F-ANP法在高速铁路风险评估中的应用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.S1.029

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (S1): 165-171.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.S1.029

F-ANP法在高速铁路风险评估中的应用

魏圆圆¹, 左忠义^**1 教授, 程伟² 高级工程师, 孟子悦³

1 大连交通大学交通运输工程学院, 辽宁大连 116028;
2 国家铁路局安全技术中心, 北京 100036;
3 沈阳市规划设计院有限公司, 辽宁沈阳 110000

收稿日期:2020-10-16 修回日期:2020-12-09 出版日期:2020-12-30 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: ** 左忠义(1973—),男,辽宁大连人,博士,教授,主要从事交通运输规划与管理等方面的研究。E-mail: zuozy@djtu.edu.cn。
作者简介:魏圆圆 (1996—),女,辽宁沈阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为交通运输规划与管理。E-mial:1914227486@qq.com。
基金资助:
辽宁省教育厅科研项目(JDL2017034); 辽宁省轨道交通装备技术项目(2018yb016)。

Application of F-ANP method in risk assessment of high-speed railway

WEI Yuanyuan¹, ZUO Zhongyi¹, CHENG Wei², MENG Ziyue³

1 College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian Liaoning 116028, China;
2 Safety Technology Center,National Railway Administration, Beijing 100036, China;
3 Shenyang Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd, Shenyang Liaoning 110000, China

Received:2020-10-16 Revised:2020-12-09 Online:2020-12-30 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为降低高速铁路风险带来的安全隐患,利用模糊网络分析法(F-ANP),评估高铁安全风险等级。通过从高铁建设运营的管理、人员、设备和环境4个方面进行统计分析,构建适用于高铁风险的指标体系;采用F-ANP法定性与定量相结合确定指标层中非独立风险因子权重及其相互之间的复杂关系;基于相关领域专家评价意见和结果建立综合模糊矩阵,评估高铁风险等级。研究表明:结合专家意见和网络分析可以相对全面、准确地量化高铁建设运营中的复杂风险因素,构建用于评估高铁风险等级的模型方法,从而进行安全预警以及决定是否采取相关保障措施。

关键词: 模糊网络分析法(F-ANP), 高速铁路, 风险评估, 综合模糊矩阵, 风险因素

Abstract: In order to reduce the risk of high-speed rail safety risks, F-ANP was used to evaluate the safety risk level of high-speed railway.Through statistical analysis from the management, personnel, equipment and environment of high-speed railway construction and operation, the index system suitable for high-speed railway risk was constructed,F-ANP method was used to determine the weight of non-independent risk factors in the index layer and the complex relationship between them. Based on the evaluation opinions and results of experts in related fields, a comprehensive fuzzy matrix was established to evaluate the risk level of high-speed railway.The results show that combined with expert opinions and network analysis, the complex risk factors in the construction and operation process of high-speed railway can be quantified relatively comprehensively and accurately, and the model method used to evaluate the risk level of high-speed railway can be built, so as to carry out safety warning and whether to take relevant safeguard measures.

Key words: fuzzy-analytic network process(F-ANP), high speed railway, risk assessment, synthetic fuzzy matrix, risk factors

中图分类号:

X913.4

魏圆圆, 左忠义, 程伟, 孟子悦. F-ANP法在高速铁路风险评估中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 165-171.

WEI Yuanyuan, ZUO Zhongyi, CHENG Wei, MENG Ziyue. Application of F-ANP method in risk assessment of high-speed railway[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 165-171.

参考文献

[1] 张健.高铁大型车站客运组织安全风险评估与预警系统研究[D].北京:中国铁道科学研究院,2019.
ZHANG Jian. Research on safety risk assessment and early warning system for passenger transport organization in high-speed railway large-scale stations [D]. Beijing:China Academy of Railway Sciences,2019.
[2] 聂洪亮.铁路路基工程风险分类及评价研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2014.
NIE Hongliang. Risk classification and evaluation of railway subgrade engineering[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2014.
[3] 王富章.铁路灾害风险评估与应急救援策略研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2013.
WANG Fuzhang. Research on disaster risk evaluation and emergency rescue strategy of railway[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2013.
[4] 牛瑾.基于层次分析法和模糊综合评价的中国高铁核心能力评价[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2017.
NIU Jin. Based on the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of core competence of China′s high-speed rail evaluation [D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University of Technology,2017.
[5] 于辰成.基于BP神经网络的高铁风险评价模型研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2014.
YU Chencheng. Research on high-speed rail risk assessment model based on BP neural network[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2014.
[6] MACRO C. Evaluation of railway tunnel safety for operation involving trains carrying dangerous goods-fire hazard and risk assessment implemented with probabilistic methods[C].Fourth International Symposium on Tunnel Safety and Security,2010:17-19.
[7] SAAT M R,WERTH C J,SCHAEFFER D,et al. Environmental risk analysis of harardous material rial transportation[J].Joural of Hazardous Materials,2013,264(2):560-569.
[8] SONG Tian, ZHONG Deming, ZHONG Hang. A STAMP analysis on the China-Yongwen railway accident[J].International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security,2012,7612:376-387.
[9] 赵冬安.基于故障树法的地铁施工安全风险分析[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2011.
ZHAO Dongan. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in engineering[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology,2011.
[10] 刘美池,尹盼盼,荣文竽.基于模糊模式识别的高铁快运安全综合评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(增2):149-154.
LIU Meichi, YIN Panpan, RONG Wenyu. Comprehensive evaluation of high-speed railway express safety based on fuzzy pattern recognition[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2018,28(S2):149-154.
[11] 尹佳雯,左忠义,尹盼盼. 基于安全论证法的铁路运营安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2018,28(增2):155-160.
YIN Jiawen, ZUO Zhongyi, YIN Panpan. Research on safety evaluation index of railway operation based on safety analects[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2018,28(S2):155-160.
[12] 周杨.基于AHP的铁路工程施工阶段风险预警管理研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2016.
ZHOU Yang. Research on risk early warning management of railway engineering construction stage that based on AHP[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology,2016.
[13] 张鹏,原亮明. 铁路运营安全风险和隐患双重预防模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(增1):163-167.
ZHANG Peng, YUAN Liangming. Research on double-prevention model of railway operation safety risk and hidden danger[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2019,29(S1):163-167.
[14] 赵杰,郭勇.基于层次分析法的铁路客运车站服务质量评价研究[J].铁道运输与经济,2019,41(6):53-58.
ZHAO Jie, GUO Yong. A research on service quality evaluation of railway passenger station based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Rail Transport and Economy,2019,41(6):53-58.

[1]	刘嘉豪, 余杨, 张振兴, 余建星, 王巍巍, 傅一钦. 二维云模型和贝叶斯网络的立管风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 147-154.
[2]	辛保泉, 喻健良, 党文义, 白永忠, 于安峰. 定量风险评估视域下的多组分混合物危险特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 80-85.
[3]	卢颖, 赵志攀, 姜学鹏, 吴锦东, 范小鹏. 大数据视域下体育场馆动态火灾风险指标研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 155-162.
[4]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[5]	张鸽. 基于累积接尘量的尘肺病风险评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 200-206.
[6]	韩鹏, 王军, 王启, 赵嶷飞. 基于飞行剖面的航空器试飞活动空管风险研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 149-156.
[7]	刘继川, 桂蕾. 城市公共安全风险评估与控制对策研究:以武汉市为例^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 164-171.
[8]	辛保泉, 党文义, 喻健良, 王溪舸, 闫兴清, 卢卫. 石化过程蒸气云爆炸抗爆设防荷载定量评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 113-118.
[9]	贾飞, 孟学雷, 贾宝通, 李涛, 张杨. 突发公共卫生事件下高速铁路客流分配研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 153-160.
[10]	安宇, 李子琪, 王袆, 郭子萌, 张姜博南. 基于FBN的高校实验室不安全行为风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 160-167.
[11]	赵挺生, 庞奇志, 姜雯茜. 基于数据库与支持向量机的施工升降机安全风险预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 11-17.
[12]	马润, 仇维斌 , 秦云, 欧红香. 模糊区间TOPSIS动车组塞拉门故障风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 177-183.
[13]	赵冬月, 陈长坤, 易亮. 灾害演化网络时序性风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 171-177.
[14]	鲁锦涛, 任利成, 戎丹, 郭昕曜. 基于灰色-物元模型的煤矿瓦斯爆炸风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 99-105.
[15]	韩鹏, 张冰玉. 航迹误差对无人机坠地伤人风险评估的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 106-111.

F-ANP法在高速铁路风险评估中的应用

Application of F-ANP method in risk assessment of high-speed railway

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价