空腔体积比对甲烷爆炸冲击波传播机制的影响

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.014

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 87-93.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.014

空腔体积比对甲烷爆炸冲击波传播机制的影响

时本军^1,2, 穆朝民^1,2 教授, 周辉^1,2, 李重情^1,2 副教授

1.安徽理工大学煤矿安全高效开采省部共建教育部重点实验室,安徽淮南 232001;
2.安徽理工大学省部共建深部煤矿采动响应与灾害防控国家重点实验室安徽淮南 232001

收稿日期:2019-12-29 修回日期:2020-02-10 出版日期:2020-03-28 发布日期:2021-01-26
作者简介:时本军(1993—),男,安徽阜阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为安全工程防护、煤与瓦斯灾害防治。E-mail:1769317307@qq.com。
基金资助:
2019年研究生创新基金资助(2019CX2009)。

Influence of cavity volume ratio on propagation of methane blast wave

SHI Benjun^1,2, MU Chaomin^1,2, ZHOU Hui^1,2, LI Zhongqing^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Coal Mining Constructed by Anhui Province and Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Deep Coalmine Mining Response and Disaster Prevention Constructed by Anhui Province and Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China

Received:2019-12-29 Revised:2020-02-10 Online:2020-03-28 Published:2021-01-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究空腔相对体积比的变化对甲烷爆炸冲击波抑制作用的影响,采用计算流体力学(CFD)软件和大型圆管甲烷爆炸试验系统研究空腔相对体积比对甲烷爆炸冲击波的影响。结果表明:腔体相对体积比由4.8变为7.9,空腔对峰值超压消减作用增强,火焰持续光照强度消减作用骤然增强;腔体相对体积比增加到12.7时,拟合得到火焰持续光照强度衰减因子呈现“L”衰减关系,整体火焰持续光照强度消减基本趋于稳定,火焰持续光照强度衰减率由90.8%变为90.9%;峰值超压衰减因子衰减先慢后快;腔体相对体积比为12.7时抑爆效果最佳,整体火焰持续光照强度衰减率90.9%,峰值超压衰减率30.8%。

关键词: 腔体, 相对体积比, 火焰持续光照强度, 数值模拟, 峰值超压

Abstract: In order to study influence of relative volume ratio change of cavity on suppression of gas explosion shock wave, experiment was carried out by using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software and large-scale circular tube methane explosion test system. The results show that cavity's reduction effect on peak overpressure is strengthened as its relative volume ratio changes from 4.8 to 7.9, and continuous light intensity reduction of flame is suddenly enhanced. When the ratio increases to 12.7, fitting results indicate that attenuation factor of flame continuous light intensity presents a “L” curve, general reduction tends to be stable, and attenuation rate rises from 90.8% to 90.9%. Attenuation factor of peak overpressure is slow at first and then fast. It is found that cavity's explosion-suppressing effect is the best when its relative volume ratio reaches 12.7 with an general attenuation rate of continuous light intensity at 90.9% and and that of peak overpressure at 30.8%.

Key words: cavity, relative volume ratio, continuous light intensity of flame, numerical simulation, peak overpressure

中图分类号:

X932

时本军, 穆朝民, 周辉, 李重情. 空腔体积比对甲烷爆炸冲击波传播机制的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 87-93.

SHI Benjun, MU Chaomin, ZHOU Hui, LI Zhongqing. Influence of cavity volume ratio on propagation of methane blast wave[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(3): 87-93.

参考文献

[1] HOLBORN P G, BATTERSBY P, INGRAM J M, et al. Modelling the mitigation of hydrogen deflagrations in a vented cylindrical rig with water fog and nitrogen dilution[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(8): 3 471-3 487.
[2] SCHWER D A, KAILASANALH K. Numerical simulations the mitigation of unconfined explosions using water-mist[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 2 361-2 369.
[3] 林柏泉. 矿井瓦斯防治理论与技术[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2010: 402.
[4] 孙继平. 瓦斯综合防治方法研究[J]. 工矿自动化, 2011, 37(2): 1-5.
SUN Jiping. Research of integrated method of prevention and control of gas[J]. Industry and Mine Automation, 2011, 37(2): 1-5.
[5] 杨克, 邢志祥, 纪虹, 等. 超细水雾抑制甲烷爆炸的影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28 (11): 66-71.
YANG Ke, XING Zhixiang, JI Hong, et al. Analysis of factors influencing air-methane explosion suppression by ultrafine water mist[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(11): 66-71.
[6] 王亚磊, 郑立刚, 于水军, 等. NaHCO₃分散状况对其抑制甲烷爆炸的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 80-85.
WANG Yalei, ZHENG Ligang, YU Shuijun, et al. Effect of dispersion condition of NaHCO₃ on inhibiting methane-air mixture explosion[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(11): 80-85.
[7] KLEMENS R, GIERAS M. Dynamics of dust explosions suppression by means of extinguishing powder in various industrial conditions[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20(4): 664-674.
[8] 余明高, 吴丽洁, 万少杰, 等. 含 NaCl 荷电细水雾对甲烷爆炸火焰传播的抑制特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(11): 4 445-4 452.
YU Minggao, WU Lijie, WAN Shaojie, et al. Inhibition characteristics on methane explosion flame propagation affected by charged water mist containing sodium chloride additive[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(11): 4 445-4 452.
[9] 陈先锋, 樊傲, 袁必和, 等. 干水材料对瓦斯爆燃抑制的实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(11): 123-133.
CHEN Xianfeng, FAN Ao, YUAN Bihe, et al. Experimental study on suppression of gas deflagration by dry water materials[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 123-133.
[10] SALZANO E, MARRA F S, RUSSO G, et al. Numerical simulation of turbulent gas flames in tubes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2002, 95(3): 233-47.
[11] HULD T, PETER G, STADTKE H. Numerical simulation of explosion phenomena in industrial environments[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1996, 46(2): 185-195.
[12] WU Zhengyan, JIANG Shuguang, LI Qinhua, et al. Experimental study on the feasibility of explosion suppression by vacuum chambers[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(4): 660-667.
[13] 邵昊, 蒋曙光, 李钦华, 等, 真空腔体积对真空腔抑制瓦斯爆炸性能的影响[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2014, 31(3): 489-493.
SHAO Hao, JIANG Shuguang, LI Qinhua, et al. Influence of vacuum chamber volume on gas explosion suppression[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2014, 31(3): 489-493.
[14] 赵凯, 高光发, 王肖钧. 柱壳结构抗冲击性能量纲分析与数值模拟研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(11): 12-16.
ZHAO Kai, GAO Guangfa, WANG Xiaojun. Dimensional analysis and numerical simulation for impact-resistance performance of cylindrical shell structures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(11): 12-16.
[15] 张涛, 刘土光, 肖汉林, 等. 高速冲击下薄壁组合结构吸能特性研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2006, 26(5): 395-403.
ZHANG Tao, LIU Tuguang, XIAO Hanlin, et al. Energy absorption performance of thin-walled structures with triggering holes subjected to high-speed axial impact[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006, 26(5): 395-403.
[16] 胡成洲. 真空度和弱面材料厚度对真空腔抑爆效果影响的实验研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2015.
HU Chengzhou. Experimental study on influence of vacuum degree and thickness of weak panel material on effect of vacuum cavity explosion suppression[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2015.
[17] ZIF R K, SAPKO M J, BRUNE F. Explosion pressure design criteria for new seals in US coal mine[R]. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2007.

空腔体积比对甲烷爆炸冲击波传播机制的影响

Influence of cavity volume ratio on propagation of methane blast wave

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李刚, 刘海振, 杨庆贺, 牛伟锋. 带压开采煤层底板破坏特征与突水风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 68-76.
[2]	郑艾辰, 向晋扬, 黄锋, 金成昊, 刘星辰. 空洞对隧道结构安全影响试验与模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 119-126.
[3]	游波, 毛聪, 施式亮, 刘何清, 鲁义, 李敏. 矿用通风服微空间环境变化特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 185-193.
[4]	冯巩, 夏元友, 王智德, 严敏嘉. 基于位移信息融合的露天矿边坡动态预警方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 116-122.
[5]	鲁义, 杨帆, 刘欢, 陈健, 王金鹏, 李文辉. 气凝胶消防救援服内衬的热阻计算^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 201-207.
[6]	张钧祥, 刘彦伟, 任培良, 韩红凯, 左伟芹. 基于蠕变效应的穿层钻孔封孔参数优化与试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 97-104.
[7]	丁厚成, 连志虚, 邓权龙, 蒋仲安, 杨利炜, 葛梦圆. 振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 106-112.
[8]	荆德吉, 贾鑫, 张天, 孟祥曦, 马明星, 王志恒. 落煤过程中涡旋吹吸式除尘技术数值模拟及试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 121-127.
[9]	朱豪豪, 郭海林, ZHUMAKELDI A. 外力作用下管道内表面缺陷处裂纹扩展研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 66-72.
[10]	姜学鹏, 陈欣格, 郭昆. 侧部点式排烟隧道火灾临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 105-111.
[11]	王亮, 孙毅民, 褚鹏, 赵伟, 邹双英. 基于时空分布特征的煤层瓦斯测压准确性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 40-47.
[12]	张萌, 刘宏磊, 乔文光, 高勋. 排土场稳定性影响因素显著性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 69-75.
[13]	曲国娜, 李红健, 贾廷贵, 强倩, 王来贵. 煤堆自燃特征的试验研究与数值模拟^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 69-77.
[14]	荆德吉, 魏德宁, 马明星, 张天, 孟祥曦, 任帅帅. 胶带运输巷粉尘运移及气动喷雾降尘技术^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 93-99.
[15]	崔村燕, 柳宁远, 段永胜, 同江. 长贮库房内偏二甲肼扩散浓度快速估算方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 109-115.