Structural reliability rating of industrial building after fire considering fire resistance

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.009

Abstract

Abstract: In order to more fully reflect the influence of fire on industrial workshop reliability, and ensure the accuracy of rating of structure safety after fire ,the existing reliability rating practice was examined ,and the fire resistance was introduced as a new rating indicator, including the refractory grade, fire crack and deformation .Fire resistance rating classification standard was established. A structural reliability comprehensive rating model was bulit for industrial buildings after fire,which considers the fire resistance and is based on Vague set similarity measurement theory. The model was applied to five engineering examples. The results show that the rating results obtained by using the model agree with the results obtained by using the standard rating methods,and that using the model can avoid errors resulted in by human factors.

Key words: fire, industrial building, fire resistance, Vague theory, structure security rating

CLC Number:

X932

PEI Xingwang, LI Huimin, MENG Hai, XU Chenxi. Structural reliability rating of industrial building after fire considering fire resistance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(3): 48-53.

References

[1] KRUPPAJ . Recent developments in fire design[J]. Progress in Structural Engineering and Matericals, 2000,2(1):6-15.
[2] ALIF , NADJAIA , SILCOCKG , et al. Outcomes of amajor research on fire resistance of concrete columns[J].Fire Safety Journal, 2004,39(6):433-445.
[3] DBJ08-219—1996,火灾后混凝土构件评定标准[S].
DBJ08-219-1996,Concrete member after fire evaluation criteria[S]
[4] CECS252:2009,火灾后建筑结构鉴定标准[S].
CECS252:2009,Building structural appraisal standard[S].
[5] 李国强,吴波,蒋首超. 工程结构抗火研究进展与建议[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2010,12(5):13-18.
LI Guoqiang, WU Bo, JIANG Shouchao. Research progress and suggestion on fire resistance of engineering structure[J]. Progress in Steel BuildingStructures,2010,12(5):13-18.
[6] 徐泽晶,宋玉普,徐有邻. 火灾后钢筋混凝土构件可靠性分析的JC法[J]. 建筑结构,2006,36(12):44-45.
XU Zejing, SONG Yupu, XU Youlin. Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete member after fire JC[J]. Building Structure,2006,36(12):44-45.
[7] 张蓓.某框架结构火灾后的鉴定与加固技术研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2011.
ZHANG Bei.Repairing and strengthening technology study of frame structure after fire[D].Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University,2011.
[8] GB 50144—2008,工业建筑可靠性鉴定标准[S].
GB 50144-2008,Industrial building reliability appraisal standard[S].
[9] 李庆森. 旧工业建筑再生利用检测评定及脆弱性研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015.
LI Qingsen. Research on detecting appraisal and vulnerability of old industrial buildings[D].Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology,2015.
[10] 周立国,姚安林,付冉,等. Vague集法在油气管道失效可能性分析中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(10):91-96.
ZHOU Liguo, YAO Anlin,FU Ran, et al. Application of Vague set method to failure possibility analysis of oil & gas pipeline[J].China Safety Science Journal,2015,25(10):91-96.
[11] GB5007—2011,建筑地基基础设计规范[S].
GB5007-2011,Code for design of building foundation[S].
[12] 孟海,李慧民.土木工程安全检测、鉴定、加固修复案例分析[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2016. 3:14-218.
MENG Hai, LI Huimin.Civil engineering safety inspection, identification, reinforcement repair case analysis[M].Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press,2016. 3:14-218.

[1]	YANG Dong, LI Ping. Critical mechanical pressure rise for preventing buoyancy-dominated flow pattern in inclined tunnel fire with longitudinal ventilation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 41-47.
[2]	LIU Quanyi, ZHU Bo, DENG Li, SHI Hang, LIANG Guanghua. Double parameters fire detection method based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 90-96.
[3]	SUN Yujia. Transient radiative heat transfer of pool fires based on large eddy simulation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(4): 65-71.
[4]	LI Cong, ZHOU Yong. Study on asymmetry ratio of Li-ion battery fire smoke [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(4): 93-98.
[5]	LU Ying, ZHAO Zhipan, JIANG Xuepeng, WU Jindong, FAN Xiaopeng. Dynamic fire risk indexes for stadiums from perspective of big data [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(4): 155-162.
[6]	GUAN Cheng,ZHANG Zhizhen,LI Jing,WU Bin,YAN Qihang. Analysis on cause factors and evolution paths of fire accidents in buildings [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(4): 163-170.
[7]	LUO Fuzhou, YUAN Huiqing, ZHANG Yang. Assessment on fire safety resilience of old industrial building regeneration projects [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(3): 167-173.
[8]	HUO Feizhou, DONG Geli, LI Moxiao, MEI Yiyun. Study on location selection of linkage fire stations based on demand level and distance loss [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(3): 183-193.
[9]	HE Yongbo, CAO Zhubing. Pressure compensation algorithm of fire gas sensors based on IPSO-BP model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 107-114.
[10]	WANG Jinhui, CAI Wei, ZHANG Xianda, CHENG Yanquan, BA Guangzhong. Study on fire-thermal-structural coupling of ship engine rooms considering fire location [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 121-129.
[11]	ZHOU Keqing , ZHAI Danyang, YIN Lian, GUI Zhou. Influence of molybdenum disulfide based hybrids on fire safety properties of polymer materials [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 102-109.
[12]	ZHOU Ning, WU Lulu, LI Xue, LI Xuwei, SHI Jingjie, CAO Linlin. Experimental study on failure features of petrochemical pipelines under jet fire [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 135-141.
[13]	LU Yi, YANG Fan, LIU Huan, CHEN Jian, WANG Jinpeng, LI Wenhui. Thermal resistance calculation of aerogel fire-fighting clothing lining [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 201-207.
[14]	WANG Wei, WANG Jian, WANG Libin, YANG Juntao, ZHANG Yongfeng. Study on fire behavior characteristics and it's burn-through capability to cargo liner in dynamic pressure cargo compartment [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 99-105.
[15]	ZHONG Kaiqi, XIAO Yang, LU Xing,DENG Jun. Orthogonal experiment design and range analysis of TPCT extracting thermal energy from coal fire [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 135-141.