Classification and responsibility identification of individual unsafe behaviors based on behavior flow

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.09.004

Abstract

Abstract: In order to perfect the theoretical system of behavior-based safety management and safety information cognition, the classification and responsibility identification procedures of unsafe behaviors were developed. Firstly, the concept of behavior flow was put forward and its connation was analyzed based on the concepts of information flow and cognition flow. Secondly, the behavior modules and deviation model related to different behavior patterns were analyzed. Lastly, the responsibility identification procedures of unsafe behaviors were constructed based on behavior flow and behaviors pattern. The results show that the individual behavior flow consists of safety information acquisition, analysis and utilization, that the classification framework including ignoring, time deviation, sequence deviation, target deviation, and action deviation, that the responsibility identification procedures of individual unsafe behaviors can be summarized to five categories, and that the proposed classification and responsibility identification procedures are feasible and effective.

Key words: behavioral safety, information cognition, responsibility identification, information flow, cognition flow, behavior flow

CLC Number:

X910

HUANG Lang, WU Chao, MA Jian. Classification and responsibility identification of individual unsafe behaviors based on behavior flow[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(9): 20-26.

References

[1] PERROW C. Normal accidents-living with high risk technologies[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011: 34-39.
[2] HUANG Lang, WU Chao, WANG Bing, et al. An unsafe behaviour formation mechanism based on risk perception[J]. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2019, 29: 109-117.
[3] REASON J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents[M]. Ashgate: Burlington, 1997: 54-61.
[4] SANDERS E. Human factors in engineering and design[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993: 78-86.
[5] 孙志强, 史秀建, 李欣欣, 等. 基于认知模型的人为差错分类方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2008, 30(1): 73-77.
SUN Zhiqiang, SHI Xiujian, LI Xinxin, et al. A framework for classifying human errors based on cognitive model[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2008, 30(1): 73-77.
[6] 陈芳, 罗云. 管制员安全能力模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(1): 17-23.
CHEN Fang, LUO Yun. Study on safety capability model of air traffic controllers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012,22(1): 17-23.
[7] 杜红兵, 刘明, 靳慧斌. 基于信息加工模型的飞行员差错分析与分类[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2013, 39(2): 90-93.
DU Hongbing, LIU Ming, JIN Huibin. Classification and analysis of pilots errors based on information processing model[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2013, 39(2): 90-93.
[8] 叶贵, 陈梦莉, 汪红霞. 建筑安全事故人为因素分类研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(4): 131-137.
YE Gui, CHEN Mengli, WANG Hongxia. Study on classification of human factors in construction safety accidents[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(4): 131-137.
[9] 马跃, 傅贵, 杨卓明. 矿工不安全行为分类及控制对策研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2014, 45(9): 235-237.
MA Yue, FU Gui, YANG Zhuoming. Classification and control countermeasure of miner unsafe behavior[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(9): 235-237.
[10] 张力, 杨大新, 王以群. 数字化控制室信息显示对人因可靠性的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(9): 81-85.
ZHANG Li, YANG Daxin, WANG Yiqun. The effect of information display on human reliability in a digital control room[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(9): 81-85.
[11] 黄浪, 吴超, 王秉. 个体安全信息力的概念模型及其作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(11): 7-12.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao, WANG Bing. Conceptual model for individual safety information force and its action mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(11): 7-12.
[12] 吴超. 安全信息认知通用模型及其启示[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(3): 5-11.
WU Chao. Construction of a general safety information cognitive model and its implications[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(3): 5-11.
[13] RASMUSSEN J. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models[J]. Systems Man & Cybernetics IEEE Transactions on, 1983, 13(3): 257-266.
[14] 黄浪, 吴超. 风险感知偏差机理概念模型构建研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(1): 60-66.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao. Conceptual modelling of risk perception deviation mechanism[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2017, 26(1): 60-66.
[15] SAURIN T A, GUIMARÃES L B D M, COSTELLA M F, et al. An algorithm for classifying error types of front-line workers based on the SRK framework[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2008, 38(11/12): 1 067-1 077.
[16] 天津港“8.12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL]. (2018-02-05). http:/ /www.china-safety.gov.cn/newpage/newfiles/201600812baogao.pdf.