挖掘载荷下燃气PE管道损伤分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.011

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 59-64.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.011

挖掘载荷下燃气PE管道损伤分析

周立国¹, 姚安林^1,2 教授, 徐涛龙¹, 周雪¹, 尚卯³

1 西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院,四川成都 610500
2 油气消防四川省重点实验室, 四川成都 610500
3 中海福建天然气有限责任公司,福建莆田 351100

收稿日期:2016-11-28 修回日期:2017-01-16 发布日期:2020-11-22
作者简介:周立国 (1991—),男,山东德州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为油气管道系统风险评价与完整性管理。E-mail:zlgsafe@163.com。
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAK06B01)。

Damage analysis of urban gas PE pipeline under excavation load

ZHOU Liguo¹, YAO Anlin^1,2, XU Taolong¹, ZHOU Xue, SHANG Mao

1 College of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering,Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China
2 Oil and Gas Fire Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China
3 CNOOC Fujian Gas Co.,Ltd,Putian Fujian 351100,China

Received:2016-11-28 Revised:2017-01-16 Published:2020-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为分析第三方挖掘施工下燃气聚乙烯(PE)管道的损伤状况,借助ABAQUS有限元软件研究挖掘载荷作用下燃气PE管道的动力响应与力学特征。建立管道、土体与管-土接触模型,其中管道模型采用Prony级数进行模拟分析;确定PE管道强度、应变和变形失效准则;从挖掘载荷直接作用与未直接作用于管道2方面进行数值模拟。研究结果表明,挖掘载荷作用下,PE管道最易达到强度失效极限;载荷直接作用于管道时,管道的应力集中现象明显,而未直接作用于管道时,载荷主要影响管道的变形;载荷直接作用下,PE管道的安全运行受到严重威胁,而有覆土保护时,载荷对管道失效的影响较小。

关键词: 燃气聚乙烯(PE)管道; 挖掘载荷; 动力响应; 失效准则; 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to analyze the damage caused by third-party excavating construction to the PE pipeline, the dynamic response of the gas PE pipeline under excavation load was studied by using the ABAQUS finite element software. First,models were built respectively for the pipe, soil and pipe-soil contact, and the model for pipeline was simulated by Prony series. Then, strength, strain and deformation failure criteria of PE pipeline were established. Finally, the numerical simulation was carried out for two scenarios: the excavation load directly acting and not directly acting on the pipe. The simulation results show that PE pipeline is easiest to reach the strength failure limit under the excavation load,that the load acting directly on the pipeline causes remarkable stress concentration, and load which is not directly acting on the pipeline mainly affects the deformation of the pipeline, and that an external load directly acting on the pipeline is a major threat to its safe operation,and the covering soil layer can reduce the threat.

Key words: gas polyethylene(PE) pipeline, excavation load, dynamic response, failure criteria, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

X937

周立国, 姚安林, 徐涛龙, 周雪, 尚卯. 挖掘载荷下燃气PE管道损伤分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 59-64.

ZHOU Liguo, YAO Anlin, XU Taolong, ZHOU Xue, SHANG Mao. Damage analysis of urban gas PE pipeline under excavation load[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(3): 59-64.

参考文献

[1] 徐涛龙, 姚安林, 蒋宏业, 等. 基于模糊综合评价的城市燃气管网第三方破坏失效可能性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2010,20(8):165-169.
XU Taolong, YAO Anlin, JIANG Hongye, et al. Study on failure possibility of third-party damage to the urban gas pipeline network based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(8): 165-169.
[2] 周立国,姚安林,蒋宏业,等.城镇燃气管道第三方施工损伤风险评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):123-128.
ZHOU Liguo, YAO Anlin, JIANG Hongye,et al. Research on risk assessment method of third-party construction damage for urban gas pipeline[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(12): 123-128.
[3] 王海婷.野蛮施工挖破燃气管道[EB/OL]. [2016-07-22]. http://www.sznews.com/news/content/2016-07/22/content_13637796.htm.
WANG Haiting. Barbaric construction dug gas pipeline[EB/OL]. [2016-07-22]. http://www.sznews.com/news/content/2016-07/22/content_13637796.htm.
[4] BROOKER Daniel C. Numerical modelling of pipeline puncture under excavator loading[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2003,80(10): 715-735.
[5] 姚安林,徐涛龙,李星, 等. 基于试验和数值模拟确定挖掘机具作用下埋地输气管道的动载荷[J]. 振动与冲击,2014,33(17):39-46.
YAO Anlin, XU Taolong, LI Xing, et al. Determining dynamic load on a buried gas pipeline under mining machinery actions based on test and numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(17): 39-46.
[6] YAO Anlin, XU Taolong, ZENG Xiangguo. Numerical analyses of the stress and limiting load for buried gas pipelines under excavation machine impact[J]. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice,2015, 6(3):1-7.
[7] 徐涛龙. 埋地管道强外力作用下变形和失效的实验研究及多尺度分析[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2015.
XU Taolong. Experimental study and multiscale analysis of deformation ang failure of buried pipeline under strong externai force[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan University,2015.
[8] 庞自啸, 阿斯汗, 孙策, 等. 挖掘载荷作用下埋地输气管道损伤过程数值模拟[J]. 当代化工, 2015, 44(1): 209-211.
PANG Zixiao, A Sihan, SUN Ce, et al. Numerical simulation of damage process of buried gas pipeline under excavating load[J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2015, 44(1): 209-211.
[9] 廖公云,黄晓明. ABAQUS有限元软件在道路工程中的应用[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2008:137-139.
LIAO Gongyun, HUANG Xiaoming. Application of ABAQUS finite element software for road engineering [M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2008, 137-139.
[10] 杨挺青. 黏弹性理论与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004:1-2.
YANG Tingqing. Viscoelastic theory and application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004:1-2.
[11] 李明阳. 埋地PE燃气管道失效机理的力学研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2010.
LI Mingyang. Mechanics study on the failure mechanism of the buried polyethylene gas pipelines[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2010.
[12] 孙逊. 聚烯烃管道[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006:298-303.
SUN Xun. Polyolefin pipe[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006:298-303.
[13] 朱庆杰, 刘英利, 蒋录珍, 等. 管土摩擦和管径对埋地管道破坏的影响分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2006, 26(3): 197-199.
ZHU Qingjie, LIU Yingli, JIANG Luzhen, et al. Analysis of buried pipeline damage affected by pipe-soil friction and pipe radius [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2006, 26(3): 197-199.
[14] GB 15558.1—2003,燃气用埋地聚乙烯(PE)管道系统第1部分: 管材[S].
GB 15558.1-2003,Buried polyethylene(PE) pipe systems for the supply of gasous fuels--part 1: pipes[S].
[15] DRIVER R, ZIMMERMAN T J E. A limit states approach to the design of pipelines for mechanical damage[C]. 17^th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 1998:390-394.
[16] ROOVERS P, STEINER M, ZAREA M. EPRG recommendations for the assessment of the tolerance and resistance of pipelines to external damage[C]. 11^th PRCI/EPRG Joint Technical Meeting, 1997: 18-21.
[17] BROOKER D C. Experimental puncture loads for external interference of pipelines by excavator equipment [J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2005, 82(11): 825-832.
[18] 赵璐, 姚安林, 徐涛龙, 等. 输气管道机械挖掘穿孔损伤预测模型研究[C].第25届全国结构工程学术会议论文集(第Ⅲ册), 2016: Ⅲ422-427.
ZHAO Lu, YAO Anlin, XU Taolong, et al. Study on damage prediction models of pipeline puncture under mechanical excavator loading[C]. Proceedings of the 25^th National Conference on Structural Engineering(No. Ⅲ) , 2016: Ⅲ422-427.

挖掘载荷下燃气PE管道损伤分析

Damage analysis of urban gas PE pipeline under excavation load

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙玉佳. 基于大涡模拟的油池火焰瞬态辐射传热研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 65-71.
[2]	辛保泉, 喻健良, 党文义, 白永忠, 于安峰. 定量风险评估视域下的多组分混合物危险特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 80-85.
[3]	邝雨婕, 赵佳虹. 连续时变风险下危险品储运选址-选线问题[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 185-191.
[4]	张新生, 王旭业, 张莹莹, 常潆戈. 海底腐蚀管道剩余寿命预测与维修策略研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 41-47.
[5]	贾文龙, 李晓宇, 成婷婷, 罗召钱, 徐嘉爽, 韩西成. 超高压含硫天然气节流阀冲蚀磨损机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 58-64.
[6]	高明. 化工运行装置HAZOP的过程偏差联合分析法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 98-102.
[7]	鲁义, 伍江乐, 邵淑珍, 施式亮, 周荣义, 王伟. 基于贝叶斯网络的危化品道路运输事故推理模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 174-182.
[8]	张新生, 常潆戈. 基于FA-BAS-ELM的海洋油气管道外腐蚀速率预测^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 99-106.
[9]	郑度奎, 程远鹏, 李昊燃, 何天隆. IAFSA-GRNN在油田集输管道CO₂腐蚀速率预测中的应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 110-117.
[10]	周宁, 吴露露, 李雪, 李徐伟, 时静洁, 曹林林. 喷射火环境下石化管廊管道失效特征试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 135-141.
[11]	刘尚志, 历宏斌, 赵东风, 刘庆龙, 酒江波, 牟睿. 基于HAZOP-Aspen的油气回收工艺风险分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 95-105.
[12]	李新宏, 王靖雯, 朱玉娇, 韩子月, 陈国明. 海洋水合物开采分解气体泄漏运移后果评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 114-119.
[13]	朱高庚, 陈国明, 张玉飞, 盛积良, 袁冠英, 刘健. 风暴灾害下海洋油气工业重大事故演化层次研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 172-179.
[14]	王干, 郑忠宇, 段玮嘉, 潘勇. 咪唑类离子液体热不稳定性的试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 163-170.
[15]	李新宏, 张毅, 韩子月, 贾瑞超, 王靖雯, 朱玉娇. 基于风险与成本的海洋溢油事故应急控制决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 184-190.