion regulation self-efficacy: effects on emotion regulation ability, perceived effort in the service of regulation, and affective reactivity[J]. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2018, 10: 108-114.
[15]	李伟, 梅继霞, 熊卫. 情绪智力、劳动策略与情感耗竭:有调节的中介模型[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(6): 228-236.
	LI Wei, MEI Jixia, XIONG Wei. Emotional intelligence, labor strategy and emotional exhaustion: the moderated mediation model[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(6): 228-236.
[16]	刘小禹, 朱恩东, 付静宇. 组织中情绪研究的回顾与展望[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(12): 178-202.
	LIU Xiaoyu, ZHU Endong, FU Jingyu. Review and prospects of research on emotions in organizations[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2023, 45(12): 178-202.
[17]	袁晓芳, 贾倩荷, 孙林辉. 基于元分析的煤矿工人不安全行为影响因素及其调节变量[J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(11): 245-250.
	YUAN Xiaofang, JIA Qianhe, SUN Linhui. Influencing factors and moderating variables of unsafe behavior of coal miners based on meta-analysis[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(11): 245-250.
[18]	MASLACH C, SCHAUFELI W B, LEITER M P. Job burnout[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, 52(1): 397-422.
[19]	陈奕荣, 魏扬帆, 张澳环, 等. 组织支持感与特殊教育教师职业倦怠的关系:职业使命感的中介作用及职称的调节作用[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2023(5): 90-96.
	CHEN Yirong, WEI Yangfan, ZHANG Aohuan, et al. The sense of organizational support and job burnout among special education teachers: the mechanisms of career calling and job title[J]. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 2023(5): 90-96.
[20]	李乃文, 牛莉霞. 矿工工作倦怠、不安全心理与不安全行为的结构模型[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24(3): 236-240.
	LI Naiwen, NIU Lixia. A structural equation model of job burnout, insecurity psychology and insecurity behavior for miner[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2010, 24(3): 236-240.
[21]	BANDURA A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning[J]. Educational Psychologist, 1993, 28: DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.
[22]	马跃如, 邓卉. 情绪劳动对员工服务导向组织公民行为的影响:以养老服务业为例[J]. 商业研究, 2022(6): 94-103.
	MA Yueru, DENG Hui. The influence of emotional labor on employee service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: based on elderly care industry[J]. Commercial Research, 2022(6): 94-103.
[23]	HEKMAN D R, BIGLEY G A, STEENSMA H K, et al. Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(3): 506-526.
[24]	CAPRARA G V, DI GIUNTA L, EISENBERG N, et al. Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries[J]. Psychological Assessment, 2008, 20: DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.227.
[25]	李超平, 时勘. 分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(5): 677-684.
	LI Chaoping, SHI Kan. The influence of distributive justice and procedural justi ce on job burnout[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2003, 35(5): 677-684.
[26]	王丹. 辱虐管理对矿工不安全行为的影响研究[J]. 经济与管理, 2012, 26(10): 65-70.
	WANG Dan. Abusive supervision on the miners' unsafe behavior influence research[J]. Economy and Management, 2012, 26(10): 65-70.

量表名称	维度	题项	计分方法(Likert 5点计分)	计分结果	Cronbach's α
组织支持感量表^[23]	工作支持、员工价值认同和关心利益	8个(工作支持2个、员工价值认同3个和关心利益3个)	1~5表示从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”,5个正向计分,3个反向计分	得分越高则组织支持感越强	0.868
情绪调节自我效能感量表^[24]	抒发积极情绪效能感、缓解沮丧/痛苦情绪效能感和控制生气/易怒情绪效能感	12个(3个维度各4个)	1~5表示从“能力很差”到“能力很强”,全部正向计分	得分越高则情绪调节自我效能感越强	0.916
工作倦怠量表^[25]	情绪耗竭、疏离工作和成就感低	15个(情绪耗竭5个、疏离工作4个和成就感低6个)	1~5表示从“很不符合”到“很符合”,9个正向计分,6个反向计分	得分越高则工作倦怠程度越强	0.937
不安全行为量表^[26]	不服从安全行为和不参与安全行为	9个(不服从安全行为4个和不参与安全行为5个)	1~5表示从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”,全部正向计分	得分越高则矿工不安全行为发生频次越高	0.877

模型	因子	χ²/df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA
四因子模型	POS,RES,JB,UB	1.294	0.990	0.985	0.030
三因子模型	POS,RES,JB+UB	2.348	0.949	0.932	0.065
二因子模型	POS+RES,JB+UB	6.185	0.796	0.739	0.128
单因子模型	POS+RES+JB+UB	9.168	0.671	0.588	0.160

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4
1组织支持感	3.51	0.84	1.000	—	—	—
2情绪调节自我效能感	3.66	1.02	0.357^**	1.000	—	—
3工作倦怠	2.29	0.94	-0.355^**	-0.309^**	1.000	—
4不安全行为	2.22	0.98	-0.384^**	-0.358^**	0.504^**	1.000

模型	χ²/df	SRMR	RMSEA	NNFI	CFI
预设模型	1.294	0.032	0.030	0.957	0.990
完全中介模型	2.249	0.085	0.063	0.920	0.953
部分中介模型Ⅰ	1.835	0.062	0.051	0.936	0.969
部分中介模型Ⅱ	1.393	0.037	0.035	0.953	0.986
部分中介模型Ⅲ	1.805	0.064	0.050	0.939	0.971

路径	效应值	95%置信区间		效果量/%
路径	效应值	Boot CI下限	Boot CI上限	效果量/%
POS→RES→UB	-0.056 4	-0.105 5	-0.019 5	16.13
POS→JB→UB	-0.098 3	-0.158 6	-0.050	28.11
POS→RES→JB→UB	-0.026 2	-0.051 5	-0.008 2	7.49
总间接效应	-0.180 8	-0.260 6	-0.110 1	51.73
直接效应	-0.168 9	-0.261 2	-0.261 2	48.27
总效应	-0.349 7	—	—	100