基于强地震动物理模拟的车-轨-桥系统动力响应

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.06.1695

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 207-214.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.06.1695

基于强地震动物理模拟的车-轨-桥系统动力响应

许乾奇¹(), 曹毅杰¹, 孙晓丹¹^,²^,^**(), 刘钰¹^,³, 王季陈¹, 肖畅⁴

1 西南交通大学土木工程学院,四川成都 610031
2 陆地交通地质灾害防治技术国家工程研究中心,四川成都 610031
3 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川成都 610031
4 中国铁道学会标准与认证部,北京 100844

收稿日期:2022-01-16 修回日期:2022-04-16 出版日期:2022-06-28 发布日期:2022-12-28
通讯作者: 孙晓丹
作者简介:
许乾奇 (1987—),男,福建漳平人,博士研究生,研究方向为高速铁路减灾防灾理论。E-mail: 751334987@qq.com。
孙晓丹,副教授
刘钰,副教授
肖畅,工程师
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFE0207100); 国家自然科学基金资助(51878578); 国家自然科学基金资助(U2039208); 国家自然科学基金资助(51708459); 中铁工程设计咨询集团有限公司科技开发课题(2021-10); 四川省科技计划项目(2020YJ0253); 四川省科技计划项目(2020YFSY0060)

Dynamic response of vehicle-track-bridge system under excitation from physics-based ground motion simulation

XU Qianqi¹(), CAO Yijie¹, SUN Xiaodan¹^,²^,^**(), LIU Yu¹^,³, WANG Jichen¹, XIAO Chang⁴

1 School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, China
2 National Engineering Research Center of Geological Disaster Prevention Technology in Land Transportation, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, China
3 Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, China
4 Standards and Certification Department, China Railway Society, Beijing 100844, China

Received:2022-01-16 Revised:2022-04-16 Online:2022-06-28 Published:2022-12-28
Contact: SUN Xiaodan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨近断层区域高速铁路桥上车-轨-桥系统的地震响应特征,以一拟建大跨度高速铁路桥梁为例,利用震源-传播途径-场地条件一体化的强地震动模拟方法,模拟桥址周围活断层引起的地震动场,并作为输入分析该车-轨-桥系统的动力响应,同时与该桥址处实测地震动输入下的动力响应作对比。结果表明:震源-传播途径-场地条件一体化的强地震动模拟方法能够模拟台站处的地震动幅值和波形特征,特别是在速度时程中体现长周期脉冲成分,体现近断层区域地震动的空间差异;相比于实测地震动,模拟地震动对系统各部件的位移差和加速度的影响更大。车体横向加速度对地震动输入更为敏感。

关键词: 高速铁路, 地震动模拟, 车辆-轨道-桥梁, 近断层, 空间差异

Abstract:

In order to investigate the seismic response characteristics of the vehicle-rail-bridge system of a high-speed railway bridge near-fault area, taking a proposed long-span high-speed railway bridge as an example, the strong ground motion field caused by active fault around the bridge site was simulated by using the method of integration of source, propagation path and site condition. The vehicle-track-bridge system's dynamic responses under the simulated ground motion were analyzed and compared with those under observed ground motion. The results show that: a strong ground motion simulation method, integrating source, propagation path and site condition, can simulate the amplitude and waveform characteristics of ground motion at the station. In particular, the long-period pulse component is reflected in the velocity time history, and the spatial difference of ground motion near-fault area is reflected. Compared with the observed ground motion, the simulated ground motion has a greater impact on the displacement difference and acceleration of each component of the system. The transverse acceleration of the vehicle body is more sensitive to the ground motion input.

Key words: high-speed railway, ground motion simulation, vehicle-track-bridge, near-fault, spatial difference

许乾奇, 曹毅杰, 孙晓丹, 刘钰, 王季陈, 肖畅. 基于强地震动物理模拟的车-轨-桥系统动力响应[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 207-214.

XU Qianqi, CAO Yijie, SUN Xiaodan, LIU Yu, WANG Jichen, XIAO Chang. Dynamic response of vehicle-track-bridge system under excitation from physics-based ground motion simulation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 207-214.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 19

[1]	李宇, 陈明, 赵国辉. 脉冲型近场地震下HDR 隔震简支梁桥参数研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10):141-148. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.020
	LI Yu, CHEN Ming, ZHAO Guohui. Study on parameters of seismic isolated simple-supported beam bridges with HDR under pulse-type near-field earthquake[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(10):141-148. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.020
[2]	唐秋宇, 张锦. 川藏铁路雅林段工程施工质量风险研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5):101-107. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.016
	TANG Qiuyu, ZHANG Jin. Research on construction quality risk of Yalin section of Sichuan-Tibet railway[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(5):101-107. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.016
[3]	蒋丽忠, 周旺保, 魏标, 等. 地震作用下高速铁路车-轨-桥系统安全研究进展[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(9):1-13.
	JIANG Lizhong, ZHOU Wangbao, WEI Biao, et al. Research progress of train-track-bridge system safety of high-speed railway under earthquake action[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(9):1-13.
[4]	MONTENEGRO P A, CALÇADA R, POUCA N V, et al. Running safety assessment of trains moving over bridges subjected to moderate earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2016,45:483-504.
[5]	JIANG Lizhong, ZHOU Tuo, LIU Xiang, et al. An efficient model for train-track-bridge-coupled system under seismic excitation[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2021, 2021(24):1-14.
[6]	WEI Biao, HU Zhangliang, HE Xuhui, et al. Evaluation of optimal ground motion intensity measures and seismic fragility analysis of a multi-pylon cable-stayed bridge with super-high piers in mountainous areas[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 129:1-12.
[7]	CHEN Lingkun, JIANG Lizhong, QIN Hongxi, et al. Nonlinear seismic assessment of isolated high-speed railway bridge subjected to near-fault earthquake scenarios[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2019, 15(11):1529-1547. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2019.1639775
[8]	WEI Biao, WANG WeiHao, WANG Peng, et al. Seismic responses of a high-speed railway (HSR) bridge and track simulation under longitudinal earthquakes[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 24(1):1-22.
[9]	WEI Biao, YANG Tianhan, JIANG Lizhong, et al. Effects of uncertain characteristic periods of ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track-bridge system of high-speed railway[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16(9):3739-3769. doi: 10.1007/s10518-018-0326-8
[10]	高亮. 高速铁路无砟轨道空间精细化分析方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020: 104-105.
[11]	雷晓燕. 高速铁路轨道动力学-模型、算法与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015: 146-147.
[12]	HARTZELL S, GUATTERI M, MAI P M, et al. Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion, part II: kinematic and dynamic modeling using theoretical Green' s functions and comparison with the 1994 Northridge earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2005, 95(2):614-645. doi: 10.1785/0120040136
[13]	JOHN B. The seismic radiation from composite models of faulting[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1988, 78(2):489-508.
[14]	FRANKEL A. Simulating strong motions of large earthquakes using recordings of small earthquakes: the Loma Prieta mainshock as a test case[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1995, 85(4):1144-1160. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0850041144
[15]	BRUNE J N. Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1970, 75: 4997-5009. doi: 10.1029/JB075i026p04997
[16]	SUN Xiaodan, HARTZELL S, REZAEIAN S. Ground-Motion simulation for the 23 August 2011, Mineral, Virginia, earthquake using physics-based and stochastic broadband methods[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2015, 105(5):1-21. doi: 10.1785/0120140029
[17]	SAIKIA C K. Modified frequency-wavenumber algorithm for regional seismograms using Filon's quadrature: modelling of L_g waves in eastern North America[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1994, 118: 142-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb04680.x
[18]	ZHU Lupei, RIVERA L A. A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2002, 148(3): 619-627. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01610.x
[19]	ATKINSON G M. Empirical attenuation of ground-motion spectral amplitudes in southeastern Canada and the northeastern United States[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society Ameria, 2004, 94(3): 1079-1095.

基于强地震动物理模拟的车-轨-桥系统动力响应

Dynamic response of vehicle-track-bridge system under excitation from physics-based ground motion simulation

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贾飞, 孟学雷, 贾宝通, 李涛, 张杨. 突发公共卫生事件下高速铁路客流分配研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 153-160.
[2]	董皓, 崔有泉, 孙丽君. 高速铁路安全环境治理分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 32-37.
[3]	章超荣. 高速铁路沿线无人机安全管理立法探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 38-42.
[4]	龙时丹. 面向高速铁路的全自动运行系统应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 92-97.
[5]	杨晓丽, 刘向东. 高速铁路工程竣工验收存在的问题与探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 146-151.
[6]	魏圆圆, 左忠义, 程伟, 孟子悦. F-ANP法在高速铁路风险评估中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 165-171.
[7]	钟庆伟, 张永祥, 文超, 彭其渊, 王锰锰. 高速铁路网络动车组运用优化分解算法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 10-17.
[8]	汤轶雄, 徐传玲, 文超, 李忠灿, 宋邵杰. 高铁故障晚点时间预测的支持向量回归模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 18-23.
[9]	李力, 闫迪, 田锐, 王全泉. 基于晚点恢复的高速铁路行车调度质量评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 118-125.
[10]	宋雨欣. GUI下的高速铁路客运站安全评价系统^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 134-137.
[11]	李程睿, 赵明, 尹盼盼, 刘美池, 马乐陶. 高速铁路客运站安全评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 149-153.
[12]	胡瑞, 徐传玲, 冯永泰, 文超, 王全泉. 广深高速铁路列车分类型晚点预测^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 181-186.
[13]	黄平, 文超, 李忠灿, 杨宇翔, 彭其渊. 高速铁路列车晚点时间实时预测的神经网络模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 20-26.
[14]	王江丽, 王俊, 蒋帅. 高速铁路安全防护系统设计研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 58-62.
[15]	于胜利, 程梁, 肖超, 高喜成, 王保江, 宋浩. 浅谈高铁变形监测内容与铁路运营安全的关系^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 180-185.