中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 216-224.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.08.0055

• 公共安全与应急管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

烟叶仓储火灾风险演化与动态评估

柯巍1(), 王勇1, 罗军1, 李鑫2, 杨昂滨2, 佟瑞鹏2,**()   

  1. 1 湖北省烟草公司十堰市公司, 湖北 十堰 442099
    2 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-10 修回日期:2026-06-24 出版日期:2026-08-28
  • 通信作者:
    **佟瑞鹏(1977—),男,黑龙江穆棱人,博士,教授,主要从事行为安全管理、职业心理健康、环境风险评估等方面的研究。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    柯巍 (1992—),男,湖北十堰人,博士,工程师,主要从事安全生产信息化、企业安全管理、火灾风险评估等方面的工作。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    中国烟草总公司湖北省公司科技项目(2025SY3CGGLWL2B030)

Risk evolution and dynamic assessment of tobacco storage fire

Ke Wei1(), Wang Yong1, Luo Jun1, Li Xin2, Yang Angbin2, Tong Ruipeng2,**()   

  1. 1 Hubei Provincial Tobacco Company Shiyan Branch, Shiyan Hubei 442099, China
    2 School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2026-03-10 Revised:2026-06-24 Published:2026-08-28

摘要:

为应对烟叶仓储系统中火灾致因复杂、管理与人因因素难以量化以及风险随时间持续累积等问题,提出融合模糊集理论与动态贝叶斯网络(DBN)的火灾风险动态评估方法。基于蝴蝶结模型辨识致因路径与防控屏障结构,引入模糊集理论将专家模糊判断映射为DBN先验概率以解决数据稀疏问题;构建含时间维度的DBN模型刻画风险动态演化,并结合反向诊断与风险降低值重要度(RRW)分析溯源关键致因。结果表明:静态管理条件下,火灾顶事件发生概率在10个管理周期内从16.76%累积至64.75%,灾难性后果概率从0.011%升至9.27%,风险呈显著的非线性增长特征;反向诊断显示,电气线路故障以57.25%的后验概率成为首要物理致因,而消防管理人员疏于职守(49.92%)与隐患排查治理流程不规范(41.38%)构成关键管理致因;RRW分析进一步揭示,管理与人因因素的风险削减敏感性显著高于物理因素,其中,消防管理人员疏于职守(RRW=1.351 2)与隐患排查治理流程不规范(RRW=1.248 7)分居前2位,表明强化人员履职监督与隐患排查闭环管理较单纯技术升级具有更高的风险削减效率;物理因素是火灾发生的物质基础,但管理缺陷的累积效应是驱动系统风险非线性攀升与多重防线失效的深层根源,动态风险评估应将管理与人因因素纳入核心监控维度,以支撑双重预防机制下差异化防控策略的制定与实施。

关键词: 烟叶仓储火灾, 风险演化, 动态风险评估, 模糊集理论, 动态贝叶斯网络(DBN)

Abstract:

To address the complexity of fire causation, the difficulty of quantifying management and human factors, and the time-dependent accumulation of risk in tobacco leaf warehousing systems, a dynamic fire risk assessment method integrating fuzzy set theory and DBN was proposed. Causation pathways and prevention barrier structures were identified based on the Bow-tie model. fuzzy set theory was introduced to map expert fuzzy judgments into DBN prior probabilities, thereby addressing the data scarcity for critical basic events. A time-dependent DBN model was then constructed to characterize the dynamic evolution of fire risk over successive management cycles. Backward diagnosis and Risk Reduction Worth (RRW) analysis were further combined to trace key hazards and prioritize mitigation actions. The results showed that, under static management conditions, the probability of the top fire event increased from 16.76% to 64.75% over 10 management cycles, while the probability of catastrophic consequences increased from 0.011% to 9.27%, exhibiting a pronounced nonlinear growth pattern. Through backward diagnosis, electrical line fault was identified as the primary physical cause with a posterior probability of 57.25%, whereas neglect of duty by fire safety personnel (49.92%) and non-compliance in hazard inspection and rectification procedures (41.38%) were determined as the dominant management-related causes. RRW analysis further revealed that the risk reduction sensitivity of management and human factors was significantly higher than that of physical factors, with neglect of duty by fire safety personnel (RRW= 1.351 2) and non-compliance in hazard inspection procedures (RRW=1.248 7) ranking first and second, respectively, indicating that strengthening personnel accountability and closed-loop hazard management yields greater risk reduction efficiency than technical upgrades alone. Physical factors provide the necessary conditions for fire occurrence; however, the cumulative effect of management deficiencies is the root cause driving the nonlinear escalation of system risk and the failure of multiple defense barriers. Dynamic risk assessment should incorporate management and human factors as core monitoring dimensions to support the formulation and implementation of differentiated risk control strategies within the dual prevention mechanism.

Key words: tobacco storage fire, risk evolution, dynamic risk assessment, fuzzy set theory, dynamic Bayesian network(DBN)

中图分类号: