基于行人恐慌情绪解析的改进社会力模型

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.02.1277

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 45-52.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.02.1277

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

基于行人恐慌情绪解析的改进社会力模型

邓社军¹(), 虞宇浩¹, 张俊林², 张超², 钱付余², 于世军¹

¹ 扬州大学建筑科学与工程学院,江苏扬州 225127
² 交控科技股份有限公司,北京 100070

收稿日期:2023-08-17 修回日期:2023-11-19 出版日期:2024-02-28

作者简介:

邓社军 (1977—),男,江苏姜堰人,工学博士,教授,主要从事交通安全与风险防控、交通规划与管理、城市智能交通系统、低碳与智慧交通等方面的研究。E-mail: yzrx6@163.com。

于世军副教授

基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFB1600702); 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助(19YJAZH011); 江苏省社会科学基金资助(2022XZB022)

Improved social force model based on analysis of pedestrian panic emotion

DENG Shejun¹(), YU Yuhao¹, ZHANG Junlin², ZHANG Chao², QIAN Fuyu², YU Shijun¹

¹ College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou Jiangsu 225127, China
² Traffic Control Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, China

Received:2023-08-17 Revised:2023-11-19 Published:2024-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为深入研究行人恐慌情绪对突发事件下群体疏散效率的影响特性,首先,考虑滞留时间、局部密度、行人与出口的距离、周围人员密度以及行人恐慌情绪传播等因素,解析并构建由自恐慌和恐慌传播2部分组成的行人恐慌情绪量化模型,并将其引入社会力模型中进行改进优化;然后,采用与经典现象对比的方法验证模型的有效性;最后,运用 Anylogic软件进行仿真分析。结果表明:改进后的模型能够较好地反映行人在恐慌情形下的疏散运动特性;适度的恐慌情绪,如当恐慌度小于0.3时,可以加快人群的疏散速度;较高的恐慌情绪,如当恐慌值大于0.3时,则会加剧瓶颈现象,出现所谓的“快即是慢”现象,从而降低疏散效率。

关键词: 行人恐慌情绪, 社会力模型, 人群疏散, Anylogic, “快即是慢”

Abstract:

In order to deeply analyze the influence of pedestrian panic on the efficiency of group evacuation under emergencies, this paper analyzed and constructed a quantitative model of pedestrian panic, which was composed of two parts: self-panic and panic propagation. First, the model considered factors such as detention time, local density, the distance between pedestrians and exits, the density of people around and the spread of pedestrian panic. Then it was introduced into the social force model for improvement and optimization, and verified the validity by comparing with the classical phenomenon. Finally, the simulation analysis was carried out using Anylogic software. The results show that the improved model can better reflect the evacuation movement characteristics of pedestrians in panic situations. A moderate panic, such as when the panic degree is less than 0.3, can accelerate the evacuation speed of the crowd. A high panic, such as when the panic value is greater than 0.3, can exacerbate the bottleneck phenomenon, and the so-called "fast is slow" phenomenon occurs, thus reducing the evacuation efficiency.

Key words: pedestrian panic, social force model, crowd evacuation, Anylogic, "Fast is slow"

中图分类号:

X915.2安全社会学

邓社军, 虞宇浩, 张俊林, 张超, 钱付余, 于世军. 基于行人恐慌情绪解析的改进社会力模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 45-52.

DENG Shejun, YU Yuhao, ZHANG Junlin, ZHANG Chao, QIAN Fuyu, YU Shijun. Improved social force model based on analysis of pedestrian panic emotion[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 45-52.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 15

[1]	王莉, 刘致君. 考虑恐慌情绪感染的 CA疏散模型算法研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(4): 1225-1230.
	WANG Li, LIU Zhijun. Research on CA evacuation model algorithm considering panic infection[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 23(4): 1225-1230.
[2]	TAN V, AU C K. Simulation of herding behaviour in panic evacuation from a room with two exits[J]. International Journal ofthe Digital Human, 2016, 1(3): 295-304.
[3]	HELBING D, MOLNAR P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics[J]. Physical Review. E, Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, 1995, 51(5): 4282-4286.
[4]	LÖHNER R. On the modeling of pedestrian motion[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2010, 34(2): 366-382. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.04.017
[5]	KIRCHNER A, SCHADHCHNEIDER A. Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2002, 312(1): 260-276. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00857-9
[6]	李昌华, 何海彤, 李智杰, 等. 烟雾场景下的人员疏散仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4):86-92. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.014
	LI Changhua, HE Haitong, LI Zhijie, et al. Simulation of personnel evacuation in smoke scenario[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 86-92. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.014
[7]	王冠宁, 陈涛, 郑晖杰, 等. 考虑恐慌情绪和沿墙引导的行人疏散模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 111-117. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2675
	WANG Guanning, CHEN Tao, ZHENG Huijie, et al. Pedestrian evacuation model considering panic and wall-following guidance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 111-117. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2675
[8]	陈长坤, 童蕴贺. 基于元胞自动机恐慌状态下人群疏散模型研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(6):12-17.
	CHEN Changkun, TONG Yunhe. Study on crowd evacuation model under panic state based on cellular automata[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2022, 32(9): 111-117.
[9]	王梦思, 张桂娟, 刘弘. 面向人群疏散仿真的异构情绪感染模型[J]. 计算机科学, 2019, 46(3):287-297. doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.03.043
	WANG Mengsi, ZHANG Guijuan, LIU Hong. Heterogenous emotional contagion model for crowd evacuation simulation[J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(3): 287-297. doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.03.043
[10]	曹雷, 王琳. 基于改进社会力模型的人群疏散研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2016, 36(9):1434-1447. doi: 10.12341/jssms12898
	CAO Lei, WANG Lin. Study of pedestrian evacuation based on modified social force model[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2016, 36(9): 1434-1447. doi: 10.12341/jssms12898
[11]	李佳洋, 唐加福, 郭恩铭. 基于动态情绪驱动的人员应急疏散模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 42(11):1656-1662.
	LI Jiayang, TANG Jiafu, GUO Enming. Crowd emergency evacuation model based on dynamic emotion drive[J]. Journal of Northeastern University: Natural Science, 2021, 42(11): 1656-1662.
[12]	KHOLSHEVNIKOV V V, SHIELDS T J, BOYCE K E, et al. Recent developments in pedestrian flow theory and research in Russia[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2008, 43(2): 108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.05.005
[13]	李芳. 基于多智能体的地铁站台乘客紧急疏散模型[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.
	LI Fang. Multi-agent-based modeling for passenger emergency evacuation from metro platforms[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015.
[14]	LEIJONMARCK E, OLERGÅRD T. Modelling of panicking pedestrians during emergency evacuation[D]. London: Royal Institute of Technology, 2013.
[15]	罗茜. 人员疏散的社会力修正模型及其仿真研究[D]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学, 2010.
	LUO Qian. Social force modification model for people evacuation and its simulation study[D]. Beijing: Capital University of Economics and Business, 2010.

基于行人恐慌情绪解析的改进社会力模型

Improved social force model based on analysis of pedestrian panic emotion

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 15

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李昆, 丁景轩, 李姣姣. 考虑信息传递机制的改进社会力模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 217-225.
[2]	李盼盼, 马剑, 王巧, 陈娟, 陈若薇. 步行力驱动的人群-桥梁系统耦合横向振动模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 121-129.
[3]	马剑, 李慧文, 宋丹丹, 陈娟. 校园通勤行人流时空伴随分析与疫情防控策略[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 86-93.
[4]	王立晓, 郝闵熙, 孙小慧. 考虑行人心理潜变量的地铁应急疏散仿真研究*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 67-75.
[5]	杨永刚, 王璟璟, 宋炜. 飞机客舱应急疏散的修正社会力模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 201-206.
[6]	魏娟, 郭阳勇, 游磊, 李忠玉, 唐志海, 胡周义. 一种基于多出口环境的人群疏散改进模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(7): 139-145.
[7]	胥旋. 车门开启方式对地铁区间平台疏散影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 113-117.
[8]	冯诚, 杨静, 张红亮, 冯焕东. 基于组合模型的地铁车站行人疏散仿真优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 49-54.
[9]	郑霞忠, 陈艳, 晋良海, 张明, 向蕾蕾. 面向道路交叉口的疏散人群分流模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10): 176-182.
[10]	张开冉, 杨树鹏, 何琳希, 龙瑛. 基于社会力模型的车站负重人群疏散模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 30-35.
[11]	王丽，刘茂，孟博，王炜. 开放空间复杂地形人员疏散模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(1): 29-.
[12]	李爽，王勇毅. 大型社会活动安全风险评估指标研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(9): 147-.
[13]	徐方，魏东，魏星. 公众聚集场所人群疏散基础数据的分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(4): 137-.
[14]	秦文虎，查骏元，苏国辉，舒鑫. 人群疏散行为仿真技术研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(2): 22-.
[15]	关超，袁文燕. 基于元胞自动机的弱视条件下群体疏散的仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(12): 41-.