中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 106-111.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.018

• 安全工程技术科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

CRES的危害因素识别方法:以EETD为例

李京生1, 赵林2, 王阳2 副研究员, 孟亮3 高级工程师   

  1. 1 中国铁道科学研究院 研究生部,北京 100081;
    2 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司 铁道科学技术研究发展中心,北京 100081;
    3 中国铁路总公司 安全监督管理局,北京 100844
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-11 修回日期:2018-12-07 出版日期:2019-01-28
  • 作者简介:李京生 (1984—),男,河北保定人,博士研究生,研究方向为运输安全工程。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金高铁联合基金资助(U1534202);中国铁道科学研究院科研开发基金资助(2017YJ141);铁科院创新基金资助(2017YJ138)。

Study on method for identifying hazardous factors in CRES: EETD taken as an example

LI Jingsheng1, ZHAO Lin2, WANG Yang2, MENG Liang3   

  1. 1 Postgraduate Department, China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    2 Railway Science and Technology Research & Development Center, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China;
    3 Safety Supervision and Administration Bureau, China Railway Corporation, Beijing 100844, China
  • Received:2018-10-11 Revised:2018-12-07 Published:2019-01-28

摘要: 首先厘清传统危害识别方法的局限性,运用系统理论的事故模型及过程(STAMP)的系统理论过程分析(STPA)方法,分析CRES不能使动车组(EMU)制动这一危害事件,将其安全问题看作是控制问题;然后以车载地震紧急处置装置(EETD)为例,分析其引起的不安全控制控制行为,找出产生不安全控制行为的原因,进而分析出其危害因素;最后与传统的故障树分析(FTA)方法结果对比,验证基于STAMP模型的STPA方法的有效性。结果表明:用该方法能比FTA方法识别出更多的危害因素,如设计缺陷、沟通不畅等。

关键词: 高铁地震预警系统(CRES), 车载地震紧急处置装置(EETD), 危害因素识别, 系统理论的事故模型及过程(STAMP), 系统理论过程分析(STPA)

Abstract: The limitations of traditional hazard identification methods were clarified, and the STPA method of STMAP was applied to analyze the hazard event in which the CRES couldn't break the EMU, the safety problem was regarded as a control problem, the on-board earthquake emergency treatment device was taken as an example to analyze its unsafe control actions, the causes of the unsafe control actions, and it's hazardous factors were analyzed. A comparison was made between the traditional FTA method and the STPA method based on the STAMP model. The effectiveness of the STPA method in identifying hazardous factors was assessed. The results show that the effectiveness of the STPA method is greater than that of the FTAmethod, and that using the former can identify more than what using the latter can, and the difference includes but is not limited to design faults and poor communication.

Key words: hina high-speed railway earthquake early-warning system(CRES), on-board earthquake emergency treatment device(EETD), hazard factor identification, system-theoretic accident model and process(STAMP), system-theoretic process analysis(STPA)

中图分类号: