Study on assessment of urban safety risks management and control system for preventing particularly serious accidents and major accidents

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.10.027

Abstract

Abstract: To prevent particularly serious accidents and major accidents in urban areas and have a proper assessment of the operation of the urban safety risks management and control system, this article first selects major factors affecting the urban safety management to set indicators of such a system by using the AHP and the grey correlation method. Following that, a risk control judgment matrix is established to define the weights of different indicators and have a dynamic evaluation of the system based on actual cases. Finally, the article takes the operation of the safety risks management and control system for preventing particularly serious accidents and major accidents in a coastal city as an example to illustrate the effectiveness of the above indicators. The result shows that the indicators set in this article can help to find out the overall performance of the urban safety risks management and control system, pin down the vulnerable points and define the key factors in future safety management.

Key words: analytical hierarchy process(AHP), grey correlation method, urban safety risks, particularly serious accidents and major accidents, management and control system, assessment

CLC Number:

X928.02

YANG Wentao, ZHANG Yue, XU Shuai, GAO Jindong. Study on assessment of urban safety risks management and control system for preventing particularly serious accidents and major accidents[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(10): 162-167.

References

[1] 吉林省长春市宝源丰禽业有限公司“6·3”特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2013-07-11]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Contents/Channel_5498/2013/0711/212466/content_212466.htm.
[2] 山东省青岛市“11·22”中石化东黄输油管道泄漏爆炸特别重大事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2014-01-11]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Contents/Channel_21140/2014/0110/229141/content_229141.htm.
[3] 江苏省苏州昆山市中荣金属制品有限公司“8·2”特别重大爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2014-12-30]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Contents/Channel_21679/2014/1230/244873/content_244873.htm.
[4] 天津港“8·12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2016-02-05]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/newfiles/201600812baogao.pdf.
[5] 广东省深圳光明新区渣土受纳场“12·20”特别重大滑坡事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2016-07-15]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/newfiles/20160715szsg.pdf
[6] 国务院安委会办公室关于印发标本兼治遏制重特大事故工作指南的通知[EB/OL]. [2016-04-29]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Contents/Channel_4976/2016/0429/268980/content_268980.htm
[7] 国务院安委会办公室关于实施遏制重特大事故工作指南构建双重预防机制的意见[EB/OL]. [2016-10-11]. http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Contents/Channel_4976/2016/1011/276643/content_276643.htm
[8] 刘燕, 庄越. 三脚架事故致因模型的结构化重构研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016,26(4): 60-65.
LIU Yan, ZHUANG Yue. A study on structural reconstruction of Tripod-DELTA[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26 (4): 60-65.
[9] HUSDON P T W, REASON J T, BENTLEY P D, et al. Tripod delta: proactive approach to enhanced safety [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1994,46 (1): 58-62.
[10] PARKER Dianne, REASON J T,MANSTEAD Antony S R, et al. Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement[J]. Ergonomics, 1995,38(5): 1 036-1 048.
[11] 范秀山. 事故致因理论—缺陷塔模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012,22(2): 3-9.
FAN Xiushan. Fault tower model as an accident causation theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012,22(2): 3-9.
[12] 张津嘉, 许开立, 王贝贝, 等. 特别重大煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故致因分析及管理模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(2): 73-78.
ZHANG Jinjia, XU Kaili, WANG Beibei, et al. Extraordinarily serious gas explosion accidents in coal mines: analysis of causes and research on management model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26(2): 73-78.
[13] 金磊. 城市安全风险评价的理论与实践[J]. 城市问题, 2008(2): 35-40.
[14] 司鹄, 贾文梅. 城市公共安全风险评估指标敏感性分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014,10(11): 71-75.
SI Hu, JIA Wenmei. Analysis of sensitivity of indexes for assessment of urban public safety risk[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014,10(11): 71-75.
[15] 周建新, 李湖生. 城市公共安全风险评估:以高层建筑火灾为例[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013,9(12): 113-117.
ZHOU Jianxin, LI Husheng. City public risk assessment:take high-rise building fire for example[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013,9(12): 113-117.
[16] 郭叶波.特大城市安全风险防范问题研究[J]. 中州学刊, 2014(6): 70-76.
GUO Yebo. Study on risk prevention in megacities[J]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 2014(6): 70-76.
[17] 许铭.就天津“8·12”事故论安全生产问题的复杂性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017,27(4): 7-12.
XU Ming, On complexity of work safety problems in the light of Tianjin “8·12” accident [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017,27(4): 7-12.
[18] 郭铜修, 刘鲁, 王起全. 层次分析法及其在航空工业企业风险评价中的应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008,18(7): 121-127.
GUO Tongxiu, LIU Lu, WANG Qiquan. Study of AHP and its application to the risk assessment of aviation industry[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008,18(7): 121-127.
[19] 张显奎, 张祖怀, 朱磊, 等. 汽车驾驶人机系统评价模型及优化方法研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2007,54(3):406-408,430.
ZHANG Xiankui, ZHANG Zuhuai, ZHU Lei, et al. Study on evaluation model and optimal method of man-machine system in car driving[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007,54(3):406-408,430.
[20] 宋晓燕, 谢中朋, 漆旺生. 基于层次分析法的企业安全文化评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008,18(7): 144-148.
SONG Xiaoyan, XIE Zhongpeng, QI Wangsheng. Research on the assessment index system of enterprise safety culture based on analytical hierarchy process[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008,18(7): 144-148.
[21] 陈杰, 石超, 方来华. 基于灰色关联分析和IAHP的CNG加气站安全评价方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009,19(6): 159-165.
CHEN Jie, SHI Chao, FANG Laihua. Study on safety evaluation of CNG filling station based on the grey correlation method and IAHP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009,19(6): 159-165.