基于耗散结构的重大决策社会风险态势判别模型

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.027

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 157-162.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.027

基于耗散结构的重大决策社会风险态势判别模型

常志朋^1,2 教授, 张增国³ 讲师, 张涛^1,2 讲师, 徐浩越^1,2

1 安徽工业大学商学院,安徽马鞍山 243002
2 安徽创新驱动发展研究院, 安徽马鞍山 243002
3 安徽工业大学公共管理与法学院,安徽马鞍山 243002

收稿日期:2017-12-03 修回日期:2018-02-28 出版日期:2018-04-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
作者简介:常志朋(1978—),男,吉林榆树人,博士,教授,主要从事公共管理、模糊多属性决策、模式识别等方面的研究。E-mail:changzp@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71673001); 安徽省哲学社会科学规划基金资助(AHSKY2015D79);安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目(gxyqZD2017040);安徽工业大学青年教师科研基金资助(QS201704)。

Dissipative structure theory based model for major decision-making social risk situation discrimination model

CHANG Zhipeng^1,2, ZHANG Zengguo³, ZHANG Tao^1,2, XU Haoyue^1,2

1 School of Business, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan Anhui 243002, China
2 Institute of Anhui's Innovation Driving and Development, Maanshan Anhui 243002, China
3 Schools of Public Administration and Law, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan Anhui 243002, China

Received:2017-12-03 Revised:2018-02-28 Online:2018-04-28 Published:2020-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高政府对重大决策社会风险的治理能力,基于耗散结构理论,构建社会风险态势识别模型。首先,利用社会系统熵增累积量和熵流累积量构建社会风险态势判别函数,根据布鲁塞尔器及其转义给出风险态势判别规则;然后,针对风险因素间存在非线性交互作用,提出利用模糊测度和Choquet积分计算社会系统在各时间节点的熵增和熵流,并开发熵增累积量和熵流累积量计算方法;最后,以某市PX项目决策为例进行实证分析。结果表明:加大熵流累积量,减小熵增累积量,有助于减小社会风险,使危险状态转化为安全状态。

关键词: 社会风险, 耗散结构, 重大决策, 模糊测度, Choquet积分

Abstract: In order to improve the government's ability to manage social risk from major decision-making, a social risk situation discrimination model was built based on the dissipative structure theory. First, the entropy production accumulation and entropy flow accumulation in social system were used to construct a social risk situation discrimination function. The discriminant rule of the function was given according to Brusselator and its transferred meaning. Then, to adapt the nonlinear interaction among social risk factors, fuzzy measure and Choquet integral were used to calculate the entropy production and entropy flow in the social system at the different time nodes. At the same time, a method was worked out to calculate the accumulation of entropy production and the accumulation of entropy flow in the social system. Finally, the model was used to discriminant social risk situation caused by a PX project in a certain city. The results show that both increasing the accumulation of entropy flow and reducing the accumulation of entropy production can decrease the social risk, transforming a dangerous situation to a security situation.

Key words: social risk, dissipative structure, major decision-making, fuzzy measure, Choquet integral

中图分类号:

X915.2

常志朋, 张增国, 张涛, 徐浩越. 基于耗散结构的重大决策社会风险态势判别模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 157-162.

CHANG Zhipeng, ZHANG Zengguo, ZHANG Tao, XU Haoyue. Dissipative structure theory based model for major decision-making social risk situation discrimination model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(4): 157-162.

参考文献

[1] 王阳. 重大决策社会稳定风险评估制度的效果分析:以评估主体的规定为重点[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016 (3): 116-120.
WANG Yang. Evaluation policies of major decisions assessment on social stability risk: focused on “the assessment subject”[J].Chinese Public Administration, 2016(3): 116-120.
[2] 肖群鹰,朱正威,刘慧君. 重大工程项目社会稳定风险的非干预在线评估模式研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2016 (1): 86-109.
XIAO Qunying, ZHU Zhengwei, LIU Huijun. The non-intervention and online model for social stability risk evaluation in major projects [J]. Journal of Public Administration, 2016 (1): 86-109.
[3] 贾海薇. 建构地方治理中防控社会风险的“优策略”体系:基于一个精炼测算模型的分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016 (11): 120-125.
JIA Haiwei. Constructing an excellent strategy system to prevent and control social risks in local governance-based on the analysis of a summary calculation model [J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2016(11): 120-125
[4] PRIGOGINE I, ALLEN P M. The challenge of complexity, see self-organization and dissipative structures [M]//SCHIEVE W C, ALLEN P M. Complexity and management. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982: 125-167.
[5] 严小丽,何超. 建设项目安全事故阶段性演化机理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(6): 111-117.
YAN Xiaoli, HE Chao. Research on four stage evolution mechanism of construction project accident[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(6): 111-117.
[6] 陈伟珂,向兰兰. 基于熵及耗散结构的公共安全突发事件的过程分析研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2007 (10): 149-154.
CHEN Weike, XIANG Lanlan. The process analysis on public safe emergencies based on entropy and dissipative theory [J].China Soft Science Magazine, 2007(10): 149-154.
[7] 平恩顺,檀润华,孙建广,等. 基于突变理论的机械产品突破性创新耗散结构模型及其评价[J]. 工程设计学报, 2014, 21(6): 513-521.
PING Enshun, TAN Runhua, SUN Jianguang et al. Mechanical product innovation dissipative structure model and evaluation based on catastrophe theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2014, 21(6): 513-521.
[8] FONTELA E, GABUS A. The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 report[R]. Battelle Geneva Research Center, 1976.
[9] 张铁男,程宝元,张亚娟. 基于耗散结构的企业管理熵Brusselator模型研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2010, 24(3): 103-108.
ZHANG Tienan, CHENG Baoyuan, ZHANG Yajuan. Research on Brusselator model enterprise management entropy based on dissipative structure[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2010, 24(3): 103-108.
[10] SUGENO M. Theory of fuzzy integral and its applications [D]. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute of Technology, 1974.
[11] SUGENO M. Fuzzy measure and fuzzy integrals, a survey, fuzzy automata and decision processes[M]. New York: North-Holland, 1997: 89-102.

[1]	江新, 李雪莲, 吴静涵, 李炜, 罗东立, 费凡. 敏感性水利工程社会稳定风险演化SD模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 18-26.
[2]	刘莉君. 中国企业参与“一带一路”建设的境外安全风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 143-150.
[3]	齐先志, 王晓霖, 许学瑞. 成品油管道周边区域社会风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 177-182.
[4]	朱江洪, 王睿, 李延来. 基于Fine-Kinney与TODIM的地铁列车车门系统风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 167-173.
[5]	韩豫，成虎. 基于脆弱性的地铁运营安全事故致因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 164-.
[6]	闫彬，陈红，周继彪，毛新华. 山区高速公路桥隧群行车安全机理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(10): 69-.
[7]	潘科，刘媛，许开立. 基于probit模型的超压引发多米诺效应定量风险评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(9): 51-.
[8]	肖雪梅，王艳辉，张思帅，贾利民. 基于耗散结构和熵的高速铁路事故演化机理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(5): 99-.
[9]	游鹏飞. 地铁隧道施工风险机理分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(4): 116-.
[10]	贾伟，朱建新，高增梁，包其富. 区域定量风险评价方法及其在化工园区中的运用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(5): 140-.
[11]	徐亚博，钱新明，刘振翼. 天然气输送管道泄漏事故危害定量分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(1): 146-.
[12]	张景林，蔡天富. 对安全系统运行机制的探讨--安全系统本征与结构[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(5): 16-.
[13]	蔡天富，张景林. 对安全系统运行机制的探讨--安全度与安全熵[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(3): 4-.

基于耗散结构的重大决策社会风险态势判别模型

Dissipative structure theory based model for major decision-making social risk situation discrimination model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价