基于D-S证据理论的地震应急救援群决策

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.025

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 163-168.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.025

基于D-S证据理论的地震应急救援群决策

宋英华^1,2 教授, 吴昊^1,2, 刘丹^**1,2 副教授, 王喆^1,2 讲师

1.武汉理工大学中国应急管理研究中心,湖北武汉 430070;
2.武汉理工大学安全科学与应急管理学院,湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2020-02-25 修回日期:2020-04-23 出版日期:2020-05-28 发布日期:2021-01-28
通讯作者: **刘丹(1985—),男,湖南邵阳人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,从事应急决策理论与方法、复杂系统建模与仿真等研究。E-mail:liudan8575@whut.edu.cn。
作者简介:宋英华(1962—),男,湖北武汉人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事公共管理、危机与灾害应急管理等方面的研究。E-mail:song6688c@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC0807000);国家社会科学基金青年项目资助(16CTQ022);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2019III021GX, 2019III053GX)。

Group decision-making for earthquake emergency rescue plan based on D-S evidence theory

SONG Yinghua^1,2, WU Hao^1,2, LIU Dan^1,2, WANG Zhe^1,2

1. China Research Center for Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430070, China;
2. School of Safety Science and Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430070, China

Received:2020-02-25 Revised:2020-04-23 Online:2020-05-28 Published:2021-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决地震应急救援群决策中专家偏好冲突问题,提出一种基于登普斯特-沙弗尔(D-S)证据理论的专家偏好型应急救援群决策方法。首先,考虑方案执行时间和方案资源的客观属性以及专家的主观偏好,在传统地震救援群决策过程基础上,设计改进的专家偏好型群决策过程;然后,借鉴应急协商模型,设计考虑方案执行时间和资源的偏好函数,基于三角模糊数定义专家主观偏好程度,并运用D-S证据理论综合专家偏好度作方案选择;最后,以2017年九寨沟地震为试验算例,开展方法对比性试验和偏好敏感性试验。结果表明:与仅考虑方案执行时间和资源或基于三角模糊偏好相比,考虑方案执行时间和资源偏好的决策方案更能满足实际地震应急救援需求,且专家的平衡性偏好更有利于地震应急救援方案的正确选择。

关键词: 登普斯特-沙弗尔(D-S)证据理论, 地震, 应急救援群决策, 专家偏好, 三角模糊数

Abstract: In order to solve expert preference conflict in group decision of earthquake emergency rescue plan, an expert preference rescue group decision method based on D-S evidence theory is proposed. Firstly, considering execution time, objective attributes of resources and subjective preferences of experts, an improved group decision-making process was designed based on traditional one. Secondly, preference functions considering program execution time and resources were designed with emergency negotiation model a reference, experts' subjective preferences were defined based on triangular fuzzy numbers, and their preferences were synthesized through DS evidence theory for plan selection. Finally, with Jiuzhaigou earthquake in 2017 as an experimental example, method comparison and preference sensitivity tests were carried out. The results show that decision-making scheme which considers execution time and resource preference is more consistent with actual rescue needs than that considering only execution time and resources or that based on triangular fuzzy preference. Moreover, balanced preference of experts is more conducive to choosing a right earthquake emergency rescue plan.

Key words: Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory, earthquake, emergency rescue group decision-making, expert preference, triangular fuzzy number

中图分类号:

X915.5

宋英华, 吴昊, 刘丹, 王喆. 基于D-S证据理论的地震应急救援群决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 163-168.

SONG Yinghua, WU Hao, LIU Dan, WANG Zhe. Group decision-making for earthquake emergency rescue plan based on D-S evidence theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(5): 163-168.

参考文献

[1] 国务院办公厅. 国家综合防灾减灾规划(2016—2020年)[Z]. 2016-12-29.
[2] 陈虹, 宋富喜, 闻明, 等. 地震应急救援标准体系及其关键标准研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(7): 164-170.
CHEN Hong, SONG Fuxi, WEN Ming, et al. Research on earthquake emergency rescue standard system and its key standards [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(7): 164-170.
[3] CAYMAZ E, AKYON F V, ERENEL F. A model proposal for efficient disaster management: the Turkish sample [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 99(11): 609-618.
[4] 程永忠, 徐健康, 马健, 等. 汶川地震四川灾区医用物资保障及精确配送体系构建与运行[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2009, 9(12): 1263-1266.
CHENG Yongzhong, XU Jiankang, MA Jian, et al. Construction and operation of a system for secure and precise medical material distribution in disaster areas after Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009, 9(12): 1 263-1 266.
[5] 宋清华, 陈建宏. 地震灾害应急管理能力建设投资优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(11): 146-151.
SONG Qinghua, CHEN Jianhong. Research on investment optimization of earthquake disaster emergency management capability construction [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(11): 146-151.
[6] 任斌, 朱昌锋, 钟校. 基于前景理论的应急物资需求动态调整模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 179-184.
REN Bin, ZHU Changfeng, ZHONG Xiao. A PT based model for dynamic adjusting emergency material demand [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(3): 179-184.
[7] KARABABA F S, POMONIS A. Damage data analysis and vulnerability estimation following the august 14, 2003 Lefkada Island, Greece, earthquake [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 9(4): 1 015-1 046.
[8] PENG Yi, ZHANG Yong, TANG Yu, et al. An incident information management framework based on data integration, data mining, and multi-criteria decision making [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51(2): 316-327.
[9] 张佰尚, 李向阳, 李相华. 信息不完备条件下地震应急案例结构化方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(2): 78-86.
ZHANG Baishang, LI Xiangyang, LI Xianghua. Research on structural methods of earthquake emergency cases under incomplete information conditions [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(2): 78-86.
[10] 张国军, 李浩, 凌云翔. 基于案例推理的地震应急救援决策方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2019, 44(4): 60-64.
ZHANG Guojun, LI Hao, LING Yunxiang. Case-based reasoning method for earthquake emergency rescue decision-making [J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2019, 44(4): 60-64.
[11] COSKUN A, ELMAGHRABY W, KARAMAN M M, et al. Relief aid stocking decisions under bilateral agency cooperation [J]. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 2019, 67(9): 147-165.
[12] 卢頔, 沈岐平. 震后初期村镇应急救援决策模型研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2016, 30(5): 39-43.
LU Di, SHEN Qiping. Research on decision model of emergency rescue in villages and towns in the early stage after earthquake [J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2016, 30(5): 39-43.
[13] 李海涛, 罗党, 孙德才. 多元不确定偏好下灰色局势群体应急决策方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(12): 140-146.
LI Haitao, LUO Dang, SUN Decai. Emergency decision-making method for grey situation group with multiple uncertainties [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(12): 140-146.
[14] 艾鹭. 基于AHP-Topsis方法的地震应急救援决策应用研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2016.
AI Lu. Research on earthquake emergency rescue decision-making based on AHP-Topsis method [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016.
[15] 陈雪龙, 王亚丽. 考虑信息源相关性的多属性应急决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(8): 2 045-2 056.
CHEN Xuelong, WANG Yali. Multi-attribute emergency decision-making method considering information source correlation [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(8): 2 045-2 056.
[16] 徐绪堪, 楼昱清, 于成成. 基于D-S理论的突发事件多源数据可信度评估研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(8): 67-72.
XU Xukan, LOU Yuqing, YU Chengcheng. Research on multi-source data credibility evaluation of unexpected events based on D-S theory [J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2019, 42(8): 67-72.
[17] 贺亮国. 我国地震救援项目救援能力评价研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015.
HE Liangguo. Research on evaluation of rescue ability of earthquake rescue projects in China [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[18] 李圆. 基于BDI Agent的个体推理和多部门应急协商方法及应用[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2012.
LI Yuan. Individual reasoning and multi-sector emergency negotiation method and application based on BDI Agent [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2012.
[19] 刘丹, 王红卫, 祁超, 等. 基于多主体的应急决策组织建模[J]. 公共管理学报, 2013, 10(4): 78-87.
LIU Dan, WANG Hongwei, QI Chao, et al. Modeling of emergency decision organization based on multi-agent [J]. Journal of Public Management, 2013, 10(4): 78-87.
[20] 张志昂, 郭志新, 吴兵, 等. 船舶溢油事故定量应急处置决策方法[J]. 中国航海, 2018, 41(2): 102-106.
ZHANG Zhiang, GUO Zhixin, WU Bing, et al. Decision-making method for quantitative emergency response of oil spill accidents [J]. Navigation of China, 2018, 41(2): 102-106.
[21] 李周琴. 四川九寨沟7.0级地震抗震救灾工作情况[J]. 中国应急管理, 2017(8): 40-44.

基于D-S证据理论的地震应急救援群决策

Group decision-making for earthquake emergency rescue plan based on D-S evidence theory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈永强, 吴志鹏, 杨湘娟, 陈璞, 孙树立. 区域地震分析软件研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 126-136.
[2]	刘振亮, 苑溦, 李素超. 地震及次生突发灾害下公路桥梁网络韧性评估*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 176-184.
[3]	许乾奇, 曹毅杰, 孙晓丹, 刘钰, 王季陈, 肖畅. 基于强地震动物理模拟的车-轨-桥系统动力响应[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 207-214.
[4]	白春, 王来贵, 刘书贤, 路沙沙, 聂伟. 煤矿采动对RC框架结构抗震性能影响试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 174-183.
[5]	刘大山, 陈晓春, 多英全, 师立晨. 化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.
[6]	韩林, 赵旭东, 陈志龙, 龚华栋. 地震灾害下城市供水网络韧性评估及优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 135-142.
[7]	余建星, 范海昭, 陈海成, 吴世博, 韩放, 刘少卿. 海洋立管失效风险因素分析方法及应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 47-53.
[8]	李岩峰, 尹家骁, 刘朝峰, 王威, 于小晨, 李子芃. 基于投影寻踪聚类的供水管网地震韧性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 152-157.
[9]	李宇, 陈明, 赵国辉. 脉冲型近场地震下HDR隔震简支梁桥参数研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 141-148.
[10]	林勇, 肖骅, 张立, 漆磊. 震灾应急物资分配-运输优化模型及算法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 171-178.
[11]	雷云, 余建星, 吴朝晖, 陈海成, 刘俊雄. 基于模糊ANP的海底管道失效风险综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 178-184.
[12]	石磊, 帅健, 许葵, 杨文. 地基沉降及动水压对储罐屈曲强度的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 116-121.
[13]	张东妮, 孟耀斌, 马海关, 伍甘霖, 叶琬. 地震NaTech中时间因素对化学品安全风险的影响^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 183-188.
[14]	李京生, 赵林, 王阳, 孟亮. CRES的危害因素识别方法:以EETD为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 106-111.
[15]	谢忠球, 江莲子, 孙广臣, 邓飞秀. 多向地震作用下软弱围岩桥隧搭接段动力响应试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 87-91.