天然气管道施工事故行为原因研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.002

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 8-13.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.002

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

天然气管道施工事故行为原因研究

孙世梅^1,2 教授, 高小迪^1,2, 孙赫², 傅贵³ 教授

1.吉林建筑大学应急科学与工程学院,吉林长春 130118;
2.吉林建筑大学事故预防科学研究院,吉林长春 130118;
3.中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2020-03-20 修回日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2020-06-28 发布日期:2021-01-28
作者简介:孙世梅(1966—),女,吉林磐石人,博士,教授,主要从事行为安全与事故预防等方面的研究。E-mail:sunshir@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(51774149);吉林省财政厅与吉林省安全生产监督管理局联合项目(吉财产业指[2017]1000号,吉安监规划[2017]287号);国家安全生产监督管理总局2018年安全生产重大事故防治关键技术科技项目(jilin-0039-2018AQ)。

Study on causes of accidents in construction of natural gas pipelines

SUN Shimei^1,2, GAO Xiaodi^1,2, SUN He², FU Gui³

1. School of Emergency Science and Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun Jilin 130118, China;
2. Accidents Prevention Research Institute, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun Jilin 130118, China;
3. School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received:2020-03-20 Revised:2020-05-12 Online:2020-06-28 Published:2021-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为预防天然气管道施工事故的发生,利用行为安全“2-4”模型原因因素编码系统,分析32起天然气管道施工事故的原因。按照4个层级29个原因因素,统计得到事故涉及的原因因素16项, 并对其中发生频率最高的5项作详细的原因分析。研究结果表明:在所调查的天然气管道施工事故中,违章的不安全操作中的人员错误操作、不安全物态中的施工前外部条件不符合要求、安全知识中的对设备和材料特性掌握不够、安全意识中的未意识到按程序施工的重要性、安全管理组织结构缺陷中的现场安全监督人员配置不合理和自然因素中的连续下雨是导致事故最主要的原因。

关键词: 天然气管道, 管道施工, 行为安全“2-4”模型, 原因因素编码系统, 原因分析

Abstract: In order to prevent natural gas pipeline construction accidents, causes of 32 natural accidents of such were analyzed by using "2-4" model causal factor coding system.16 causal factors involved in the accident were obtained through statistical analysis of 29 factors at 4 levels, and 5 most frequent ones were analyzed in detail. The results show that for all investigated accidents, the major reasons for them are personnel's faulty operation from the category of illegal and unsafe operation, inconformity of external conditions before construction with requirements from unsafe states, insufficient mastery of equipment and material characteristics from safety knowledge, failure to realize importance of construction procedures from safety awareness, unreasonable deployment of on-site safety supervision personnel from safety management structure defect, and continuous rain from natural factors.

Key words: natural gas pipeline, pipeline construction, behavioral safety “2-4” model, causal factor coding system, cause analysis

中图分类号:

X937

孙世梅, 高小迪, 孙赫, 傅贵. 天然气管道施工事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 8-13.

SUN Shimei, GAO Xiaodi, SUN He, FU Gui. Study on causes of accidents in construction of natural gas pipelines[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 8-13.

参考文献

[1] 胡奥林,汤浩,吴雨舟,等.2018年中国天然气发展述评及2019年展望[J].天然气技术与经济,2019,13(1):1-7,81.
HU Aolin, TANG Hao, WU Yuzhou, et al. Review of China's natural gas development in 2018 and outlook for 2019[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2019,13(1):1-7,81.
[2] 戚爱华.加快管道建设是促进天然气消费的重要途径[J].中国能源,2011,33(7):21-23,42.
QI Aihua. Speeding up pipeline construction is an important way to promote natural gas consumption[J]. Energy of China, 2011,33(7):21-23,42.
[3] 高鹏,高振宇,王峰,等.2018年中国油气管道建设新进展[J].国际石油经济,2019,27(3): 54-59.
GAO Peng, GAO Zhenyu, WANG Feng, et al. New progress in China's oil and gas pipeline construction in 2018[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2019,27(3): 54-59.
[4] 梁永宽,杨馥铭,尹哲祺,等.油气管道事故统计与风险分析[J].油气储运,2017,36(4): 472-476.
LIANG Yongkuan, YANG Fuming, YIN Zheqi, et al. Accident statistics and risk analusis of oil and gas pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017,36(4): 472-476.
[5] 王禹轩,袁纪武,侯孝波.天然气输送管道事故分析与防范[J].安全、健康和环境,2019,19(4): 9-11.
WANG Yuxuan, YUAN Jiwu, HOU Xiaobo. Analysis and preventive mwasures of natural gas pipeline accident[J].Safety Health & Environment,2019,19(4): 9-11.
[6] 杨克,王壮,贺雷,等.天然气管道蒸汽云爆炸事故定量计算及风险评估[J].工业安全与环保,2019,45(11): 31-35.
YANG Ke, WANG Zhuang, HE Lei, et al. Risk assessment and quantitative caculation steam cloud explosion accidents in natural gas pipelines[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection,2019,45(11): 31-35.
[7] 傅贵,王秀明,李亚.事故致因“2-4”模型及其事故原因因素编码研究[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(3): 1 003-1 008.
FU Gui, WANG Xiuming, LI Ya. On the 2-4Model and the application of its causative codes to the analysis of the related accidents[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017,17(3): 1 003-1 008.
[8] 傅贵,索晓,王春雪.24Model的系统特性研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(1):263-272.
FU Gui, SUO Xiao, WANG Chunxue. Study on the systematic characteristics of 24Model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018,38(1):263-272.
[9] HEINRICH WH, PETERSON D, ROOS N.Industrial accident prevention[M].New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company,1980:22.
[10] REASON J. Human error[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1900: 6-12.
[11] 傅贵,殷文韬,董继业,等.行为安全“2-4”模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(7): 1 123-1 129.
FU Gui, YIN Wentao, DONG Jiye, et al. Behavior-based accident causation: the "2-4" model and its safety implications in coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013,38(7): 1 123-1 129.
[12] 高平,傅贵.煤矿顶板事故不安全动作分析及预防[J].工业安全与环保,2015,41(7): 67-70.
GAO Ping, FU Gui. Analysis and prevention of unsafe acts in mine roof accidents[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015,41(7): 67-70.
[13] 曹家琳,傅贵.煤矿瓦斯突出事故不安全动作原因统计分析[J].工业安全与环保,2016,42(12):37-39,54.
CAO Jialin, FU Gui. Statistical analysis of unsafe act reasons in coal and gas outburst accidents[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016,42(12):37-39,54.
[14] 张洪,宫运华,傅贵.基于“2-4”模型的建筑施工高处坠落事故原因分类与统计分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(9): 169-174.
ZHANG Hong, GONG Yunhua, FU Gui. Causes classification and statistical analysis on falling accidents on construction sites based on "2-4" model[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017,13(9): 169-174.
[15] 刘辉,张智超,闫伟,等.建筑施工高处坠落事故各工种不安全动作分析研究[J].工业安全与环保,2019,45(5): 80-84.
LIU Hui, ZHANG Zhichao, YAN Wei, et al. Study on unsafe acts analysis of each type of work in falling accidents on construction[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019,45(5): 80-84.
[16] 孙世梅,赵金坤,傅贵.基于“2-4”模型的高处坠落事故行为原因研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(8): 23-28.
SUN Shimei, ZHAO Jinkun, FU Gui. Study on behavioral causes of falling accidents based on " 2-4" model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(8): 23-28.
[17] 周琳,傅贵,刘希扬.基于行为安全理论的化工事故统计及分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1): 148-153.
ZHOU Lin, FU Gui, LIU Xiyang. Statistics and analysis on chemical accidents based on behavior-based safety theory[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016,12(1): 148-153.
[18] 付净,刘辉,葛及,等.基于行为安全“2-4”模型的化工行业典型事故分析[J].吉林化工学院学报,2015,32(6): 59-64.
FU Jing, LIU Hui, GE Ji, et al. Analysis of typical accidents in chemical industry based on behavioral safety "2-4" model[J]. Journal of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, 2015,32(6): 59-64.
[19] 付净,聂方超,刘虹,等.基于FTA-24Model的化工事故原因分析[J].安全与环境工程,2019,26(6): 159-165.
FU Jing, NIE Fangchao, LIU Hong, et al. Cause analysis of chemical accidents based on FTA-24Model[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2019,26(6): 159-165.

天然气管道施工事故行为原因研究

Study on causes of accidents in construction of natural gas pipelines

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	关城, 张志珍, 栗婧, 吴斌, 严启航. 建筑物火灾事故致因及路径分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 163-170.
[2]	王秋红, 王力文, 蒋军成, 张明广, 李鑫. 城镇地埋天然气管道泄漏诱发气云爆炸仿真^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 75-82.
[3]	何乐平, 唐爽, 胡启军, 蔡其杰, 石仁丹. 综合管廊天然气泄漏扩散及监控方法优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 43-50.
[4]	孙世梅, 赵金坤, 傅贵. 基于“2-4”模型的高处坠落事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 23-28.
[5]	李扬, 赵楠. 高铁快件业务安全监管分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 105-109.
[6]	王志刚. 铁路信号电源事故原因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S1): 53-58.
[7]	柴冠华. 高速铁路外部环境问题分析及措施建议[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S1): 145-148.
[8]	俞徐超, 梁伟, 张来斌, 王蕊. 数据缺失情况下水淹天然气管道泄漏风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(5): 93-98.
[9]	胡翩，刘书海，王德国，何仁洋. 基于变权综合理论的天然气管道动态风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(7): 82-.
[10]	彭星煜，梁光川，张鹏，喻建胜，周飞，汪涛. 天然气管道失效个人生命风险评价技术研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(4): 139-.
[11]	柴建设，赵秀雯. 城市埋地天然气管道系统的脆弱性评价模型及其实例应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(7): 9-.
[12]	王凯全，王宁，张弛，卢泽. 城市天然气管道风险特征与肯特法的改进[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(9): 152-.
[13]	梁瑞，张春燕，姜峰，王贵仁. 天然气管道泄漏爆炸后果评价模型对比分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(8): 131-.
[14]	孙斌. 金融风险的原因及防范对策研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(7): 32-.
[15]	徐洪涛，郭国忠，蒲焕玲，苑敏. 我国近年来桥梁事故发生的原因与教训[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(11): 90-.