油库抗震韧性动态评估模型

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.04.1002

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 87-92.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.04.1002

油库抗震韧性动态评估模型

陈超¹^,²(), 谭心鑫¹, 王迪³, 李长俊¹

¹ 西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院,四川成都 610500
² 代尔夫特理工大学安全科学系,荷兰代尔夫特 2628 BX
³ 国家石油天然气管网集团,北京 100028

收稿日期:2023-10-20 修回日期:2024-01-21 出版日期:2024-04-28
作者简介:
陈超 (1991—),男,四川广安人,博士,教授,主要从事油气及新能源储运系统安全韧性与完整性管理等方面的研究。E-mail: chenchaoswpu@gmail.com。
李长俊教授
基金资助:
四川省重点研发项目资助(2023YFS0412); 英国劳氏基金资助(Sg3\100021)

Dynamic assessment model for seismic resilience of oil depot

CHEN Chao¹^,²(), TAN Xinxin¹, WANG Di³, LI Changjun¹

¹ School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
² Safety and Security Science Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2628 BX
³ China Oil & Gas Pipeline Network Group,Beijing 100028, China

Received:2023-10-20 Revised:2024-01-21 Published:2024-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决油库面临地震时的安全管理问题,首先,将抗震韧性定义为油库为保持储存功能表现出的抵御地震破坏、减轻地震次生灾害、适应震后环境和震后快速恢复的能力,并量化油库抗震韧性表现出的4种能力,建立油库抗震韧性评估模型;其次,考虑到抵御阶段和减轻阶段的不确定性,基于动态蒙特卡罗法,定量评估油库抗震韧性,并获得油库的抗震韧性值;最后,以某地震区域油库为例,验证模型的有效性。结果表明:油库韧性能力的不确定性导致韧性值出现大幅波动;多米诺效应对油库韧性的影响较大,不可忽略;震源距离越远、断层滑移率越小,抗震韧性越高;远离活动断层、预测地震危害、减少应急响应时间等措施可提高抗震韧性。

关键词: 油库, 地震, 安全韧性, 抗震韧性, 动态评估, 评估模型

Abstract:

To address the safety management issues of oil depots in case of earthquakes, firstly, seismic resilience is defined as the ability of oil depots to maintain their storage functions in terms of resisting earthquake damage, mitigating secondary disasters, adapting to environments after earthquakes, and quickly recovering after earthquakes. Moreover, an assessment model for the seismic resilience of Oil depot is proposed by quantifying the four types of abilities. Secondly, a quantitative assessment of the seismic resilience of the oil depot is realized through a dynamic Monte Carlo method, considering the uncertainty of the resistance and mitigation stages, thereby obtaining the seismic resilience value. Finally, the performance of the proposed model is validated against the oil depot in an earthquake area. The results indicate that the uncertainty of the resilience ability of the oil depot results in a significant fluctuation in resilience values, and the domino effect has a significant influence on the oil depot's resilience and cannot be ignored. Moreover, the farther the earthquake source distance and the lower the fault slip rate lead to higher seismic resilience. The seismic resilience can be improved by staying away from active faults, predicting earthquake hazards, and reducing emergency response time.

Key words: oil depot, earthquake, safety resilience, seismic resilience, dynamic assessment, assessment model

中图分类号:

X915.5

陈超, 谭心鑫, 王迪, 李长俊. 油库抗震韧性动态评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 87-92.

CHEN Chao, TAN Xinxin, WANG Di, LI Changjun. Dynamic assessment model for seismic resilience of oil depot[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 87-92.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 19

[1]	王红蕾, 朱宏, 毛国良, 等. 地震预警数据流监控与分析[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2023, 18(2): 389-397.
	WANG Honglei, ZHU Hong, MAO Guoliang, et al. Data flow monitoring and analysis of earthquake early warning system[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2023, 18(2): 389-397.
[2]	郝进锋, 高小波, 孙建刚, 等. 大型立式石油储罐考虑桩土作用地震响应分析[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 34(3): 430-438.
	HAO Jinfeng, GAO Xiaobo, SUN Jiangang, et al. Seismic response analysis of large vertical oil storage tank considering pile-soil interaction[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Natural Science, 2018, 34(3): 430-438.
[3]	HOLLING C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 1-23.
[4]	DOORN N, GARDONI P, MURPHY C. A multidisciplinary definition and evaluation of resilience: the role of social justice in defining resilience[J]. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 2019, 4(3): 112-123.
[5]	AVEN T. How some types of risk assessments can support resilience analysis and management[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 167: 536-543.
[6]	黄浪, 吴超, 杨冕, 等. 韧性理论在安全科学领域中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 1-6. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.001
	HUANG Lang, WU Chao, YANG Mian, et al. Application of resilience theory in field of safety science[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(3): 1-6. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.001
[7]	李鑫, 阳富强, 洪溢都, 等. 流水线作业疲劳安全韧性模型及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 200-205. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2056
	LI Xin, YANG Fuqiang, HONG Yidu, et al. Fatigue safety resilience model of assembly line work and its application[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 200-205. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2056
[8]	HOSSEINI S, BARKER K. Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks: a case study of inland waterway ports[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 93: 252-266.
[9]	袁必和, 杨家祺, 罗欣昱, 等. 基于模糊物元的化工园区安全韧性评估方法[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(8): 2624-2629.
	YUAN Bihe, YANG Jiaqi, LUO Xinyu, et al. Evaluation method of safety resilience of chemical industry park based on fuzzy matter element[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 23(8): 2624-2629.
[10]	DINH L T T, PASMAN H, Gao Xiaodan, et al. Resilience engineering of industrial processes: principles and contributing factors[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2012, 25(2): 233-241.
[11]	LINKOV I, TRUMP B D, KEISLER J. Risk and resilience must be independently managed[J]. Nature, 2018, 555(30): DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-02567-0.
[12]	CHEN Chao, YANG Ming, RENIERS G. A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 215: DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107909.
[13]	SHARMA N, TABANDEH A, GARDONI P. Regional resilience analysis: a multiscale approach to optimize the resilience of interdependent infrastructure[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2020, 35(12): 1315-1330.
[14]	ANBAZHAGAN P, KUMAR A, SITHARAM T. Ground motion prediction equation considering combined dataset of recorded and simulated ground motions[J]. Soil Dynamics Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 53: 92-108.
[15]	EBRAHIMIAN H, JALAYER F, FORTE G, et al. Site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the western area of Naples, Italy[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17: 4743-4796.
[16]	HUANG Kongxing, CHEN Guohua, YANG Yunfeng, et al. An innovative quantitative analysis methodology for Natech events triggered by earthquakes in chemical tank farms[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 128: DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104744.
[17]	SALZANO E, IERVOLINO I, FABBROCINO G. Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2003, 16(5): 403-409.
[18]	CHEN Chao, RENIERS G, ZHANG Laobing. An innovative methodology for quickly modeling the spatial-temporal evolution of domino accidents triggered by fire[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 54: 312-324.
[19]	YOUNESI A, SHAYEGHI H, SAFARI A, et al. Assessing the resilience of multi microgrid based widespread power systems against natural disasters using Monte Carlo Simulation[J]. Energy, 2020, 207: DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118220.

油库抗震韧性动态评估模型

Dynamic assessment model for seismic resilience of oil depot

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈长坤, 王思琪, 孙凤琳, 余荣付. 城市关联基础设施多层网络韧性评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 204-213.
[2]	齐庆杰, 刘英杰, 孙祚, 佟瑞鹏. 地震诱发煤矿次生灾害类型与评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 167-174.
[3]	申玲, 唐令怡, 廖洁. 基于CN-FRAM的公共交通设备设施系统运营安全韧性度量[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(3): 45-54.
[4]	祁云, 薛凯隆, 汪伟, 崔欣超, 王宏祥, 齐庆杰. 矿井煤与瓦斯突出事故应急救援能力评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 225-230.
[5]	苏成林, 王志, 刘洋. 随机风速风向对无人机地面风险作用效果研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 101-108.
[6]	王伟, 张思远, 齐庆杰, 刘文岗, 孙祚, 李媛媛. 地震诱发井工煤矿次生灾害系统研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 196-202.
[7]	魏米铃, 王威, 戎卿文, 刘晓然, 刘朝峰. 考虑不确定性的复合灾害避难疏散风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 203-212.
[8]	陈娜, 郭浩然, 张志鹏, 赵军. 基于H-OWA算子和投影寻踪的地铁站水灾安全韧性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 148-154.
[9]	江雯, 孟耀斌, 张东妮, 张媛, 吴佳馨. 基于人群生活模式的房屋震毁致死率估计[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(11): 165-173.
[10]	张雅宁, 司鹄. 城市综合韧性能力时空动态评估模型:以传染病为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(10): 39-45.
[11]	陈永强, 吴志鹏, 杨湘娟, 陈璞, 孙树立. 区域地震分析软件研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 126-136.
[12]	李鑫, 阳富强, 洪溢都, 段在鹏. 流水线作业疲劳安全韧性模型及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 200-205.
[13]	刘振亮, 苑溦, 李素超. 地震及次生突发灾害下公路桥梁网络韧性评估*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 176-184.
[14]	陈昌华, 许帅帅, 蒋玉香, 杨小杰, 熊光辉. 多因子修正的补货作业负荷评估模型及仿真研究*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 201-207.
[15]	黄亚江, 李书全, 李益锌, 郑涵. 基于DEMATEL-ISM-ANP的地铁运营安全韧性综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 171-177.