中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 105-116.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.11.0791

• 公共安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

社区韧性的概念演进与中外前沿热点对比分析

瞿英1,2(), 许生1,2,**()   

  1. 1 河北科技大学 经济管理学院, 河北 石家庄 050018
    2 河北科技大学 数据科学与智能计算研究中心,河北 石家庄 050018
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-18 修回日期:2023-08-24 出版日期:2023-11-28
  • 通讯作者:
    **许 生(1994—),男,河北邢台人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为服务科学管理与工程、风险管理。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    瞿 英 (1973—),女,江苏南通人,博士,教授,主要从事决策理论与技术、系统评价等方面的研究。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(ZD202210)

Conceptual evolution of community resilience and comparative analysis of frontier spots at home and abroad

QU Ying1,2(), XU Sheng1,2,**()   

  1. 1 School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050018, China
    2 Data Science and Intelligent Computing Research Center, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050018, China
  • Received:2023-05-18 Revised:2023-08-24 Published:2023-11-28

摘要:

社区作为社会系统的基本构成单元,是承受灾害冲击的关键对象,为提高社区应对风险的能力,从韧性内容刻画角度分析“工程韧性→生态韧性→演进韧性”的韧性概念演进,从韧性主体角度剖析“社会韧性→城乡韧性→社区韧性”的韧性演进脉络,细化社区韧性的系统定位。借助CiteSpace工具可视化分析国内外社区韧性研究文献。结果表明:在研究内容热点方面,国外研究侧重社会、环境、经济等宏观领域,而国内研究更倾向解决新冠等突发事件引起的针对性问题;热点演进趋势上,国外研究由微观个体向宏观系统逐步迈进,而国内则呈现由宏观构架向微观分支逐步深入的演进路线;在研究前沿方面,国外社区韧性前沿由框架性研究、自然领域引发韧性需求向社会领域转移,而国内的研究前沿保持在城市治理的领域。

关键词: 社区韧性, 演进趋势, 前沿热点, 共现, 文献计量

Abstract:

Community resilience was the ability of communities to cope with risks. As a basic component of the social system, communities were the key objects to withstand the impact of disasters. The concept evolution of "Engineering resilience → Ecological resilience → Evolutionary resilience" was analyzed from the perspective of the description of resilience content. The context of resilience evolution of "Social resilience → Urban and rural resilience → Community resilience" was analyzed from the perspective of the subject of resilience, and the study refined the systematic positioning of community resilience. Through the visual analysis of the research literature on community resilience at home and abroad by CiteSpace, it can be found that foreign research focuses on the macro direction of society, environment and economy, while domestic research tends to solve the targeted problems caused by emergencies such as COVID-19.By analyzing the evolution trend of hot spots, we can find that foreign countries are gradually moving forward from micro individuals to macro systems, while China is deepening from macro framework to micro branches. Through the analysis of research frontiers at home and abroad, it can be found that the resilience frontiers of foreign communities have shifted from the framework research and the natural field to the social field, while the domestic research frontiers have been in the field of social and urban governance.

Key words: community resilience, evolution trend, frontier hot spots, co-occurrence, bibliometric